Skip to main content
Log in

Wellbeing Economics Narratives for a Sustainable Future

  • Original research
  • Published:
Humanistic Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is increasing attention to the idea of bringing about what is termed a wellbeing economy, and recognition that a coherent story or narrative is important in countering the strength of today’s dominant economic narrative--neoliberalism. Yet there has been relatively little consensus on what such an idea might mean in practice, despite the proliferation of many different initiatives attempting to bring such an economy about. Many of these initiatives have allied with an aggregator called WEAll, the Wellbeing Economy Alliance. In an effort to determine what new economics/next economies initiatives mean by wellbeing economy, this study assesses the statements provided by WEAll allies to WEAll when seeking membership to see whether there is a consistent narrative about wellbeing economy that emerges. Four nuanced, yet related, versions of the wellbeing economy narrative emerged. “Transformation” is mainly a critique of business as usual, emphasizing transformation towards a wellbeing economy that critiques neoliberalism and emphasizes wellbeing of all people. The Nature-Centric or Planetary Boundaries perspective takes a more ecological perspective, emphasizing humanity’s need to live and operate within planetary boundaries. The Good Life or People-Centric perspective offers a people-oriented narrative that emphasizes sustainability while ensuring that basic needs of all are met. The Integrated perspective is an integrated life-centered perspective that combines these interests and focuses on the wellbeing of both people and planet, recognizing the complexity and holistic nature of that task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that ‘economy’ appears as the first word with 163 mentions and ‘economics as the 4th with 52 mentions.

References

  • Atkins, W.B., D.S. Wilson, and S.C. Hayes. 2019. Prosocial: Using evolutionary science to build productive, equitable, and collaborative groups. Oakland: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, Joel. 2020. The new corporation: How “good” corporations are bad for democracy. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. 1997. The power of the meme meme. Skeptic 5 (2): 43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, Susan. 1998. Imitation and the definition of a meme. Journal of Metrics 2 (2): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. 2000. The meme machine. Vol. 25. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G.H. 1987. Our common future: World commission on environmental development. Oxford: The Brundtland-Report Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, J. 1986. Universal aspects of symbolic healing: A theoretical synthesis. American Anthropologist 88 (1): 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J., and A. Hoffman. 2013. Flourishing: A frank conversation about sustainability. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Four Arrows (aka Donald Trent Jacobs). 2016. Point of departure: Returning to our more authentic worldview for education and survival. Charlotte: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 2017. The new story of business: Towards a more responsible capitalism. Business and Society Review 122 (3): 449–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 2018. The “business sucks” story. Humanistic Management Journal 3 (1): 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, J. 2015. Regenerative capitalism: How universal principles and patterns will shape our new economy. Capital Institute. Posted at: http://capitalinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-Regenerative-Capitalism-4-20-15-final.pdf.

  • Ghosh, Amitav. 2018. The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J.M. 2008. Behavioral economics and climate change policy. Journal of Economic Behavior 68: 632–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., and J.D. Erickson. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 29: 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harari, Y.N. 2014. Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., and J. Wasilewski. 2004. Indigenous wisdom of the people forum: Strategies for expanding a web of transnational indigenous interactions. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 21: 505–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, P. 2007. Blessed unrest: How the largest movement in the world came into being and why no one saw it coming. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, David C. 2015. Change the story, change the future: A living economy for a living earth. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten, D. 2018. Ecological civilization: The vision. Posted at: https://davidkorten.org/home/ecological-civilization/.

  • Lent, J. 2017. The patterning instinct: A cultural history of Humanity’s search for meaning. Amherst: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, L. H. 2016. Needed: A better story. Humanistic Management Journal 1(1): 75–90.

  • Lovins, L.H., S. Wallis, A. Wijkman, and J. Fullerton. 2018. A finer future: Creating an economy in service to life, a report to the club of Rome. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. 2016a. Neoliberalism—The ideology at the root of all of our problems. The Guardian, April 15, 2016, https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-ideology-problem-george-monbiot.

  • Monbiot, G. 2016b. How did we get into this mess? Politics, equality, nature. New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monbiot, G. 2016c. The Zombie doctrine. The Guardian, April 16, http://www.monbiot.com/2016/04/15/the-zombie-doctrine/Pirson, Michael (2017). Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Narvaez, D., Four Arrows (Trent Jacobs, D.), E. Halton, B. Collier, and G. Enderle, eds. 2019. Indigenous sustainable wisdom: First-nation know-how for global flourishing. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirson, Michael. 2017. Humanistic management: Protecting dignity and promoting well-being. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, L.F. 1971. Confidential memorandum: Attack of American free enterprise system. Posted at: http://reclaimdemocracy.org/powell_memo_lewis/.

  • Raworth, K. 2017. Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedy, C. 2020a. Discourse coalitions for sustainability transformations: Common ground and conflict beyond neoliberalism. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 45: 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedy, C. 2020b. Storytelling the future: Storytelling practice in transformative systems. In Higher education: An Educator’s handbook, 71–87. Abington: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J. 2015. Bounding the planetary future: Why we need a great transition. Great Transition Initiative 9: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, Å. Persson, F.S. Chapin III, E. Lambin, et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society 14 (2).

  • Sent, E.M. 2004. Behavior economics: How psychology made its (limited) way back into economics. History of Political Economics. 36: 735–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., K. Richardson, J. Rockström, S.E. Cornell, I. Fetzer, E.M. Bennett, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223): 1259855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Rockström, J., Richardson, K., Lenton, T. M., Folke, C., Liverman, D., ... & Donges, J. F. 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(33), 8252–8259, URL: https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/early/2018/08/07/1810141115.full.pdf.

  • Thaler, R.H. 2016. Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economics Review 106: 1577–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. 2015. Reflections: Intellectual Shamans, Sensemaking, and Memes in Large System Change. Journal of Change Management 15(4): 259–273.

  • Waddock, S. 2016. Foundational memes for a new narrative about the role of business in society. Humanistic Management Journal 1: 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-016-0012-4.

  • Waddock, S. 2020. Reframing and transforming economics around life. Sustainability, m 12, 7553, 1–16, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/18/7553/pdf.

  • Waddock, S. & Waddell, S. (2021). Transformtion catalysts: Weaving transformational change for a flourishing world for all. Cadmus, may, 1 ff.

  • WEAll (Wellbeing Economy Alliance). 2020. WEAll, https://wellbeingeconomy.org/about, accessed, January 11, 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank WEAll (the Wellbeing Economy Alliance) for the generous use of their membership application data for this project.

Availability of Data and Material

The source data belong to an organization and were given to me for research use, so I cannot publish them.

Code Availability

Data were coded into NVivo, as explained in the article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The paper is solo authored.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Waddock.

Ethics declarations

Financial Interests

The author declares no financial interests resulting from this paper.

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests

The author declares no conflicts of interest or competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waddock, S. Wellbeing Economics Narratives for a Sustainable Future. Humanist Manag J 6, 151–167 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00107-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-021-00107-z

Keywords

Navigation