Abstract
Detection of groundwater pollution source is an inverse problem. To solve this inverse problem, it has been posed into an optimization problem. In this study, a hybrid optimization model has been developed for detection of groundwater pollution sources in terms of its source characteristics, namely, source location, source strength and duration of activity of pollution source. In this hybrid optimization model, the Genetic Algorithm model has been linked with the Gradient Descent optimization model. The global convergence property of Genetic Algorithm has been utilized to find the optimal solution near global minima. This solution is then used as an initial guess to the Gradient Descent optimization model to find the global minima. The performance of developed hybrid model has been evaluated for two-dimensional case for error free and erroneous concentration data. Performance results show a significant improvement in the prediction error of groundwater pollution source parameters. The prediction error using GA model was found to be equal to 10.806%, 13.930% and 25.211% in source location, duration of activity and source strength, respectively, while using hybrid optimization model the prediction error were improved to 0.461%, 7.178% and 9.999%. The novelty of the present work is that it requires the observed concentration data of one observation well only for complete identification of pollution source. Also, a prior knowledge of probable locations of potential pollution sources is not required in this model.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig7_HTML.png)
source parameters with error free concentration data
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig8_HTML.png)
source parameters for run no. 5 with error level 5%
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig9_HTML.png)
source parameters for run no. 5 with error level 10%
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig11_HTML.png)
source parameters for run no. 3 with error level 5%
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs42108-021-00118-4/MediaObjects/42108_2021_118_Fig12_HTML.png)
source parameters for run no. 9 with error level 10%
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- t :
-
Time
- C :
-
Concentration of the dissolved pollutant
- D x :
-
Coefficient of hydrodynamic dispersion in x-direction
- D z :
-
Coefficient of hydrodynamic dispersion in z-direction
- U :
-
Groundwater velocity in x-direction
- R d :
-
Retardation factor
- ν :
-
Decay constant
- T o :
-
Duration of disposal period
- C 0 :
-
Pollution source strength
- n:
-
Total number of concentration observation reading at an observation well
- \({\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{obs}}^{\mathrm{i}}\) :
-
Observed concentration at the observation well at ith reading
- \({\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{est}}^{\mathrm{i}}\) :
-
Estimated concentration corresponding to the observation well at ith reading
- q :
-
Vector of model parameters (source location and release period)
- C :
-
Vector of simulated concentrations
- h(q):
-
Simulation model which transform q into C
- q l :
-
Lower bound on vector q
- q u :
-
Upper bound on vector
References
Aral, M. M., Guan, J., Maslia, M. L., 2001. Identification of contaminant source location and release history in aquifers. Jl. Of Hydrologic Engrg., ASCE. 6(3), 225–234.
Atmadja, J., & Bagtzoglou, A. C. (2001). State of the art report on mathematical methods for groundwater pollution source identification. Environmental Forensics, 2(3), 205–214.
Ayaz, M. (2017). Groundwater Pollution Source Identification Using Genetic Algorithm Based Model. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering., 5(10), 65–72.
Ayvaz, M. T. (2010). A linked simulation-optimization model for solving the unknown groundwater pollution source identification problems. J. of Contaminant Hydrology., 117(1–4), 46–59.
Bear, J. (1972). Dynamics of fluid in porous media. New York: Dover Publication Inc.
Chadalavada, S., Datta, B., & Naidu, R. (2011). Optimisation approach for pollution source identification in groundwater: an overview. International Journal of Environment and Waste management, 8(1–2), 40–61.
Datta, B., Beegle, J. E., Kavvas, M. L., Orlob, G. T., 1989. Development of an expert system embedding pattern recognition techniques for pollution source identification. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virg
Datta, B., Chakrabarty, D., & Dhar, A. (2009). Simultaneous identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources and estimation of aquifer parameters. Journal of Hydrology., 376(1–2), 48–57.
Datta, B., Chakrabarty, D., & Dhar, A. (2011). Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using classical optimization with linked simulation. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research., 5(1), 25–36.
Deb, K. (1995). Optimization for engineering design: algorithms and examples (p. 1995). Delhi: Prentice-Hall Publisher.
Foster, S. S. D., Chilton, P. J., 2003. Groundwater: the processes and global significance of aquifer degradation. philosophical transactions of the royal society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 358(1440), 1957–1972.
Gorelick, S. M., Evans, B., & Remson, I. (1983). Identification of groundwater pollution: an optimization approach. Water Resources Research, 19(3), 779–790.
Liu, C., & Ball, W. P. (1999). Application of inverse methods to contaminant source identification from acuitard diffusion profiles at Dover AFB Delaware. Water Resources Center, 35(7), 1975–1925.
Mahar, P. S., Datta, B., 1997. Optimal monitoring network and groundwater pollution source identification. Jl. of Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt, ASCE. 123(4), 199–207.
Mahinthakumar, G. K., & Sayeed, M. (2005). Hybrid genetic algorithm—local search methods for solving ground- water source identification inverse problems. Water Resources Planning and Management, 131(1), 45–57.
Mahinthakumar, G. K., & Sayeed, M. (2006). Reconstructing groundwater source release histories using hybrid optimization approaches. Environmental Forensics, 7(1), 45–54.
Neupauer, R. M., Borcherers, B., & Wilson, J. L. (2000). Comparison of inverse methods for reconstructing the release history of a groundwater contaminant source. Water Resources Research, 36(9), 2469–2475.
Sciortino, A., Harman, T, C., Yeh, W. W-G., 2000. Inverse modeling for locating dense nonaqueous pools in groundwater under steady flow conditions. Water Resources Center. 36(7), 1723-1735
Sidauruk, P., Cheng, A.H.-D., & Quazar, D. (1998). Groundwater contaminant source and transport parameter identification by correlation coefficient optimization. Groundwater, 36(2), 208–214.
Singh, R. M., & Datta, B. (2006). Identification of groundwater pollution sources using GA-based linked simulation optimization model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 11(2), 101–109.
Singh, R. M., Datta, B., & Jain, A. (2004). Identification of unknown groundwater pollution sources using artificial neural networks. Water Resources Planning and Management, 130(6), 506–514.
Skaggs, T. H., & Kabala, Z. H. (1994). Recovering the release history of a groundwater contaminant. Water Resources Research, 30(1), 71–79.
Snodgrass, M. F., & Kitanidis, P. K. (1997). A geostatistical approach to contaminant source identification. Water Resources Research, 33(4), 537–546.
Wagner, B. J. (1992). Simultaneous parameter estimation and contaminant source characterization for coupled groundwater flow and contaminant transport modeling. Journal of Hydrology, 135, 275–305.
Woodbury, A. D., Sudicky, E., Ulrych, T. J., & Ludwig, R. (1998). Three dimensional plume source reconstruction using minimum relative entropy inversion. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 32, 131–158.
Woodbury, A. D., & Ulrych, T. J. (1996). Minimum relative entropy inversion: the release history of a groundwater contaminant. Water Resources Research, 32(9), 2671–2681.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank all who assisted in conducting this work.
Funding
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ayaz, M., Ansari, S.A. & Singh, O.K. Detection of pollutant source in groundwater using hybrid optimization model. Int J Energ Water Res 6, 81–93 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00118-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-021-00118-4