Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Embedding Silk Fibroin-Alginate Hydrogel in a 3D-Printed Porous Poly(Lactic Acid) Bone Tissue Scaffold Augments Stem Cell Function

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Regenerative Engineering and Translational Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract 

Purpose

Synthetic polymers such as poly(lactic acid) (PLA) are well suited for preparing patient-specific bone tissue scaffolds by three-dimensional (3D) printing due to their favorable mechanical properties; however, they have limited biological activity. Natural polymers have good bioactivity and provide a better cellular microenvironment for attachment, proliferation, and differentiation, but lack the mechanical strength required as a bone substitute.

Method

In this work, porous PLA scaffolds were prepared by fused filament fabrication. For uniform cell seeding and enhanced cellular function, a silk fibroin-alginate (SF/Alg) blend hydrogel loaded with human mesenchymal cells (hMSCs) was loaded into the pores of the 3D-printed hybrid scaffolds between the struts. The physicochemical properties of the scaffold and the hMSC response were characterized.

Results

The gel-loaded 3D-printed PLA scaffolds were stable over 21 days in an aqueous buffer solution. The compressive strength of the scaffolds was ≈ 10 MPa, which is similar to that of cancellous bone. The proliferation and viability of hMSCs were significantly enhanced when loaded within the SF/Alg hydrogel in the PLA scaffolds than in the neat PLA scaffold. Furthermore, the stem cells in the gel-loaded 3D-printed PLA scaffold showed markedly higher alkaline phosphatase expression and calcium phosphate deposition, which indicates higher osteogenic differentiation with the gels. These observations were corroborated by increased expressions of osteocalcin, RUNX2, and BMP-2.

Conclusion

Thus, the combination of SF/Alg hydrogel loaded with stem cells offers a promising route for enhancing the bioactivity of 3D-printed PLA scaffolds with significant clinical potential for bone tissue engineering.

Lay Summary

Owing to their good mechanical stability, 3D-printed porous scaffolds of thermoplastics such as PLA have been used for bone tissue engineering applications. However, the presence of macro-sized pores leads to low cell attachment efficiency and distribution within the scaffolds, which results in low osteogenic activity. In this work, stem cells were encapsulated within the sonicated silk fibroin and alginate blend hydrogel and embedded within the gaps of 3D-printed PLA struts. This hybrid approach maximizes the cell density and uniform distribution and leverages the mechanical integrity of the 3D-printed PLA scaffold and osteoconductive microenvironment for proliferation and differentiation offered by the silk fibroin and alginate hydrogel. The cell-laden gels loaded within 3D-printed scaffold showed improved proliferation and osteogenic activity of stem cells, which makes the system a promising bone substitute for regeneration or healing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dimitriou R, Jones E, McGonagle D, Giannoudis PV. Bone regeneration: current concepts and future directions. BMC Med. 2011;9(1):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev™ Biomed Eng. 2012;40(5):363–408.

  3. Orciani M, Fini M, Di Primio R, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Biofabrication and bone tissue regeneration: cell source, approaches, and challenges. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kinoshita Y, Maeda H. Recent developments of functional scaffolds for craniomaxillofacial bone tissue engineering applications. Sci World J. 2013;2013:863157.

  5. Perez JR, Kouroupis D, Li DJ, Best TM, Kaplan L, Correa D. Tissue engineering and cell-based therapies for fractures and bone defects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2018;6:105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Melke J, Midha S, Ghosh S, Ito K, Hofmann S. Silk fibroin as biomaterial for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2016;31:1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang G, Liu Z, Liu Y, Yu J, Wang X, Tan Z, Ye X. Recent trends in the development of bone regenerative biomaterials. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:665813.

  8. Mravic M, Péault B, James AW. Current trends in bone tissue engineering. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:865270.

  9. Bose S, Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30(10):546–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioactive materials. 2019;4:271–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buyuksungur S, Hasirci V, Hasirci N. 3D printed hybrid bone constructs of PCL and dental pulp stem cells loaded GelMA. J Biomed Mater Res, Part A. 2021;109(12):2425–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haleem A, Javaid M, Khan RH, Suman R. 3D printing applications in bone tissue engineering. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:S118–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Su X, Wang T, Guo S. Applications of 3D printed bone tissue engineering scaffolds in the stem cell field. Regen Ther. 2021;16:63–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buj-Corral I, Bagheri A, Petit-Rojo O. 3D printing of porous scaffolds with controlled porosity and pore size values. Materials. 2018;11(9):1532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rezania N, Asadi-Eydivand M, Abolfathi N, Bonakdar S, Mehrjoo M, Solati-Hashjin M. Three-dimensional printing of polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite bone tissue engineering scaffolds mechanical properties and biological behavior. J Mater Sci - Mater Med. 2022;33(3):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar A, Kargozar S, Baino F, Han SS. Additive manufacturing methods for producing hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based composite scaffolds: a review. Front Mater. 2019;6:313.

  17. Chung JJ, Im H, Kim SH, Park JW, Jung Y. Toward biomimetic scaffolds for tissue engineering: 3D printing techniques in regenerative medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:586406.

  18. Gregor A, Filová E, Novák M, Kronek J, Chlup H, Buzgo M, Blahnová V, Lukášová V, Bartoš M, Nečas A. Designing of PLA scaffolds for bone tissue replacement fabricated by ordinary commercial 3D printer. J Biol Eng. 2017;11(1):1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jaidev L, Chatterjee K. Surface functionalization of 3D printed polymer scaffolds to augment stem cell response. Mater Des. 2019;161:44–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nilawar S, Chatterjee K. Surface decoration of redox-modulating nanoceria on 3D-printed tissue scaffolds promotes stem cell osteogenesis and attenuates bacterial colonization. Biomacromolecules. 2021;23(1):226–39.

  21. Zhang B, Wang L, Song P, Pei X, Sun H, Wu L, Zhou C, Wang K, Fan Y, Zhang X. 3D printed bone tissue regenerative PLA/HA scaffolds with comprehensive performance optimizations. Mater Des. 2021;201:109490.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Q, Li Q, Xu S, Zheng Q, Cao X. Preparation and properties of 3D printed alginate–chitosan polyion complex hydrogels for tissue engineering. Polymers. 2018;10(6):664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bakhtiary N, Liu C, Ghorbani F. Bioactive inks development for osteochondral tissue engineering: a mini-review. Gels. 2021;7(4):274.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Midha S, Murab S, Ghosh S. Osteogenic signaling on silk-based matrices. Biomaterials. 2016;97:133–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Midha S, Chameettachal S, Dey E, Ghosh S. Nonmulberry silk braids direct terminal osteocytic differentiation through activation of wnt-signaling. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(6):1062–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Y, Wang X, Shi J, Zhu R, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Ma D, Hou Y, Lin F, Yang J. A biomimetic silk fibroin/sodium alginate composite scaffold for soft tissue engineering. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ming J, Zuo B. A novel silk fibroin/sodium alginate hybrid scaffolds. Polym Eng Sci. 2014;54(1):129–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rajput M, Bhandaru N, Barui A, Chaudhary A, Paul RR, Mukherjee R, Chatterjee J. Nano-patterned honey incorporated silk fibroin membranes for improving cellular compatibility. RSC Adv. 2014;4(84):44674–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Silva R, Singh R, Sarker B, Papageorgiou DG, Juhasz JA, Roether JA, Cicha I, Kaschta J, Schubert DW, Chrissafis K. Soft-matrices based on silk fibroin and alginate for tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;93:1420–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang X, Kluge JA, Leisk GG, Kaplan DL. Sonication-induced gelation of silk fibroin for cell encapsulation. Biomaterials. 2008;29(8):1054–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kadakia P, Jain E, Hixon K, Eberlin C, Sell S. Sonication induced silk fibroin cryogels for tissue engineering applications. Mater Res Exp. 2016;3(5):055401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yucel T, Cebe P, Kaplan DL. Vortex-induced injectable silk fibroin hydrogels. Biophys J. 2009;97(7):2044–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou C, Ma H. Ultrasonic degradation of polysaccharide from a red algae (Porphyra yezoensis). J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54(6):2223–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Prins H-J, Braat AK, Gawlitta D, Dhert WJ, Egan DA, Tijssen-Slump E, Yuan H, Coffer PJ, Rozemuller H, Martens AC. In vitro induction of alkaline phosphatase levels predicts in vivo bone forming capacity of human bone marrow stromal cells. Stem Cell Res. 2014;12(2):428–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. BouAssaf R, Fayyad-Kazan M, Al-Nemer F, Makki R, Fayyad-Kazan H, Badran B, Berbéri A. Evaluation of the osteogenic potential of different scaffolds embedded with human stem cells originated from Schneiderian membrane: an in vitro study. BioMed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zou L, Kidwai FK, Kopher RA, Motl J, Kellum CA, Westendorf JJ, Kaufman DS. Use of RUNX2 expression to identify osteogenic progenitor cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Reports. 2015;4(2):190–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang L-T, Lee Y-W, Bai C-H, Chiang H-C, Wang H-H, Yen BL, Yen M-L. A rapid and highly predictive in vitro screening platform for osteogenic natural compounds using human runx2 transcriptional activity in mesenchymal stem cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:607383.

  38. De Giglio E, Bonifacio MA, Ferreira AM, Cometa S, Ti ZY, Stanzione A, Dalgarno K, Gentile P. Multi-compartment scaffold fabricated via 3D-printing as in vitro co-culture osteogenic model. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Cai H, Zou J, Wang W, Yang A. BMP2 induces hMSC osteogenesis and matrix remodeling. Mol Med Rep. 2021;23(2):1–1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mandal BB, Kundu S. Non-mulberry silk gland fibroin protein 3-D scaffold for enhanced differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into osteocytes. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(7):2579–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Anindo Roy for SEM imaging.

Funding

This work was supported by the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India (DST/NM/NB/2018/119(G)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, CV Raman Road, Bengaluru, 560012, India

    Monika Rajput, Sagar Nilawar & Kaushik Chatterjee

Authors
  1. Monika Rajput
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sagar Nilawar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kaushik Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.R. and K.C. designed the study. M.R. performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. S.N. performed XRD and FTIR experiments and assisted in 3D printing. K.C. edited the manuscript and is the senior author overseeing the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaushik Chatterjee.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajput, M., Nilawar, S. & Chatterjee, K. Embedding Silk Fibroin-Alginate Hydrogel in a 3D-Printed Porous Poly(Lactic Acid) Bone Tissue Scaffold Augments Stem Cell Function. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 9, 384–396 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-022-00286-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-022-00286-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation