Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Die paradoxe M.-puborectalis-Kontraktion aus Sicht der Physiotherapie

Paradoxical puborectalis contraction from the viewpoint of physiotherapy

  • MKÖ
  • Published:
Journal für Urologie und Urogynäkologie/Österreich Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Ehe bei paradoxer Kontraktion des M. puborectalis (Beckenbodendyskinesie, „obstructed defecation syndrome“ [ODS] usw.) ein chirurgisches Vorgehen ins Auge gefasst wird, das mit dem Risiko von Fehlschlag und postoperativer Morbidität einhergeht, müssen alle Möglichkeiten einer konservativen Therapie ausgeschöpft werden. Als wirkungsvolle Option resultiert aus zahlreichen Studien die physiotherapeutische Behandlung, vorzugsweise unterstützt von Biofeedback, was auch anderen konservativen Maßnahmen überlegen ist.

Abstract

Before surgery is considered for the condition of paradoxical puborectalis contraction (pelvic floor dyssynergia, obstructive defecation syndrome, etc.), all conservative therapy options should be exhausted because of the risk of failure and complications associated with surgery. Numerous studies have confirmed that physiotherapy is an effective treatment, preferably supported by biofeedback, which is superior to other conservative measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Landmann RG, Wexner SD (2008) Paradoxical puborectalis contraction and increased perineal descent. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 21(2):138–145. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1075863

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M, Villani RD, Queralto M, Lazorthes F, Hershman M, Carriero A, Pigot F, Meurette G, Narisetty P, Villet R, ODS II Study Group (2008) Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51(11):1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9378-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alame AM, Bahna H (2012) Evaluation of constipation. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 25(1):5–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1301753

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Leroi AM, Bernier C, Watier A, Hémond M, Goupil G, Black R, Denis P, Devroede G (1995) Prevalence of sexual abuse among patients with functional disorders of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Int J Colorectal Dis 10(4):200–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leroi AM, Berkelmans I, Denis P, Hémond M, Devroede G (1995) Anismus as a marker of sexual abuse. Consequences of abuse on anorectal motility. Dig Dis Sci 40(7):1411–1416

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leroi AM, Duval V, Roussignol C, Berkelmans I, Peninque P, Denis P (1996) Biofeedback for anismus in 15 sexually abused women. Int J Colorectal Dis 11(4):187–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murad-Regadas SM, Rodrigues LV, Furtado DC, Regadas FS, Olivia da S Fernandes G, Regadas Filho FS, Gondim AC, de da Paula Joca SR (2012) The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome. Tech Coloproctol 16(3):227–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0831-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takano S, Sands DR (2016) Influence of body posture on defecation: a prospective study of “The Thinker” position. Tech Coloproctol 20(2):117–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1402-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baessler K, Metz M, Junginger B (2017) Valsalva versus straining: there is a distinct difference in resulting bladder neck and puborectalis muscle position. Neurourol Urodyn 36(7):1860–1866. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.23197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Laycock J, Jerwood D (2001) Pelvic floor muscle assessment: the PERFECT scheme. Physiotherapy 12:631–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hanzal E et al (2015) Palpation für das Beckenbodentraining. De Gruyter, Berlin, S 45

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shafik A, El Sibai O, Shafik IA, Shafik AA (2007) Electromyographic activity of the anterolateral abdominal wall muscles during rectal filling and evacuation. J Surg Res 143(2):364–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Woodward S, Norton C, Chiarelli P (2014) Biofeedback for treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008486.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Podzemny V, Pescatori LC, Pescatori M (2015) Management of obstructed defecation. World J Gastroenterol 21(4):1053–1060. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i4.1053

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ho YH, Tsang C, Tang CL, Nyam D, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2000) Anal sphincter injuries from stapling instruments introduced transanally: randomized, controlled study with endoanal ultrasound and anorectal manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 43(2):169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A (2009) Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 52(7):1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a9120 (discussion 1212–4)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pescatori M, Gagliardi G (2008) Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures. Tech Coloproctol 12(1):7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-008-0391-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lerchengasse 21/7, 1080, Wien, Österreich

    Rita Hochwimmer

Authors
  1. Rita Hochwimmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Hochwimmer.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

R. Hochwimmer gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von der Autorin durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hochwimmer, R. Die paradoxe M.-puborectalis-Kontraktion aus Sicht der Physiotherapie. J. Urol. Urogynäkol. 25, 12–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-018-0026-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41972-018-0026-2

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation