Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and risks of “biorationals”

  • Perspectives Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The following texts summarize the different perspectives of participants of the 8th International Symposium Plant Protection and Plant Health in Europe in Braunschweig, December 13 and 14, 2017, on “biorationals.” The aims of the symposium were to develop a critical perspective on the current risk and efficacy evaluation of “biorationals” and to evaluate the current classification system of “biorationals” via “mode of action” versus “applicant’s intention.” Furthermore, the event highlighted experiences with “acceptable” efficacy in pest management strategies balancing negative and positive effects and pointed out impediments to introduce “biorationals” into practice under the existing Sustainable Use Directive 2009/128. The results of the presentations and discussions are reported here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barzman M, Bàrberi P, Birch ANE, Boonekamp P, Dachbrodt-Saaydeh S, Graf B, Bernd H, Jensen JE, Kiss J, Kudsk P, Lamichhane JR, Messéan A, Moonen AC, Ratnadass A, Ricci P, Sarah JL, Sattin M (2015) Eight principles of integrated pest management. Agron Sustain Dev 35(4):1199–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deising HB (2018) Revisiting wishful thinking: the need of molecular tools to accurately assess the risks associated with microbial biocontrol agents. J Plant Dis Prot 125:131–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Deising HB, Gase I, Kubo Y (2017) The unpredictable risk imposed by microbial secondary metabolites: how safe is biological control of plant diseases? J Plant Dis Prot 124:413–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldmann F (2017): Efficacy and risks of “biorationals” in organic and integrated pest management—acceptable?. In: Book of Abstracts of the 8th international symposium plant protection and plant health in Europe, 13–14 December 2017, Braunschweig, Germany. urn:nbn:de:0294-PMO-PPPHE-2017-4

  • HSE (2017) Efficacy assessments: UK product labelling and national issues/addenda. http://www.hse.gov.uk/pesticides/topics/pesticide-approvals/pesticides-registration/efficacy-guides.htm. 22 Jan 2017

  • IBMA (International Biocontrol Manufacturers Association) (2018) Comments of IBMA on the results of 8th international symposium 13./14.12.2017 in Braunschweig. http://plant-protection.net/fileadmin/Tagungen/PPPHE/2017/Documents/IBMA_Comment.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2018

  • Koch E, Becker O, Berg G, Hauschild R, Jehle J, Köhl J, Smalla K (2018) Biocontrol of plant diseases is not an unsafe technology! J Plant Dis Prot 125:121–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugtenberg B (2018) Putting concerns for caution into perspective: microbial plant protection products are safe to use in agriculture. J Plant Dis Prot 125:127–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Moerschbacher BM (2017). Towards chitosans as dual-use biostimulants. http://plant-protection.net/de/ppphe/. Accessed 12 April 2018

Download references

Funding

This symposium was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (Grant No. 394722738).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Falko Feldmann.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feldmann, F., Carstensen, C. Efficacy and risks of “biorationals”. J Plant Dis Prot 125, 517–521 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0186-0

Keywords

Navigation