Skip to main content
Log in

Children’s Eyewitness Lineup Accuracy One Year Later: The Role of Social Support and Working Memory Capacity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children’s ability to identify perpetrators who are strangers is crucial. Both failures to identify actual perpetrators and false accusations have serious costs for children’s personal security and wellbeing or for innocent suspects. In the current study, we investigated the accuracy of children’s person identification after a very long delay (one year) and, for the first time, as a function of interviewer-provided socio-emotional support, children’s pre-existing social support reserves, state anxiety, and individual differences in children’s working memory capacity. One year after a play session, 7- to 8-year-old children were asked to identify a stranger from a target-present lineup that included four pictures, a “She’s not here” card, and an “I don’t know” option in the form of a question mark card. Overall, children made few correct identifications, but also few false identifications, preferring to give “I do not know” responses or incorrectly stating the person was not in the lineup. Contrary to predictions, there were no main effects of interviewer-provided social support nor of social support reserves, but as predicted, children with higher working memory capacity performed significantly more accurately than did children with lower working memory capacity, regardless of interview condition. Children’s state anxiety and their confidence in the identification were unrelated to their performance, although interviewer support did decrease state anxiety. Implications of these findings for children’s personal safety are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, K. W., Quas, J. A., & Goodman, G. S. (2002). Theoretical advances in understanding children’s memory for distressing events: The role of attachment. Developmental Review, 22, 490–519.

  • Alloway, T. P., Gathercole, S. E., Kirkwood, H., & Elliott, J. (2009). The cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with low working memory. Child Development, 80, 606–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01282.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almerigogna, J., Ost, J., Bull, R., & Akehurst, L. (2007). State of high anxiety: How non-supportive interviewers can increase the suggestibility of child witnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 963–974. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. (2010). Working memory. Current Biology, 20, R136–R140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 104, 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.1.54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohannon, J. N. (1988). Flashbulb memories for the space shuttle disaster: a tale of two theories. Cognition, 29, 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90036-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B. L., Quas, J. A., & Davis, S. L. (2007). The Influence of interviewer-provided social support on children’s suggestibility, memory, and disclosures. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 135–158). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottoms, B. L., Peter-Hagene, L. C., Epstein, M. A., Wiley, T. R. A., Reynolds, C. E., & Rudnicki, A. G. (2016). Abuse characteristics and individual differences related to disclosing childhood sexual, physical, and emotional abuse and witnessed domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1308–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514564155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brackmann, N., Sauerland, M., & Otgaar, H. (2019). Developmental trends in lineup performance: adolescents are more prone to innocent bystander misidentifications than children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 47, 428–440. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, N., & Day, K. (2005). The confidence-accuracy and decision latency-accuracy relationships in children's eyewitness identification. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1375/pplt.2005.12.1.119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.12.1.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodes v. State, 279 Ga. 435, 614 S.E.2d 766 (2005).

  • Bruer, K. C., & Price, H. L. (2017). A repeated forced-choice line-up procedure provides suspect bias information with no cost to accuracy for older children and adults (Confidence-accuracy relationship) [Supplemental material]. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, R., Parzer, P., Haffner, J., Steen, R., Roos, J., Klett, M., & Resch, F. (2007). Prevalence and psychological correlates of occasional and repetitive deliberate self-harm in adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.161.7.641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burleson, B. R., Albrecht, T. L., Goldsmith, D. J., & Sarason, I. G. (1994). Introduction: The communication of social support. In B. R. Burleson, T. L. Albrecht, & I. G. Sarason (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. xi–xxx). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. A., Bottoms, B. L., & Levine, M. (1996). Linguistic and socioemotional influences on the accuracy of children’s reports. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 335–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R., Kurland, D. M., & Goldberg, J. (1982). Operational efficiency and the growth of short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(82)90054-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda, A., McCandless, B. R., & Palermo, D. S. (1956). The children’s form of the Manifest Anxiety Scale. Child Development, 27, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.2307/1126201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Center on Wrongful Convictions, & Possley, M. (2019, January 29). Jacques Rivera. The National Registry of Exonerations. Retrieved from http://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/casedetail.aspx?caseid=3815

  • Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59, 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., & Engle, R. W. (1996). Individual differences in working memory capacity: more evidence for a general capacity theory. Memory, 4, 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/741940997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: the importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 331–335. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crookes, K., & McKone, E. (2009). Early maturity of face recognition: no childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space. Cognition, 111, 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. L., & Bottoms, B. L. (2002). Effects of social support on children’s eyewitness reports: a test of the underlying mechanism. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 185–215. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014692009941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., McGorty, E. K., & Penrod, S. D. (2008). Forgetting the once-seen face: estimating the strength of an eyewitness's memory representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-898X.14.2.139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekle, D. J., Beal, C. R., Elliott, R., & Huneycutt, D. (1996). Children as witnesses: a comparison of lineup versus showup identification methods. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 1-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199602)10:13.0.CO;2-Y

  • Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: new developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen, M. L., Qin, J., Goodman, G. S., & Davis, S. L. (2002). Memory and suggestibility in maltreated children: Age, stress arousal, dissociation, and psychopathology. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 167–212.

  • Eisen, M. L., Goodman, G. S., Qin, J., Davis, S., & Crayton, J. (2007). Maltreated children's memory: Accuracy, suggestibility, and psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1275.

  • Eisen, M. L., Goodman, G. S., Diep, J., Lacsamana, M. T., Olomi, J., Goldfarb, D., & Quas, J. A. (2019). Effects of interviewer support on maltreated and at-risk children’s memory and suggestibility. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00016-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, D. M., & Briere, J. (1994). Forensic sexual abuse evaluations of older children: disclosures and symptomatology. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 12, 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370120306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel de Abreu, P. M., Conway, A. R., & Gathercole, S. E. (2010). Working memory and fluid intelligence in young children. Intelligence, 38, 552–561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J. E., & Conway, A. R. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: a latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: the processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208409696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck, M. W., Derakshan, N., Santos, R., & Calvo, M. G. (2007). Anxiety and cognitive performance: attentional control theory. Emotion, 7, 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.2.336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Hotaling, G., Lewis, I. A., & Smith, C. (1990). Sexual abuse in a national survey of adult men and women: prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 14, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(90)90077-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelhor, D., Hammer, H., & Sedlack, A. J. (2008). Sexually assaulted children: National estimates and characteristics. Juvenile Justice Bulletin – NCJ214383 (pp. 1-12). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.

  • Fischer, K. W. (1980). A theory of cognitive development: the control and construction of hierarchies of skills. Psychological review, 87, 477–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.6.477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, K. W., Bullock, D. H., Rotenberg, E. J., & Raya, P. (1993). The dynamics of competence: How context contributes directly to skill. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context: Acting and thinking in specific environments (pp. 93–117). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, R. J., & Price, H. L. (2015). Eyewitness identification across the life span: a meta-analysis of age differences. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 1228–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., Mullen, P., & Bammer, G. (1997). A study of potential risk factors for sexual abuse in childhood. Child Abuse & Neglect, 21, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(96)00126-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flin, R., Boon, J., Knox, A., & Bull, R. (1992). The effect of a five-month delay on children's and adults' eyewitness memory. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02444.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. E., Karayanidis, F., & Chalmers, K. A. (2017). Metacognitive monitoring of working memory performance and its relationship to academic achievement in Grade 4 children. Learning and Individual Differences, 57, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.06.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, B., Bradford, M., & Pease, K. (2008). Attempted and completed incidents of stranger-perpetrated child sexual abuse and abduction. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32, 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S. (2006). Children's eyewitness memory: a modern history and contemporary commentary. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 811–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00488.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Rudy, L., Bottoms, B. L., & Aman, C. (1990). Children’s concerns and memory: Issues of ecological validity in the study of children’s eyewitness testimony. In R. Fivush & J. A. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (pp. 249–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., & Rudy, L. (1991a). Children’s testimony about a stressful event: improving children’s reports. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 1, 69–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.1.1.05chi.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Hirschman, J. E., Hepps, D., & Rudy, L. (1991b). Children’s memory for stressful events. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37, 109–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., Ogle, C. M., McWilliams, K., Narr, R. K., & Paz-Alonso, P. M. (2014). Forensic Context.

  • Goodman, G. S., Taub, E. P., Jones, D. P., England, P., et al. (1992). Testifying in criminal court: Emotional effects on child sexual assault victims. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(5, Serial No. 299). doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1166127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., & Reed, R. S. (1986). Age differences in eyewitness testimony. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 317–332.

  • Goodman, G. S., Quas, J. A., Batterman-Faunce, J. M., Riddlesberger, M. M., & Kuhn, J. (1997). Children's reactions to and memory for a stressful event: Influences of age, anatomical dolls, knowledge, and parental attachment. Applied Developmental Science, 1, 54–75.

  • Harter. S. (1985). The social support scale for children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Denver.

  • Hershkowitz, I. (2011). Rapport building in investigative interviews of children. In M. E. Lamb, D. J. La Rooy, L. C. Malloy, & C. Katz (Eds.), Children’s testimony: A handbook of psychological research and forensic practice (pp. 109–128). Chichester: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119998495.ch6.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., Lamb, M. E., Sternberg, K. J., Pipe, M. E., & Horowitz, D. (2007). Suspected victims of abuse who do not make allegations: An analysis of their interactions with forensic interviewers. In M. E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A. C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay, and denial (pp. 97–114). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., Katz, C., & Malloy, L. C. (2015). Does enhanced rapport-building alter the dynamics of investigative interviews with suspected victims of intra-familial abuse? Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30, 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9136-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingshead, A. B. (1975). Four factor index of social status. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Humphries, J. E., & Flowe, H. D. (2015). Receiver operating characteristic analysis of age-related changes in lineup performance. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2014.12.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, M. C., & Baker-Ward, L. (1999). Preschoolers’ suggestibility: effects of developmentally appropriate language and interviewer supportiveness. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 20, 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(99)00022-.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innocence Project. (2019). Eyewitness identification reform. Retrieved from https://www.innocenceproject.org/eyewitness-identification-reform/

  • Jones, D. P., & Krugman, R. D. (1986). Can a three-year-old child bear witness to her sexual assault and attempted murder? Child Abuse & Neglect, 10, 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0145-2134(86)90086-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1990). The development of memory in children. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karageorge, A., & Zajac, R. (2011). Exploring the effects of age and delay on children’s person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712610X507902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, A., Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2007). Children’s metacognitive judgments in an eyewitness identification task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2007.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528809378719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M. A., & Yuille, J. C. (1987). Suggestibility and the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.), Children’s eyewitness memory (pp. 24–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Klemfuss, J. Z., Milojevich, H. M., Yim, I. S., Rush, E. B., & Quas, J. A. (2013). Stress at encoding, context at retrieval, and children’s narrative content. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 693–706.

  • Lamb, M. E., Hershkowitz, I., Orbach, Y., & Esplin, P. W. (2008). Tell me what happened: Structured investigative interviews of child victims and witnesses. West Sussex: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773291.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, M. A., Jones, S., McComas Collard, L., & Thomas, S. W. (2001). Similarities and differences in eyewitness testimonies of children who directly versus vicariously experience stress. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221320109597486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2005). Disclosure of child sexual abuse: What does the research tell us about the ways that children tell? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 194–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenstein, J. A., Blank, H., & Sauer, J. D. (2010). Uniforms affect the accuracy of children’s eyewitness identification decisions. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 7, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G. B. (2018). Children’s right to personal security: the foundation for a new journal. International Journal on Child Maltreatment: Research, Policy and Practice, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-018-0007-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A., Havard, C., Clifford, B., Gabbert, F., & Watt, M. (2011). A field evaluation of the VIPER system: a new technique for eliciting eyewitness identification evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 711–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160903524333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. E. B., Redlich, A. D., Goodman, G. S., Prizmich, L. P., & Imwinkelried, E. (1999). Jurors' perceptions of hearsay in child sexual abuse cases. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 388–419. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.2.388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (1972).

  • Nevo, E., & Breznitz, Z. (2011). Assessment of working memory components at 6 years of age as predictors of reading achievements a year later. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oats, K., & Shrimpton, S. (1991). Children’s memories for stressful and non-stressful events. Medical Science and Law, 31, 4–10.

  • Owens, M., Stevenson, J., Hadwin, J. A., & Norgate, R. (2014). When does anxiety help or hinder cognitive test performance? The role of working memory capacity. British Journal of Psychology, 105, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbay, F., Johnson, D. C., Dimoulas, E., Morgan III, C. A., Charney, D., & Southwick, S. (2007). Social support and resilience to stress: from neurobiology to clinical practice. Psychiatry, 4, 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papay, J. P., & Spielberger, C. D. (1986). Assessment of anxiety and achievement in kindergarten and first- and second-grade children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 14, 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00915446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipe, M. E., Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., & Cederborg, A. C. (Eds.). (2007). Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzulo, J. (2014). Person description and identification by child witnesses. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology Vol. II: Memory for people (pp. 283–308). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1998). Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025739514042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzulo, J. D., Dempsey, J., Bruer, K., & Sheahan, C. (2012). The culprit in target-absent lineups: understanding young children’s false positive responding. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-011-9089-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quas, J. A., & Lench, H. C. (2007). Arousal at encoding, arousal at retrieval, interviewer support, and children's memory for a mild stressor. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quas, J. A., Bauer, A., & Boyce, W. T. (2004). Physiological reactivity, social support, and memory in early childhood. Child Development, 75, 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00707.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quas, J. A., Rush, E. B., Yim, I. S., & Nikolayev, M. (2014). Effects of stress on memory in children and adolescents: testing causal connections. Memory, 22, 616–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.809766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quas, J. A., Wallin, A. R., Papini, S., Lench, H., & Scullin, M. H. (2005). Suggestibility, social support, and memory for a novel experience in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 315-341.

  • Rassin, E., Van Der Sleen, J., Van Amelsvoort, A. G., & Buttinger, E. (2006). Boys will be boys: a pre-line-up gameplay has beneficial effects on boys' but not girls’ identification performance. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 3, 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2001). Memory for an observed event in the presence of prior misinformation: developmental patterns of free recall and identification accuracy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151001166227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roebers, C. M., & Schneider, W. (2005). Individual differences in young children's suggestibility: relations to event memory, language abilities, working memory, and executive functioning. Cognitive Development, 20, 427–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2005.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and student intellectual development. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, L., & Goodman, G. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: implications for children's testimony. Developmental Psychology, 27, 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, E. B., Quas, J. A., Yim, I. S., Nikolayev, M., Clark, S. E., & Larson, R. P. (2014). Stress, interviewer support, and children’s eyewitness identification accuracy. Child Development, 85, 1292–1305. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Pierce, G. R. (Eds.). (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayitz, K. J., Lyon, T. D., & Goodman, G. S. (2018). When interviewing children: A review and update. In J. B. Klika & J. B. Conte (Eds.), The APSAC handbook on child maltreatment (pp. 310–329). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Camparo, L. B. (2014). Evidence-based child forensic interviewing: The developmental narrative elaboration interview. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., & Snyder, L. (1996). Narrative elaboration: Test of a new procedure for interviewing children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1347–1357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.64.6.1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saywitz, K. J., Wells, C. R., Larson, R. P., & Hobbs, S. D. (2019). Effects of interviewer support on children’s memory and suggestibility: systematic review and meta-analyses of experimental research. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20, 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016683457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Kenney, B. M., Bottoms, B. L., & Goodman, G. S. (1996). Improving children’s person identification. Child Maltreatment, 1, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559596001002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrivner, E., & Safer, M. A. (1988). Eyewitnesses show hypermnesia for details about a violent event. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 371–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.3.371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D. (1979). State-trait anxiety inventory for children. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, T., Saltzstein, H. D., & Peach, R. (2013). Children’s eyewitness identification as implicit moral decision-making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State v. Henderson, 208 N.J. 208 (2011).

  • State v. Mitchell, 294 Kan. 469, 275 P.3d 905 (2012).

  • Towse, J., & Hitch, G. J. (1995). Is there a relationship between task demand and storage space in tests of working memory capacity? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 48a, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749508401379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, S. E. (2007). Relationship to perpetrator, disclosure, social reactions, and PTSD symptoms in child sexual abuse survivors. Journal of child sexual abuse, 16, 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2014.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934/1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C., & Wixted, J. (in preparation). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. American Psychology-Law Society (Draft White Paper). Retrieved from http://apls.wildapricot.org/resources/Documents/Feb42019EWwhitepaper.pdf

  • Whitebread, D. (1999). Interactions between children’s metacognitive abilities, working memory capacity, strategies and performance during problem-solving. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 489–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcock, R., Crane, L., Hobson, Z., Nash, G., Kirke-Smith, M., & Henry, L. A. (2018). Supporting child witnesses during identification lineups: Exploring the effectiveness of registered intermediaries. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32, 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 10–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616686966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolchik, S. A., Sandler, I. N., & Braver, S. L. (1990). Social support: Its assessment and relation to children's adjustment. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Contemporary topics in developmental psychology (pp. 319–349). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajac, R., & Karageorge, A. (2009). The wildcard: A simple technique for improving children’s target-absent lineup performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 358–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelkowitz, P. (1989). Parents and children as informants concerning children’s social networks. In D. Belle (Ed.), Children’s social networks and social supports (pp. 221–237). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Tamara Haegerich and Suzanne Davis for early leadership on this project. We thank Jason Rohacs, Alon Stein, Rich Reyes, Lisa Tockman, Kelly Ricketts, Danielle Brandstetter, Sonja Veille, Kara Doering, Matthew Badanek, Nora O’Malley, Jessica Dilley, Michelle Prestige, Michelle Gap, Erika Chen, Laurie Guy, and Elaine Shreder for valuable research assistance. We also extend thanks to the families who participated in the study. Some toys and prizes were provided by Chicago International Children’s Film Festival, Cineplex Odeon, Little Ceasars, and Taco Bell.

Funding

Funding for this research was provided by a BSTART grant to Bette L. Bottoms from the National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liana C. Peter-Hagene.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peter-Hagene, L.C., Burke, K.C., Bottoms, B.L. et al. Children’s Eyewitness Lineup Accuracy One Year Later: The Role of Social Support and Working Memory Capacity. Int. Journal on Child Malt. 2, 255–285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00028-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00028-3

Keywords

Navigation