Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Binocular Rivalry: A Window into Cortical Competition and Suppression

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of the Indian Institute of Science Aims and scope

Abstract

When the two eyes view very dissimilar images, the visual system often fails to combine the images and one experiences stochastically alternating percepts. This phenomenon, called binocular rivalry, has fascinated researchers for centuries since it provides insights into two critical aspects of visual perception: visual consciousness and cortical suppression. Here, we review the mechanisms of binocular rivalry from a cognitive neuroscience perspective, focusing on empirical findings from two widely used methods—functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). With these techniques, researchers have been able to identify the cortical sites of suppression in binocular rivalry, probe neural responses evoked by unconscious (invisible) visual stimuli, and examine the role of top-down attentional signals in rivalry. We conclude by proposing some future directions for the study of binocular rivalry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. James W (1890) The consciousness of self. Princ Psychol

  2. Wandell BA (1999) Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 22:145–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grill-Spector K, Malach R (2004) The human visual cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:649–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tong F, Nakayama K, Vaughan JT, Kanwisher N (1998) Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron 21:753–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lumer ED, Friston KJ, Rees G (1998) Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. Science 280:1930–1934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lumer ED, Rees G (1999) Covariation of activity in visual and prefrontal cortex associated with subjective visual perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1669–1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Polonsky A, Blake R, Braun J, Heeger DJ (2000) Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 3:1153–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cobb WA, Morton HB, Ettlinger G (1967) Cerebral Potentials evoked by pattern reversal and their suppression in visual rivalry. Nature 216:1123–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lansing RW (1964) Electroencephalographic correlates of binocular rivalry in man. Science 146:1325–1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown RJ, Norcia AM (1997) A method for investigating binocular rivalry in real-time with the steady-state VEP. Vision Res 37:2401–2408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cosmelli D et al (2004) Waves of consciousness: ongoing cortical patterns during binocular rivalry. Neuroimage 23:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tononi G, Srinivasan R, Russell DP, Edelman GM (1998) Investigating neural correlates of conscious perception by frequency-tagged neuromagnetic responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:3198–3203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong F (2003) Primary visual cortex and visual awareness. Nat Rev Neurosci 4:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wunderlich K, Schneider KA, Kastner S (2005) Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 8:1595–1602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes JD, Deichmann R, Rees G (2005) Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 438:496–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frassle S, Sommer J, Jansen A, Naber M, Einhauser W (2014) Binocular rivalry: frontal activity relates to introspection and action but not to perception. J Neurosci 34:1738–1747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Knapen T, Brascamp J, Pearson J, van Ee R, Blake R (2011) The role of frontal and parietal brain areas in bistable perception. J Neurosci 31:10293–10301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Safavi S, Kapoor V, Logothetis NK, Panagiotaropoulos TI (2014) Is the frontal lobe involved in conscious perception? Front Psychol 5:1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weilnhammer VA, Ludwig K, Hesselmann G, Sterzer P (2013) Frontoparietal cortex mediates perceptual transitions in bistable perception. J Neurosci 33:16009–16015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zaretskaya N, Narinyan M (2014) Introspection, attention or awareness? The role of the frontal lobe in binocular rivalry. Front Hum Neurosci 8:527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brascamp J, Blake R, Knapen T (2015) Negligible fronto-parietal BOLD activity accompanying unreportable switches in bistable perception. Nat Neurosci 18:1672–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee SH, Blake R (1999) Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39:1447–1454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tong F (2001) Competing theories of binocular rivalry: a possible resolution. Brain Mind 2(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blake R (2001) A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain Mind 2(1):5–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kovacs I, Papathomas TV, Yang M, Feher A (1996) When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:15508–15511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Carlson TA, He S (2004) Competing global representations fail to initiate binocular rivalry. Neuron 43:907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tong F, Engel SA (2001) Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature 411:195–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tong F, Meng M, Blake R (2006) Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends Cogn Sci 10:502–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsuchiya N, Koch C (2005) Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nat Neurosci 8:1096–1101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pasley BN, Mayes LC, Schultz RT (2004) Subcortical discrimination of unperceived objects during binocular rivalry. Neuron 42:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pearson J, Clifford CW (2005) Suppressed patterns alter vision during binocular rivalry. Curr Biol 15:2142–2148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. He S, Cavanagh P, Intriligator J (1996) Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness. Nature 383:334–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. He S, MacLeod DI (2001) Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature 411:473–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Blake R, Fox R (1974) Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature 249:488–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. White KD, Petry HM, Riggs LA, Miller J (1978) Binocular interactions during establishment of McCollough effects. Vis Res 18:1201–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Blake R, Tadin D, Sobel KV, Raissian TA, Chong SC (2006) Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103:4783–4788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Harris JJ, Schwarzkopf DS, Song C, Bahrami B, Rees G (2011) Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychol Sci 22:399–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sweeny TD, Grabowecky M, Suzuki S (2011) Awareness becomes necessary between adaptive pattern coding of open and closed curvatures. Psychol Sci 22:943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stein T, Sterzer P (2011) High-level face shape adaptation depends on visual awareness: evidence from continuous flash suppression. J Vis 11:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moradi F, Koch C, Shimojo S (2005) Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Axelrod V, Bar M, Rees G (2015) Exploring the unconscious using faces. Trends Cogn Sci. 19:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Haynes JD, Rees G (2005) Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 8:686–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kamitani Y, Tong F (2005) Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain. Nat Neurosci 8:679–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jiang Y, He S (2006) Cortical responses to invisible faces: dissociating subsystems for facial-information processing. Curr Biol 16:2023–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Williams MA, Morris AP, McGlone F, Abbott DF, Mattingley JB (2004) Amygdala responses to fearful and happy facial expressions under conditions of binocular suppression. J Neurosci 24:2898–2904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang E, Zald DH, Blake R (2007) Fearful expressions gain preferential access to awareness during continuous flash suppression. Emotion 7:882–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Costello P, Jiang Y, Baartman B, McGlennen K, He S (2009) Semantic and subword priming during binocular suppression. Conscious Cogn 18:375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Fang F, He S (2005) Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nat Neurosci 8:1380–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mueller TJ, Blake R (1989) A fresh look at the temporal dynamics of binocular-rivalry. Biol Cybern 61:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Fukuda H, Blake R (1992) Spatial interactions in binocular rivalry. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 18:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Paffen CL, Alais D, Verstraten FA (2005) Center-surround inhibition deepens binocular rivalry suppression. Vision Res 45:2642–2649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Paffen CL, Tadin D, te Pas SF, Blake R, Verstraten FA (2006) Adaptive center-surround interactions in human vision revealed during binocular rivalry. Vision Res 46:599–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alais D, Blake R (1999) Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Res 39:4341–4353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sobel KV, Blake R (2002) How context influences predominance during binocular rivalry. Perception. 31:813–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yu K, Blake R (1992) Do recognizable figures enjoy an advantage in binocular rivalry? J Exp Psychol 18(4):1158

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ (2005) Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 8:22–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Yuille A (2004) Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annu Rev Psychol 55:271–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Yuille A, Kersten D (2006) Vision as Bayesian inference: analysis by synthesis? Trends Cogn Sci 10(7):301–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sasaki Y, Nanez JE, Watanabe T (2010) Advances in visual perceptual learning and plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Watanabe T, Sasaki Y (2015) Perceptual learning: toward a comprehensive theory. Annu Rev Psychol 66:197–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu JP, He ZJ, Ooi TL (2010) Effectively reducing sensory eye dominance with a push-pull perceptual learning protocol. Curr Biol 20:1864–1868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Dieter KC, Melnick MD, Tadin D (2016) Perceptual training profoundly alters binocular rivalry through both sensory and attentional enhancements. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(45):12874–12879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Chun MM, Golomb JD, Turk-Browne NB (2011) A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annu Rev Psychol 62:73–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG (2000) Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:315–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee SH, Blake R, Heeger DJ (2007) Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nat Neurosci 10:1048–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhang P, Jamison K, Engel S, He B, He S (2011) Binocular rivalry requires visual attention. Neuron 71:362–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Xu H et al (2016) Rivalry-like neural activity in primary visual cortex in anesthetized monkeys. J Neurosci 36:3231–3242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wilson HR (2003) Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:14499–14503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Said CP, Heeger DJ (2013) A model of binocular rivalry and cross-orientation suppression. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1002991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Dayan P (1998) A hierarchical model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput 10:1119–1135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Laing CR, Chow CC (2002) A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry. J Comput Neurosci 12:39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Stollenwerk L, Bode M (2003) Lateral neural model of binocular rivalry. Neural Comput 15:2863–2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Li HH, Carrasco M, Heeger DJ (2015) Deconstructing interocular suppression: attention and divisive normalization. PLoS Comput Biol 11:e1004510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Bartos M, Vida I, Jonas P (2007) Synaptic mechanisms of synchronized gamma oscillations in inhibitory interneuron networks. Nat Rev Neurosci 8:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Vogels TP, Rajan K, Abbott LF (2005) Neural network dynamics. Annu Rev Neurosci 28:357–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Katyal S, Engel SA, He B, He S (2016) Neurons that detect interocular conflict during binocular rivalry revealed with EEG. J Vis. 16:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gershman SJ, Vul E, Tenenbaum JB (2012) Multistability and perceptual inference. Neural Comput 24:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Haefner RM, Berkes P, Fiser J (2016) Perceptual decision-making as probabilistic inference by neural sampling. Neuron 90:649–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Hohwy J, Roepstorff A, Friston K (2008) Predictive coding explains binocular rivalry: an epistemological review. Cognition 108:687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Leopold DA, Logothetis NK (1996) Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys’ percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature 379:549–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Lehky SR, Maunsell JHR (1996) No binocular rivalry in the LGN of alert macaque monkeys. Vision Res 36:1225–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Whitney D, Levi DM (2011) Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 15:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Breitmeyer BG, Ogmen H (2000) Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: a comparison, review, and update. Percept Psychophys 62:1572–1595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Baker DH, Graf EW (2009) On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vis Res 49:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Robertson CE, Kravitz DJ, Freyberg J, Baron-Cohen S, Baker CI (2013) Slower rate of binocular rivalry in autism. J Neurosci 33:16983–16991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Casanova JAA, Campos JAA, Sanchez MM, Super H (2013) Onset time of binocular rivalry and duration of inter-dominance periods as psychophysical markers of ADHD. Perception 42:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Miller SM et al (2003) Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder. Psychol Med 33:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Dieter KC, Tadin D (2011) Understanding attentional modulation of binocular rivalry: a framework based on biased competition. Front Hum Neurosci 5:155

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kendrick Kay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, R., Engel, S.A. & Kay, K. Binocular Rivalry: A Window into Cortical Competition and Suppression. J Indian Inst Sci 97, 477–485 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-017-0048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41745-017-0048-y

Keywords

Navigation