Skip to main content
Log in

A Soft Robotic Fish with Variable-stiffness Decoupled Mechanisms

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Body and/or Caudal Fin (BCF) fish modulate its body stiffness by mechanisms consisting of antagonistic muscles. The mechanisms can be considered as Redundant Planar Rotational Parallel Mechanisms (RPRPM) with antagonistic flexible elements. For a typical RPRPM, its stiffness consists of the adjustable stiffness resulting from internal forces and the inherent stiffness caused by inherent compliances of flexible elements. In order to decouple the adjustable stiffness from the inherent stiffness and expand the range of stiffness variation, a variable-stiffness decoupled mechanism based on the Mechanically Adjustable Compliance and Controllable Equilibrium Position Actuator (MACCEPA) is presented and used to construct a soft robotic fish with large stiffness variation. According to the analysis of the evolution from RPRPM to MACCEPA, it can be found that MACCEPA is just a special type of RPRPM with only an adjustable stiffness. In addition, MACCEPA existed before RPRPM mechanism. The prototype of the soft robotic fish with variable-stiffness decoupled mechanisms is built to explore the relationships between the body stiffness and the swimming performance. It is validated experimentally that the stiffness variation multiple of the robotic fish is raised, the swimming performance of the robotic fish is improved when the stiffness is modulated to match the driving frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marchese A D, Onal C D, Rus D. Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators. Soft Robotics, 2014, 1, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee C, Kim M, Kim Y J, Hong N, Ryu S, Kim H J, Kim S. Soft robot review. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 2017, 15, 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. She Y, Chen J, Shi H L, Su H J. Modeling and validation of a novel bending actuator for soft robotics applications. Soft Robotics, 2016, 3, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raj A, Thakur A. Fish-inspired robots: Design, sensing, actuation, and autonomy–A review of research. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2016, 11, 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Trivedi D, Rahn C D, Kier W M, Walker I D. Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research. Applied Bionics & Biomechanics, 2008, 5, 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kushner A M, Guan Z. Modular design in natural and biomimetic soft materials. Angewandte Chemie, 2011, 50, 9026–9057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paraz F, Schouveiler L, Eloy C. Thrust generation by a heaving flexible foil: Resonance, nonlinearities, and optimality. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28, 1193–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alvarado P V, Youcef-Toumi K. Design of machines with compliant bodies for biomimetic locomotion in liquid environments. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2006, 128, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Epps B P, Alvarado P V Y, Youceftoumi K, Techet A H. Swimming performance of a biomimetic compliant fish-like robot. Experiments in Fluids, 2009, 47, 927–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Esposito C J, Tangorra J L, Flammang B E, Lauder G V. A robotic fish caudal fin: Effects of stiffness and motor program on locomotor performance. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2012, 215, 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mchenry M J, Pell C A, Jr J. Mechanical control of swimming speed: Stiffness and axial wave form in undulating fish models. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1995, 198, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen P L, Lee B R, Ahn K K. Thrust and swimming speed analysis of fish robot with non-uniform flexible tail. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Westneat M W, Hoese W, Pell C A, Wainwright S A. The horizontal septum: Mechanisms of force transfer in locomotion of scombrid fishes. Journal of Morphology, 1993, 217, 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Westneat M W, Hale M E, Mchenry M J, Long J H. Mechanics of the fast-start: Muscle function and the role of intramuscular pressure in the escape behavior of Amia calva and Polypterus palmas. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1998, 201, 3041–3055.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cui Z, Jiang H Z. Design and implementation of thunniform robotic fish with variable body stiffness. International Journal of Robotics and Automation, 2017, 32, 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Park Y J, Cho K J. Design and manufacturing a bio-inspired variable stiffness mechanism in a robotic dolphin. International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications, New York, USA, 2013, 302–309.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Park Y J, Huh T M, Park D, Cho K J. Design of a variablestiffness flapping mechanism for maximizing the thrust of a bio-inspired underwater robot. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 2014, 9, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li K K, Jiang H Z, Cui Z, Huang Q. Variable stiffness design of redundantly actuated planar rotational parallel mechanisms. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30, 818–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogan N. Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1984, 29, 681–690.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez-Villalpando E C, Herr H. Agonist–antagonist active knee prosthesis: A preliminary study in level-ground walking. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 2009, 46, 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chakarov D. Study of the antagonistic stiffness of parallel manipulators with actuation redundancy. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2004, 39, 583–601.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nahon M A, Angeles J. Force optimization in redundantly actuated closed kinematic chains. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, USA, 1989, 951–956.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vanderborght B, Albu-Schaeffer A, Bicchi A, Burdet E, Caldwell D G, Carloni R, Catalano M, Eiberger O, Friedl W, Ganesh G, Garabini M, Grebenstein M, Grioli G, Haddadin S, Hoppner H, Jafari A, Laffranchi M, Lefeber D, Petit F, Stramigioli S, Tsagarakis N, Van Damme M, Van Ham R, Visser L C, Wolf S. Variable impedance actuators: A review. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2013, 61, 1601–1614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lavate M S A, Todkar R G. Variable stiffness actuators: A general review. International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research, 2015, 4, 201–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jimenez-Fabian R, Flynn L, Geeroms J, Vitiello N, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D. Sliding-bar MACCEPA for a powered ankle prosthesis. Journal of Mechanisms & Robotics, 2015, 7, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ham R V, Damme M V, Verrelst B, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D. MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: A 3DOF joint with two independent compliances. International Applied Mechanics, 2007, 43, 467–474.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Ham R V, Vanderborght B, Damme M V, Verrelst B, Lefeber D. MACCEPA, the mechanically adjustable compliance and controllable equilibrium position actuator: Design and implementation in a biped robot. Robotics & Autonomous Systems, 2007, 55, 761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vanderborght B, Tsagarakis N G, Semini C, Ham R V, Caldwell D G. MACCEPA 2.0: Compliant actuator used for energy efficient hopping robot chobino1d. Autonomous Robots, 2011, 31, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Geeroms J, Flynn L, Jimenez-Fabian R, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D. Energetic analysis and optimization of a MACCEPA actuator in an ankle prosthesis. Autonomous Robots, 2018, 42, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Verstraten T, Beckerle P, Furnémont R, Mathijssen G, Vanderborght B, Lefeber D. Series and parallel elastic actuation: Impact of natural dynamics on power and energy consumption. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2016, 102, 232–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chakarov D. Optimization synthesis of parallel manipulators with desired stiffness. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1998, 4, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lauder G V, Tytell E D. Hydrodynamics of undulatory propulsion. Fish Physiology, 2005, 23, 425–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eloy C. Optimal Strouhal number for swimming animals. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2012, 30, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51275127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongzhou Jiang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, K., Jiang, H., Wang, S. et al. A Soft Robotic Fish with Variable-stiffness Decoupled Mechanisms. J Bionic Eng 15, 599–609 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0049-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-018-0049-1

Keywords

Navigation