Background

Despite their presence in organisms as diverse as fungi, plants and animals, the functions and evolution of Makorin (Mkrn) proteins in eukaryotes remain poorly understood. Makorins are zinc finger proteins with a typical C3HC4 motif called the RING domain. This protein-protein interaction motif is found in most E3 ubiquitin ligases, a category of enzymes mediating the transfer of ubiquitin from an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme to target protein substrates. The RING domain is responsible for the ubiquitin ligase activity, leading to mono-ubiquitination and/or to synthesis of poly-ubiquitin chains on lysine residues (for review [1]). Accordingly, some Makorin proteins work as E3 ubiquitin ligases [2]. In Makorin proteins, the RING domain is associated with typical arrays of one to four C3H domains, a type of zinc finger found in a variety of ribonucleoproteins [3]. Another motif rich in Cys and His residues, with so far unknown function, is also generally present in Mkrn proteins [4](Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Zinc finger domains in Mkrn4 and other vertebrate Makorin proteins. Green arrows show conserved cysteine and histidine residues in zinc finger motifs. Minimal/maximal numbers of amino-acid residues between motifs are indicated over black arrows. Black columns indicate identical amino-acids, grey columns similar residues.

Full size image

Three functional mkrn genes, mkrn1, 2 and 3, have been described so far in vertebrates, with mkrn3 being specific to therian mammals. Makorin1 has been well studied in mammals. Its described functions are linked to E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, for example ubiquitination-mediated degradation of capsid proteins as a defence mechanism against virus infection [5]. Mkrn1 is also involved in the control of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through ubiquitination and proteasome-dependent degradation of proteins p53 and p21 [6]. Mkrn1 targets human telomerase catalytic subunit (hTERT) for proteasome processing during differentiation or cell cycle arrest [7]. Makorin1 might also have transcriptional activity and regulates RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription independently from E3 ligase activity, with either negative or positive effects on gene expression [8]. Changes in mkrn1 expression have been associated with different types of cancer and other diseases, as observed for other RING proteins with E3 ligase activity [9–12].

A close relative to mkrn1 is mkrn3 (aka Znf127 in human and mouse), which has been detected only in therian mammals. Mkrn3 has been first identified in the Prader-Willi syndrome critical region on 15q11.2 in the human genome [13, 14], but with no obvious role in the disease [15]. No function has been assigned so far to Mkrn3. Mkrn3 in fact corresponds to an intronless retrocopy of mkrn1 generated through reverse transcription of an mkrn1 mRNA molecule. The formation of such retrogenes is catalyzed by the reverse transcriptase encoded by autonomous retrotransposable elements. Several other retrocopies of mkrn1 have been identified in mammalian genomes, most of them probably corresponding to pseudogenes. The possible involvement of such pseudogenes in the regulation of the founding source gene mkrn1 has been proposed and debated [8, 13, 14, 16].

The third functional member of the makorin family described in vertebrates is mkrn2. This gene partially overlaps with the raf1 proto-oncogene in antisense transcriptional orientation [17]. Functional data have been only published for the clawed frog Xenopus laevis, where Mkrn2 is a neurogenesis inhibitor acting upstream of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3beta) in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. The third C3H zinc finger, the Cys-His motif as well as the RING zinc finger are necessary for this anti-neurogenic activity [18, 19].

During the screening of a testis cDNA library from the platyfish Xiphophorus maculatus (poeciliid), we have identified a gene with gonad-specific expression representing a new divergent member of the makorin gene family in vertebrates, which was named mkrn4. Comparative analyses in different species revealed the evolutionary dynamics of this family of RING finger proteins, suggesting an ancestral gonad-specific function and maternal embryonic expression before duplication in vertebrates.

Results and discussion

Mkrn4 is a new member of the vertebrate makorin gene family

In order to identify new potential gonad-specific transcription factors or regulatory proteins expressed in fish gonads, we randomly sequenced clones from a testis cDNA library of the platyfish Xiphophorus maculatus. In silico screening for sequences containing zinc finger domains revealed a clone with similarity to uncharacterized members of the makorin gene family [20] (Genbank accession number HQ377193). Since three functional mkrn genes have been described so far in vertebrates, the newly identified gene was called makorin4 (mkrn4).

We could identify sequences orthologous to platyfish mkrn4 in other fish species (Figures 1 and 2). All fully sequenced fish genomes including zebrafish (Danio rerio), medaka (Oryzias latipes[21], green spotted pufferfish (Tetraodon nigroviridis),[22], fugu (Takifugu rubripes) [23] and three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) contained mkrn4 as a single copy gene. Mkrn4 ESTs were also identified in databases for other fish species without available genome draft. Mkrn4 is present in birds (on Gga26 in chicken) and amphibians as well as in most mammals, including human (Hsa6q14.1, where it was annotated as a pseudogene, see below). Mkrn4 sequences form a clear monophyletic group within the Makorin molecular phylogeny (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Molecular phylogeny of the Makorin family. The tree was constructed using maximum likelihood analysis with 1000 bootstrap replicates on a 131 amino acid MUSCLE alignment of the RING domain and the C-terminal C3H zinc finger. The tree was rooted using the sequence of the sea urchin. Accession numbers of proteins used in the alignment are given in Additional file 1.

Full size image

Surprisingly, analysis of genome sequence drafts and EST data failed to detect mkrn4 in two murid rodents, the mouse Mus musculus and rat Rattus norvegicus, even after targeted scrutiny of chromosomal segments syntenic to mkrn4-containing loci from other species (on Mmu17 in mouse and Rno20 in rat). Partial mkrn4 sequences were found in other rodents such as Ord's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii), thirteen-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus) and Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus; for this species a deduced sequence could be included into the Mkrn phylogeny), as well as in the American pika Ochotona princeps (lagomorph). No mkrn4-related sequences were identified in the genome draft of another lagomorph, the rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus, and in the northern tree shrew Tupaia belangeri (order Scandentia). For all these species, no mkrn4 EST sequence was present in databases. Hence, these results suggest that the mkrn4 gene has been lost in murid rodents (mouse and rat). In some other rodent or lagomorph species, mkrn4 may be also on the way of degradation (as suggested by long branch for Guinea pig sequence; Figure 2) or even might have been already eliminated, but genomic sequences of better quality will be required to confirm this hypothesis.

We noticed that mkrn4 was annotated as a pseudogene in the current Ensembl human genome release, under the name of Mkrnp2[24]. Very similar orthologous sequences were identified in syntenic regions of the genome of chimpanzee (chr. 6, 99% nucleotide identity with the human sequence in the coding region), orangutan (chr. 6, 99% nucleotide identity) and macaque (chr. 4, 96% nucleotide identity), a degree of conservation surprising for a pseudogene evolving under neutral selection. Only gorilla did not show any mkrn4 sequence, despite the presence of a large syntenic region on chromosome 6 including several genes surrounding mkrn4 in other primates. However, the draft sequence of this region contains many gaps, especially at the position where mkrn4/mkrnp2 would be expected. Hence, mkrn4 might be absent from draft but present in the genome of the gorilla.

In human, mkrnp2 was annotated as pseudogene due to a premature stop codon at position 53 in the Ensembl transcript. We suggest that the translation start codon was wrongly annotated in the Ensembl prediction. A start codon in frame +3, using the ATG at position 54 of the predicted transcript, leads to a full length protein without any further interruption of the open reading frame. This ATG is conserved between primate sequences and annotated as the bona fide start codon in GenBank entry EAX03829.1 used in sequence alignments and molecular phylogenies (Figures 1 and 2). Primate sequences were reannotated accordingly (Figure 1).

Using primate sequences as query against EST databases in BLAST analysis, no evidence of transcription could be found. We then compared the rate of non-synonymous (Ka) to the rate of synonymous substitutions (Ks) between mkrn sequences in primates (human, chimpanzee, orangutan and macaque) and other vertebrates. The average Ka/Ks value obtained between primate mkrn4 sequences was 0.12, indicating an excess of synonymous vs. non-synonymous substitutions. This value was similar to those obtained between primate mkrn1 (0.16) and mkrn2 (0.11). The average Ka/Ks ratio for mkrn4 between fish sequences (medaka, platyfish and guppy) was 0.27. Taken together, these observations suggest that mkrn4 evolved under purifying selection in primates and fish, as observed for other makorin genes. Mkrn4 might be a functional protein-coding gene in primates but expressed at a very low level, in a particular type of cells or under very specific conditions. Alternatively, mkrn4 might have lost its expression potential after initial functionality in different primate species.

No mkrn4 sequence was found in the genome of more divergent species, including the elephant shark Callorhinchus milii (Chondrichthyes aka cartilaginous fish, a divergent jawed vertebrate) [25] and the invertebrate chordates Branchiostoma floridae (amphioxus) and Ciona intestinalis/savignyi (sea squirts).

Large-scale duplication and the evolution of the makorin gene family

Mkrn1, mkrn2 and mkrn4 are all present in both ray-finned fish and tetrapod lineages, indicating that these genes have been formed through gene duplications at least 450 million years ago early in the vertebrate lineage. Mkrn1 and mkrn2 but not mkrn4 were detected in the genome of elephant shark Callorhinchus milii, a cartilaginous fish. In contrast, we could identify only one makorin gene in amphioxus and sea squirts (non-vertebrate chordates), as well as in other more divergent non-vertebrate species including yeast and rice. In the fly Drosophila melanogaster, four makorin genes were identified, but three of them clearly corresponded to retrocopies of the only bona fide intron-containing mkrn gene. Hence, the mkrn gene family observed in vertebrates is probably the result of two events of gene duplication having taken place between the emergence of vertebrates and the divergence between tetrapods and ray-finned fish. At least the duplication having led to mkrn1 and mkrn2 occurred before the split between cartilaginous and bony fish.

In order to know if gene duplications at the origin of the mkrn family might be linked to rounds of whole genome duplications having occurred at the basis of the vertebrate lineage [26–29], we tested if mkrn genes might be included in large ancient duplicated regions called paralogons having resulted from such events.

On human chromosome 3, mkrn2 and the raf1 proto-oncogene partially overlap in antisense transcriptional orientation. This syntenic relationship is conserved in most vertebrates but not in teleost fish, with the exception of the zebrafish, where mkrn2 and raf1 are closely linked on chromosome 11 (Figure 3). Strikingly, in medaka raf1 is located close to mkrn4 but not mkrn2. We further analyzed syntenic relationships between genomic regions containing mkrn2 and mkrn4 in human, chicken, medaka and zebrafish genomes (Figure 3). We could identify a set of genes with duplicated copies linked to mkrn2 and mkrn4 in at least one species (for example ppard/pparg in human, chicken and medaka). Other genes like raf1 or cnpb showed only one copy but either linked to mkrn2 in some species or to mkrn4 in others, suggesting differential loss of paralogous copies after duplication.

Figure 3
figure 3

Mkrn2 and mkrn4 are included in large paralogons in bony vertebrates. Genes are indicated in colored boxes. Colored lines connect orthologs on one side with paralogs on the other side of the figure. Each grey panel contains a set of orthologous syntenic regions, the putative ancestral region before duplication is shown in the central white panel. Dre: Danio rerio (zebrafish); Gga: Gallus gallus (chicken); Hsa: Homo sapiens (human); Ola: Oryzias latipes (medaka fish). Accession numbers of genes presented in this figure are listed in Additional file 2.

Full size image

These results indicate that mkrn2 and mkrn4 are parts of ancient large duplicated regions present in distant vertebrate species. Hence, these paralogons might have been generated by one of the whole genome duplications having occurred in the ancestral vertebrate lineage, the so called 1R and 2R duplications [26–29]. Both mkrn2 and mkrn4 are called ohnologs (paralogous sequences resulting from whole genome duplications). On the other hand, we can not exclude the occurrence of a very large segmental gene duplication having generated these duplicated blocks.

The region containing mkrn1 shows little conservation between mammals and fish (data not shown). We could not find any evidence for synteny between the mkrn1-containing region and other mkrn regions. It has been previously proposed that mkrn1 and mkrn2 are indeed the result of a single gene duplication event [17].

Retroposition and the evolution of the makorin gene family

In addition to mkrn1, mkrn2 and mkrn4, multiple other mkrn-like sequences are present in mammalian genomes. Some of these sequences correspond to intronless retrocopies of mkrn1. Their functional status concerning expression, regulation and mutual interference has been the source of controversial debate [16, 30].

In order to identify all vertebrate mkrn- related sequences, we searched over the Ensembl Genome Browser the current genome releases of representatives of all vertebrate groups including all mammalian genomes [24]. The great majority of identified sequences corresponded to retrogenes of mkrn1 (Table 1), with the characteristic absence of introns due to reverse transcription of the mature mRNA molecule [31]. Besides mkrn3, which probably corresponds to an expressed functional retrogene present in human and mouse, as many as ten different retrogenes located on eight different chromosomes were identified in the human genome. Most of them presented inactivating mutations or severely truncated open reading frames. Almost no EST corresponding to these retrogenes was detected in databases. Hence, most of these mkrn1 retrocopies probably correspond to pseudogenes. Six mkrn1 retropseudogenes located on five different chromosomes were identified in the mouse.

Table 1 Mkrn1- and mkrn2-related retro(pseudo)genes in human and mouse genomes.
Full size table

We detected makorin3 and other retrocopies of makorin1 only in mammals and not in chicken, frog and all five fish genomes analyzed. An mkrn3 sequence was detected in opossum, suggesting an event of retroposition that took place before the split of marsupials from therian mammals. No mkrn3 was found in the current genome draft of the platypus.

Retrocopies of mkrn2 were found in the mouse but neither in the human nor in non-mammalian vertebrate genomes (Table 1). These three retropseudogenic copies of mkrn2 are located on three different chromosomes in M. musculus. No retrocopy of mkrn4 was found in all vertebrate genomes analysed, but three potentially functional retrocopies of the single intron-containing mkrn gene were identified in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Taken together, these observations demonstrate an intriguing tendency of the mkrn gene family to generate duplicated copies by retroposition.

Structural evolutionary dynamics in the Makorin family

The evolution of the nature and number of zinc fingers in the Makorin protein family was investigated (Figure 4). In most plants and invertebrate species (but not in Drosophila), the single Makorin protein contains the RING domain flanked by three C3H zinc fingers on its N-terminal side and one C3H zinc finger on its C-terminal side. An additional motif rich in cysteine and histidine residues (the CysHis motif) is located between the third C3H zinc finger and the RING domain (Figures 1 and 4). This structure, likely to be ancestral in vertebrates, is also found in most, if not all Mkrn1 and Mkrn2 proteins.

Figure 4
figure 4

Zinc finger domains in the Makorin protein family. Black hexagons indicate the RING domain, white rectangles the C3H zinc fingers. Dashed lines and lighter content indicate incomplete motifs due to sequence changes or loss. The structure of Mkrn2 for Xenopus is based on a X. laevis EST (EF626804) since the tropicalis sequence is incomplete and lacks the RING domain. Accession numbers are provided in Additional file 2.

Full size image

In contrast, this otherwise well conserved structure was not found in Mkrn4 proteins (Figures 1 and 4). While the RING domain and the C-terminal C3H zinc finger are found in all Mkrn4 sequences, the third C3H zinc finger and the CysHis motif are missing and have been probably lost in the ancestral mkrn4 gene early after duplication.

Only fish and Xenopus have kept the first two C3H complete domains, which are both absent from mammalian sequences. In birds, a remnant of one of these domains has been retained in chicken and zebra finch under the form of a C2H domain, the second C3H domain having been maintained only in zebra finch but not in chicken.

These results indicate that the evolution of the Mkrn4 protein is associated with the dynamic loss of zinc finger domains otherwise conserved in Mkrn proteins. This is consistent with a to some extent faster evolution also reflected by the longer branches in the Makorin-like group in the phylogenetic tree (Figure 2). Another example of zinc finger domain loss is visible in mkrn3: this mkrn1-derived retrogene encodes a protein having lost the second C3H zinc finger (Figures 1 and 3) in human and mouse.

In the much conserved Mkrn1 and Mkrn2 groups, the platypus sequences present a reduced number of zinc fingers, like the opossum Mkrn2 sequence. This might reflect a biological reality, but might also be an artifact of local poor sequence assembly quality of the genome drafts for these species.

Evolution of makorin expression in vertebrates

We compared the expression of the different vertebrate makorin genes in different species representative of the fish (medaka and zebrafish), amphibian (the African clawed frog Xenopus laevis) and bird (chicken) lineages (published and EST data are generally available for mammals) (Figures 5 and 6). This might allow to assess the functional evolution of mkrn genes in vertebrates and to estimate the ancestral expression pattern and function in the primitive vertebrate before gene duplication.

Figure 5
figure 5

RT-qPCR expression analysis of makorin genes in vertebrate adult tissues. Q-PCR values for each gene were normalized to expression levels of rpl7 using the 2-DDCT method [71]. Expression in eye (fish) or heart (chicken and frog) was set as a reference (value: 1); Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of two independent quantitative real-time PCR experiments (average of two independent reverse transcription reactions, each tested with two PCR reactions). Black bars represent male tissues and organs, white bars female tissues and organs. B brain, E eye, G gills, H heart, I intestine, K kidneys, Lu lung, Li liver, M muscle, O ovary, S skin, Sp spleen, T testis, nt not tested.

Full size image
Figure 6
figure 6

RT-qPCR expression analysis of makorin genes in vertebrate embryos and embryonic tissues. Q-PCR values for each gene were normalized to expression levels of rpl7 using the 2-DDCT method [71]. Expression in adult eye (fish) (Fig. 5) or heart (chicken) was set as a reference (value: 1). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of two independent quantitative real-time PCR experiments (average of two independent reverse transcription reactions, each tested with two PCR reactions). Black bars represent male tissues and organs, white bars female tissues and organs. For grey bars, the sex of the donor(s) is undetermined (embryos prior to sexual differentiation) or both sexes have been mixed (frog samples). H heart, I intestine, K kidneys, Li liver, M muscle, O ovary, T testis. Embryonic stages are referred to as [53] for medaka and [54] for zebrafish, respectively.

Full size image

In adult tissue, the whole mkrn gene family showed a clear gonad-biased expression in fish and frog, with particular high expression in ovary (Figure 5). Accordingly, mkrn1 is upregulated during ovarian maturation in flatfish, with strong expression in previtellogenic ovarian follicles [32]. Such a specificity of expression was not observed in birds and mammals, even if mkrn1 has been reported to be strongly expressed in mouse adult testis [4] and mkrn4 showed a slightly testis-biased expression in chicken.

Taken together, these results suggested that the ancestral mkrn gene was preferentially expressed in the gonads in a primitive vertebrate, with conservation of expression pattern after duplication in fish and amphibians but partial relaxation of this specificity and possible extension of functions in birds and mammals.

Mkrn expression during early embryonic stages in fish largely reflected maternally stored mRNA expressed during oogenesis [33, 34], since mRNA levels were very high at very early stages (Figure 6). RNA levels then decreased throughout development, probably due to dilution effect through continuous cell division, and reached a very low level shortly after midblastula transition (MBT), the state of zygotic transcription activation. MBT takes place around stage 11 in medaka [35] and starts at cycle 10 corresponding to 512 cell stage in zebrafish [36] (between 128 cell stage and dome in our experiments). Maternal expression was observed for all three mkrn genes in both medaka and zebrafish, suggesting here again an ancestral expression pattern. As observed in adults, no tissue-specific expression was observed in chicken embryos one day before hatching (Figure 6).

Conclusion

Through the identification of mkrn4, a new member of the makorin gene family present in tetrapods and ray-finned fishes, we were able to gain some insights into the structural and functional evolution of this E3 ubiquitin ligase gene family. We could show that different evolutionary dynamics affect different mkrn genes in vertebrates. While mkrn1 and mkrn2 were detected in all bony vertebrates studied, mkrn4 was found to be absent from rat and mouse, two rodent murids, as well as from rabbit, a lagomorph. In addition, both Mkrn1 and Mkrn2 proteins have retained the ancestral arrangement of zinc fingers, with four C3H motifs surrounding the RING domain responsible for the ubiquitin ligase activity. In contrast, Mkrn4 has lost several motifs early after its formation through duplication, and subsequent lineage-specific zinc finger loss was observed. Taken together, these observations suggest that Mkrn4 is subject to more relaxed evolutionary constraints than Mkrn1 and Mkrn2, with possible development of new general and lineage-specific functions. However, all Mkrn proteins contain the RING domain with adjacent C-terminal C3H zinc finger, indicating that E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and interactions with nucleic acids might be properties common to all Makorin proteins. It appears therefore possible that Mkrn4 function, if still required in rat and mouse, might be performed by Mkrn1 or Mkrn2.

Through comparative genomics, we could find evidence that mkrn2 and mkrn4 have been duplicated together with other genes through a large-scale duplication. These genes are embedded in paralogons, i.e. in large syntenic chromosomal blocks of duplicated genes within a same genome. These paralogons were found in both tetrapods and ray-finned fish, tracing back their origin to at least 450 million years ago. We propose that mkrn2 and mkrn4 duplication was the result of either 1R or 2R, the two events of genome duplication having taken place at the basis of the vertebrate lineage [12, 26–28]. Both 1R and 2R arose before the split between cartilaginous and bony fish; one might therefore expect the presence of both mkrn2 and mkrn4 in the genome of elephant shark. However, only mkrn2 was detected. This might be explained by secondary loss of mkrn4 or incomplete coverage of the elephant shark genome. The molecular mechanism of formation of mkrn1 remains elusive. Involvement of 1R or 2R appears possible (but we could not find any evidence for that) or of a more local event of segmental duplication. Conservation of intron position between mkrn1, mkrn2 and mkrn4 (data not shown) suggests that retroposition was not involved.

After formation of mkrn1, mkrn2 and mkrn4, the makorin gene family was shaped by lineage-specific retroposition-mediated duplications in vertebrates. Such retrogenes are formed by reverse transcription of generally mature mRNA molecules followed by integration of the formed cDNA into a new location of the genome. In mammals, retrogene formation is catalyzed by reverse transcriptase encoded by LINE-1 retrotransposons [37]. Retrogenes were detected for mkrn1 and mkrn2 in mammals but not in other vertebrates, and not for mkrn4. Most of the retrogenes are pseudogenes, but at least one of them, mkrn3, is functional and conserved in therian mammals. Hence, retroposition is an evolutionary mechanism of duplication and functional diversification in the mkrn family. There is at the moment no satisfying explanation for the strong tendency of the mkrn family to generate retrogenes. Germ cell expression, necessary for retrogene formation and transmission to the next generation, might predispose mkrn genes to duplication through retroposition. Goncalves et al.[38] have proposed that the gene expression level in the germ line is correlated with the number of retropseudogenes, since abundant mRNAs are more likely to be taken as a substrate by reverse-transcriptases. However, high mkrn expression is not the only explanation, since no retrocopy was detected for mkrn genes in amphibians and fish, in which they show a strong gonadal expression. Other factors might be involved, for example the affinity of expressed reverse transcriptases for mRNA molecules.

Finally, comparative expression analysis showed a strongly gonad-biased expression pattern for mkrn1, mkrn2 and mkrn4 in medaka and zebrafish (ray-finned fishes) and amphibians, with particularly strong expression in ovary. Even if some mkrn genes showed also preferential gonadal expression in chicken and mouse, expression was much less specific in birds and mammals. Maternal RNA was detected for all three genes in early medaka and zebrafish embryos. Taken together, these results suggest that the ancestral single-copy mkrn gene was gonad-specific in primitive vertebrates, with a possible role in sexual development or gonad functions. This ancestral gene was also possibly maternally expressed and therefore potentially involved in fundamental processes such as fertilization, cell division or germ cell development [34].

Nothing is known concerning the functions of Mkrn proteins in fish and amphibian gonads and embryos, with the exception of a described role for Mkrn2 as a negative regulator of neurogenesis in Xenopus[18]. At the moment it is therefore difficult to propose a function for the ancestral vertebrate Mkrn protein, but results obtained for Mkrn1 suggest a link with the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis [4, 6]. An involvement of the ubiquitin pathway in testis and spermatogenesis has been proposed for different organisms and testis-specific transcripts of different ubiquitin-interacting factors have been reported (for example [39–43]). Some data indicated an involvement of the ubiquitin pathway in the maintenance and development of ovarian germ cells in the fly [44] and the zebrafish [45] and during maturation of the ovary in mouse [46]. Several examples of maternally-expressed RING finger proteins with essential functions during development have been reported [47–51]. Multispecies comparative functional analysis of mkrn genes is now required to better understand the evolution of this gene family in vertebrates.

Methods

Fish

Platyfish (Xiphophorus maculatus, population Rio Jamapa WLC1274, closed colony stock derived from Jp163A), zebrafish (Danio rerio, strain AB/TU) and medaka (Oryzias latipes, strain Hd-rR) were kept under standard conditions at the PRECI aquarium facility of the IFR128 Biosciences Gerland-Lyon Sud (Lyon, France). Fish embryos were raised to the required stages of development in E3 embryo media [52] at 26°C for medaka and 28.5°C for zebrafish. Medaka and zebrafish embryos were staged according to Iwamatsu [53] and Kimmel et al.[54], respectively. Chicken samples (embryonic chicken, one day before hatching and male adult tissue) were provided by B. Pain (Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle de Lyon, ENS de Lyon, France). Adult Xenopus laevis samples were gifts from F. Vollmar (Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Würzburg, Germany) and C. Schultheis (Physiological Chemistry I, University of Würzburg, Germany). Experimental research reported here has been performed following internationally recognized guidelines (DDSV, Direction Départementale des Services Vétérinaires de Lyon, agreement number A 69 387 0602).

In silico analyses

Protein and nucleotide sequences of mkrn genes were identified using BLAST/BLAT searches against GenBank [55], the current Ensembl genome assemblies ([24] version 57, March 2010) of human (Homo sapiens), chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), gorilla (Gorilla gorilla), orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), macaque (Macaca mulatta), mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus), mouse (Mus musculus), guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), horse (Equus caballus), rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), cow (Bos taurus), opossum (Monodelphis domestica), wallaby (Macropus eugenii), platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), chicken (Gallus gallus), clawed frog (Xenopus tropicalis), zebrafish (Danio rerio), medaka (Oryzias latipes), green spotted pufferfish (Tetraodon nigroviridis), fugu (Takifugu rubripes), three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), sea squirts (Ciona intestinalis and Ciona savignyi), the amphioxus genome (Branchiostoma floridae) [56] and the elephant shark genome (Callorhinchus milii) [57]. Automatic genome annotation was refined manually using EST data and related protein sequences with the help of FGENESH [58].

Nucleotide and protein sequences were loaded into BioEdit [59] and aligned using MUSCLE [60, 61] and CLUSTALW2 [62]. Alignments were checked manually and ambiguously aligned regions were removed before phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic trees were calculated based on a 131 amino acid alignment including the RING domain and the downstream adjacent C3H zinc finger. Maximum likelihood reconstruction was done using PhyML 3.0 [63, 64], with 1000 bootstrap replicates under the LG model. Similar results were obtained using the neighbor-joining method as implemented in MEGA4 [65] with bootstrap values of 10.000 replicates. MEGA4 was also used to visualize phylogenetic trees. To establish syntenic relationships between genomes we used Genomicus [66], Synteny Database [67] and information provided by Ensembl Gene Trees [24]. Annotation of conserved protein motifs was performed with Motif Scan [68] and NCBI conserved domains [12].

Ka/Ks calculation was peformed using KaKsCalculator under the MYN model [69] on pairwise nucleotide alignments done with LASTZ [70] and MUSCLE [60, 61]. Indicated Ka/Ks values are averages of values obtained for all possible pairwise comparisons.

RT-qPCR expression analysis

Total RNA was extracted from separated male and female tissues (brain, eyes, gills, heart, intestine, kidneys, lung, liver, muscle, ovary, skin, spleen and testis) and from whole embryos using the TRIReagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc.). After DNase treatment, reverse transcription was performed starting from 1 μg of total RNA using the RevertAid First Strand Synthesis kit (Fermentas) and random hexamer primers. Real-time PCR was done on 2 μl of dilutional series of cDNA starting from a dilution of factor 20 using IQTM Custom SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). PCR amplification was monitored with a CFX96 RealtimeSystem (Bio-Rad). After one incubation step at 95°C for 3 min, the thermal cycling protocol was as follows: 95°C for 10 seconds, 55-62°C (primer-dependent annealing temperature) for 20 seconds and 72°C for 15 seconds during 40 cycles. Primers were designed manually and ordered from Invitrogen (Additional file 3). For each primer set, the efficiency of the PCR reaction was measured in duplicate on serial dilutions (factor 10) of the cDNA sample. Real-time PCR efficiencies (E) for each reaction were calculated from the slope of the standard curve using the equation E = 10(-1/slope)-1 as implemented in the BioRad CFX manager V1.5 software, with 100% efficiency as an indicator of a robust assay. All results reported here are averages of two independent reverse transcription reactions, which have been each tested with two PCR reactions. For quantification, data were analyzed by the 2-DDCT method [71], by normalizing to the housekeeping gene rpl7 (ribosomal protein l7). Expression was normalized to eye tissue (fish) or heart (due to lack of eye samples for female frog and chicken).