Skip to main content
Log in

Nonlinear Modeling and Analysis of a Novel Robot Fish with Compliant Fluidic Actuator as a Tail

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compliant mobile robotics is a developing bioinspired concept of propulsion for locomotion. This paper studies the modeling and analysis of a compliant tail-propelled fish-like robot. This biomimetic design uses a fluid-filled network of channels embedded into the soft body to actuate the compliant tail and generate thrust. This study analyzes the nonlinear dynamics of Fish Tail Fluidic Actuator (FTFA). The fluidic expansion under pressure creates a bending moment in the tail. It is demonstrated that the tail response follows the theoretical formulation extracted from the accurate modeling. In this modeling, tail is assumed as a continuous Euler–Bernoulli beam considering large deflection and nonlinear strain. Then, the implementation of Hamilton's principle and the method of calculation lead to the motion equations. The assumed mode method is used to achieve the mathematical model in the multi-mode system that is more similar to the soft continuous system. We investigate the tendencies of the tail amplitude, swimming speed, and Strouhal number when the input driving frequency changes. The simulation results disclose that high swimming efficiency can be obtained at the multi-order resonances; meanwhile, the compliant fish robot is pushed at the corresponding frequency illustrating nonlinear behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(u_{x} ,u_{y} ,u_{z}\) :

Displacement of the beam

\(\in_{xx}\) :

x-Direction normal strain

ρ:

Density of the beam

\(\omega\) :

Frequency of inlet pressure

w :

Transverse displacement of the centerline

\(\dot{u}_{x} ,\dot{u}_{y} ,\dot{u}_{z}\) :

Velocities component of the beam

V :

Mean velocity of the steady flow

\(A\) :

Cross-sectional of the beam

\(l\) :

Total length of the channel

\(r_{{\text{c}}}\) :

Radius of channel

\(l_{{\text{c}}}\) :

Length of a single channel segment

t :

Time

\(P\) :

Fluid pressure

\(B\) :

Volumetric force

\(\phi_{i}\) :

Mode shape of beam

\(\eta_{i}\) :

Generalized coordinate for beam transverse Displacement

\(T\) :

Total kinetic energy

\(L_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Hydrodynamic force

\(m\) :

Effective mass per unit length at the length x.

z :

Height from natural plan of compliant tail

\(D\) :

Drag force

\(a_{0}\) :

Big diameter of cross section of tail at x = 0

\(T_{{\text{b}}}\) :

Kinetic energy of the beam

\(T_{{{\text{fluid}}}}\) :

Kinetic energy of the fluid inside the channel

\(\rho_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Fluid density

L :

Tail length

\(v\) :

Absolute velocity of the fluid

\(v_{{\text{b}}}\) :

Velocity of the beam

\(v_{{{\text{pr}}}}\) :

Relative velocity vector of the fluid

E :

Young's modulus of compliant tail

\(m_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Mass per unit length of the fluid

\(p_{{\text{a}}}\) :

Amplitude of inlet pressure

\(\phi\) :

Channel density function

\(\phi^{*}\) :

Normalized channel density

\(p_{{{\text{in}}}}\) :

Inlet pressure

\(\mu_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Fluid viscosity

\(\psi_{m}\) :

Mode shape for fluid pressure

\(B_{m}\) :

Generalized coordinate for fluid pressure

\(U_{{\text{s}}}\) :

Strain energy of system

\(U\) :

Swimming speed

\(M_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Mass of fish robot

\(T_{{\text{f}}}\) :

Mean thrust

\(C_{{\text{D}}}\) :

Drag force coefficient

\(b_{0}\) :

Small diameter of cross section of tail at x = 0

References

  1. Wen, L., Wang, T. M., Wu, G., Liang, J., & Wang, C. (2012). Novel method for the modeling and control investigation of efficient swimming for robotic fish. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 59, 3176–3188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phamduy, P., Cheong, J., & Porfiri, M. (2016). An autonomous charging system for a robotic fish. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 21, 2953–2963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, L., Wang, C., & Xie, G. M. (2014). Modeling of a carangiform-like robotic fish for both forward and backward swimming: Based on the fixed point. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2014, Hong Kong, China, pp 800–805.

  4. Yu, J. Z., Su, Z. S., Wu, Z. X., & Tan, M. (2016). Development of a fast-swimming dolphin robot capable of leaping. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 21, 2307–2316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Triantafyllou, M. S., Triantafyllou, G. S., & Yue, D. K. P. (2000). Hydrodynamics of fishlike swimming. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 32, 33–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang, H. Z., & Liu, Y. (2021). Nonlinear analysis of compliant robotic fish locomotion. Journal of Vibration and Control. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077546321997608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Z., Shatara, S., & Tan, X. (2010). Modeling of biomimetic robotic fish propelled by an ionic polymer–metal composite caudal fin. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 15, 3448–3459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan, X. (2006). An autonomous robotic fish for mobile sensing. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2006, Beijing, China, pp 5424–5429.

  9. Wang, Z. L., Hang, G. R., Wang, Y. W., Li, J., & Du, W. (2008). Embedded SMA wire actuated biomimetic fin: a module for biomimetic underwater propulsion. Smart Materials and Structures, 17, 025039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Low, K.H., Yang, J., Pattathil, A.P., & Zhang, Y. (2006). Initial prototype design and investigation of an undulating body by SMA. IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, 2006, Shanghai, China, pp 472–477.

  11. Katzschmann, R.K., Maille, A.D., Dorhout, D.L., & Rus, D. (2016). Cyclic hydraulic actuation for soft robotic devices. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2016, Daejeon, Korea (South), pp 3048–3055.

  12. Marchese, D., Katzschmann, K., & Rus, D. (2015). A recipe for soft fluidic elastomer robots. Soft Robotics, 23, 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shintake, J., Cacucciolo, V., Shea, H., & Floreano, D. (2018). Soft biomimetic fish robot made of dielectric elastomer actuators. Soft Robotics, 5, 466–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong, Y., Li, Z., & Du, R. X. (2017). A novel robot fish with wire-driven active body and compliant tail. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 22, 1633–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alvarado, V., & Alvaro, P. (2007). Design of Biomimetic Compliant Devices for Locomotion in Liquid Environments, PhD Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA.

  16. Epps, B. P., Alvarado, V., & Youcef-Toumi, K. (2009). Swimming performance of a biomimetic compliant fish-like robot. Experiments in Fluids, 47, 927–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daou, H. E., Salum, T., Chambers, T., Megill, W. M., & Kruusmaa, M. (2014). Modelling of a biologically inspired robotic fish driven by compliant parts. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/9/1/016010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gamus, B., Salem, L., & Haim, E. B. (2017). Interaction between inertia, viscosity, and elasticity in soft robotic actuator with fluidic network. IEEE Transactions on Robotics., 34, 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aureli, M., Kopman, V., & Porfiri, M. (2010). Free-locomotion of underwater vehicles actuated by ionic polymer metal composites. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics., 15, 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, J. X., & Tan, X. B. (2013). A dynamic model for tail-actuated robotic fish with drag coefficient adaptation. Mechatronics, 23, 659–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, J. X., & Tan, X. B. (2015). Averaging tail-actuated robotic fish dynamics through force and moment scaling. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 31, 906–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duraisamy, P., Sidharthan, R. K., & Santhanakrishnan, M. N. (2019). Design, modeling, and control of biomimetic fish robot: A review. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 16, 967–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, P. L., Lee, B. R., & Ahn, K. K. (2016). Thrust and swimming speed analysis of fish robot with non-uniform flexible tail. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 13, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams, T. L., & McMillen, T. (2015). Strategies for swimming: Explorations of the behavior of a neuro-musculo-mechanical model of the lamprey. Biology Open, 4, 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., & Overvelde, T. B. (2015). Modeling of soft fiber-reinforced bending actuators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics., 31, 778–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lighthill, M. J. (1960). Note on the swimming of slender fish. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 9, 305–317.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabeel Khan, M., & Kaneez, H. (2017). Nonlinear vibration analysis of Euler–Bernoulli beams by using continuous Galerkin–Petrov time-discretization method. Journal of Solid and Structure, 14, 1695–1709.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, T., Ouyang, H., & Zhang, Y. O. (2016). Nonlinear dynamics of straight fluid-conveying pipes with general boundary conditions and additional springs and masses. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40, 17–31.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, W. M., Yan, H., & Jiang, H. M. (2016). Dynamics of suspended microchannel resonators conveying opposite internal fluid flow: Stability, frequency shift and energy dissipation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 368, 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Matia, Y., Elimelech, T., & Gat, A. D. (2016). Leveraging internal viscous flow to extend the capabilities of beam-shaped soft robotic actuators. Soft Robotics, 4, 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, X., Cai, G. P., & Peng, F. J. (2017). Nonlinear vibration analysis of a membrane based on large deflection theory. Journal of Vibration and Control, 56, 2418–2429.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Breitman, P., Matia, Y., & Gat, A. (2020). Fluid mechanics of pneumatic soft robots. Soft Robotics. https://doi.org/10.1089/soro.2020.0037

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Bamdad.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in preparing this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haji, B.J., Bamdad, M. Nonlinear Modeling and Analysis of a Novel Robot Fish with Compliant Fluidic Actuator as a Tail. J Bionic Eng 19, 629–642 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00166-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-022-00166-4

Keywords

Navigation