Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Optimization of Repulsive Magnetic Array Negative Stiffness Structure for High-Performance Precision Micro-vibration Isolation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A repulsive magnetic array negative stiffness structure (RMANSS) is proposed to achieve low-frequency micro-vibration isolation with large load capacity. The RMANSS utilizes a perpendicular magnetized magnetic array to maintain the repulsive magnetic force exhibiting linear and high negative stiffness, which offsets the stiffness of vibration isolators to the maximum extent and achieves high vibration isolation performance.

Methods

The theoretical model of magnetic force, stiffness and nonlinearity of RMANSS is established, and its effectiveness is validated by simulation. Based on the theoretical model, geometric parameters are optimized by the genetic algorithm. Furthermore, the performance of RMANSS is compared with three state-of-the-art magnetic negative stiffness structures.

Results and conclusion

Optimized stiffness at the equilibrium position is − 29.5 N/mm, and the nonlinearity at ± 1 mm is less than 0.5‰. Both negative stiffness and linearity of RMANSS are improved by one order of magnitude than those before optimization. Comparisons with three state-of-the-art magnetic negative stiffness structures show that magnetic array not only increases negative stiffness by a factor of 2, 10 and 5, reduces nonlinearity by 93.2%, 96.8% and 93.6%, respectively, but also ensures the best vibration isolation at the equilibrium position. So, the proposed RMANSS is applicable in fields requiring high-performance vibration isolation, such as advanced manufacturing, frontier scientific research, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig.11
Fig.12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Courtland R (2017) Moore’s law’s next step: 10 nanometers. IEEE Spectr 54(1):52–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ito S, Schitter G (2018) Atomic force microscopy capable of vibration isolation with low-stiffness Z-axis actuation. Ultramicroscopy 186:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng L, Wu L, Chen P et al (2021) Effects of retracting velocities on the vibration of atomic force microscope probe on different surfaces. J Vib Eng Technol 9:1305–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vo NYP, Nguyen MK, Le TD (2021) Analytical study of a pneumatic vibration isolation platform featuring adjustable stiffness. Commun Nonlinear Sci 98:105775

  5. Suman S, Balaji PS, Selvakumar K et al (2021) Nonlinear vibration control device for a vehicle suspension using negative stiffness mechanism. J Vib Eng Technol 9:957–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oyelade AO (2019) Vibration isolation using a bar and an Euler beam as negative stiffness for vehicle seat comfort. Adv Mech Eng 11(7):1687814019860983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun XT, Jing XJ (2016) Analysis and design of a nonlinear stiffness and damping system with a scissor-like structure. Mech Syst Signal Proc 66–67:723–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang XL, Zhou JX, Xu DL et al (2017) Force transmissibility of a two-stage vibration isolation system with quasi-zero stiffness. Nonlinear Dyn 87:633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yonnet JP (2003) Passive magnetic bearings with permanent magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 14:803–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Robertson WS, Kidner MRF, Cazzolato BS et al (2009) Theoretical design parameters for a quasi-zero stiffness magnetic spring for vibration isolation. J Sound Vib 326(1–2):88–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Olaru R, Arcire A, Petrescu C et al (2017) A novel vibration actuator based on active magnetic spring. Sens Actuators A 264:11–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shan YH, Wu WJ, Chen XD (2015) Design of a miniaturized pneumatic vibration isolator with high-static-low-dynamic stiffness. J Vib Acoust 137 (4):045001

  13. Zheng YS, Zhang XN, Luo YJ et al (2016) Design and experiment of a high-static-low-dynamic stiffness isolator using a negative stiffness magnetic spring. J Sound Vib 360:31–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zheng YS, Li QP, Yan B et al (2018) A stewart isolator with high-static-low-dynamic stiffness struts based on negative stiffness magnetic springs. J Sound Vib 422:390–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhou ZH, Chen SH, Xia D et al (2019) The design of negative stiffness spring for precision vibration isolation using axially magnetized permanent magnet rings. J Vib Control 25(19–20):2667–2677

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Q, Zhou JX, Xu DL et al (2020) Design and experimental investigation of ultra-low frequency vibration isolation during neonatal transport [J]. Mech Syst Signal Proc 139:106633

  17. Nijsse GJ (2001) Linear motion systems: a modular approach for improved straightness performance. Delft University of Technology, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  18. Carrella A, Brennan MJ, Waters TP et al (2008) On the design of a high-static-low-dynamic stiffness isolator using linear mechanical springs and magnets. J Sound Vib 315(3):712–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang M, Chen XD, Li XQ (2016) An ultra-low frequency two DOFs’ vibration isolator using positive and negative stiffness in parallel. Math Probl Eng 2016:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wu WJ, Chen XD, Shan YH (2014) Analysis and experiment of a vibration isolator using a novel magnetic spring with negative stiffness. J Sound Vib 333(13):2958–2970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chai K, Zhu S, Yang Q et al (2018) Analysis and test for the performances of a tri-magnet vibration isolator. J Vib Shock 37(006):36–41

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wu WJ (2014) Study on active precision vibration isolation system based on parallel of positive and negative stiffness springs. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan

    Google Scholar 

  23. Allag H, Yonnet JP (1984) 3D analytical calculation of the forces exerted between two cuboidal magnets. IEEE Trans Magn 20(10):1962–1964

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen JLG, Paulides JJH, Lomonova E et al (2009) Analytical calculation of interaction force between orthogonally magnetized permanent magnets. Sens Lett 7(3):442–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52075133).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junning Cui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, Y., Cui, J. & Zou, L. Genetic Optimization of Repulsive Magnetic Array Negative Stiffness Structure for High-Performance Precision Micro-vibration Isolation. J. Vib. Eng. Technol. 10, 1325–1336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00449-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42417-022-00449-4

Keywords

Navigation