Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characterization of Pediatric Reports in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2010–2020: A Cross-Sectional Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) is a database of adverse event (AE) and medication error reports for drugs and therapeutic biologics. Examining trends of reported individual case safety reports (ICSRs) provides context for evaluating safety concerns.

Objective

Characterize pediatric FAERS ICSRs and compare trends (1) to adult reports; (2) within pediatric subgroups.

Methods

This cross-sectional study examined FAERS ICSRs received between January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2020. Stratified age bands were neonates, infants, younger children, older children, adolescents, and adults. We characterized groups by patient demographic information, suspect products, AEs, and reporter type.

Results

From 2010 to 2020, there were 11,258,995 FAERS ICSRs; 3.1% described pediatric patients. Compared to adults, pediatric ICSRs had higher proportions of all serious outcomes except death. Within pediatric subgroups, neonates had the highest proportions of serious outcomes (96.2%) compared to infants, younger children, older children, and adolescents (79.8%, 67.9%, 59.5%, and 52.7%, respectively). Younger pediatric age groups were more likely to have weight information than older age groups but were less likely to include gender information. The most frequently reported AE was off label use for pediatrics and drug ineffective for adults. Products and AEs reported also differed among pediatric subgroups. Neonates, infants, and adolescents had entirely distinct sets of top five product-event combinations.

Conclusion

Pediatric ICSRs represent a minority of FAERS reports but have distinctly different attributes relative to adult ICSRs. Reporting trends also vary within pediatric subgroups, which highlights the need for unique considerations for pediatric safety surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

FAERS data are available via the FAERS Public Dashboard and as Quarterly Data files. Additionally, individual case reports can be requested via a Freedom of Information Act request to the FDA. Additional details can be found at https://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers.

References

  1. S Y. Similarities and dissimilarities in physiology, metabolism, and disease states and responses to therapy in children and adults. S Y, editor. Institute of Medicine Roundtable on Research and Development of Drugs, Biologics, and Medical Devices: National Academies Press (US); 2000.

  2. Stockwell DC, Landrigan CP, Toomey SL, et al. Adverse events in hospitalized pediatric patients. Pediatrics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-3360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy SL, Mathews TJ, Martin JA, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2013–2014. Pediatrics. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-3239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Smyth RM, Gargon E, Kirkham J, et al. Adverse drug reactions in children–a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(3):e24061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmerman KO, Smith PB, McMahon AW, et al. Duration of pediatric clinical trials submitted to the US food and drug administration. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(1):60–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johann-Liang R, Wyeth J, Chen M, et al. Pediatric drug surveillance and the food and drug Administration’s adverse event reporting system: an overview of reports, 2003–2007. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(1):24–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. In: Field MJ, Boat TF, editors. Safe and Effective Medicines for Children: Pediatric Studies Conducted Under the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act and the Pediatric Research Equity Act. Washington 2012.

  8. US food and drug Administration. Pediatric labeling changes. https://www.fda.gov/science-research/pediatrics/pediatric-labeling-changes.

  9. Lester J, Neyarapally GA, Lipowski E, et al. Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(3):302–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cope JU, Rosenthal GL, Weinel P, et al. FDA safety reviews on drugs, biologics, and vaccines: 2007–2013. Pediatrics. 2015;136(6):1125–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarridge K, Chin S, Eworuke E, et al. A boxed warning for montelukast: The FDA perspective. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(7):2638–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Bie S, Ferrajolo C, Straus SM, et al. Pediatric drug safety surveillance in FDA-AERS: a description of adverse events from GRiP project. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(6):e0130399.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/ucm070093.htm.

  14. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Pediatric information incorporated into human prescription drug and biological Product Labeling (2019). https://www.fda.gov/media/84949/download.

  15. US Food and Drug Administration. Questions and answers on FDA's adverse event reporting system (FAERS). https://www.fda.gov/drugs/surveillance/questions-and-answers-fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers.

  16. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. Postmarketing reporting of adverse drug experiences. 21 CFR §314.80. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-314

  17. Maintenance and Support Services Organization. Medical dictionary for regulatory activities. https://www.meddra.org/.

  18. US Food and Drug Administration. Pharmacologic class. https://www.fda.gov/industry/structured-product-labeling-resources/pharmacologic-class.

  19. Harinstein L, Kalra D, Kortepeter CM, et al. Evaluation of postmarketing reports from industry-sponsored programs in drug safety surveillance. Drug Saf. 2019;42(5):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marwitz K, Jones SC, Kortepeter CM, et al. An evaluation of postmarketing reports with an outcome of death in the US FDA adverse event reporting system. Drug Saf. 2020;43(5):457–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues final rule on postmarketing safety report in electronic format. http://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170111002213/http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm400526.htm.

  22. US Food and Drug Administration. New Molecular Entity (NME) Drug and New Biologic Approvals. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/nda-and-bla-approvals/new-molecular-entity-nme-drug-and-new-biologic-approvals.

  23. Muñoz MA, Dal Pan GJ. The impact of litigation-associated reports on signal identification in the US FDA’s adverse event reporting system. Drug Saf. 2019;42(10):1199–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Star K, Noren GN, Nordin K, et al. Suspected adverse drug reactions reported for children worldwide: an exploratory study using VigiBase. Drug Saf. 2011;34(5):415–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Martin CBHC, Gu Q, Ogden CL. Prescription drug use in the United States, 2015–2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2019;334:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Misu T, Kortepeter CM, Munoz MA, et al. An evaluation of “drug ineffective” postmarketing reports in drug safety surveillance. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2018;5(2):91–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoon D, Taylor MT, Kapadia P, et al. Trends in off-label drug use in ambulatory settings: 2006–2015. Pediatrics. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Eguale T, Buckeridge DL, Verma A, et al. Association of off-label drug use and adverse drug events in an adult population. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(1):55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Horen B, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Adverse drug reactions and off-label drug use in paediatric outpatients. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;54(6):665–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Star K, Sandberg L, Bergvall T, et al. Paediatric safety signals identified in VigiBase: methods and results from uppsala monitoring centre. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019;28(5):680–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Blake KV, Saint-Raymond A, Zaccaria C, et al. Enhanced paediatric pharmacovigilance at the European medicines agency: a novel query applied to adverse drug reaction reports. Paediatr Drugs. 2016;18(1):55–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. US Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: pregnant women: scientific and ethical considerations for inclusion in Clinical Trials (April 2018). https://www.fda.gov/media/112195/download.

  33. US Food and Drug Administration. Draft guidance for industry: postapproval pregnancy safety studies guidance for industry (May 2019). https://www.fda.gov/media/124746/download.

  34. US Food and Drug Administration. Reporting serious problems to FDA. https://www.fda.gov/safety/medwatch-fda-safety-information-and-adverse-event-reporting-program/reporting-serious-problems-fda.

Download references

Funding

This project was supported in part by an appointment to the ORISE Research Participation Program at the CDER administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an agreement between the US Department of Energy and the US Food and Drug Administration. Michael Phan and Vivian Dang conducted this research while they were ORISE fellows in the Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center of Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection and analysis were performed by MP, VD, and CC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by MP and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This is a public health surveillance activity and is granted an exemption from US FDA Institutional Review Board.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 42 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phan, M., Cheng, C., Dang, V. et al. Characterization of Pediatric Reports in the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System from 2010–2020: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ther Innov Regul Sci 57, 1062–1073 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00542-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-023-00542-0

Keywords

Navigation