Skip to main content
Log in

Construction Crew Productivity Prediction: Application of Two Novel Methods

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Various methods have been applied to the construction crew productivity problem. This paper introduces the use of two novel artificial intelligent methods; which are self organizing maps (SOM) and artificial bee colony (ABC). It first presents the results of prediction performances of these two methods and also focuses on the visualization ability of SOM through the presentation of two dimensional maps produced for the current problem. The prediction performances are evaluated by comparing MAPE, MAE and MSE values obtained during the sevenfold cross validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alsugair AM, Al-Qudrah AA (1998) Artificial neural network approach for pavement maintenance. J Comput Civil Eng 12(4):249–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arditi D, Tokdemir OB (1999) Comparison of case-based reasoning and artificial neural networks. J Comput Civil Eng 13(3):162–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ezeldin AS, Sharara LM (2006) Neural networks for estimating the productivity of concreting activities. J Constr Eng Manag 132:650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Portas J, Abourizk S (1997) Neural network model for estimating construction productivity. J Constr Eng Manag 123(4):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rateb SJ, Sweis GJ, Ayman HA, Malek AR (2009) Modeling the variability of labor productivity in masonry construction. Jordan J Civil Eng 3(3):197–210

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sonmez R, Rowings JE (1998) Construction labor productivity modeling with neural networks. J Constr Eng Manag 124(6):498–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilmot CG, Bing M (2005) Neural network modeling of highway construction costs. J Constr Eng Manag 131:765–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oral M, Oral E, Aydın A (2012) Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction. Autom Constr 22:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gerek İH, Erdiş E, Mıstıkoğlu G, Usmen M (2013) Modeling masonry crew productivity using two artificial neural network techniques. J Civil Eng Manag 231–238

  10. Dissanayake M, Fayek AR, Russell AD, Pedrycz W (2005) A hybrid neural network for predicting construction labour productivity. Comput Civil Eng ASCE 303–328

  11. Dissanayake M, Fayek AR (2008) Soft computing approach to construction performance prediction and diagnosis. Can J Civil Eng 35(8):764–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ming L, Yeung DS, Wing Æ, Ng WY (2006) Applying undistorted neural network sensitivity analysis in iris plant classification and construction productivity prediction. Soft Comput 10:68–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Oral EL, Oral M (2010) Predicting construction crew productivity by using self organizing maps. Autom Constr 19:791–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karaboğa D, Akay BB (2007) Artificial bee colony algorithm on training artificial neural networks. In: Signal processing and communications applications, SIU 2007, IEEE 15th. 11–13 June, pp 1–4

  15. Nandy S, Sarkar PP, Das A (2012) Training a feed-forward neural network with artificial bee colony based backpropagation method. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol (IJCSIT) 4(4):33–46

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohonen T (1982) Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol Cybern 43:59–69

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Oral M, Oral E (2007) A computer based system for documentation and monitoring of construction labour productivity. In: CIB 24th W78 conference, Maribor

  18. Kaming PF, Olomolaiye PO, Holt GD, Haris FC (1997) Factors influencing craftmen’s productivity in Indonesia. Int J Project Manag 15(1):21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ok SC, Sinha KS (2006) Construction equipment productivity estimation using artificial neural network model. Constr Manag Econ 24(10):1029–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kazaz A, Ulubeyli S (2004) A different approach to construction labor in Turkey: comparative productivity analysis. Build Environ 39:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karaboğa D, Akay BB, Ozturk C (2007) Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for training feed-forward neural networks. In: LNCS: modeling decisions for artificial intelligence, vol 4617/2007, pp 318–319

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collection and development of the integrated computer model stages of this research is based on the findings of the research work undertaken as part of a larger project (106M055) sponsored by TÜBITAK (The Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emel Laptalı Oral.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oral, E.L., Oral, M. & Andaç, M. Construction Crew Productivity Prediction: Application of Two Novel Methods. Int. J. Civ. Eng. 14, 181–186 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0009-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-016-0009-2

Keywords

Navigation