Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behavior and Design of Back-to-Back Walls Considering Compaction and Surcharge Loads

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Back-to-back geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls are commonly used as approach embankments for bridges and flyovers. Compaction and surcharge loads should be incorporated in the model to understand the realistic behavior of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls through numerical modeling. In this study, a finite-difference method-based numerical model, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua (FLAC 2D, Version 7.0), is used to study the effects of surcharge and compaction stresses on lateral pressures and lateral displacements of back-to-back MSE walls. The ratio of the distance between walls to the height of the wall (W/H) in back-to-back walls is varied from 1.4 through 2.0, and the stiffness of reinforcement from 500 to 50,000 kN/m to cover the entire range of stiffness values of extensible to inextensible reinforcements. The coefficient of lateral pressure, Kr, at the end of the reinforcement zone for W/H = 1.4 is found to be 50% less than that for W/H = 2.0. Plots showing the variation of lateral earth pressure coefficients and lateral deformations versus normalized depth of wall are presented. Maximum tensile forces in the reinforcements along the depth of wall are also analyzed. The lateral pressures at the facing appear to be unaffected with W/H ratio. Finally, a design example showing the external stability analysis of reinforced back-to-back walls is illustrated incorporating the lateral pressures obtained from the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

(modified after Ling et al. 2000)

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berg RR, Christopher BRB, Samtani NCN (2009) Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes, vol I. FHWA-NHI-10-024. Washington, DC

  2. Balunaini U, Sravanam SM, Madhav MR (2017) Effect of compaction stresses on performance of back-to-back retaining walls. In: Lee W, Lee J-S, Kim H-K, Kim D-S (eds) Proceedings of 19th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. ISSMGE, Seoul, pp 1951–1954

  3. El-Sherbiny R, Ibrahim E, Salem A (2013) Stability of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. In: Christopher M, Pradel D, Pando MA, Labuz JF (eds) Proceedings of Geo-congress. ASCE, San Diego, pp 555–565

    Google Scholar 

  4. Han J, Leshchinsky D (2010) Analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. Geotext Geomem 28:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Djabri M, Benmebarek S (2016) FEM analysis of back-to-back geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng 2:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0067-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrlich M, Mitchell JK (1994) Working stress design method for reinforced soil walls. J Geotech Eng 120:625–645. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:4(625)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aggour MS, Brown CB (1974) The prediction of earth pressure on retaining walls due to compaction. Géotechnique 24:489–502. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1974.24.4.489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ingold TS (1979) The effects of compaction on retaining walls. Geotechnique 29:265–283. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.3.265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Seed RB, Duncan JM (1986) FE analyses: compaction-induced stresses and deformations. J Geotech Eng 112:20262

    Google Scholar 

  10. Duncan JM, Williams GW, Sehn AL, Seed RB (1991) Estimation earth pressures due to compaction. J Geotech Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:12(1833)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen T-J, Fang Y-S (2008) Earth pressure due to vibratory compaction. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134:437–444. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:4(437)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gotteland P, Gourc JP, Villard P (1997) Geosynthetics reinforced structures as bridge abutments: full scale experimentation and comparison with modelisations. In: Wu JTH (ed) Proceedings of international symposium on mechanically stabilized backfill, Balkema, Denver, pp 25–34

  13. Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2005) Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions. Can Geotech J 42:1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guler E, Hamderi M, Demirkan MM (2007) Numerical analysis of reinforced soil-retaining wall structures with cohesive and granular backfills. Geosynth Int 14:330–345. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrlich M, Mirmoradi SH (2013) Evaluation of the effects of facing stiffness and toe resistance on the behavior of GRS walls. Geotext Geomem 40:28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.07.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Riccio M, Ehrlich M, Dias D (2014) Field monitoring and analyses of the response of a block-faced geogrid wall using fine-grained tropical soils. Geotext Geomem 42:127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mirmoradi SH, Ehrlich M (2015) Modeling of the compaction-induced stress on reinforced soil walls. Geotext Geomem 43:82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2006) Numerical model for reinforced soil segmental walls under surcharge loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:673–684. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:6(673)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bathurst RJ, Nernheim A, Walters DL et al (2009) Influence of reinforcement stiffness and compaction on the performance of four geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 16:43–59. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2009.16.1.43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng Y, Fox PJ (2016) Numerical investigation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil bridge abutments under static loading. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 142:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoo C, Bin KS (2008) Performance of a two-tier geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining wall under a surcharge load: full-scale load test and 3D finite element analysis. Geotext Geomem 26:460–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Itasca (2011) FLAC-fast langragian analysis of continua, version 7.00 User’s Guide. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minnepolis, Minn

  23. Duncan JM, Byrne P, Wong KS, Mabry P (1980) Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analysis of stress and movements in soil masses. University of California, Berkley

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dyer NR, Milligan GWE (1984) A photoelastic investigation of the interaction of a cohesionless soil with reinforcement placed at different orientations. In: Proceedings of international conference on in situ soil and rock reinforcement, Paris, pp 257–262

  25. Jewell RA (1980) Some effects of reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of soils. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  26. Huang B, Bathurst RJ, Hatami K, Allen TM (2010) Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls. Can Geotech J 47:885–904. https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. AASTHO (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington DC

  28. Ling HI, Cardany CP, Sun L-X, Hashimoto H (2000) Finite element study of a geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete block facing. Geosynth Int 7:137–162. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.7.0170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Benmebarek S, Attallaoui S, Benmebarek N (2016) Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:697–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Damians IP, Lloret A, Josa A, Bathurst RJ (2013) Influence of facing vertical stiffness on reinforced soil wall design. In: Proceedings of 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, pp 1959–1962

  31. Widisinghe S, Sivakugan N (2012) Vertical stresses within granular materials in silos. In: Arulrajah A, Kodikara J (eds) Proceedings of Narsilio GA, 11th Australia - N Zealand conference on geomechanics (ANZ 2012), Melbourne, pp 590–595

  32. Yang G, Zhang B, Lv P, Zhou Q (2009) Behaviour of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-rigid facing. Geotext Geomem 27:350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Elias PE, Christopher BR, Berg RR (2001) Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes design & construction guidelines. FHWA-NHI-00-043, Washington, DC, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Hyderabad, Kandi, Telangana, 502285, India

    Sasanka Mouli Sravanam, Umashankar Balunaini & Madhira R. Madhav

Authors
  1. Sasanka Mouli Sravanam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Umashankar Balunaini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Madhira R. Madhav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umashankar Balunaini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sravanam, S.M., Balunaini, U. & Madhav, M.R. Behavior and Design of Back-to-Back Walls Considering Compaction and Surcharge Loads. Int. J. of Geosynth. and Ground Eng. 5, 31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0180-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0180-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation