Skip to main content
Log in

Load–Displacement Behavior of Driven Piles in Sand Using CPT-Based Stress and Strain Fields

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bearing capacity of piles is often estimated by a variety of methods such as the limit equilibrium or the limit analysis. In contrast, the load–displacement behavior, which should not be disregarded in common practices, cannot be obtained as simply as the bearing capacity. The reason is its dependency on the stress and the strain (or the displacement) fields around the pile. In the current work, attempt has been made to predict the load–displacement behavior of driven piles in sand by direct and indirect implementation of the cone penetration test (CPT) data into the displacement field. CPT often serves as a very successful in situ test which provides a close link between the soil resistance and the bearing capacity, although it brings no direct information. A rather simple procedure is presented to indirectly use the CPT data to find the stress and strain fields. While the pattern of the failure mechanism has been obtained by the method of stress characteristics, the displacement (and strain) field has been found by the kinematics of the failure mechanism. The proposed procedure has been calibrated and verified by 98 case histories including pile load test results in conjunction with CPT data. Comparisons made by this new method show that the CPT-based method of stress characteristics can be successfully used in load–displacement prediction of driven piles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CFEM (2012) Canadian foundation engineering manual, 4th edn. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fellenius BH (2018) Basics of foundation design—a textbook. Electronic Edition, p 451. http://www.Fellenius.net

  3. Fellenius BH (1988) Unified design of piles and pile groups. Transportation Research Board, TRB Record 1169, Washington D.C, pp 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen JJ, Zhang L (2013) Effect of spatial correlation of cone tip resistance on the bearing capacity of piles. J Geotech Geoenviron ASCE 139:494–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moshfeghi S, Eslami A (2016) Study on pile ultimate capacity criteria and CPT-based direct methods. Int J Geotech Eng 12:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baziar MH, Kashkooli A, Saeedi-Azizkandi A (2012) Prediction of pile shaft resistance using cone penetration tests (CPTs). Comput Geotech 45:74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eslami A, Valikhah F, Veiskarami M, Salehi M (2017) CPT-based investigation for pile toe and shaft resistances distribution. Geotech Geol Eng 13:2891–2905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Battaglio M, Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Maniscalco R (1981) Piezometer probe test in cohesive deposits. In: ASCE, geotechnical division, symposium on cone penetration testing and experience, pp 264–302

  9. Robertson PK, Campanella RG (1983) Interpretation of cone penetration tests. Part I: sand. Can. Geotech J 20:718–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sokolovski VV (1960) Statics of soil media (Translated by D.H. Morton-Jones and A.N. Schofield). Butterworths, London, p 237

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martin CM, Houlsby GT (2001) Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modeling. Géotechnique 51:687–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar J (2009) The variation of with footing roughness using the method of characteristics. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 33:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Veiskarami M, Eslami A, Kumar J (2011) End bearing capacity of driven piles in sand using the stress characteristics method: analysis and implementation. Can Geotech J 48:1570–1586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Veiskarami M, Kumar J, Valikhah F (2014) Effect of the flow rule on the bearing capacity of strip foundations on sand by the upper-bound limit analysis and slip lines. Int J Geomech ASCE, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Veiskarami M, Kumar J, Valikhah F (2015) A practical procedure to estimate the bearing capacity of footings on sand—application to 87 case studies. IJSTC Trans Civ Eng 39(C2+):469–483

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bolton MD, Lau CK (1993) Vertical bearing capacity factors for circular and strip footings on Mohr–Coulomb soil. Can Geotech J 30:1024–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Veiskarami M, Zanj A (2014) Stability of sheet-pile walls subjected to seepage flow by slip lines and finite elements. Géotechnique 64(10):759–775. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.14.P.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Larkin LA (1968) Theoretical bearing capacity of very shallow footings. J Soil Mech Founda Div (ASCE) 94(6):1347–1360

    Google Scholar 

  19. Drescher A, Detournay E (1993) Limit load in translational failure mechanisms for associative and non-associative materials. Géotechnique 43:443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis EH (1968) Theories of plasticity and the failure of soil masses. In: Lee IK (ed) Soil mechanics: selected topics. Butterworth & Co Publishers Ltd., London, pp 341–380

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rowe PW (1969) The relation between the shear strength of sands in triaxial compression, plane strain and direct shear. Géotechnique 19:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowles JE (1996) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kulhawy FH, Mayne PW (1990) Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design, Electric Power Research Institute EL-6800, Project 1493-6. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jardine RJ, Standing JR (2000) Pile load testing performed for HSE cyclic loading study at Dunkirk, France. Offshore Technology Report OTO 2000 007, vol 2. Health and Safety Executive, London, p 60, 200

  25. Lutenegger AJ, Kelley SP (2000) Tension tests on driven piles in sand. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on deep foundations, pp 219–225

  26. Fellenius BH (2002) Determining the true distribution of load in piles. In: O’Neill MW, Townsend FC (eds) International deep foundation congress, an international perspective on theory, design, construction, and performance, ASCE, GSP116, Orlando, February 14–16, 2002, vol 2, pp 1455–1470

  27. Paik K, Salgado R, Lee J, Kim B (2003) Behavior of open- and closed-ended piles driven into sands. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 129:296–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gavin KG, O’Kelly BC (2007) Effect of friction fatigue on pile capacity in dense sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 133:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fellenius BH, Santos JA, Fonseca AVD (2007) Analysis of piles in a residual soil—the ISC’2 prediction. Can Geotech J 44:201–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schneider JA, Xu X, Lehane BM (2008) Database assessment of CPT-based design methods for axial capacity of driven piles in siliceous sands. J Geotech Geoenviron ASCE 134:1227–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Eslami A, Fellenius BH (1997) Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories. Can Geotech J 34:886–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Axelsson G (1998) Long-term increase in shaft capacity of driven piles in sand. In: Proceedings 4th international conference on case histories in geotechnical engineering, St. Louis, March 9–12, 1998

  33. Vesić AS (1967) A study of bearing capacity of deep foundations. Final Report Project B-169. Georgia Institute of Technology, Engineering Experiment Station, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fioravante V (2002) On the shaft friction modeling of non-displacement piles in sand. Soils Found 42:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. White DJ, Bolton MD (2004) Displacement and strain paths during plane-strain model pile installation. Géotchnique 54:375–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. DeJong JT, Randolph MF, White DJ (2003) Interface load transfer degradation during cyclic loading: a microscale investigation. Soils Found 43:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Yu F, Yang J (2012) Improved evaluation of interface friction on steel pipe pile in sand. J Perform Constr Facil 26:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nottingham LC (1975) Use of quasi-static friction cone penetrometer data to predict load capacity of displacement piles. PhD thesis. University of Florida, Department of Civil Engineering, Gainesville, p 553

  39. Schmertmann JH (1978) Guideline for cone penetration test (Performance and design). Report No. FHWA-TS-78-209. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, p 145

    Google Scholar 

  40. Clark JI (1998) The settlement and bearing capacity of very large foundations on strong soils. 1996 R.M. Hardy Keynote address. Can Geotech J 35:131–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jahanandish M, Veiskarami M, Ghahramani A (2011) Investigation of foundations behavior by implementation of a developed constitutive soil model in the ZEL method. Int J Civ Eng 9(4):293–306

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Lade PV, Duncan JM (1975) Elastoplastic stress–strain theory for cohesionless soil. J Geotech Geoenviron ASCE 101:1037–1053

    Google Scholar 

  43. Veiskarami M, Mir Tamizdoust M (2017) Bifurcation analysis in sands under true triaxial conditions with coaxial and noncoaxial plastic flow rules. J Eng Mech ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang QQ, Li LP, Chen YJ (2014) Analysis of compression pile response using a softening model, a hyperbolic model of skin friction, and a bilinear model of end resistance. J Eng Mech ASCE 140:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Gavin KG, Lehane BM (2003) The shaft capacity of pipe piles in sand. Can Geotech J 40:36–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Jardine J, Chow F, Overy R, Standing J (2005) ICP design methods for driven piles in sands and clays. Thomas Telford Publishing Ltd., London, p 105

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Clausen C, Aas P, Karlsrud K (2005) Bearing capacity of driven piles in sand, the NGI approach. In: 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, ISFOG 2005, Perth, pp 677–682

  48. Kolk H, Baaijens A, Senders M (2005) Design criteria for pipe piles in silica sands. In: 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, ISFOG 2005, Perth, pp 711–716

  49. Lehane BM, Scheider JA, Xu X (2005) The UWA-05 method for prediction of axial capacity of driven piles in sand. In: 1st international symposium on frontiers in offshore geotechnics, ISFOG 2005, Perth, pp 683–689

  50. Kempfert HG, Becker P (2010) Axial pile resistance of different pile types based on empirical values. In: Proceedings of GeoShanghai international conference, deep foundations and geotechnical in situ testing, pp 149–154

  51. Hansen JB (1963) Discussion on hyperbolic stress–strain response, cohesive soils. J Soil Mech Found Eng (ASCE) 89(SM4):241–242

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fellenius BH (1995) In: Chen WF (ed) Geotechnical engineering handbook. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Eslami.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised: The article was originally published in SpringerLink with open access. With the author(s)' decision to step back from Open Choice, the copyright of the article changed on May 2019 to © Iran University of Science and Technology 2019

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valikhah, F., Eslami, A. & Veiskarami, M. Load–Displacement Behavior of Driven Piles in Sand Using CPT-Based Stress and Strain Fields. Int J Civ Eng 17, 1879–1893 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0388-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-018-0388-7

Keywords

Navigation