Abstract
This study provides a behavior-analytic framework for a previous nudging experiment from Kallbekken and Sælen (Economics Letters 119(3), 325–327, 2013). We are concerned with achieving societal well-being from a selection-of-cultures perspective, and we call for increasing synergies between the 2 fields. The original experiment achieved a 20% reduction in food waste among restaurant customers by implementing 2 independent nudges: reducing plate size and socially approving multiple servings. We use this experiment as an example to introduce an analysis of the social contingencies (metacontingencies) responsible for not only establishing but also maintaining sustainable behavioral repertoires. We show how reducing food waste can be a simple, economic, effective example of a behavioral intervention when programmed with contingencies of cooperation. Furthermore, we generalize our model to social architectures that create and sustain cultural practices. Namely, our model addresses the long-term effects of nudging as a result of cooperation between stakeholders and how these effects are maintained by feedback loops. Whereas the aggregate effect of individual choice behavior can affect food consumption significantly, it may not suffice to change an enduring cultural practice. We argue that a behavior-analytic approach in studying complex systems informs nudging applications at the policy-making level.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu Vasconcelos, L. (2013). Exploring macrocontingencies and metacontingencies: Experimental and non-experimental contributions. Suma Psicológica, 20(1), 31–43 Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0121-43812013000100003&nrm=iso.
Alavosius, M., Getting, J., Dagen, J., Newsome, W., & Hopkins, B. (2009). Use of a cooperative to interlock contingencies and balance the commonwealth. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060902874575.
Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Sunstein, C. R., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., et al. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501.
Biglan, A. (2015). The nurture effect: How the science of human behavior can improve our lives and our world. Oakland: New Harbinger.
Bohnet, I., van Geen, A., & Bazerman, M. (2016). When performance trumps gender bias: Joint vs. separate evaluation. Management Science, 62(5), 1225–1234. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2186.
Brandon, P. (2008). BEHAVIORAL behavioral economics [Review of the book Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness, by R. H. Thaler & C. R. Sunstein]. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com/review/R3FC6CUFXEZTWC.
Carvalho Couto, K., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Natural, behavioral and cultural selection-analysis: An integrative approach. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6891.
Catania, A. C., & Sagvolden, T. (1980). Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1980.34-77.
Cerutti, D., & Catania, A. C. (1986). Rapid determinations of preference in multiple concurrent-chain schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1986.46-211.
Cerutti, D., & Catania, A. C. (1997). Pigeons’ preference for free choice: Number of keys versus key area. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1997.68-349.
Cesareo, M. (2018). Behavioral economics and behavioral change policies: Theoretical foundations and practical applications to promote well-being in the Italian context (Unpublished doctoral thesis, International University of Language and Media, Milan, Italy).
Couto de Carvalho, L., & Sandaker, I. (2016). Interlocking behavior and cultural selection. Norsk Tidsskrift for Atferdsanalyse, 43(1), 19–25 Retrieved from www.nta.atferd.no/loadfile.aspx?IdFile=1376.
Delgado, D. (2012). The selection metaphor: The concepts of metacontingencies and macrocontingencies revisited. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(1), 13–24. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v44n1/v44n1a02.pdf.
European Commission. (2014). Taking consumer rights into the digital age: Over 507 million citizens will benefit as of today [Press release]. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-655_en.htm.
European Commission. (2016). Food waste [Press release]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/food_waste_en.
Geller, E. S. (1989). Applied behavior analysis and social marketing: An integration for environmental preservation. Journal of Social Issues, 45(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1989.tb01531.x.
Glenn, S. S. (1986). Metacontingencies in Walden two. Behavior Analysis & Social Action, 5(1–2), 2–8. Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/basa/article/view/7345/5861.
Glenn, S. S. (1988). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Toward a synthesis of behavior analysis and cultural materialism. The Behavior Analyst, 11(2), 161–179. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22478011.
Glenn, S. S. (2003). Operant contingencies and the origin of cultures. In K. A. Lattal & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Behavior theory and philosophy (pp. 223–242). Boston: Springer.
Glenn, S. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. The Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393175.
Glenn, S. S., & Malott, M. E. (2004). Complexity and selection: Implications for organizational change. Behavior and Social Issues, 13(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v13i2.378.
Glenn, S. S., Malott, M. E., Andery, M. A. P. A., Benvenuti, M., Houmanfar, R. A., Sandaker, I., & Vasconcelos, L. A. (2016). Toward consistent terminology in a behaviorist approach to cultural analysis. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v.25i0.6634.
Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. London: WH Allen.
Hansen, P. G. (2017). The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00005468.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1961.4-267.
Houmanfar, R. A., Rodrigues, N. J., & Ward, T. A. (2010). Emergence and metacontingency: Points of contact and departure. Behavior and Social Issues, 19, 78–103. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v19i0.3065.
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338–1339. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721.
Kallbekken, S., & Sælen, H. (2013). “Nudging” hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win–win environmental measure. Economics Letters, 119(3), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.019.
Keller, J. J. (1991). The recycling solution: How I increased recycling on Dilworth Road. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24(4), 617–619. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1991.24-617.
Krispin, J. (2016). What is the metacontingency? Deconstructing claims of emergence and cultural-level selection. Behavior and Social Issues, 25, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v25i0.6186.
Luyben, P. D. (2009). Applied behavior analysis: Understanding and changing behavior in the community—a representative review. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 37(3), 230–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852350902975884.
Malott, M. E., & Glenn, S. S. (2006). Targets of intervention in cultural and behavioral change. Behavior and Social Issues, 15(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v15i1.344.
Marchiori, D., De Ridder, D., Veltkamp, M., & Adriaanse, M. (2015). What is in a nudge: Putting the psychology back in nudges. European Health Psychologist, 17, 546. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12297.
Mathis, K., & Tor, A. (2016). Nudging: Possibilities, limitations and applications in European law and economics. Cham: Springer International.
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149.
Obama, B. H. (2006). The audacity of hope: Thoughts on reclaiming the American dream. New York: Crown River Press.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017a). Behavioural insights and public policy: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development. (2017b). Behavioural insights in public policy: Key messages and summary from OECD international events, May 2017. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/OECD-events-behavioural-insights-summary-may-2017.pdf.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. London: Routledge.
Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361633.
Rachlin, H. (2015). Choice architecture: A review of Why nudge: The politics of libertarian paternalism. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104(2), 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.163.
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1972.17-15.
Sandaker, I. (2009). A selectionist perspective on systemic and behavioral change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 29(3–4), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608060903092128.
Simon, C., & Tagliabue, M. (2018). Feeding the behavioral revolution: Contributions of behavior analysis to nudging and vice versa. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 2(1), 91–97 Retrieved from http://sabeconomics.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/JBEP-2-1-13.pdf.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf/Random House.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213(4507), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7244649.
Skyttner, L. (2005). General systems theory: Problems, perspectives, practice (2nd ed.). Hackensack: World Scientific.
Sunstein, C. R. (2013). Simpler: The future of government. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(4), 583–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9273-1.
Sunstein, C. R. (2016). People prefer System 2 nudges (kind of). Duke Law Journal, 66, 121–168. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2731868.
Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Nudges that fail. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.3.
Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2017). Behavioral insights all over the world? Public attitudes toward nudging in a multi-country study (Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper No. 916). SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2921217.
Tagliabue, M., Sandaker, I., & Ree, G. (2017). The value of contingencies and schedules of reinforcement: Fundamentals of behavior analysis contributing to the efficacy of behavioral business research. Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, 1, 33–39 Retrieved from http://www.sabeconomics.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/JBEP-1-S-7.pdf.
Thaler, R. H. (2018). Nudge, not sludge. Science, 361(6401), 431–431. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9241.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Todorov, J. C. (2013). Conservation and transformation of cultural practices through contingencies and metacontingencies. Behavior and Social Issues, 22, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v22i0.4812.
Ulman, J. D. (1998). Toward a more complete science of human behavior: Behaviorology plus institutional economics. Behavior and Social Issues, 8(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.5210/bsi.v8i2.329.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: G. Braziller.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Nicholas J. Bergin and Gunnar Ree; this work would not have been complete without their dedication. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.
Funding
This work has been financially supported by OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University (earlier Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Copyright Information
The use and reprint of Table 1 is authorized by the original publisher (Elsevier) with license number 4003061329299.
Conflict of Interest
The contents of this manuscript were first presented at the Eighth Conference of the European Association for Behaviour Analysis, hosted in Enna, Italy, on September 16, 2016. The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tagliabue, M., Sandaker, I. Societal Well-Being: Embedding Nudges in Sustainable Cultural Practices. Behav. Soc. Iss. 28, 99–113 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-0002-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42822-019-0002-x