Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graphene oxide MgFe2O4 nanocomposites for Cr(VI) remediation: a comparative modeling study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article describes the synthesis and application of magnesium ferrite nanoparticles (MgFe2O4 NPs) and engineered MgFe2O4 nanocomposites (NCs) by graphene oxide as green and easy separable magnetic adsorbents in removal of Cr(VI) from environmental pollutant. The statistical study of the adsorption process and optimization was accomplished with central composite design method of response surface methodology (RSM) approach. The optimum conditions, predicted by RSM, were achieved at pH, contact time, initial Cr(VI) concentration and adsorbent dosage of 2, 60 min, 40 mg L−1 and 0.15 g, respectively. The removal of Cr(VI) under optimum situations was 97%, and the achieved result in practice was found to be 99%. Pareto analysis suggests the importance relative order of the factors as: pH > concentration of Cr(VI) > time > adsorbent dosage under optimized situations. The engineered nanocomposite was further analyzed for real groundwater samples, and 92% Cr(VI) remediation was resulted. The study is the first study for efficient Cr(VI) remediation from real groundwater sample using novel engineered nanocomposites and has potential to have societal as well as industrial impact in the form of process or product development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig.5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serrano-Gómez J, Olguiin MT (2015) Separation of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by adsorption on the microfungus Ustilago maydis. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:2559–2566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Martinez LJ, Munoz-Bonilla A, Mazario E, Recio FJ, Palomares FJ, Herrasti P (2015) Adsorption of chromium (VI) onto electrochemically obtained magnetite nanoparticles. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:4017–4024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lan C-R, Tseng C-L, Yang M-H, Alfassi ZB (1991) Two-step coprecipitation method for differentiating chromium species in water followed by determination of chromium by neutron activation analysis. Analyst 116:35–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yusof AM, Malek NANN (2009) Removal of Cr(VI) and As (V) from aqueous solutions by HDTMA-modified zeolite Y. J Hazard Mater 162:1019–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mädler S, Todd A, Pamuku M, Sun F, Tat C, Tooley RJ, Switzer TA, Furdui VI (2016) Ultra-trace level speciated isotope dilution measurement of Cr(VI) using ion chromatography tandem mass spectrometry in environmental waters. Talanta 156:104–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu J, Lo IMC, Chen G (2005) Fast removal and recovery of Cr(VI) using surface-modified jacobsite (MnFe2O4) nanoparticles. Langmuir 21:11173–11179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahadir Z, Bulut VN, Hidalgo M, Soylak M, Margui E (2016) Cr speciation in water samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 115:46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Diao Z-H, Xu X-R, Chen H, Jiang D, Yang Y-X, Kong L-J, Sun Y-X, Hu Y-X, Hao Q-W, Liu L (2016) Simultaneous removal of Cr(VI) and phenol by persulfate activated with bentonite-supported nanoscale zero-valent iron: reactivity and mechanism. J Hazard Mater 316:186–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhitkovich A (2011) Chromium in drinking water: sources, metabolism, and cancer risks. Chem Res Toxicol 24:1617–1629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rengaraj S, Joo CK, Kim Y, Yi J (2003) Kinetics of removal of chromium from water and electronic process wastewater by ion exchange resins: 1200H, 1500H and IRN97H. J Hazard Mater 102:257–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Uysal M, Ar I (2007) Removal of Cr(VI) from industrial wastewaters by adsorption: part I: determination of optimum conditions. J Hazard Mater 149:482–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manage 92:407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gheju M, Balcu I (2011) Removal of chromium from Cr(VI) polluted wastewaters by reduction with scrap iron and subsequent precipitation of resulted cations. J Hazard Mater 196:131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Barkat M, Nibou D, Chegrouche S, Mellah A (2009) Kinetics and thermodynamics studies of chromium (VI) ions adsorption onto activated carbon from aqueous solutions. Chem Eng Process Process Intensif 48:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rengaraj S, Yeon K-H, Moon S-H (2001) Removal of chromium from water and wastewater by ion exchange resins. J Hazard Mater 87:273–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abubakar Sani H, Ahmada MB, Saleh TA (2016) Synthesis of zinc oxide/talc nanocomposite for enhanced lead adsorption from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv 110:108819–108827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Saleh TA, Sari A, Tuzen M (2017) Effective adsorption of antimony (III) from aqueous solutions by polyamide-graphene composite as a novel adsorbent. Chem Eng J 307:230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saleh TA (2016) Nanocomposite of carbon nanotubes/silica nanoparticles and their use for adsorption of Pb (II): from surface properties to sorption mechanism. Desalin Water Treat 57:10730–10744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gore CT, Omwoma S, Chen W, Song Y-F (2016) Interweaved LDH/PAN nanocomposite films: application in the design of effective hexavalent chromium adsorption technology. Chem Eng J 284:794–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu C, Liu G, Yu Q, Pfeffer R, Dave RN, Nam CH (2004) Sound assisted fluidization of nanoparticle agglomerates. Powder Technol 141:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang L, Li J, Wang Y, Zhao L, Jiang Q (2012) Adsorption capability for Congo red on nanocrystalline MFe 2 O 4 (M=Mn, Fe Co, Ni) spinel ferrites. Chem Eng J 181:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei J, Zhang X, Liu Q, Li Z, Liu L, Wang J (2014) Magnetic separation of uranium by CoFe2 O4 hollow spheres. Chem Eng J 241:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma YC, Srivastava V, Singh VK, Kaul SN, Weng CH (2009) Nano-adsorbents for the removal of metallic pollutants from water and wastewater. Environ Technol 30:583–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Omer MIM, Elbadawi AA, Yassin OA (2013) Synthesis and structural properties of MgFe2O4 ferrite nano-particles. J Appl Ind Sci 1:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Chakraborty AR, Ramalingam C, Shanker R, Kumar A (2016) Nanoagriculture and water quality management. Nanosci Food Agric 1(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dasgupta N, Ranjan S, Ramalingam C (2017) Applications of nanotechnology in agriculture and water quality management. Environ Chem Lett 15(4):591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Saleh AA, Gupta VK (2016) Nanomaterial and polymer membranes, synthesis, characterization, and applications, 1st edn. Netherland, Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saleh A A (217) Advanced nanomaterials for water engineering, treatment, and hydraulics, 1st ed., IGI

  29. Lingamdinne LP, Koduru JR, Choi Y-L, Chang Y-Y, Yang J-K (2016) Studies on removal of Pb (II) and Cr (III) using graphene oxide based inverse spinel nickel ferrite nano-composite as sorbent. Hydrometallurgy 165:64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Babu Maddinedi S, Mandal BK, Patil SH, Andhalkar VV, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N (2017) Diastase induced green synthesis of bilayered reduced graphene oxide and its decoration with gold nanoparticles. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 166:252–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Essandoh M, Wolgemuth D, Pittman CU, Mohan D, Mlsna T (2017) Adsorption of metribuzin from aqueous solution using magnetic and nonmagnetic sustainable low-cost biochar adsorbents. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:4577–4590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Virkutyte J, Rokhina E, Jegatheesan V (2010) Optimisation of Electro-Fenton denitrification of a model wastewater using a response surface methodology. Bioresour Technol 101:1440–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zabeti M, Daud WMAW, Aroua MK (2009) Optimization of the activity of CaO/Al2 O3 catalyst for biodiesel production using response surface methodology. Appl Catal A Gen 366:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Garg UK, Kaur MP, Sud D, Garg VK (2009) Removal of hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sugarcane bagasse using response surface methodological approach. Desalination 249:475–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reddy KJ, McDonald KJ, King H (2013) A novel arsenic removal process for water using cupric oxide nanoparticles. J Colloid Interface Sci 397:96–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pradeep A, Priyadharsini P, Chandrasekaran G (2008) Sol-gel route of synthesis of nanoparticles of MgFe2O4 and XRD, FTIR and VSM study. J Magn Magn Mater 320:2774–2779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Reddy S, Swamy BEK, Chandra U, Mahathesha KR, Sathisha TV, Jayadevappa H (2011) Synthesis of MgFe2O4 nanoparticles and MgFe2O4 nanoparticles/CPE for electrochemical investigation of dopamine. Anal Methods 3:2792–2796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hu J, Lo IMC, Chen G (2007) Comparative study of various magnetic nanoparticles for Cr(VI) removal. Sep Purif Technol 56:249–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khataee AR, Safarpour M, Naseri A, Zarei M (2012) Photoelectro-Fenton/nanophotocatalysis decolorization of three textile dyes mixture: response surface modeling and multivariate calibration procedure for simultaneous determination. J Electroanal Chem 672:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu D, Zhou J, Li Y (2009) Effect of the sulfidation process on the mechanical properties of a CoMoP/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst. Chem Eng Sci 64:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Deng H, Lu J, Li G, Zhang G, Wang X (2011) Adsorption of methylene blue on adsorbent materials produced from cotton stalk. Chem Eng J 172:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Adinarayana K, Ellaiah P (2002) Response surface optimization of the critical medium components for the production of alkaline protease by a newly isolated Bacillus sp. J Pharm Pharm Sci 5:272–278

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dehghani MH, Sanaei D, Ali I, Bhatnagar A (2016) Removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution using treated waste newspaper as a low-cost adsorbent: kinetic modeling and isotherm studies. J Mol Liq 215:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Malwade K, Lataye D, Mhaisalkar V, Kurwadkar S, Ramirez D (2016) Adsorption of hexavalent chromium onto activated carbon derived from Leucaena leucocephala waste sawdust: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. Int J Environ Sci Technol 13:2107–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dubey S, Upadhyay SN, Sharma YC (2016) Optimization of removal of Cr by γ-alumina nano-adsorbent using response surface methodology. Ecol Eng 97:272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Verma A, Chakraborty S, Basu JK (2006) Adsorption study of hexavalent chromium using tamarind hull-based adsorbents. Sep Purif Technol 50:336–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Hashemi L, Morsali A (2014) A new lead (II) nanoporous three-dimensional coordination polymer: pore size effect on iodine adsorption affinity. CrystEngComm 16:4955–4958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hashemi FSM, Prasittichai C, Bent SF (2014) A new resist for area selective atomic and molecular layer deposition on metal-dielectric patterns. J Phys Chem C 118:10957–10962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mirzayi B, Shayan NN (2014) Adsorption kinetics and catalytic oxidation of asphaltene on synthesized maghemite nanoparticles. J Pet Sci Eng 121:134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Peng Z, Xiong C, Wang W, Tan F, Xu Y, Wang X, Qiao X (2017) Facile modification of nanoscale zero-valent iron with high stability for Cr(VI) remediation. Sci Total Environ 596–597:266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Setshedi KZ, Bhaumik M, Onyango MS, Maity A (2015) High-performance towards Cr(VI) removal using multi-active sites of polypyrrole-graphene oxide nanocomposites: batch and column studies. Chem Eng J 262:921–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.10.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Khare P, Yadav A, Ramkumar J, Verma N (2016) Microchannel-embedded metal-carbon-polymer nanocomposite as a novel support for chitosan for efficient removal of hexavalent chromium from water under dynamic conditions. Chem Eng J 293:44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dima JB, Sequeiros C, Zaritzky NE (2015) Hexavalent chromium removal in contaminated water using reticulated chitosan micro/nanoparticles from seafood processing wastes. Chemosphere 141:100–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Gokila S, Gomathi T, Sudha PN, Anil S (2017) Removal of the heavy metal ion chromiuim(VI) using Chitosan and Alginate nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol 104:1459–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Chávez-Guajardo AE, Medina-Llamas JC, Maqueira L, Andrade CAS, Alves KGB, de Melo CP (2015) Efficient removal of Cr(VI) and Cu(II) ions from aqueous media by use of polypyrrole/maghemite and polyaniline/maghemite magnetic nanocomposites. Chem Eng J 281:826–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bhaumik M, Agarwal S, Gupta VK, Maity A (2016) Enhanced removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using polypyrrole wrapped oxidized MWCNTs nanocomposites adsorbent. J Colloid Interface Sci 470:257–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Chauke VP, Maity A, Chetty A (2015) High-performance towards removal of toxic hexavalent chromium from aqueous solution using graphene oxide-alpha cyclodextrin-polypyrrole nanocomposites. J Mol Liq 211:71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2015.06.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Guan X, Yan S, Xu Z, Fan H (2017) Gallic acid-conjugated iron oxide nanocomposite: an efficient, separable, and reusable adsorbent for remediation of Al (III)-contaminated tannery wastewater. J Environ Chem Eng 5:479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Grewal JK, Kaur M (2017) Effect of core-shell reversal on the structural, magnetic and adsorptive properties of Fe2O3-GO nanocomposites. Ceram Int 43:16611–16621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.09.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kalidhasan S, Santhana Krishna Kumar A, Rajesh V, Rajesh N (2016) The journey traversed in the remediation of hexavalent chromium and the road ahead toward greener alternatives-A perspective. Coord Chem Rev 317:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sherlala A, Raman A, Bello M, Asghar A (2018) A review of the applications of organo-functionalized magnetic graphene oxide nanocomposites for heavy metal adsorption. Chemosphere 193:1004–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Especial thanks to Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative Council for the encouraging support. SR and ND are acknowledging Director, Indian Institute of Food Processing Technology, for constant encouragement and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

    Seyed Ali Hosseini & Sahar Talebipour

  2. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Zanjan University, Zanjan, Iran

    Mahmoud Reza Neyestani

  3. R&D and Technology Development, E-Spin Nanotech Pvt Ltd, SIDBI Incubation Center, IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208016, India

    Shivendu Ranjan

  4. Nano-food Research Group, School of Bio Sciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

    Nandita Dasgupta

Authors
  1. Seyed Ali Hosseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sahar Talebipour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahmoud Reza Neyestani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shivendu Ranjan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nandita Dasgupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Seyed Ali Hosseini, Shivendu Ranjan or Nandita Dasgupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hosseini, S.A., Talebipour, S., Neyestani, M.R. et al. Graphene oxide MgFe2O4 nanocomposites for Cr(VI) remediation: a comparative modeling study. Nanotechnol. Environ. Eng. 3, 10 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-018-0039-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-018-0039-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation