Abstract
The nuclear data of \({\text{n}}\,+\,^{240,242,244}\)Pu reactions for incident energy below 200 MeV are calculated and evaluated to meet the requirement in the design of an accelerator-driven subcritical system. The optical model is used to calculate the total, nonelastic, shape elastic cross sections, shape elastic scattering angular distributions, and transmission coefficients. The distorted-wave Born approximation is applied to calculate the direct inelastic scatterings to the discrete excited states. The nuclear reaction statistical models and fission theory are applied to describe neutron, proton, deuteron, triton, helium-3, alpha and \(\gamma\) emissions, and fission consistently. The results thus obtained are compared with experimental data and the evaluated data obtained from ENDF/B-VII.1 and JENDL-4.0.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.D. Bowman, E.D. Arthur, P.W. Lisowski et al., Nuclear energy generation and waste transmutation using an accelerator-driven intense thermal neutron source. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 320, 336–367 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(92)90795-6
A.J. Koning, J.-P. Delaroche, O. Bersillon, Nuclear data for accelerator driven systems: nuclear models, experiments and data libraries. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 414, 49–67 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)00528-2
H. Guo, Y. Han, T. Ye et al., Theoretical analysis and evaluation for neutron-induced reaction on \(^{239}\)Pu. Ann. Nucl. Energy 108, 151–162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.043
K. Shibata, O. Iwamoto, T. Nakagawa et al., JENDL-4.0: a new library for nuclear science and engineering. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 48, 1–30 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.2011.9711675
M.B. Chadwick, M. Herman, P. Oblozinsky et al., ENDF/B-VII.1 nuclear data for science and technology: cross sections, covariances, fission product yields and decay data. Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887–2996 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2011.11.002
Y. Han, Y. Xu, H. Liang et al., Global phenomenological optical model potential of nucleon-actinide reaction for energies up to 300 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 81, 024616 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.81.024616
P.D. Kunz, Distorted Wave Code DWUCK4 (University of Colorado, Denver, 1994)
J. Zhang, A unified Hauser-Feshbach and exciton model for calculating double-differential cross sections of neutron-induced reactions below 20 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 114, 55–63 (1993). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE93-3
W. Dilg, W. Schantl, H. Vonach, Level density parameters for the back-shifted fermi gas model in the mass range 40\(<\)A\(<\)250. Nucl. Phys. A 217, 269–298 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(73)90196-6
A. Iwamoto, K. Harada, Mechanism of cluster emission in nucleon-induced preequilibrium reactions. Phys. Rev. C 26, 1821–1834 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.26.1821
J. Zhang, S. Yan, C. Wang, The pick-up mechanism in composite particle emission processes. Z. Phys. A 344, 251–258 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01303018
A.V. Ignatyuk, G.N. Smirenkin, A.S. Tishin, Phenomenological description of the energy dependence of the level density parameter. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 255 (1975)
Q. Shen et al., Monte-Carlo calculations of nucleon emitted and energy deposition in cylindrical targets induced by intermediate energy protons, in The 2nd international conference on accelerator-driven transmutation technologies and applications, Kalmar, Sweden (1997) p. 686
C. Kalbach, F.M. Mann, Phenomenology of continuum angular distributions. I. Systematics and parametrization. Phys. Rev. C 23, 112–123 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.23.112
C. Kalbach, Systematics of continuum angular distributions: Extensions to higher energies. Phys. Rev. C 37, 2350–2370 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.37.2350
J. Zhang, UNF code for fast neutron reaction data calculations. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 142, 207–219 (2002). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE02-02
C. Cai, MEND: a program for calculating the complete set of nuclear data of medium-heavy nuclei in a medium-low energy region. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 153, 93 (2006). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE05-06CCA
Z. Wu, H. Liang, Y. Han, Theoretical calculations and evaluations of n+\(^{23}\)Na reaction. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 27, 102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0092-8
Y. Han, Y. Shi, Q. Shen, Deuteron global optical model potential for energies up to 200 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 74, 044615 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.044615
Y. Xu, H. Guo, Y. Han et al., Applicability of the systematic helium-3 potential for triton-nucleus reactions. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1550005 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301315500056
Y. Xu, H. Guo, Y. Han et al., Helium-3 global optical model potential with energies below 250 MeV. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 54, 2005 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-011-4488-5
X. Su, Y. Han, Global optical model potential for alpha projectile. Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 24, 1550092 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301315500925
A. Gilbert, A.G.W. Cameron, A composite nuclear-level density formula with shell corrections. Can. J. Phys. 43, 1446–1496 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1139/p65-139
N. Bohr, J.A. Wheeler, The mechanism of nuclear fission. Phys. Rev. 56, 426–450 (1939). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.426
D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Nuclear constitution and the interpretation of fission phenomena. Phys. Rev. 89, 1102–1145 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.1102
D.G. Madland, J.R. Nix, New calculation of prompt fission neutron spectra and average prompt neutron multiplicities. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 81, 213–271 (1982). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-5
A.B. Smith, J.F. Whalen, P. Lambropoulos, Fast neutron total and scattering cross sections of plutonium-240. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 47, 19–28 (1972). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A28417
W.P. Poenitz, J.F. Whalen, A.B. Smith, Total neutron cross sections of heavy nuclei. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 78, 333–341 (1981). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE81-A21367
W. P. Poenitz, J. F. Whalen, Neutron total cross section measurements in the energy region from 47 keV to 20 MeV. ANL-NDM-80 (1983)
A. B. Smith, P. T. Guenther, On neutron inelastic-scattering cross sections of \(^{232}\)Th, \(^{233}\)U, \(^{235}\)U, \(^{238}\)U, \(^{239}\)Pu and \(^{240}\)Pu. ANL-NDM-63 (1982)
R.W. Hockenbury, W.R. Moyer, R.C. Block, Neutron Capture, Fission, and Total Cross Sections of \(^{240}\)Pu from 20 eV to 30 keV. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 49, 153–161 (1972). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE72-A35503
F. Tovesson, T.S. Hill, M. Mocko et al., Neutron induced fission of \(^{240,242}\)Pu from 1 eV to 200 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 79, 014613 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.014613
A.B. Laptev, AYu. Donets, V.N. Dushin et al., Neutron-induced fission cross sections of \(^{240}\)Pu, \(^{243}\)Am, and \(^{Nat}\)W in the energy range 1–200 MeV, in Proceedings of International Conference Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Santa Fe (2004), pp. 865–869
A. V. Fomichev, V.N. Dushin, S.M. Soloviev et al., Neutron induced fission cross sections For \(^{240}\)Pu, \(^{243}\)Am, \(^{209}\)Bi, \(^{nat}\)W measured relative to \(^{235}\)U in the energy range 1-350 MeV. RI-262 (2004)
J.W. Behrens, R.S. Newbury, J.W. Magana, Measurements of the neutron-induced fission cross sections of \(^{240}\)Pu, \(^{242}\)Pu, and \(^{244}\)Pu relative to \(^{235}\)U from 0.1 to 30 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 66, 433–441 (1978). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE78-A27227
P. Staples, K. Morley, Neutron-induced fission cross section ratios for \(^{239}\)Pu, \(^{240}\)Pu, \(^{242}\)Pu, and \(^{244}\)Pu Relative to \(^{235}\)U from 0.5 to 400 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 129, 149–163 (1998). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE98-A1969
M. V. Savin, Yu.A. Khokhlov, Yu.S. Zamjatnin et al., The average number of prompt neutrons in fast neutron induced fission of \(^{235}\)U, \(^{239}\)Pu and \(^{240}\)Pu, in Nuclear Data for Reactors Conference, 2, Helsinki (1970), p. 157
J. Frehaut, G. Mosinski, R. Bois et al., Measurement of the average number, nu-bar, of the prompt neutrons emitted in the \(^{240}\)Pu and \(^{241}\)Pu fission induced by neutrons of energy between 1.5 and 15 MeV. CEA-R-4626 (1974)
V. G. Vorobeva, N.P. Dyachenko, B.D. Kuzminov et al., Determination of energy dependence of NU for uranium-238, plutonium-240 and plutonium-241 from an analysis of the fission energy balance. YK-15, 3 (1974)
Yu. A. Khokhlov, I.A. Ivanin, V.I. Inkov et al., Measurement results of average neutron multiplicity from neutron induced fission of actinides in 0.5–10 MeV energy range, in Proceedings of International Conference Nuclear Data for Science and Technology, Gatlinburg (1994), p. 272
T.E. Young, S.D. Reeder, Total neutron cross section of \(^{242}\)Pu. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 40, 389–395 (1970). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE70-A20190
M. S. Moore, P.W. Lisowski, G.L. Morgan et al., Total cross section of \(^{242}\)Pu between 0.7 and 170 MeV. in Conference on Nuclear Cross Sections for Technology, Knoxville (1979), p. 703
D. M. Drake, M. Drosg, P. Lisowski, et al., Neutron scattering cross sections for Pu-242. LA-7855 (1979)
G. Haouat, J. Lachkar, C.H. Lagrange et al., Neutron scattering cross sections for \(^{232}\)Th, \(^{233}\)U, \(^{235}\)U, \(^{238}\)U, \(^{239}\)Pu and \(^{242}\)Pu between 0.6 and 3.4 MeV. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 81, 491–511 (1982). https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE82-A21439
R. W. Hockenbury, A. J. Sanislo, N. N. Kaushal, keV capture cross section of \(^{242}\)Pu, in Conference on Nuclear Cross Sections and Technology, 2, Washington (1975), p. 584
M.Q. Buckner, C.Y. Wu, R.A. Henderson et al., Absolute measurement of the \(^{242}\)Pu neutron-capture cross section. Phys. Rev. C 93, 044613 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044613
P. Salvador-Castineira, T. Brys, R. Eykens et al., Neutron induced fission cross sections of \(^{242}\)Pu from 0.3 MeV to 3 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 92, 044606 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.044606
C. Matei, F. Belloni, J. Heyse et al., Absolute cross section measurements of neutron-induced fission of \(^{242}\)Pu from 1 to 2.5 MeV. Phys. Rev. C 95, 024606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024606
M.S. Moore, J.A. Wartena, H. Weigmann et al., Neutron induced fission cross section of \(^{244}\)Pu. Nucl. Phys. A 393, 1–14 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(83)90061-1
B. M. Gokhberg, S. M. Dubrovina, V. A. Shigin, Fast neutron fission cross-section of \(^{244}\)Pu. YFI-22, 10 (1976)
E. F. Fomushkin, B.K. Maslennikov, G.F. Novoselov et al., Fission Threshold Measurement of \(^{244}\)Pu by Neutrons. YFI-22, 11 (1976)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China-NSAF (No. U1630122) and IAEA Coordinated Research Projects (CRPs) on Recommended Input Parameter Library (RIPL) for Fission Cross Section Calculations (No. 20464).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guo, HR., Han, YL. & Cai, CH. Theoretical calculation and evaluation of n + 240,242,244Pu reactions. NUCL SCI TECH 30, 13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0533-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-018-0533-7