Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Strength and permeability potentials of cement-modified desert sand for roads construction purpose

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The costs associated with the transportation and manufacture of crushed fine aggregate (CFA) as a material for base and subbase layers in roads construction creates a need for a good view of strategies that can take advantage of local materials, such as natural desert sand (NDS). NDS is not normally considered to be of sufficient quality for road construction, mainly because of less cohesion between particles and low bearing capacity under traffic loads. However, when it is mixed with CFA and a small amount of ordinary Portland cement (OPC), project costs can be limited while creating an exceptional quality for road constructions. This experimental research builds on previous studies that evaluated the optimal ratio of NDS by percentages of CFA. In addition, this paper examines the optimal percentage of OPC in the fine aggregate mix. The percentages tested were 0, 3, 5, and 7% of OPC. The tests carried out by California bearing ratio (CBR), compaction, permeability, unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and shear strength parameters. Finally, the UCS test was critical in determining that OPC improved the mixture’s mechanical properties. Other important factors that substantially impact mechanical properties, were cement percentage, curing time, dry density, and moisture content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CFA:

Crushed fine aggregate

NDS:

Natural desert sand

OPC:

Ordinary Portland cement

CBR:

California bearing ratio

UCS:

Unconfined compressive strength

XRF:

X-ray fluorescence

MDD:

Maximum dry density

OMC:

Optimum moisture content

k :

Hydraulic conductivity for saturated soils

Ø°:

Friction angle

C :

Apparent undrained shear strength or apparent cohesion

µ :

Poisson’s ratio

References

  1. Little DN (1998) Evaluation of structural properties of lime stabilized soils and aggregates. National Lime Association, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kalantari B, Huat BBK (2008) Peat soil stabilization, using ordinary Portland cement, polypropylene fibers, and air curing technique. Electron J Geotech Eng 13:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haeri SM, Hosseini SM, Toll DG, Yasrebi SS (2005) The behaviour of an artificially cemented sandy gravel. Geotech Geol Eng 23(5):537–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-5110-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnaid F, Prietto PDM, Consoli NC (2001) Characterization of cemented sand in triaxial compression. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(10):857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Onyelowe KC (2016) Ordinary Portland cement stabilization of engineering soil using coconut shell and husk ash as admixture. Int J Innov Stud Sci Eng Technol 2:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  6. Magafu FF, Li W (2010) Utilization of local available materials to stabilize native soil (earth roads) in Tanzania—case study Ngara. Engineering 2(07):516–519. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2010.27068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen JM, Senstad PK (1992) Effects of tire pressures on flexible pavement structures; a literature survey. Publication 62. ISSN: 0781–5816.

  8. Consoli NC, Foppa D, Festugato L, Heineck KS (2007) Key parameters for strength control of artificially cemented soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 133(2):197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lo SR, Wardani SPR (2002) Strength and dilatancy of a silt stabilized by a cement and fly ash mixture. Can Geotech J 39(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. da Fonseca AV, Cruz RC, Consoli NC (2009) Strength properties of sandy soil–cement admixtures. Geotech Geol Eng 27(6):681–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joel M, Agbede IO (2010) Cement stabilization of Igumale shale lime admixture for use as flexible pavement construction material. Electron J Geotech Eng 15:1661–1673

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abbasi N, Bahramloo R, Movahedan M (2015) Strategic planning for remediation and optimization of irrigation and drainage networks: a case study for Iran. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 4:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baghini MS, Bin Ismail A, Bin Karim MR, Shokri F, Firoozi AA (2017) Effects on engineering properties of cement-treated road base with slow setting bitumen emulsion. Int J Pavement Eng 18(3):202–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xuan DX, Houben LJM, Molenaar AAA, Shui ZH (2012) Mechanical properties of cement-treated aggregate material—a review. Mater Des 33:496–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Molenaar AA, Xuan D, Houben LJM, Shui Z (2011) Prediction of the mechanical characteristics of cement treated demolition waste for road bases and subbases. In: Proceedings of the 10th conference on asphalt pavements for Southern Africa, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

  16. M. O. T. China (2000) Technical specifications for construction of highway roadbases. JTJ 034-2000

  17. Linares-Unamunzaga A, Pérez-Acebo H, Rojo M, Gonzalo-Orden H (2019) Flexural strength prediction models for soil–cement from unconfined compressive strength at seven days. Materials (Basel) 12(3):387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Little DN, Nair S (2009) Recommended practice for stabilization of subgrade soils and base materials. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.574.8248&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  19. A. International (2004) Annual book of ASTM standards. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  20. Aa. Highway and T. Officials (1993) AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Aashto, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haralambos SI (2009) Compressive strength of soil improved with cement. In: Contemporary topics in ground modification, problem soils, and geo-support, pp 289–296

  22. Firoozi AA, Olgun CG, Firoozi AA, Baghini MS (2017) Fundamentals of soil stabilization. Int J Geoeng 8(1):26

    Google Scholar 

  23. Consoli NC, Vendruscolo MA, Fonini A, Dalla Rosa F (2009) Fiber reinforcement effects on sand considering a wide cementation range. Geotext Geomembr 27(3):196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Consoli NC, Cruz RC, Floss MF, Festugato L (2009) Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(5):759–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Aghbari MY, Mohamedzein Y-A, Taha R (2009) Stabilisation of desert sands using cement and cement dust. Proc Inst Civ Eng Improv 162(3):145–151

    Google Scholar 

  26. ASTM D1557-12e1 (2012) Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  27. ASTM D1883-16 (2016) Standard test method for California bearing ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  28. ASTM D2166/D2166M-16 (2016) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  29. ASTM D7181-11 (2011) Method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. www.astm.org

  30. ASTM D7664-10 (2018) e1, standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010. www.astm.org

  31. Lade PV, Liggio CD, Yamamuro JA (1998) Effects of non-plastic fines on minimum and maximum void ratios of sand. Geotech Test J 21(4):336–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering and Construction, École de Technologie Supérieure (ÉTS), University of Québec, 1100 Rue Notre-Dame Ouest, Montreal, QC, H3C, Canada

    Talal S. Amhadi & Gabriel J. Assaf

Authors
  1. Talal S. Amhadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gabriel J. Assaf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talal S. Amhadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amhadi, T.S., Assaf, G.J. Strength and permeability potentials of cement-modified desert sand for roads construction purpose. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00327-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00327-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation