Abstract
With respect to the gamma spectrum, the energy resolution improves with increase in energy. The counts of full energy peak change with energy, and this approximately complies with the Gaussian distribution. This study mainly examines a method to deconvolve the LaBr3:Ce gamma spectrum with a detector response matrix constructing algorithm based on energy resolution calibration. In the algorithm, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of full energy peak was calculated by the cubic spline interpolation algorithm and calibrated by a square root of a quadratic function that changes with the energy. Additionally, the detector response matrix was constructed to deconvolve the gamma spectrum. Furthermore, an improved SNIP algorithm was proposed to eliminate the background. In the experiment, several independent peaks of 152Eu, 137Cs, and 60Co sources were detected by a LaBr3:Ce scintillator that were selected to calibrate the energy resolution. The Boosted Gold algorithm was applied to deconvolve the gamma spectrum. The results showed that the peak position difference between the experiment and the deconvolution was within ± 2 channels and the relative error of peak area was approximately within 0.96–6.74%. Finally, a 133Ba spectrum was deconvolved to verify the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithm in unfolding the overlapped peaks.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E.V.D. van Loef, P. Dorenbos, C.W.E. van Eijk et al., High-energy-resolution scintillator: Ce3+ activated LaBr 3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1573–1575 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1385342
K.S. Shah, J. Glodo, M. Klugerman et al., LaBr 3: Ce scintillators for gamma-ray spectroscopy. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 50, 2410–2413 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2003.820614
R. Nicolini, F. Camera, N. Blasi et al., Investigation of the properties of a 1″ × 1″ LaBr 3: Ce scintillator. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 582, 554–561 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2007.08.221
Z. Li, Y.W. Zhang, S.F. Sun et al., Study on response function model for γ-ray scintillation detector. At. Energy Sci. Technol. 49, 1354–1358 (2015). https://doi.org/10.7538/yzk.2015.49.08.1354. (in Chinese)
R. Shi, X.G. Tuo, H.L. Li et al., 239Pu alpha spectrum analysis based on PIPS detector response function and variations with vacuum and distance. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 28, 4–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0163-x
T.P. Li, M. Wu, Reconstruction of objects by direct demodulation. Astrophys. Space Sci. 215, 213–227 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00660079
L.B. Lucy, An iterative technique for the rectification of observed distributions. Astron. J. 79, 745–754 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1086/111605
M. Morháč, V. Matoušek, High-resolution boosted deconvolution of spectroscopic data. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, 1629–1640 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.09.005
M. Morháč, V. Matoušek, Complete positive deconvolution of spectrometric data. Digit. Signal Process. 19, 372–392 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsp.2008.06.002
M. Morháč, J. Kliman, V. Matoušek et al., Efficient one-and two-dimensional gold deconvolution and its application to γ-ray spectra decomposition. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 401, 385–408 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(97)01058-9
R. Gold, An iterative unfolding method for response matrices. Math. Comput. Res. Dev. Rep. 6984, 1–39 (1964). https://doi.org/10.2172/4634295
M. Morháč, Deconvolution methods and their applications in the analysis of γ-ray spectra. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 559, 119–123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2005.11.129
L. Li, X.G. Tuo, M.Z. Liu et al., High-resolution boosted reconstruction of γ-ray spectra. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 25, 18–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.25.050202
X.Y. Ai, Y.X. Wei, W.Y. Xiao, Direct demodulation method for γ spectra analysis detected by CZT detectors. J. Tsinghua Univ. Sci. Technol. 46, 821–824 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0054.2006.06.018. (in Chinese)
M. Jandel, M. Morháč, J. Kliman et al., Decomposition of continuum γ-ray spectra using synthesized response matrix. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 516, 172–183 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2003.07.047
C.M. Salgado, C.C. Conti, P.H.B. Becker, Determination of HPGe detector response using MCNP5 for 20–150 keV X-rays. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 64, 700–705 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2005.12.011
Z. Li, X.G. Tuo, R. Shi et al., A statistical approach to fit Gaussian part of full-energy peaks from Si (PIN) and SDD X-ray spectrometers. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 19–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-013-5427-7
M. Morháč, V. Matoušek, J. Kliman, Efficient algorithm of multidimensional deconvolution and its application to nuclear data processing. Digit. Signal Process. 13, 144–171 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1051-2004(02)00011-8
P. Bandžuch, M. Morháč, J. Krištiak, Study of the Van Cittert and Gold iterative methods of deconvolution and their application in the deconvolution of experimental spectra of positron annihilation. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 384, 506–515 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(96)00874-1
Z. Li, X.G. Tuo, R. Shi et al., Analytic fitting and simulation methods for characteristic X-ray peaks from Si-PIN detector. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 24, 060206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.13538/j.1001-8042/nst.2013.06.007
Z. Li, X.G. Tuo, J.B. Yang et al., Statistical distribution based detector response function of a Si (PIN) detector for Kα and Kβ X-ray. Chin. Phys. C 37, 018202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/37/1/018202
P. Dorenbos, J.T.M. de Haas, C.W.E. van Eijk, Non-proportionality in the scintillation response and the energy resolution obtainable with scintillation crystals. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 42, 2190–2202 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/23.489415
M. Moszyński, W. Czarnacki, W. Klamra et al., Intrinsic energy resolution of pure NaI studied with large area avalanche photodiodes at liquid nitrogen temperatures. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 505, 63–67 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(03)01021-0
M. Moszynski, J. Zalipska, M. Balcerzyk et al., Intrinsic energy resolution of NaI(Tl). Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 484, 259–269 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)01964-7
C.G. Ryan, E. Clayton, W.L. Griffin et al., SNIP: a statistics-sensitive background treatment for the quantitative analysis of PIXE spectra in geoscience applications. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 34, 396–402 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(88)90063-8
M. Morháč, V. Matoušek, Peak clipping algorithms for background estimation in spectroscopic data. Appl. Spectrosc. 62, 91–106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1366/000370208783412762
M. Morháč, An algorithm for determination of peak regions and baseline elimination in spectroscopic data. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 600, 478–487 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2008.11.132
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41374130 and 41604154).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, R., Tuo, XG., Li, HL. et al. Unfolding analysis of LaBr3:Ce gamma spectrum with a detector response matrix constructing algorithm based on energy resolution calibration. NUCL SCI TECH 29, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0340-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-017-0340-6