Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviour of laser cladded stainless steel 410 substrate using stainless steel 420 and Colmonoy 5 particles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Iron and Steel Research International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stainless steel (SS) 410 is widely used in many components of nuclear reactors due to its good corrosion resistance and high strength. However, wear is a major issue of these components due to its continuous sliding. SS 420 and Colmonoy 5 particles were deposited over SS 410 substrate by laser cladding process. Then, X-ray diffraction was used to find the phases present after cladding process. Further, coating morphologies were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) twinned with energy-dispersive spectroscopy. The obtained morphology indicates the hard laves phase present in the Colmonoy 5 cladding surface and needle-like structure in SS 420 cladding surface. Then, Vickers microhardness test was carried out in order to study the hardness and load-carrying capacity of the cladding specimen. Among those, Colmonoy 5 cladding specimen provide higher hardness due to the presence of laves phase formation. Then, the dry sliding wear study was conducted to calculate the mass loss after 2500 m of sliding. The combined effect of hardness and laves phase formation were reflected in dry sliding wear study analysis of the specimens. Then, to study the wear mechanism and roughness, worn surface morphologies were captured using SEM and white light interferometer, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.R. Ramkumar, S. Sivasankaran, F.A. Al-Mufadi, S. Siddharth, R. Raghu, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 19 (2019) 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Š. Houdková, Z. Pala, E. Smazalová, M. Vostřák, Z. Česánek, Surf. Coat. Technol. 318 (2017) 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A.P. Wu, J.L. Ren, Z.S. Peng, H. Murakawa, Y. Ueda, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 101 (2000) 70–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. V.D. Botch, Y.H. Hong, Z.H. Huang, Z.W. Li, Q. Liu, J. Wu, Y.M. Lu, X.K. Liu, J. Alloy. Compd. 773 (2019) 698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Ya, B. Pathiraj, D.T.A. Matthews, M. Bright, S. Melzer, Surf. Coat. Technol. 350 (2018) 323–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D.Y. Lin, N.N. Zhang, B. He, G.W. Zhang, Y. Zhang, D.Y. Li, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 24 (2017) 184–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Atamert, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, Metall. Trans. A 20 (1989) 1037–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Wang, D.O. Northwood, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007) 895–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Zhang, P. Farahmand, R. Kovacevic, Mater. Des. 109 (2016) 686–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. L.J. da Silva, A.S.C.M. D’Oliveira, Weld. Int. 31 (2017) 1–8

  11. M. Benkahoul, P. Robin, L. Martinu, J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, Surf. Coat. Technol. 203 (2009) 934–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Hassani, J.E. Klemberg-Sapieha, L. Martinu, Surf. Coat. Technol. 205 (2010) 1426–1430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. F.A. España, V.K. Balla, A. Bandyopadhyay, Surf. Coat. Technol. 204 (2010) 2510–2517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. X.T Liu, W.B. Lei, Q.J. Wang, W.P. Tong, C.S. Liu, J.Z. Cui, J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 23 (2016) 1195–1199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Jeyaprakash, C.H. Yang, S.P. Tseng, Met. Mater. Int. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12540-019-00526-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Gnanasekaran, G. Padmanaban, V. Balasubramanian, H. Kumar, S.K. Albert, High Temp. Mater. Processes 38 (2019) 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R.K. Rajan, H. Kumar, S.K. Albert, T.R. Vijayaram, Appl. Mech. Mater. 592–594 (2014) 1346–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F. Gao, R. Liu, X.J. Wu, Thin Solid Films 519 (2011) 4809–4817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Jeyaprakash, M. Duraiselvam, R. Raju, Arch. Metall. Mater. 63 (2018) 1303–1315.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.B. Lin, C.J. Chen, M. Zhang, S.Q. Wang, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 27 (2018) 6339–6348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Liu, J.H. Yao, Q.L. Zhang, M.X. Yao, R. Collier, J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 138 (2016) 041001–041007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Kumar, D.P. Mondal, A.K. Jha, H.K. Khaira, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 8 (1999) 711–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Jeyaprakash, C.H. Yang, M. Duraiselvam, G. Prabu, Results Phys. 12 (2019) 1610–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Vencl, B. Katavić, D. Marković, M. Ristić, B. Gligorijević, Tribol. Ind. 37 (2015) 320–329.

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Jeyaprakash, C.H. Yang, M. Duraiselvam, G. Prabu, S.P. Tseng, D. Raj Kumar, Results Phys. 15 (2019) 102585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Rodriguez, M.A. González, H.R. Monjardín, O. Jimenez, M. Flores, J. Ibarra, Met. Mater. Int. 23 (2017) 1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.D. Gates, Wear 214 (1998) 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. N. Jeyaprakash, M. Duraiselvam, S.V. Aditya, Surf. Rev. Lett. 26 (2019) 1950009.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J.R. Davis, ASM Int. Met. Park 6 (1993) 789–829.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ö.N. Doǧan, J.A. Hawk, Wear 189 (1995) 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. A.P. Umanskii, M.S. Storozhenko, I.V. Hussainova, A.E. Terentiev, A.M. Kovalchenko, M.M. Antonov, Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 53 (2015) 663–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Taiwan, China, for providing financial support to carry out this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Additive Manufacturing Center for Mass Customization Production, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, 10608, Taiwan, China

    N. Jeyaprakash & Che-hua Yang

  2. Institute of Manufacturing Technology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, 10608, Taiwan, China

    Che-hua Yang

  3. Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    K.R. Ramkumar

  4. Graduate Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, 10608, Taiwan, China

    Guang-zhou Sui

Authors
  1. N. Jeyaprakash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Che-hua Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K.R. Ramkumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guang-zhou Sui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Jeyaprakash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeyaprakash, N., Yang, Ch., Ramkumar, K. et al. Comparison of microstructure, mechanical and wear behaviour of laser cladded stainless steel 410 substrate using stainless steel 420 and Colmonoy 5 particles. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 27, 1446–1455 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-020-00447-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42243-020-00447-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation