Abstract
We consider a generalized logistic equation driven by the Neumann p-Laplacian and with a reaction that exhibits a superdiffusive kind of behavior. Using variational methods based on the critical point theory, together with truncation and comparison techniques, we show that there exists a critical value \(\lambda _*>0\) of the parameter, such that if \(\lambda >\lambda _*\), the problem has at least two positive solutions, if \(\lambda =\lambda _*\), the problem has at least one positive solution and it has no positive solution if \(\lambda \in (0,\lambda _*)\). Finally, we show that for all \(\lambda \geqslant \lambda _*\), the problem has a smallest positive solution.
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Let \(\Omega \subseteq \mathbb {R}^N\) be a bounded domain with a \(C^2\)-boundary \(\partial \Omega \). In this paper, we study the following nonlinear parametric Neumann problem:
with \(\beta \in L^{\infty }(\Omega )_+\), \(\beta \ne 0\). Here \(\Delta _p\) denotes the p-Laplace differential operator, defined by
with \(p\in (1,+\infty )\). Also \(n(\cdot )\) denotes the outward unit normal on \(\partial \Omega \). When the reaction in \((P)_{\lambda }\) has the particular form
with \(q<r\), then the resulting equation is the p-logistic equation (or simply the logistic equation when \(p=2\)). The logistic equation is important in mathematical biology (see Gurtin and Mac Camy [21] and Afrouzi and Brown [1]) and describes the dynamics of biological populations whose mobility is density dependent.
There are three different types of the p-logistic equation, depending on the value of the exponent q with respect to p. More precisely, we have
-
the “subdiffusive” type, when \(q<p<r\);
-
the “equidiffusive” type, when \(q=p<r\);
-
the “superdiffusive” type, when \(p<q<r\).
The subdiffusive and equidiffusive cases are similar, but the superdiffusive case differs essentially and it exhibits bifurcation phenomena (see Takeuchi [29, 30] and Filippakis et al. [7], where the Dirichlet problem is studied).
The aim of this work, is to prove a bifurcation-type theorem for the positive solutions of \((P)_{\lambda }\) as the parameter \(\lambda >0\) varies in \((0,+\infty )\) and the reaction \(\zeta \longmapsto \lambda g(z,\zeta )-f(z,\zeta )\) (which is more general than the standard p-logistic equation; see Afrouzi and Brown [1]), exhibits a superdiffusive kind of behavior. To the best of our konwledge, the Neumann p-logistic equation has not been studied. There is only the recent work of Marano-Papageorgiou [25], where the equidiffusive case is examined.
Our approach is variational based on the critical point theory, combined with suitable truncation and comparison techniques. In the next section, for the convenience of the reader we recall main mathematical tools which we will use in the sequel.
This work is the outgrowth of a remark made by the referee of [19]. In that paper, the authors deal with the parametric equation
and some analogous bifurcation-type results were proved. It was pointed out by the referee that in mathematical biology, the Neumann model is a more realistic one. For some other recent results on nonlinear Neumann boundary value problems involving p-Laplacian, we refer to Gasiński and Papageorgiou [11–17].
2 Mathematical Background
Let X be a Banach space and let \(X^*\) be its topological dual. By \(\langle \cdot ,\cdot \rangle \) we denote the duality brackets for the pair \((X,X^*)\). Let \(\varphi \in C^1(X)\). We say that \(\varphi \) satisfies the Palais–Smale condition, if the following holds:
“Every sequence \(\{x_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq X\), such that \(\big \{\varphi (x_n)\big \}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq \mathbb {R}\) is bounded and
admits a strongly convergent subsequence.”
Using this compactness-type condition on \(\varphi \), we can state the following theorem, known in the literature as the “mountain pass theorem”.
Theorem 2.1
If X is a Banach space, \(\varphi \in C^1(X)\) satisfies the Palais–Smale condition, \(x_0,x_1\in X\), \(0<\varrho <\Vert x_0-x_1\Vert \),
where
then \(c\geqslant \eta _{\varrho }\) and c is a critical value of \(\varphi \) (i.e., there exists \(\widehat{x}\in X\), such that \(\varphi '(\widehat{x})=0\) and \(\varphi (\widehat{x})=c\)).
In the study of problem \((P)_{\lambda }\), we will use the Sobolev space \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and the ordered Banach space \(C^1(\overline{\Omega })\). The positive cone of the latter is
This cone has a nonempty interior, given by
The next result relates local minimizers in \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) with local minimizers in the smaller Banach space \(C^1(\overline{\Omega })\). A result of this type was first proved for the Dirichlet Laplacian by Brézis and Nirenberg [5] and was later extended to the p-Laplacian by García Azorero et al. [8] and Guo and Zhang [20] (in the latter, for \(p\geqslant 2\)). Extensions to the Neumann p-Laplacian or Neumann p-Laplacian-like operators can be found in Motreanu et al. [26] and Motreanu and Papageorgiou [28].
So let \(f_0:\Omega \times \mathbb {R}\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be a Carathéodory function (i.e., for all \(\zeta \in \mathbb {R}\), the function \(z\longmapsto f_0(z,\zeta )\) is measurable and for almost all \(z\in \Omega \), the function \(\zeta \longmapsto f_0(z,\zeta )\) is continuous), which exhibits subcritical growth in \(\zeta \in \mathbb {R}\), i.e.,
with \(a\in L^{\infty }(\Omega )_+\), \(c>0\) and \(1<r<p^*\), where
We set
and consider the \(C^1\)-functional \(\psi _0:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\), defined by
Theorem 2.2
If \(u_0\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is a local \(C^1(\overline{\Omega })\)-minimizer of \(\psi _0\), i.e., there exists \(\varrho _1>0\), such that
then \(u_0\in C^1(\overline{\Omega })\) and it is a local \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\)-minimizer of \(\psi _0\), i.e., there exists \(\varrho _2>0\), such that
Remark 2.3
In [26, 28], the result was stated in terms of \(W^{1,p}_n(\Omega )=\overline{C^1_n(\overline{\Omega })}^{\Vert \cdot \Vert }\), where
Actually, there is no need for this restriction.
Let \(A:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow W^{1,p}(\Omega )^*\) be the nonlinear map defined by
The next result can be found in Aizicovici et al. [3, Proposition 2].
Proposition 2.4
The map \(A:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow W^{1,p}(\Omega )^*\) defined by (2.1) is continuous, strictly monotone (hence maximal monotone too) and of type \((S)_+\), i.e., if \(\{u_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is a sequence, such that \(u_n\longrightarrow u\) weakly in \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and
then \(u_n\longrightarrow u\) in \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\).
The next simple lemma, will be useful in our estimations and can be found in Aizicovici et al. [4, Lemma 2]. Recall that by \(\Vert \cdot \Vert \) we denote the norm of the Sobolev space \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), i.e.,
Lemma 2.5
If \(\beta \in L^{\infty }(\Omega )\), \(\beta (z)\geqslant 0\) for almost all \(z\in \Omega \) and \(\beta \ne 0\), then there exists \(\xi _0>0\), such that
We conclude this section by fixing some notation. By \(|\cdot |_N\) we denote the Lebesgue measure on \(\mathbb {R}^N\). For every \(u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), we set \(u^{\pm }=\max \{\pm u,0\}\). We know that
Finally for every measurable function \(h:\Omega \times \mathbb {R}\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\), we define
(the Nemytskii map corresponding to h).
3 A Bifurcation-Type Theorem
The hypotheses on the data of problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) are the following:
\(\underline{H_g}\) \(g:\Omega \times \mathbb {R}\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a Carathéodory function, such that \(g(z,0)=0\) for almost all \(z\in \Omega \) and
- (i):
-
we have
$$\begin{aligned} \big |g(z,\zeta )\big |\ \leqslant a(z)+c|\zeta |^{r-1} \quad \text {for almost all}\ z\in \Omega ,\ \text {all}\ \zeta \in \mathbb {R}, \end{aligned}$$with \(a\in L^{\infty }(\Omega )_+\), \(c>0\) and \(p<r<p^*\);
- (ii):
-
there exist \(\vartheta >q>p\), such that
$$\begin{aligned} 0 \ <\ \eta _g \ \leqslant \ \liminf _{\zeta \rightarrow +\infty }\frac{g(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}} \ \leqslant \ \limsup _{\zeta \rightarrow +\infty }\frac{g(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}} \ \leqslant \ \widehat{\eta }_g \end{aligned}$$uniformly for almost all \(z\in \Omega \) and for almost all \(z\in \Omega \), the function \(\zeta \longmapsto \frac{g(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}}\) is nonincreasing on \((0,+\infty )\);
- (iii):
-
we have
$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{\zeta \rightarrow 0^+}\frac{g(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}} \ =\ 0 \end{aligned}$$uniformly for almost all \(z\in \Omega \);
- (iv):
-
there exist two functions \(\sigma _0,\sigma _1:(0,+\infty )\longrightarrow (0,+\infty )\), both upper semicontinuous, such that
$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _0(\zeta )\ \leqslant \ g(z,\zeta ) \ \leqslant \ \sigma _1(\zeta ) \quad \text {for almost all}\ z\in \Omega ,\ \text {all}\ \zeta >0. \end{aligned}$$
\(\underline{H_f}\) \(f:\Omega \times \mathbb {R}\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) is a Carathéodory function, such that \(f(z,0)=0\) for almost all \(z\in \Omega \) and
- (i):
-
we have
$$\begin{aligned} \big |f(z,\zeta )\big |\ \leqslant a(z)+c|\zeta |^{r-1} \quad \text {for almost all}\ z\in \Omega ,\ \text {all}\ \zeta \in \mathbb {R}, \end{aligned}$$with \(a\in L^{\infty }(\Omega )_+\), \(c>0\) and \(p<r<p^*\);
- (ii):
-
with \(\vartheta >q>p\) as in hypothesis \(H_g(ii)\), we have
$$\begin{aligned} 0 \ <\ \eta _f \ \leqslant \ \liminf _{\zeta \rightarrow +\infty }\frac{f(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}} \ \leqslant \ \limsup _{\zeta \rightarrow +\infty }\frac{f(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}} \ \leqslant \ \widehat{\eta }_f \end{aligned}$$uniformly for almost all \(z\in \Omega \) and for almost all \(z\in \Omega \), the function \(\zeta \longmapsto \frac{f(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{p-1}}\) is nondecreasing on \((0,+\infty )\);
- (iii):
-
we have
$$\begin{aligned} 0 \ \leqslant \ \liminf _{\zeta \rightarrow 0^+}\frac{f(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}} \ \leqslant \ \limsup _{\zeta \rightarrow 0^+}\frac{f(z,\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}} \ \leqslant \ \zeta ^* \end{aligned}$$uniformly for almost all \(z\in \Omega \);
- (iv):
-
there exists a lower semicontinuous function \(\sigma _2:(0,+\infty )\longrightarrow (0,+\infty )\), such that
$$\begin{aligned} \sigma _2(\zeta )\ \leqslant \ f(z,\zeta ) \quad \text {for almost all}\ z\in \Omega ,\ \text {all}\ \zeta >0. \end{aligned}$$
\(\underline{H_0}\) For every \(\lambda >0\) and \(\varrho >0\), we can find \(\gamma _{\varrho }=\gamma _{\varrho }(\lambda )>0\), such that for almost all \(z\in \Omega \), the function \(\zeta \longmapsto \lambda g(z,\zeta )-f(z,\zeta )+\gamma _{\varrho }\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}\) is nondecreasing on \([0,\varrho ]\) (\(\vartheta >q>p\) as in the hypothesis \(H_g(ii)\)).
Remark 3.1
Since we are interested in positive solutions and hypotheses \(H_g\), \(H_f\) and \(H_0\) concern the positive semiaxis \(\mathbb {R}_+= [0,+\infty )\), we may (and will) assume that
Example 3.2
The following functions satisfy hypotheses \(H_g\), \(H_f\) and \(H_0\) (for the sake of simplicity we drop the z-dependence):
(a) \(g(\zeta )= \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \zeta ^{s-1} &{} \quad \text {if} &{} \quad \zeta \in [0,1],\\ \zeta ^{q-1} &{} \quad \text {if} &{} \quad \zeta >1 \end{array} \right. \) and \(f(\zeta )=\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}\) for all \(\zeta \geqslant 0\), with \(p<q<s<\vartheta <p^*\).
(b) \(g(\zeta )= \left\{ \begin{array}{lll} \zeta ^{s-1}-\zeta ^{\vartheta -1} &{} \quad \text {if} &{} \quad \zeta \in [0,1],\\ \zeta ^{q-1}-\zeta ^{p-1} &{} \quad \text {if} &{} \quad \zeta >1 \end{array} \right. \) and \(f(\zeta )=\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}-\zeta ^{s-1}\) for all \(\zeta \geqslant 0\), with \(p<q<s<\vartheta <p^*\).
Example (a) corresponds to the standard superdiffusive p-logistic reaction (see Afrouzi and Brown [1]).
By a positive solution of problem \((P)_{\lambda }\), we understand a function \(u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), \(u\ne 0\), which is a weak solution of \((P)_{\lambda }\). Then \(u\in L^{\infty }(\Omega )\) (see e.g., Gasiński and Papageorgiou [9, 18] and Hu and Papageorgiou [23]). Invoking Theorem 2 of Lieberman [24], we have that \(u\in C_+\setminus \{0\}\). Let \(\varrho =\Vert u\Vert _{\infty }\) and let \(\gamma _{\varrho }=\gamma _{\varrho }(\lambda )>0\) be as postulated by hypothesis \(H_0\). We have
(see Motreanu and Papageorgiou [27]), so
and finally
(see Vázquez [31]).
So, we see that the positive solutions of problem \((P)_{\lambda }\), if they exist, belong in \(\mathrm {int}\, C_+\).
Let
Proposition 3.3
If hypotheses \(H_g\), \(H_f\) and \(H_0\) hold, then \(\inf \mathcal {Y}>0\).
Proof
By virtue of hypothesis \(H_g(ii)\), we can find \(\eta _1>0\) and \(M>0\), such that
On the other hand, from hypothesis \(H_g(iii)\), for a given \(\varepsilon >0\), we can find \(\delta \in (0,1)\) small, such that
The function \(\zeta \longmapsto \frac{\sigma _1(\zeta )}{\zeta ^{q-1}}\) is upper semicontinuous on \([\delta ,M]\) and so, we can find \(\widehat{\xi }\in [\delta ,M]\), such that
so
(see hypothesis \(H_g(iv)\)). From (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3), it follows that
with \(\widehat{\eta }(\varepsilon )=\max \{\eta _1,\eta _2\}>0\).
In a similar fashion, using hypotheses \(H_f\,({ ii})\), \(({ iii})\) and \(({ iv})\), for a given \(\varepsilon >0\), we can find \(\vartheta =\vartheta (\varepsilon )>0\), such that
Let us fix \(\varepsilon \in \big (0,\frac{\xi _0}{2}\big )\) (\(\xi _0>0\) as in Lemma 2.5) and let \(\widehat{\lambda }\leqslant \min \big \{1,\frac{\vartheta }{\widehat{\eta }}\big \}\). From (3.4) and (3.5), we have
Suppose that for \(\lambda \in (0,\widehat{\lambda })\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has a positive solution (i.e., \(\lambda \in \mathcal {Y}\)). Then we can find a positive solution \(u_{\lambda }\in \mathrm {int}\, C_+\) of \((P)_{\lambda }\). Hence
(see (2.1) for the definition of A). On (3.7) we act with \(u_{\lambda }\) and obtain
so using Lemma 2.5 and (3.6), we have
recalling that \(\varepsilon \in \big (0,\frac{\xi _0}{2}\big )\), we conclude that \(u_{\lambda }=0\), a contradiction. Therefore \(\inf \mathcal {Y}\geqslant \widehat{\lambda }>0\). \(\square \)
If \(\mathcal {Y}=\emptyset \), then \(\inf \mathcal {Y}=+\infty \). In the next proposition, we establish the nonemptiness of \(\mathcal {Y}\).
Proposition 3.4
If hypotheses \(H_g, H_f\) and \(H_0\) hold, then \(\mathcal {Y}\ne \emptyset \) and if \(\lambda \in \mathcal {Y}\) and \(\tau >\lambda \), then \(\tau \in \mathcal {Y}\).
Proof
Let \(\varphi _{\lambda }:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\) be the energy functional for problem \((P)_{\lambda }\), defined by
for all \(u\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\). Evidently \(\varphi _{\lambda }\in C^1\big (W^{1,p}(\Omega )\big )\). By virtue of hypotheses \(H_g(i),(ii)\), we can find \(\xi _1>0\) and \(c_1>0\), such that
Since \(q<\vartheta \), using Young inequality with \(\varepsilon >0\), from (3.8) we see that for a given \(\varepsilon >0\), we can find \(c_2=c_2(\varepsilon )>0\), such that
Also, from hypotheses \(H_f(i),(ii)\), we see that we can find \(\xi _2>0\) and \(c_3>0\), such that
Then
for some \(c_4=c_4(\varepsilon )>0\) (see Lemma 2.5 and (3.9), (3.10)).
We choose \(\varepsilon \in \big (0,\frac{\xi _2}{\lambda }\big ]\). Then, from (3.11), it follows that \(\varphi _{\lambda }\) is coercive. Also, it is easy to see that \(\varphi _{\lambda }\) is sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. Therefore, by the Weierstrass theorem, we can find \(u_{\lambda }\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), such that
Let \(\overline{u}\in \text {int}\, C_+\). Then clearly for \(\lambda >0\) big, we have \(\varphi _{\lambda }(\overline{u})<0\). Hence
(see (3.12)), so
From (3.12), we have
so
On (3.14) we act with \(-u_{\lambda }^-\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and we obtain
so
(see Lemma 2.5), i.e., \(u_{\lambda }\geqslant 0\), \(u_{\lambda }\ne 0\) (see (3.13)).
Then (3.14) becomes
so
i.e., \(\mathcal {Y}\ne \emptyset \).
Now suppose that \(\lambda \in \mathcal {Y}\) and \(\tau >\lambda \). We choose \(s\in (0,1)\), such that
(recall that \(\vartheta >p\) and \(\lambda <\tau \)). Since \(\lambda \in \mathcal {Y}\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has a solution \(u_{\lambda }\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\). We set \(\underline{u}=s u_{\lambda }\in \text {int}\,C_+\). Then
By virtue of hypothesis \(H_g(ii)\) and since \(s\in (0,1)\), we have
so
Similarly, using hypothesis \(H_f(ii)\), we have
so
Returning to (3.16) and using (3.15), (3.17) and (3.18), we have
We consider the following truncation of the reaction in problem \((P)_{\tau }\):
This is a Carathéodory function. We set
and consider the \(C^1\)-functional \(\psi _{\tau }:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\), defined by
As we did for \(\varphi _{\lambda }\) earlier in this proof, we can check that \(\psi _{\tau }\) is coercive and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find \(u_{\tau }\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), such that
so
thus
On (3.21) we act with \((\underline{u}-u_{\tau })^+\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and obtain
We recall the following elementary inequalities (see e.g., Gasiński and Papageorgiou [10, Lemma 6.2.13, p. 740]). If \(1<p\leqslant 2\), then
and if \(2<p\), then
If \(1<p\leqslant 2\), then from (3.22), (3.23) and since \(u_{\tau },\underline{u}\in \mathrm {int}\, C_+\), we have
for some \(c_5>0\), so
i.e., \(\underline{u}\leqslant u_{\tau }\).
If \(2<p\), then from (3.22) and (3.24), we have
so
i.e., \(\underline{u}\leqslant u_{\tau }\).
So, finally \(\underline{u}\leqslant u_{\tau }\) and then (3.21) becomes
(see (3.20)), so \(u_{\tau }\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) is a positive solution of \((P)_{\lambda }\), i.e., \(\tau \in \mathcal {Y}\). \(\square \)
Proposition 3.5
If hypotheses \(H_f\), \(H_g\) and \(H_0\) hold and \(\lambda >\lambda _*\), then problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has at least two positive solutions.
Proof
Let \(\tau \in (\lambda _*,\lambda )\cap \mathcal {Y}\). Then, we can find \(u_{\tau }\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\), such that
Proceeding as in the proof of Proposition 3.4, we introduce the following truncation of the reaction:
This is a Carathéodory function. We set
and consider the \(C^1\)-functional \(\widehat{\psi }:W^{1,p}(\Omega )\longrightarrow \mathbb {R}\), defined by
As we did for \(\varphi _{\lambda }\) in the proof of Proposition 3.4, we can check that \(\widehat{\psi }_{\lambda }\) is coercive and sequentially weakly lower semicontinuous. So, we can find \(u_{\lambda }^0\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), such that
and
so
From this, as before, acting with \((u_{\tau }-u_{\lambda }^0)^+\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and using (3.25) and (3.26), we show that \(u_{\tau }\leqslant u_{\lambda }^0\). Hence, we have
(see (3.26)), so \(u_{\lambda }^0\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) is a solution of \((P)_{\lambda }\) and \(u_{\lambda }^0\geqslant u_{\tau }\).
Claim 1
\(u_{\lambda }^0-u_{\tau }\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\).
Let \(\varrho =\Vert u_{\lambda }^0\Vert _{\infty }\). By hypothesis \(H_0\), we can find \(\gamma _{\varrho }=\gamma _{\varrho }(\lambda )>0\), such that for all \(z\in \Omega \), the function \(\zeta \longmapsto \lambda g(z,\zeta )-f(z,\zeta )+\gamma _{\varrho }\zeta ^{\vartheta -1}\) is nondecreasing on \([0,\varrho ]\). For \(\delta >0\), we set
Then
with \(\xi (\delta )\rightarrow 0\) as \(\delta \searrow 0\) (see hypothesis \(H_g(iv)\) and recall that \(\tau <\lambda \)).
Since \(u_{\tau }\in \mathrm {int}\, C_+\), the function \(z\longmapsto \sigma _0\big (u_{\tau }(z)\big )\) is upper semicontinuous on \(\overline{\Omega }\) (see hypothesis \(H_g(iv)\)). So, we can find \(z_0\in \overline{\Omega }\), such that
We use (3.28) in (3.27). Since \(\xi (\delta )\searrow 0\) and \(\delta \searrow 0\) and \(\lambda >\tau \), we infer that
for \(\delta >0\) small (see \(H_0\) and recall that \(u_{\tau }\leqslant u_{\lambda }^0\)). Acting on this inequality with \((\overline{u}_{\tau }-u_{\lambda }^0)^+\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and using the nonlinear Green’s identity (see e.g., Gasiński and Papageorgiou [9]) as above, we obtain
so
This proves Claim 1.
Let
From (3.26), we see that
for some \(\widehat{c}\in \mathbb {R}\). Then Claim 1 and (3.29) imply that \(u_{\lambda }^0\) is a local \(C^1(\overline{\Omega })\)-minimizer of \(\varphi _{\lambda }\). From Theorem 2.2, it follows that \(u_{\lambda }^0\) is a local \(W^{1,p}(\Omega )\)-minimizer of \(\varphi (\lambda )\).
By virtue of hypotheses \(H_g\)(iii) and \(H_f\)(iii), for a given \(\varepsilon >0\) we can find \(\delta =\delta (\varepsilon )>0\), such that
So, if \(u\in C^1(\overline{\Omega })\) with \(\Vert u\Vert _{C^1(\overline{\Omega })}\leqslant \delta \), then
(see Lemma 2.5) and (3.30). Choosing \(\varepsilon \in \big (0,\frac{\xi _0}{\lambda +1}\big )\), we infer that
so
and thus
(see Theorem 2.2).
Without any loss of generality, we may assume that
(the analysis is similar if the opposite inequality is true). Moreover, we may assume that both local minimizers \(u=0\) and \(u=u_{\lambda }^0\) are isolated (otherwise it is clear that we have a whole sequence of positive solutions of \((P)_{\lambda }\) and so we are done). Reasoning as in Aizicovici et al. [2, Proposition 29], we can find \(\varrho \in \big (0,\Vert u_{\lambda }^0\Vert \big )\) small, such that
Recall that \(\varphi _{\lambda }\) is coercive (see the proof of Proposition 3.4). Hence it satisfies the Palais–Smale condition. This fact and (3.1) permit the use of the mountain pass theorem (see Theorem 2.1) and so, we obtain \(\widehat{u}_{\lambda }\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\), such that
and
From (3.31) and (3.32), it follows that \(\widehat{u}_{\lambda }\not \in \{0, u_{\lambda }^0\}\). From (3.33), we have
so \(\widehat{u}_{\lambda }\in \mathrm {int}\, C_+\) is a solution of \((P)_{\lambda }\).
So, we conclude that \((P)_{\lambda }\) (\(\lambda >\lambda _*\)) has at least two positive solutions \(u_{\lambda }^0,\widehat{u}_{\lambda }\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\). \(\square \)
Next we examine what happens in the critical case \(\lambda =\lambda _*\).
Proposition 3.6
If hypotheses \(H_f\), \(H_g\) and \(H_0\) hold, then \(\lambda _*\in \mathcal {Y}\).
Proof
Let \(\lambda _n>\lambda _*\) for \(n\geqslant 1\) be such that \(\lambda _n\searrow \lambda _*\) and let \(u_n=u_{\lambda _n}\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) be positive solutions for problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) for \(n\geqslant 1\) (see Proposition 3.4). We have
By virtue of hypothesis \(H_g(ii)\) and since \(\vartheta >q\), we have
This fact combined with hypothesis \(H_g(i)\), implies that for a given \(\varepsilon >0\), we can find \(c_6=c_6(\varepsilon )>0\), such that
In a similar fashion, using hypotheses \(H_f(i)\) and (ii), we see that we can find \(\eta >0\) and \(c_7>0\), such that
On (3.34) we act with \(u_n\in W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) and obtain
for some \(c_8>0\) (see (3.35) and (3.36)).
We choose \(\varepsilon \in \big (0,\frac{\eta }{\lambda _1}\big )\) (recall that \(\lambda _n\leqslant \lambda _1\) for all \(n\geqslant 1\)). Then from (3.37) and Lemma 2.5, it follows that
and so the sequence \(\{u_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is bounded.
So, passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that
with \(\theta <p^*\). On (3.34) we act with \(u_n-u_*\), pass to the limit as \(n\rightarrow +\infty \) and use (3.38). We obtain
so
(see Proposition 2.4).
So, if in (3.34) we pass to the limit as \(n\rightarrow +\infty \) and use (3.40), we obtain
so \(u_*\in C_+\) and it solves problem \((P)_{\lambda _*}\).
It remains to show that \(u_*\ne 0\). Arguing by contradiction, suppose that \(u_*=0\). From (3.34), we have
From (3.41) and Theorem 2 of Lieberman [24], we know that we can find \(\alpha \in (0,1)\) and \(M>0\), such that
From the compactness of the embedding \(C^{1,\alpha }(\overline{\Omega })\subseteq C^1(\overline{\Omega })\), we have
Let
Then
So, passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that
From (3.34), we have
From hypotheses \(H_g(i)\), (iii) and \(H_f(i)\), (iii), it follows that
(where \(\frac{1}{p}+\frac{1}{p'}=1\)).
Acting on (3.44) with \(y_n-y_*\), passing to the limit as \(n\rightarrow +\infty \) and using (3.42), we obtain
so
(see Proposition 2.4) and so \(\Vert y_*\Vert =1\).
Note that by virtue of hypotheses \(H_g\)(iii) and \(H_f\)(iii), we have
with \(0\leqslant \widehat{\zeta }(z)\leqslant \zeta ^*\) for almost all \(z\in \Omega \). So, if in (3.44) we pass to the limit as \(n\rightarrow +\infty \) and we use (3.45) and (3.46), we obtain
so
thus
(see Lemma 2.5) and finally, we have that \(y_*=0\), which contradicts to (3.45).
This proves that \(u_*\ne 0\). Hence \(u_*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) is a solution of problem \((P)_{\lambda _*}\). Therefore \(\lambda _*\in \mathcal {Y}\). \(\square \)
We show that for every \(\lambda \geqslant \lambda _*\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has an extremal (smallest) positive solution.
Proposition 3.7
If hypotheses \(H_f\), \(H_g\), and \(H_0\) hold and \(\lambda \geqslant \lambda _*\), then problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has a smallest positive solution \(u_{\lambda }^*\in \mathrm {int}\, C_+\).
Proof
Let \(S(\lambda )\) be the set of positive solutions for problem \((P)_{\lambda }\). Since \(\lambda \geqslant \lambda _*\), \(S(\lambda )\ne 0\) and \(S(\lambda )\subseteq \mathrm {int}\,C_+\). Let \(C\subseteq S(\lambda )\) be a chain (i.e., a nonempty linearly ordered subset of \(S(\lambda )\)). From Dunford and Schwartz [6, p.336], we know that we can find a sequence \(\{u_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq C\), such that
Moreover, from Lemma 11.5(a) of Heikkilä and Lakshmikantham [22, p. 15], we know that we may assume that the sequence \(\{u_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\) is decreasing. We have
so
for some \(M_1>0\) (see hypotheses \(H_g(i)\), \(H_f(i)\) and recall that \(u_n\leqslant u_1\) for all \(n\geqslant 1\)). So,
(see Lemma 2.5) and thus the sequence \(\{u_n\}_{n\geqslant 1}\subseteq W^{1,p}(\Omega )\) is bounded.
So, passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that
with \(\theta <p^*\). On (3.47) we act with \(u_n-u_*\), pass to the limit as \(n\rightarrow +\infty \) and use (3.48). Then
so
(see Proposition 2.4).
Reasoning as in the proof of Proposition 3.6, we show that \(u_*\ne 0\) and so \(u_*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) is a positive solution of \((P)_{\lambda }\). Hence \(u_*=\inf C\in S(\lambda )\) and since C was an arbitrary chain, from the Kuratowski-Zorn lemma, we infer that \(S(\lambda )\) has a minimum element \(u_{\lambda }^*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\). But \(S(\lambda )\) is downward directed (i.e., if \(u,v\in S(\lambda )\), then there exists \(y\in S(\lambda )\), such that \(y\leqslant \min \{u,v\}\); see Aizicovici et al. [3]). So, it follows that \(u_{\lambda }^*\leqslant u\) for all \(u\in S(\lambda )\), i.e., \(u_{\lambda }^*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\) is the smallest positive solution of problem \((P)_{\lambda }\). \(\square \)
Summarizing the situation, we have the following bifurcation-type theorem describing the dependence of positive solutions of \((P)_{\lambda }\) on the parameter \(\lambda >0\).
Theorem 3.8
If hypotheses \(H_f\), \(H_g\) and \(H_0\) hold, then there exists \(\lambda _*>0\), such that:
- (a) :
-
for all \(\lambda >\lambda _*\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has at least two positive solutions
$$\begin{aligned} u_0,\ \widehat{u}\ \in \ \mathrm {int}\,C_+; \end{aligned}$$ - (b) :
-
for \(\lambda =\lambda _*\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has at least one positive solution \(u_*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\);
- (c) :
-
for all \(\lambda \in (0,\lambda _*)\), problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has no positive solution.
Moreover, if \(\lambda \geqslant \lambda _*\), then problem \((P)_{\lambda }\) has a smallest positive solution \(u_{\lambda }^*\in \mathrm {int}\,C_+\).
References
Afrouzi, G.A., Brown, K.J.: On a diffusive logistic equation. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 225, 326–339 (1998)
Aizicovici, S., Papageorgiou, N.S., Staicu, V.: Degree theory for operators of monotone type and nonlinear elliptic equations with inequality constraints. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 196, 915 (2008)
Aizicovici, S., Papageorgiou, N.S., Staicu, V.: Existence of multiple solutions with precise sign information for semilinear Neumann problems. Ann. Math. Pure Appl. 188, 679–719 (2009)
Aizicovici, S., Papageorgiou, N.S., Staicu, V.: The spectrum and an index formula for the Neumann \(p\)-Laplacian and multiple solutions for problems with a crossing nonlinearity. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 25, 431–456 (2009)
Brézis, H., Nirenberg, L.: \({H}^1\) versus \({C}^1\) local minimizers. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I Math. 317, 465–472 (1993)
Dunford, N., Schwartz, J.T.: Linear Operators. I. General Theory, Volume 7 of Pure and Applied Mathematics. Wiley, New York (1958)
Filippakis, M., O’Regan, D., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Positive solutions and biffurcation phenomena for nonlinear elliptic equations of logistic type: the superdiffusive case. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 9, 1507–1527 (2010)
García Azorero, J., Manfredi, J., Peral Alonso, I.: Sobolev versus Hölder local minimizers and global multiplicity for some quasilinear elliptic equations. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2, 385–404 (2000)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Nonsmooth Critical Point Theory and Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2005)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Nonlinear Analysis. Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Positive solutions for nonlinear Neumann eigenvalue problems. Dyn. Syst. Appl. 21, 235–250 (2012)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Neumann problems resonant at zero and infinity. Ann. Math. Pure Appl. 191, 395–430 (2012)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Pairs of nontrivial solutions for resonant Neumann problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 398, 649–663 (2013)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Multiplicity of solutions for Neumann problems with an indefinite and unbounded potential. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 12, 1985–1999 (2013)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions for the Neumann \(p\)-Laplacian. Positivity 17, 309–332 (2013)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Multiple solutions for a class of nonlinear Neumann eigenvalue problems. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 13, 1491–1512 (2014)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Resonant equations with the Neumann \(p\)-Laplacian plus anindefinite potential. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 422, 1146–1179 (2015)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Anisotropic nonlinear Neumann problems. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 42, 323–354 (2011)
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Bifurcation-type results for nonlinear parametric elliptic equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 142A, 595–623 (2012)
Guo, Z., Zhang, Z.: \({W}^{1, p}\) versus \({C}^1\) local minimizers and multiplicity results for quasilinear elliptic equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 286, 32–50 (2003)
Gurtin, M.E., Mac Camy, R.C.: On the diffusion of bilogical population. Math. Biosci. 33, 35–49 (1977)
Heikkilä, S., Lakshmikantham, V.: Monotone Iterative Techniques for Discontinuous Nonlinear Differential Equations, Volume 181 of Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics. Marcel Dekker, New York (1994)
Hu, S., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Nonlinear Neumann equations driven by a homogeneous differential operator. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 10, 1055–1078 (2011)
Lieberman, G.M.: Boundary regularity for solutions of degenerate elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal. 12, 1203–1219 (1988)
Marano, S., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Multiple solutions for a Neumann problem with equidiffusive reaction term. Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 38, 521–534 (2011)
Motreanu, D., Motreanu, V.V., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Nonlinear Neumann problems near resonance. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 58, 1257–1279 (2009)
Motreanu, D., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for Neumann problems. J. Differ. Equ. 232, 1–35 (2007)
Motreanu, D., Papageorgiou, N.S.: Multiple solutions for nonlinear Neumann problems driven by a nonhomogeneous differential operators. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 139, 3527–3535 (2011)
Takeuchi, S.: Positive solutions of a degenerate elliptic equations with a logistic reaction. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 129, 433–441 (2001)
Takeuchi, S.: Multiplicity results for a degenerate elliptic equation with a logistic reaction. J. Differ. Equ. 173, 138–144 (2001)
Vázquez, J.L.: A strong maximum principle for some quasilinear elliptic equation. Appl. Math. Optim. 12, 191–202 (1984)
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the two referees for their corrections and helpful remarks. The research was supported by the Marie Curie International Research Staff Exchange Scheme Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. 295118, the International Project co-financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Republic of Poland under Grant No. W111/7.PR/2012 and the National Science Center of Poland under Maestro Advanced Project No. DEC-2012/06/A/ST1/00262.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Rosihan M. Ali.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Gasiński, L., Papageorgiou, N.S. Positive Solutions for the Neumann p-Laplacian with Superdiffusive Reaction. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. 40, 1711–1731 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-015-0212-3
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-015-0212-3
Keywords
- p-Laplacian
- Superdiffusive reaction
- Local minimizers
- Mountain pass theorem
- Comparison principle
- Bifurcation-type theorem