Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance of Novel Patient Interface for Electrical Impedance Tomography Applications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In electrical impedance tomography (EIT) currents are applied to a body, for example to the human thorax, and resulting voltages are measured to estimate the intra-thoracic impedance distribution. For this purpose 16 or 32 individual electrodes need to be placed onto the patient. The electrical contact with skin is one of the most important performance factors for EIT measurements. In this study, the electrical skin contact of a novel, textile-based electrode assembly comprising 32 active electrodes integrated in a vest-like structure was assessed in 10 volunteers and in 40 patients. Skin contact impedance was measured with dry and wetted electrodes; mid-term stability was measured over a period of 4 h. Results showed that the skin contact impedance of the dry electrodes was higher than 2 kΩ at a frequency of 144 kHz, after applying contact agent, the skin contact impedance dropped below 500 Ω and remained there for the next 4 h. We conclude that the new patient interface in combination with the special contact agent provides a stable electrical contact between electrodes and skin for at least 4 h.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Costa, E. L., Lima, R. G., & Amato, M. B. (2009). Electrical impedance tomography. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 15(1), 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Victorino, J. A., Borges, J. B., Okamoto, V. N., Matos, G. F. J., Tucci, M. R., Caramez, M. P. R., et al. (2004). Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 169(7), 791–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Vogt, B., Pulletz, S., Elke, G., Zhao, Z., Zabel, P., Weiler, N., et al. (2012). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of regional lung ventilation determined by electrical impedance tomography during pulmonary function testing. Journal of Applied Physiology, 113(7), 1154–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Frerichs, I., Dargaville, P. A., van Genderingen, H., Morel, D. R., & Rimensberger, P. C. (2006). Lung volume recruitment after surfactant administration modifies spatial distribution of ventilation. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174(7), 772–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf, G. K., Gómez-Laberge, C., Rettig, J. S., Vargas, S. O., Smallwood, C. D., Prabhu, S. P., et al. (2013). Mechanical ventilation guided by electrical impedance tomography in experimental acute lung injury. Critical Care Medicine, 41(5), 1296–1304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frerichs, I., Hinz, J., Herrmann, P., Weisser, G., Hahn, G., Quintel, M., et al. (2002). Regional lung perfusion as determined by electrical impedance tomography in comparison with electron beam CT imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(6), 646–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frerichs, I., Pulletz, S., Elke, G., Gawelczyk, B., Frerichs, A., & Weiler, N. (2011). Patient examinations using electrical impedance tomography—Sources of interference in the intensive care unit. Physiological Measurement, 32(12), L1–L10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mamatjan, Y., Grychtol, B., Gaggero, P., Justiz, J., Koch, V. M., & Adler, A. (2013). Evaluation and real-time monitoring of data quality in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 32(11), 1997–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meeson, S., Blott, B. H., & Killingback, A. L. (1996). EIT data noise evaluation in the clinical environment. Physiological Measurement, 17(Suppl 4), A33–A38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oh, T. I., Kim, T. E., Yoon, S., Kim, K. J., Woo, E. J., & Sadleir, R. J. (2012). Flexible electrode belt for EIT using nanofiber web dry electrodes. Physiological Measurement, 33(10), 1603–1616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rahal, M., Khor, J. M., Demosthenous, A., Tizzard, A., & Bayford, R. (2009). A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography. Physiological Measurement, 30(6), S73–S84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Adler, A., Amato, M. B., Arnold, J. H., Bayford, R., Bodenstein, M., Böhm, S. H., et al. (2012). Whither lung EIT: Where are we, where do we want to go and what do we need to get there? Physiological Measurement, 33(5), 679–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Puurtinen, M. M., Komulainen, S. M., Kauppinen, P. K., Malmivuo, J. A. V., & Hyttinen, J. A. K. (2006) Measurement of noise and impedance of dry and wet textile electrodes, and textile electrodes with hydrogel. In Conference on Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 1 (pp. 6012–6015).

  14. Bikker, I. G., Preis, C., Egal, M., Bakker, J., & Gommers, D. (2011). Electrical impedance tomography measured at two thoracic levels can visualize the ventilation distribution changes at the bedside during a decremental positive end-expiratory lung pressure trial. Critical Care, 15(4), R193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blankman, P., Hasan, D., van Mourik, M. S., & Gommers, D. (2013). Ventilation distribution measured with EIT at varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with ALI. Intensive Care Medicine, 39(6), 1057–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luepschen, H., Meier, T., Grossherr, M., Leibecke, T., Karsten, J., & Leonhardt, S. (2007). Protective ventilation using electrical impedance tomography. Physiological Measurement, 28(7), S247–S260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Muders, T., Luepschen, H., Zinserling, J., Greschus, S., Fimmers, R., Guenther, U., et al. (2012). Tidal recruitment assessed by electrical impedance tomography and computed tomography in a porcine model of lung injury. Critical Care Medicine, 40(3), 903–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Meier, T., Luepschen, H., Karsten, J., Leibecke, T., Grossherr, M., Gehring, H., et al. (2008). Assessment of regional lung recruitment and derecruitment during a PEEP trial based on electrical impedance tomography. Intensive Care Medicine, 34(3), 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaggero, P. O., Adler, A., Brunner, J., & Seitz, P. (2012). Electrical impedance tomography system based on active electrodes. Physiological Measurement, 33(5), 831–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaggero, P. O. (2011) Miniaturization and distinguishability limits of electrical impedance tomography for biomedical application, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland.

  21. Karsten, J., Stueber, T., Voigt, N., Teschner, E., & Heinze, H. (2016). Influence of different electrode belt positions on electrical impedance tomography imaging of regional ventilation: A prospective observational study. Critical Care, 20(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Merletti, R. (2010). The electrode–skin interface and optimal detection of bioelectric signals. Physiological Measurement, 31, 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tronstad, C., Johnsen, G. K., Grimnes, S., & Martinsen, Ø. G. (2010). A study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurements. Physiological Measurement, 31(10), 1395–1410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Alexe-Ionescu, A. L., Barbero, G., Freire, F. C. M., & Merletti, R. (2010). Effect of composition on the dielectric properties of hydrogels for biomedical applications. Physiological Measurement, 31(10), S169–S182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Batt, M. D., Davis, W. B., Fairhurst, E., Gerrard, W. A., & Ridge, B. D. (1988). Changes in the physical properties of the stratum corneum following treatment with glycerol. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists, 39(December), 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beckmann, L., Neuhaus, C., Medrano, G., Jungbecker, N., Walter, M., Gries, T., et al. (2010). Characterization of textile electrodes and conductors using standardized measurement setups. Physiological Measurement, 31(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially funded by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Swisstom AG, Schulstrasse 1, 7302, Landquart, Switzerland

    Andreas D. Waldmann & Stephan H. Böhm

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany

    Karin H. Wodack, Alexander März, Asi Ukere, Constantin J. Trepte & Daniel A. Reuter

Authors
  1. Andreas D. Waldmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karin H. Wodack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alexander März
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Asi Ukere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Constantin J. Trepte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephan H. Böhm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel A. Reuter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas D. Waldmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Waldmann, A.D., Wodack, K.H., März, A. et al. Performance of Novel Patient Interface for Electrical Impedance Tomography Applications. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 37, 561–566 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0264-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-017-0264-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation