Abstract
Increasing urbanization and growth of population have increased the demand for various water resources especially the groundwater resources in Sagar Island, South 24 Parganas, West Bengal, India. Thus Groundwater resources should be managed properly with the application of various scientific propositions and modern techniques. In this research, identification of groundwater potential zonation (GWPZ) has been done using remote sensing–geographic information system (RS–GIS) technology and Fuzzy-AHP approach on a single platform. The main objective of the research is to use the Fuzzy-AHP approach to demarcate GWPZs utilizing 10 geo-environmental parameters. The study successfully identifies the GWPZs within the area of interest and categorizes GWPZs has been classified into five different classes following the groundwater availability that is very high potential 6.84%), high (36.23%), medium (27.68%), low (17.53%) and very low (11.72%). The originated GWPZ map has been verified using geophysical data collected from the field survey to test the model's performance. The validation results demonstrated that the applied technique yields considerably reliable findings that can aid in long-term planning and management for sustainable use of groundwater resources in different coastal tracts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abijith D, Saravanan S, Singh L, Jennifer JJ, Saranya T, Parthasarathy KSS (2020) GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for identification of potential groundwater recharge zones - a case study from Ponnaniyaru watershed, Tamil Nadu, India. HydroResearch 3:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2020.02.002
Achu AL, Thomas J, Reghunath R (2020) Multi-criteria decision analysis for delineation of groundwater potential zones in a tropical river basin using remote sensing, GIS and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100365
Adiat KAN, Nawawi MNM, Abdullah K (2012) Assessing the accuracy of GIS-based elementary multi criteria decision analysis as a spatial prediction tool – a case of predicting potential zones of sustainable groundwater resources. J Hydrol 440–441:75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.03.028
Adnan K, Ying L, Sarker S, Yu M, Eliw M, Sultanuzzaman M, Huq M (2020) Simultaneous adoption of risk management strategies to manage the catastrophic risk of maize farmers in Bangladesh. GeoJournal 86:1981–1998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10154-y
Agarwal R, Garg P (2016) Remote sensing and GIS based groundwater potential & recharge zones mapping using multi-criteria decision making technique. Water Resour Manag 30(1):243–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1159-8
Ahmad I, Dar MA, Teka AH, Teshome M, Andualem TG, Tehsome A, Shafi T (2020) GIS and fuzzy logic techniques-based demarcation of groundwater potential zones: a case study from Jemma River basin, Ethiopia. J Afr Earth Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2020.103860
Ajibade FO, Olajire OO, Ajibade TF, Nwogwu NA, Lasisi KH, Alo AB, Owolabi TA, Adewumi JR (2019) Combining multicriteria decision analysis with GIS for suitably siting landfills in a Nigerian state. Environ Sustain Indic 3–4:100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2019.100010
Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 44:120–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003
Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Park HJ, Lee JH (2014) A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping. CATENA 114:21–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.011
Aniya M (1985) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Amahata River Basin. Japan Ann Assoc Am Geogr 75:102–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1985.tb00061.x
Arefin R (2020) Groundwater potential zone identification at Plio-Pleistocene elevated tract, Bangladesh: AHP-GIS and remote sensing approach. Groundw Sustain Dev 10:100340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100340
Beven K (1997) TOPMODEL: a critique. Hydrol Process 11:1069–1085
Beven K, Freer J (2001) A dynamic TOPMODEL. Hydrol Process 15(10):1993–2011
Cagman N, Enginoglu S, Citak F (2011) Fuzzy soft set theory and its applications. Iran J Fuzzy Syst 8(3):137–147
Carleer A, Wolff E (2006) Region-based classification potential for land-cover classification with very high spatial resolution satellite data. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Object-Based Image Analysis. Citeseer, pp 4–5
Chen XL, Wei JC, Guo JB (2010) Prediction on water abundance of sandstone by multiple factors analysis method. Shaanxi Coal 5
Coyle G (2004) The analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Practical strategy: structured tools and techniques
Crétaux JF, Calmant S, Del Rio RA, Kouraev A, Bergé-Nguyen M, Maisongrande P (2011) Lakes studies from satellite altimetry. In: Vignudelli S et al (eds) Coastal altimetry. Springer, Berlin, pp 509–533
Das GK (2006) Sunderbans environment and ecosystem, 1st edn. Levant Books, Sagar Island, pp 12–120
Gaber A, Koch M, El-Baz F (2010) Textural and compositional characterization of wadifeiran deposits, sinai peninsula, Egypt, using radarsat-1, PALSAR, SRTM and ETM+ data. Rem Sens 2(1):52–75. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs2010052
Gayen A, Zaman A (2013) Mitigation of water crisis and growing crops in lean period by rainwater harvesting through concreted rooftops and household ponds in Sagar Island. Curr Agric Res J 1:87–91
Gopinath G, Seralathan P (2005) Rapid erosion of the coast of Sagar Island, West Bengal - India. Environ Geol 48:1058–1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-005-0044-9
Hall DK, Box JE, Casey KA, Hook SJ, Shuman CA, Steffen K (2008) Comparison of satellite-derived and in-situ observations of ice and snow surface temperatures over Greenland. Remote Sens Environ 112(10):3739–3749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.05.007
Huq ME, Su C, Li J, Sarven MS (2018) Arsenic enrichment and mobilization in the Holocene alluvial aquifers of Prayagpur of Southwestern Bangladesh. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 128:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.01.008
IPCC (2001) Climate Change (2001): the Scientific Basis: Part of the Working Group I Contribution to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC
Jasmin I, Mallikarjuna P (2011) Review: Satellite-based remote sensing and geographic information systems and their application in the assessment of groundwater potential, with particular reference to India. Hydrogeol J 19(4):729–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-011-0712-7
Jothibasu A, Anbazhagan S (2016) Modeling groundwater probability index in Ponnaiyar River basin of South India using analytic hierarchy process. Model Earth Syst Environ 2(3):109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0174-y
Kamruzzaman M, Alanazi SA, Alruwaili M, Alshammari N, Siddiqi MH, Huq ME (2020) Water resource evaluation and identifying groundwater potential zones in arid area using remote sensing and geographic information system. J Comput Sci 16(3):266–279
Lavender S, Groom S (1999) Technical Note the SeaWiFS Automatic Data Processing System (SeaAPS). https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699212830
Liu X, Pedrycz W (2009) Axiomatic fuzzy set theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin
Mahmoud SH, Alazba A (2016) Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for deciphering groundwater potential zones in the central region of Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 75(4):344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5156-2
Mallick J, Singh RK, AlAwadh MA, Islam S, Khan RA, Qureshi MN (2018) GISbased landslide susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decisionmaking techniques in the Abha Watershed, Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 77(7):276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7451-1
Minh HVT, Avtar R, Kumar P, Tran DQ, Ty TV, Behera HC, Kurasaki M (2019) Groundwater quality assessment using fuzzy-AHP in an giang province of vietnam. Geosciences 9(8):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9080330
Mohammadi-Behzad HR, Charchi A, Kalantari N, Nejad AM, Vardanjani HK (2018) Delineation of groundwater potential zones using remote sensing (RS), geographical information system (GIS) and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) techniques: a case study in the Leylia-Keynow watershed, southwest of Iran. Carbonates Evaporites 34:1307–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-018-0420-7
Mokarram M, Roshan G, Negahban S (2015) Landform classification using topography position index (case study: salt dome of Korsia-Darab plain, Iran). Model Earth Syst Environ 1:40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0055-9
Mumtaz R, Baig S, Kazmi SSA, Ahmad F, Fatima I, Ghauri B (2019) Delineation of groundwater prospective resources by exploiting geo-spatial decision-making techniques for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Neural Comput Appl 31(9):5379–5399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-3370-z
Murthy K, Mamo AG (2009) Multi-criteria decision evaluation in groundwater zones identification in Moyale-Teltelesubbasin, South Ethiopia. Int J Rem Sens 30(11):2729–2740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802468255
Nair Hema C, Padmalal D, Ammini J, Vinod PG (2017) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in river basins using geospatial tools—an example from Southern Western Ghats, Kerala, India. J Geovis Spatial Anal 1(1–2):5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41651-017-0003-5
Nandi SG, Mili K, Dutta A, Baksi D, Moumita, (2016) Shoreline shifting and its prediction using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Sagar Island, West Bengal (India). J Coast Conserv 20(1):61–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-015-0418-4
Nayyer S, Huq M, Nana Yaw Danquah T, Akib J, Asif S (2019) Parameters derived from and/or used with digital elevation models (DEMs) for landslide susceptibility mapping and landslide risk assessment: a review. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 8(12):545. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8120545
Nhamo L, Ebrahim GY, Mabhaudhi T, Mpandeli S, Magombeyi M, Chitakira M, Magidi J, Sibanda M (2020) An assessment of groundwater use in irrigated agriculture using multi-spectral remote sensing. Phys Chem Earth a/b/c 115:102810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2019.102810
Oikonomidis D, Dimogianni S, Kazakis N, Voudouris K (2015) A GIS/remote sensing-based methodology for groundwater potentiality assessment in Tirnavos area, Greece. J Hydrol 525:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.03.056
Patra S, Mishra P, Mahapatra SC (2018a) Delineation of groundwater potential zone for sustainable development: a case study from Ganga Alluvial Plain covering Hooghly district of India using remote sensing, geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 172:2485–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.161
Patra S, Mishra P, Mahapatra SC (2018b) Delineation of groundwater potential zone for sustainable development: A case study from Ganga Alluvial Plain covering Hooghly district of India using remote sensing, geographic information system and analytic hierarchy process. J Clean Prod 172:2485–2502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.161
Pham-Duc B, Sylvestre F, Papa F et al (2020) The Lake Chad hydrology under current climate change. Sci Rep 10:5498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62417-w
Pinto D, Shrestha S, Babel MS, Ninsawat S (2017) Delineation of groundwater potential zones in the Comoro watershed, Timor Leste using GIS, remote sensing and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) technique. Appl Water Sci 7(1):503–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0270-6
Rana MMSP, HossainRefat Nasher MMNM (2022) Identification of groundwater potential zone using geospatial techniques of agriculture dominated area in Dinajpur district, Bangladesh. J Environ Chall. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2022.100475
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(1):9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Saravanan S, Saranya T, Abijith D, Jacinth JJ, Singh L (2021) Delineation of groundwater potential zones for Arkavathi sub-watershed, Karnataka, India using remote sensing and GIS. J Environ Chall. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100380
Sarker MNI, Wu M, Alam GMM, Shouse RC (2020a) Life in riverine islands in Bangladesh: local adaptation strategies of climate vulnerable riverine island dwellers for livelihood resilience. Land Use Pol 94:104574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104574
Sarker MNI, Wu M, Alam GMM, Shouse RC (2020b) Livelihood diversification in rural Bangladesh: patterns and determinants in disaster prone riverine islands. Land Use Pol 96:104720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104720
Sarker MNI, Yang B, Lv Y, Huq ME, Kamruzzaman M (2020c) Climate change adaptation and resilience through big data. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl 11(3):533–539
Schneider K (2018) Circle of Blue https://www.circleofblue.org/2018/world/groundwater-scarcity-pollution-set-india-on-perilous-course/. Accessed on 30 May 2021
Shao Z, Cai J (2018) Remote sensing image fusion with deep convolutional neural network. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Rem Sens 11(5):1656–1669. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2805923
Shao Z, Yang K, Zhou W (2018) Performance evaluation of single-label and multilabel remote sensing image retrieval using a dense labeling dataset. Rem Sens 10(6):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10060964
Shao Z, Fu H, Li D, Altan O, Cheng T (2019a) Remote sensing monitoring of multiscale watersheds impermeability for urban hydrological evaluation. Remote Sens Environ 232:111338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111338
Shao Z, Wang L, Wang Z, Deng J (2019b) Remote sensing image super-resolution using sparse representation and coupled sparse autoencoder. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observ Rem Sens 12(8):2663–2674. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2925456
Shao Z, Huq ME, Cai B, Altan O, Li Y (2020) Integrated remote sensing and GIS approach using Fuzzy-AHP to delineate and identify groundwater potential zones in semi-arid Shanxi Province, China. Environ Model Softw. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104868
Siddi Raju R, SudarsanaRaju G, Rajasekhar M (2019) Identification of groundwater potential zones in Mandavi River basin, Andhra Pradesh, India using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. HydroResearch 2:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2019.09.001
Silwal CB, Pathak D (2018) Review on practices and state of the art methods on delineation of ground water potential using GIS and remote sensing. Bull Dep Geol. https://doi.org/10.3126/bdg.v20i0.20717
Singaraja C, Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Prasanna MV, Thivya C, Thilagavathi R (2015) A study on the status of saltwater intrusion in the coastal hard rock aquifer of South India. Environ Dev Sustain 17(3):443–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-014-9554-5
Singh LK, Jha MK, Chowdary VM (2017) Multi-criteria analysis and GIS modelling for identifying prospective water harvesting and artificial recharge sites for sustainable water supply. J Clean Prod 142:1436–1456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.163
Song B, Park K (2014) Validation of ASTER surface temperature data with in situ measurements to evaluate heat islands in complex urban areas. Adv Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/620410
Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J, Wilcox C (2009) Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Anal Int J 29(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01130.x
Thapa R, Gupta S, Gupta A, Reddy DV, Kaur H (2018) Use of geospatial technology for delineating groundwater potential zones with an emphasis on water-table analysis in Dwarka River basin, Birbhum, India. Hydrogeol J 26:899–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1683-0
Turk FJ, Miller SD (2005) Toward improved characterization of remotely sensed precipitation regimes with MODIS/AMSR-E blended data techniques. IEEE Trans Geosci Rem Sens 43(5):1059–1069. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.841627
Yin H, Shi Y, Niu H, Xie D, Wei J, Lefticariu L, Xu S (2018) A GIS-based model of potential groundwater yield zonation for a sandstone aquifer in the Juye Coalfield, Shangdong, China. J Hydrol 557:434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.043
Yousif M, Sabet HS, Ghoubachi SY, Aziz A (2018) Utilizing the geological data and remote sensing applications for investigation of groundwater occurrences, West El Minia, Western Desert of Egypt. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 7(2):318–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nrjag.2018.07.002
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353
Zhang K, Xie X, Zhu B, Meng S, Yao Y (2019) Unexpected groundwater recovery with decreasing agricultural irrigation in the Yellow River Basin. Agric Water Manag 213:858–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.009
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Natural Resources Data Management System, Department of Science & Technology for the financial support and also thankful to the United State Geological Survey, European Space Agency for providing satellite data to pursue this study. The authors are also thankful to the School of Water Resources Engineering, Jadavpur University for providing the logistic and other facilities to conduct the study.
Funding
The entire research work is funded by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Natural Rural Data Management System (NRDMS), Govt of India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by SK Mohinuddin and Saurabh Kumar Basak. The first draft of the manuscript was written by SK Mohinuddin, Saurabh Kumar Basak and Sudipa Halder. Pankaj Kumar Roy, Malabika Biswas Roy supervise the work. All the authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, P.K., Basak, S.K., Mohinuddin, S. et al. Modelling groundwater potential zone using fuzzy logic and geospatial technology of an deltaic island. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 8, 5565–5584 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01392-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01392-9