Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Single and Back-to-Back Reinforced Retaining Walls with Full-Length Panel Facia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls have several applications in infrastructure development. Present study firstly discusses on the kinematics of deformation of MSE wall with full-length panel facia. Secondly, single and back-to-back MSE walls with full-length panel facing are modelled using finite difference based software (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua). The reinforcements in the back-to-back walls extend through and through from one wall facing to the other wall facing. Lateral pressures, vertical stresses, and lateral deformations at the facing for various reinforcement stiffness values are evaluated for both single and back-to-back walls under working stresses. Reinforcement stiffness values of 500 kN/m, 5000 kN/m and 50,000 kN/m are considered. For single MSE wall with stiff reinforcement, lateral pressures at the facing are higher than those for active earth pressure. Lateral deformations of facing with reinforcement of low stiffness are higher than those with reinforcement of high stiffness. In back-to-back walls, the lateral deformation of wall facing with reinforcement of high stiffness is slightly inwards near the top of the wall. Reinforcement stiffness is found to have significant effect on the vertical stress in both single and back-to-back walls. Lateral pressures of both single and back-to-back connected walls are compared. Lateral pressures on single MSE wall are found to be lesser than those for back-to-back wall at the top of the wall. However, lateral pressures near the bottom of single wall are higher than those of back-to-back wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASTHO (2012) AASHTO LRFD Bridge design specifications, 6th edn. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Abu-hejleh N, Mcmullen M, Hearn G, Zornberg JG (2001) Design and construction guidelines for MSE Walls with independent full-height facing, Report No. CDOT-DTD-R-2001–5

  • Andrawes KZ, Loke KH, Yeo KC, Murray TR (1991) PI/11 Application of boundary yielding concept of full scale reinforced and unreinforced soil walls. In: McGown A, Yeo K, Andrawes KZ (eds) Preformance of reinforced soil strcutures. ICE, pp 79–83

  • Anubhav S, Basudhar PK (2011) Numerical modelling of surface strip footings resting on double-faced wrap-around vertical reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 18:21–34. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2011.18.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz ESMA, Taha YK, Eweada SN (2011) Theoretical study of earth pressure at -rest for sandy soils. J Eng Sci Assiut Univ 39:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmebarek S, Attallaoui S, Benmebarek N (2016) Interaction analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:697–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmebarek S, Djabri M (2017a) FEM to investigate the effect of overlapping-reinforcement on the performance of back-to-back embankment bridge approaches under self-weight. Transp Geotech 11:17–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benmebarek S, Djabri M (2017b) FE analysis of back-to-back Mechanically Stabilized Earth walls under cyclic harmonic loading. Indian Geotech J 48:498–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-017-0269-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg RR, Christopher BRB, Samtani NCN (2009) Design and construction of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes–volume I publication. FHWA-NHI-10-024. FHWA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Damians IP, Bathurst RJ, Josa A, Lloret A (2014) Numerical study of the influence of foundation compressibility and reinforcement stiffness on the behavior of reinforced soil walls. Int J Geotech Eng 8(3):247–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djabri M, Benmebarek S (2016) FEM analysis of back-to-back geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng 2:26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-016-0067-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer NR, Milligan GWE (1984) A photoelastic investigation of the interaction of a cohesionless soil with reinforcement placed at different orientations. In: International conference on in situ soil and rock reinforcement. Paris, pp 257–262

  • Ehrlich M, Mirmoradi SH, Saramago RP (2012) Evaluation of the effect of compaction on the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geotext Geomembr 34:108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Sherbiny R, Ibrahim E, Salem A (2013) Stability of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. In: Christopher M, Pradel D, Pando MA, Labuz JF (eds) Geo-congress. ASCE, San Diego, California, USA, pp 555–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Han J, Leshchinsky D (2010) Analysis of back-to-back mechanically stabilized earth walls. Geotext Geomembr 28:262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2005) Development and verification of a numerical model for the analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced soil segmental walls under working stress conditions. Can Geotech J 42:1066–1085. https://doi.org/10.1139/t05-040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helwany MB, Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Kojima K (1996) Effects of facing rigidity on the performanace of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Soils Found 36:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.37.3229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho SK (1993) A numerical investigation into the behaviour of reinforced soil walls. Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Western Ontario

  • Holtz RD, Lee WF (2002) Internal stability analyses of geosynthetic reinforced retaining walls. Washington State Transportation Center (TRAC), Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang B, Bathurst RJ, Hatami K, Allen TM (2010) Influence of toe restraint on reinforced soil segmental walls. Can Geotech J 47:885–904. https://doi.org/10.1139/T10-002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismeik M, Guler E (1998) Effect of wall facing on seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls. Geosynth Int 5:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.5.0113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (2011) FLAC-fast Lagragian analysis of continua version 7.00 user’s guide. Itasca Consulting Group Inc., Minnepolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewell RA (1980) Some effects of reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of soils. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

  • Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil Mechanics. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenart S, Kralj M, Medved SP, Šuler J (2016) Design and construction of the first GRS integrated bridge with FHR facings in Europe. Transp Geotech 8:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Leshchinsky D (2003) Finite element parametric study of the behavior of segmental block reinforced-soil retaining walls. Geosynth Int 10:77–94. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2003.10.3.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirmoradi SH, Ehrlich M (2015) Numerical evaluation of the behavior of GRS walls with segmental block facing under working stress conditions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Ho SK (1997) Continuous panel reinforced soil walls on rigid foundations. J Geotech Eng 123:912–919. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:10(912)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sravanam SM, Balunaini U, Madhav MR (2019) Behavior and design of back-to-back walls considering compaction and surcharge loads. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 5:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-019-0180-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sravanam SM, Balunaini U, Madhira RM (2020) Behavior of connected and unconnected back-to-back walls for bridge approaches. Int J Geomech 20(7):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tateyama M, Murata O, Watanabe K, Tatsuoka F (1994) Geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls for bullet train yard in Nagoya. In: Tatsuoka F, Leshchinsky D (eds) Seiken symposium on recent case histories of permanent geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F (1993) Keynote Lecture: Roles of facing rigidity in soil reinforcing. In: Ochiai H, Hayashi S, Otani J (eds) International symposium on earth reinforcement practice. Balkema, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 831–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F, Murata O, Tateyama M (1992) Permanent geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls used for railway embankments in Japan. In: Wu JTH (ed) Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. A. A Balkema Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Denver, Colorado, pp 101–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CS, Lopes ML, Caldeira LMMS (2008) Influence of facing panel rigidity on performance of reinforced soil retaining walls: a numerical study. In: Dixon N (ed) 4th European geosynthetics conference (EuroGeo 4). International Geosynthetics Society, UK Chapter, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp 2–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Widisinghe S, Sivakugan N (2012) Vertical stresses within granular materials in silos. In: Narsilio GA, Arulrajah A, Kodikara J (eds) 11th Australia - N Zealand Conference on Geomechanics (ANZ 2012). Melbourne, Australia, pp 590–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Zhang B, Lv P, Zhou Q (2009a) Behaviour of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall with concrete-rigid facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27(5):350–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G, Zhou Q, Zhang B, Ding J (2009b) Applications of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall with wrap-around facing in railway. In: Chen Y, Tang X, Zhan L (eds) International symposium on geoenvironmental engineering, Hangzhou, China. Springer, Berlin, pp 799–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa T, Yamazaki T, Tateyama M, Tatsuoka F (2014) Design and construction of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures for Hokkaido high-speed train line. Transp Geotech 1:3–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umashankar Balunaini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sravanam, S.M., Balunaini, U. & Madhav, R.M. Analysis of Single and Back-to-Back Reinforced Retaining Walls with Full-Length Panel Facia. Geotech Geol Eng 38, 6281–6293 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01435-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01435-x

Keywords

Navigation