Skip to main content
Log in

“Current-IPM-Fit”: a new proposal for enhanced efficacy labelling of plant protection products

  • Opinion Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 July 2019

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the European Union, plant protection products (PPP) undergo an intensive evaluation procedure including toxicology, ecotoxicology, fate and residues for approval of the active substance. On product level, additionally the efficacy against pests and adverse effects on pest antagonists and on the cultivated plant itself, i.e. phytotoxicity, are evaluated. Currently, a development towards a two-class classification system takes place in which PPP with low impact in risk categories (“low-risk products”) can be approved with reduced efficacy requirements. Other parallel registration pathways that include limited or no evaluation of efficacy exist for basic substances and minor-use registrations. Nevertheless, registration of a product does not give information of its efficacy level in many European countries. The situation for the effects of PPP on antagonists of practical relevance in growing systems is similar: up to date, there is a lack of information on relevant antagonists because the evaluation and registration process include mostly information about the standard indicator organisms Typhlodromus pyri and Aphidius rhopalosiphi. As a consequence, information on efficacy levels on target pests and side effect levels on relevant pest antagonists are to date mainly provided by private companies, mainly PPP-producing companies and beneficial organisms-producing companies. Unfortunately, it is not transparent on which observations and experiments these ratings base on, i.e. these ratings do not undergo an independent evaluation process. But verified knowledge on efficacy and side effects on relevant antagonists are vital for successful IPM strategies. Both, efficacy and side effects on pest antagonists must be considered together in order to foresee the outcome of a PPP application in an agricultural system. Therefore, the aim of this opinion paper is to propose a standardized European labelling system that displays efficacy levels and side effect levels on beneficial arthropods other than bees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 24 July 2019

    In the original publication, old version of Table 1 was included by mistake. The correct version of Table 1 is given here.

References

  • BAES (2018) Bundesamt für Ernährungssicherheit. https://www.baes.gv.at/fachmeldungen/details//neue-angaben-zur-wirksamkeit-von-pflanzenschutzmitteln-in-der-zulassung-zur-befallsminderung-und-nur/. Accessed 14 May 2019

  • Barzman M, Bàrberi P, Birch ANE, Boonekamp P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S, Graf B, Hommel B, Jensen JE, Kiss J, Kudsk P, Lamichhane JR, Messéan A, Moonen AC, Ratnadass A, Ricci P, Sarah J-L, Sattin M (2015) Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron Sustain Dev 35(4):1199–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biobest (2019). https://www.biobestgroup.com/en/side-effect-manual. Accessed 18 Jan 2019

  • BMEL (2016) Reducing risks & creating confidence. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture. www.bmel.de. Accessed 25 Apr 2016

  • EU Council (2016) Acceleration of sustainable plant production; AGRI 320 PHYTOSAN 12-PESTICIDE 1; 10041/1/16 REV 1

  • EC (2009): Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Official Journal of the European Union L 309, 21.10.2009, pp 1–50

  • EPPO (2019) EPPO Standards. https://www.eppo.int/RESOURCES/eppo_standards. Accessed 22 May 2019

  • EU (2013a) Commission Regulation (EU) No 283/2013—Data requirements for active substances, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union L 93, 3.4.2013, pp 1–84

  • EU (2013b) Commission Regulation (EU) No 284/2013—Data requirements for plant protection products, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union L 93, 3.4.2013, pp 85–151

  • EU Commission (2016) Working document SANTE/12376/2015 amending Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market as regards the criteria for the approval of low-risk active substances. Ares (2016)6239720-03/11/2016

  • EU Parliament and Council (2009) Directive 2009/128/EC establishing a framework for Community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides; Official Journal of the European Union L 309/71-86

  • Feldmann F, Carstensen C (2018) J Plant Dis Prot 125:517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0186-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSE (2017) Efficacy assessments: UK product labelling and national issues/addenda. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/efficacy-guides.htm. Accessed 22 Jan 2017

  • IOBC-WPRS (2019) IOBC-WPRS pesticide side effect database. https://www.iobc-wprs.org/ip_ipm/IOBC_Pesticide_Side_Effect_Database.html. Accessed 22 May 2019

  • Koppert (2018). https://www.koppert.com/side-effects/explanation-of-the-side-effects-database/. Accessed 10 Jan 2018

  • Matyjaszczyk E (2019) Problems of implementing compulsory integrated pest management. Pest Management Science (early view). https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OEPP, EPPO (2017a) PP 1/214(4) Principles of acceptable efficacy. OEPP/EPPO Bull 47(3):293–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OEPP, EPPO (2017b) PP 1/296 (1) Principles of efficacy evaluation for low-risk plant protection products. Bull OEPP/EPPO Bull 1:1–8

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank several anonymous reviewers for their critical and very valuable comments on this publication. This work does not necessarily reflect the view of all specialized Institutes within the JKI and in no way anticipates the JKI’s future policy in this area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Böckmann.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original version of this article was revised: In the original publication, old version of Table 1 was included and this has been updated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Böckmann, E., Feldmann, F. & Vogler, U. “Current-IPM-Fit”: a new proposal for enhanced efficacy labelling of plant protection products. J Plant Dis Prot 126, 385–389 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-019-00237-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-019-00237-5

Keywords

Navigation