Abstract
In this article, we introduce a dissensual knowledge production mechanism for the creation and governance of the commons. Rather than seeking a singular truth which is a social construct, producing a bricolage of truths by citizen associations or communities opens up new perspectives for the commons and democracy. Taking an online community as a case study, we analyze knowledge production and sharing mechanisms, and conflict generation and resolution processes, using simple statistics, text mining, disagreement hierarchy, community guidelines, and group rules. We use the conclusions drawn from these techniques in the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Superposing our findings and critical reading of current best practices, we define the four main principles as the operational framework for an online community based on the commons, dissensus, and shared knowledge: distributed versioning, layering, inclusion, and self-determination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angermuller, J. (2018). Truth after post-truth: for a strong Programme in discourse studies. Palgrave Communications, 4. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0080-1.
Anon (n.d.). Description: Welcome to P2P! P2P Facebook Group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/p2p.open/about/. Accessed 14 May 2019.
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x.
Blommaert, J. (2016). Het jaar van de informatiecrisis. https://jmeblommaert.wordpress.com/2016/12/18/het-jaar-van-de-informatiecrisis/. Accessed 15 February 2019.
Bodirsky, K. (2018). The commons, property, and ownership. Suggestions for further discussion. Focaal. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 81, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2018.810109.
Cadwalladr, C., & Graham-Harrison E. (2018). Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach. Guardian, 17 March. https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election. Accessed 17 May 2019.
Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700600980728.
Chacon, S., Straub, B. (2014). Pro git. https://github.com/progit/progit2. Accessed 14 July 2019.
Dardot, P. (2018). What democracy for the global commons? In S. Cogolati & J. Wouters (Eds.), The commons and a new global governance (pp. 20–36). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118514.00010.
De Angelis, M., & Stavrides, S. (2010). On the commons: a public interview with Massimo De Angelis and Stavros Stavrides. E-Flux, 17. June. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/17/67351/on-the-commons-a-public-interview-with-massimo-de-angelis-and-stavros-stavrides/. Accessed 4 July 2019.
de Tocqueville, A. (1863). Democracy in America. Cambridge, MA: Sever and Francis.
Deleixhe, M. (2018). Conflicts in common(s)? Radical democracy and the governance of the commons. Thesis Eleven, 144(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513618756089.
Deve, A. (2018). New tools to support group admins and keep communities safe. Facebook newsroom, 23 May. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/05/new-tools-to-support-group-admins/. Accessed 17 May 2019.
Euler, J. (2018). Conceptualizing the commons: moving beyond the goods-based definition by introducing the social practices of commoning as vital determinant. Ecological Economics, 143, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.020.
Facebook (n.d.). Facebook Terms and Policies.https://www.facebook.com/policies/. Accessed 16 May 2019.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.
Fuster Morell, M. (2014). Governance of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: Viewed through the framework of the institutional analysis and development. In M. J. Madison, K. Strandburg, & B. Frischmann (Eds.), Governing the knowledge commons. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199972036.003.0009.
Gielen, P. (2018). Common aesthetics: The shape of a new meta-ideology. In N. Dockx & P. Gielen (Eds.), Commonism: A new aesthetics of the real. Amsterdam: Valiz.
Glott, R., Schmidt, P., & Ghosh, R. (2010). Wikipedia survey - overview of results. http://www.ris.org/uploadi/editor/1305050082Wikipedia_Overview_15March2010-FINAL.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2019.
Graham, P. (2008). How to disagree. http://paulgraham.com/disagree.html. Accessed 12 May 2019.
Hess, C., & Ostrom, E. (2007). A framework for analyzing the knowledge commons. In C. Hess & E. Ostrom (Eds.), Understanding knowledge as a commons: From theory to practice (pp. 41–82). Cambridge & London: The MIT Press.
Horton, M., & Freire, P. (1990). We make the road by walking: Conversations on education and social change. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Klein, H. K. (1999). Tocqueville in cyberspace: using the internet for citizen associations. The Information Society, 15, 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/019722499128376.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy. Towards a radical democratic politics. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London & New York: Verso.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mosseri, A. (2016). Building a better news feed for you. Facebook Newsroom, 29 June. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2016/06/building-a-better-news-feed-for-you/. Accessed 16 May 2019.
Mosseri, A. (2018). Bringing people closer together. Facebook Newsroom, 11 January. https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/01/news-feed-fyi-bringing-people-closer-together/. Accessed 16 May 2019.
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. London: Verso.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford Dictionary (2019). Feedback. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/feedback. Accessed 19 May 2019.
P2P Group (n.d.). P2P Group Facebook Community Guidelines.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1luHJoHx55yF8CUMFQPSoP6NwDU8ocHp9IRarWTa8UsE/edit#. Accessed 4 July 2019.
Rancière, J. (2009). The emancipated spectator. London & New York: Verso.
Ranciere, J. (2010). Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London & New York: Continuum.
Raymond, E. S. (2003). Lurker. The online hacker jargon file, version 4.4.7. http://catb.org/jargon/html/L/lurker.html. Accessed 16 May 2019.
Revel, J. (2015). Producing subjectivity, producing the common: Three challenges and a slightly long postscript on what the common is not. In V. Bobin (Ed.), Composing differences. Dijon: Les Presses du Reél.
Stevens, A. (2011). Distributed version control systems: A guide for the perplexed. Slideshare , 13 October. https://www.slideshare.net/alanstevens/distributed-version-control-with-mercurial. Accessed 25 May 2019.
Susser, I. (2017a). Commoning in New York City, Barcelona, and Paris. Focaal. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 79, 6–22. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2017.790102.
Susser, I. (2017b). Introduction. For or against commoning? Focaal. Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 79, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2017.790101.
Torvalds, L. (2007). Tech talk: Linus Torvalds on git. Google Tech Talk conference.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok. Accessed 14 July 2019.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our reviewers for their constructive feedback and Thomas Glenn Kelso for the proofreading.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is co-created as part of a Ph.D. research project by Hulya Ertas ‘Building a Knowledge Commons for Commons Architecture’ at the KU Leuven Department of Architecture, Campus Sint-Lucas Brussels, co-advised by Burak Pak, Caroline Newton and Lieven de Cauter. The online platform proposed in this chapter will be implemented as a part of her Ph.D. project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ertas, H., Pak, B. & Newton, C. An Operational Framework for an Online Community Based on the Commons, Dissensus and Shared Knowledge. Postdigit Sci Educ 2, 397–415 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00067-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00067-6