Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Detecting disturbed forest tracts in the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India, using forest canopy density and fragmentation models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper explored the level of forest disturbance in the Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR) of Indian tropical forest. We acquired single scene image of Landsat-5 (1989) and Landsat-8 (2015) for the analysis. Disturbance map was produced using fragmentation and canopy density models. The map was categorized into high, moderate, low, and undisturbed forest tracts. Spatiotemporal analysis of forest disturbance (1989–2015) revealed that highly disturbed tracts experienced a decrease of 43%, while medium and low disturbed tracts showed an increase of 57% and 30%, respectively. Undisturbed forest tracts witnessed decrease mainly due to a decrease in very high canopy density and increase in forest fragmentation. Within cores I, II and III of STR, undisturbed forest tracts in core I have significantly declined due to increased anthropogenic activities. Thus, the study calls for immediate attention to check forest disturbance in core I of STR. Though the government has initiated relocation program of the villages and restoration of the STR, the execution process has still a long way to achieve the goal. The methodology adopted in this study can effectively be utilized for assessing the forest disturbance tracts at spatial scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullah SA, Nakagoshi N (2007) Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. For Ecol Manag 241(1–3):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Asner GP (2013) Geography of forest disturbance. PNAS 110(10):3711–3712

    Google Scholar 

  • Azizia Z, Najafi A, Sohrabia H (2008) Forest canopy density estimating, using satellite images. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B8):1127–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee R, Srivastava PK (2013) Reconstruction of contested landscape: detecting land cover transformation hosting cultural heritage sites from Central India using remote sensing. Land Use Policy 34:193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Swenson JJ, Alig RJ (2004) Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. For Ecol Manag 189(1–3):363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Cale PG, Hobbs RJ (1994) Landscape heterogeneity indices: problems of scale and applicability, with particular reference to animal habitat description. Pac Conserv Biol 1(3):183–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) The forest types of India. The government of India Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • CLEAR (2002) Forest fragmentation in Connecticut: 1985–2006. Center for land use education and research. http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscape/forestfrag

  • Cohen WB, Fiorella M, Gray J, Helmer E, Anderson K (1998) An efficient and accurate method for mapping forest clearcuts in the Pacific Northwest using Landsat imagery. Photogr Eng Remote Sens 64(4):293–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG, Green K (2002) Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP, Ayres MP, Flannigan MD, Simberloff D (2001) Climate change and forest disturbances: climate change can affect forests by altering the frequency, intensity, duration, and timing of fire, drought, introduced species, insect and pathogen outbreaks, hurricanes, windstorms, ice storms, or landslides. Bioscience 51(9):723–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Danneyrolles V, Dupuis S, Fortin G, Leroyer M, de Römer A, Terrail R, Arseneault D (2019) Stronger influence of anthropogenic disturbance than climate change on century-scale compositional changes in northern forests. Nat Commun 10(1):1265

    Google Scholar 

  • Deka J, Tripathi OP, Khan ML (2013) Implementation of forest canopy density model to monitor tropical deforestation. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 41(2):469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornelas M (2010) Disturbance and change in biodiversity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B: Biol Sci 365(1558):3719–3727

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson L, Lynam AJ, Bradshaw CJ, He F, Bickford DP, Woodruff DS, Laurance WF (2013) Near-complete extinction of native small mammal fauna 25 years after forest fragmentation. Science 341(6153):1508–1510

    Google Scholar 

  • GoR (2004) Management plan for Sariska Tiger Reserve. Jaipur, Rajasthan

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray RE, Ewers RM, Boyle MJ, Chung AY, Gill RJ (2018) Effect of tropical forest disturbance on the competitive interactions within a diverse ant community. Sci Rep 8(1):5131

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey SP, Cohen WB, Zhiqiang Y, Krankina ON (2005) Comparison of Tasseled Cap-based Landsat data structures for use in forest disturbance detection. Remote Sens Environ 97(3):301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman GE, Strittholt JR, Slosser NC, Dellasala DA (2002) Forest Fragmentation of the Conterminous United States: assessing Forest Intactness through Road Density and Spatial Characteristics: Forest fragmentation can be measured and monitored in a powerful new way by combining remote sensing, geographic information systems, and analytical software. Bioscience 52(5):411–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Hérault B, Piponiot C (2018) Key drivers of ecosystem recovery after disturbance in a neotropical forest. For Ecosyst 5(1):2

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Goward SN, Schleeweis K, Thomas N, Masek JG, Zhu Z (2009) Dynamics of national forests assessed using the Landsat record: case studies in eastern United States. Remote Sens Environ 113(7):1430–1442

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Goward SN, Masek JG, Thomas N, Zhu Z, Vogelmann JE (2010) An automated approach for reconstructing recent forest disturbance history using dense Landsat time series stacks. Remote Sens Environ 114(1):183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo LZ, Boschetti L, Sparks AM (2019) Object-based classification of forest disturbance types in the conterminous United States. Remote Sens 11(5):477

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Sajjad H (2016a) Analysis of willingness for relocation of the local communities living in the Critical Tiger Habitat of the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Local Environ 21(11):1409–1419

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Sajjad H (2016b) Household dependency on forest resources in the Sariska Tiger Reserve (STR), India: implications for management. J Sustain For 35(1):60–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain P, Ahmed R, Sajjad H (2016) Assessing and monitoring forest health using a forest fragmentation approach in Sariska Tiger Reserve, India. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian J Geogr 70(5):306–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings SB, Brown ND, Sheil D (1999) Assessing forest canopies and understorey illumination: canopy closure, canopy cover and other measures. For Int J For Res 72(1):59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Karanth KK, Curran LM, Reuning-Scherer JD (2006) Village size and forest disturbance in Bhadra wildlife sanctuary, Western Ghats, India. Biol Conserv 128(2):147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RE, Cohen WB, Schroeder TA (2007) Trajectory-based change detection for automated characterization of forest disturbance dynamics. Remote Sens Environ 110(3):370–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RE, Yang Z, Cohen WB (2010) Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr—Temporal segmentation algorithms. Remote Sens Environ 114(12):2897–2910

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Singh MP, Singh H, Dhakate PM, Ravindranath NH (2019) Forest working plan for the sustainable management of forest and biodiversity in India. J Sustain For 1:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLean MG, Congalton RG (2010) Mapping and analysis of fragmentation in southeastern New Hampshire. In: ASPRS/CaGUS 2010 fall specialty conference, pp 15–19

  • Maren IE, Karki S, Prajapati C, Yadav RK, Shrestha BB (2015) Facing north or south: does slope aspect impact forest stand characteristics and soil properties in a semiarid trans-Himalayan valley? J Arid Environ 121:112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report (GTR). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 122 p

  • Mitchell AL, Rosenqvist A, Mora B (2017) Current remote sensing approaches to monitoring forest degradation in support of countries measurement, reporting and verification (MRV) systems for REDD+. Carbon Bal Manag 12(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Murayama YKKL, Lwin KK (2010) Estimation of Landsat TM Surface Temperature Using ERDAS Imagine Spatial Modeler. Division of Spatial Information Science Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba

  • Nandy S, Joshi PK, Das KK (2003) Forest canopy density stratification using biophysical modeling. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 31(4):291–297

    Google Scholar 

  • NTCA: National Tiger Conservation Authority (2010) Compendium of guidelines/advisories/gazette notification. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdogan M (2014) A practical and automated approach to large area forest disturbance mapping with remote sensing. PLoS One 9(4):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent J, Civco D, Hurd J (2007) Simulating future forest fragmentation in a Connecticut region undergoing suburbanization. In: ASPRS 2007 Annual Conference Tampa, Florida

  • Pfeifer M, Gonsamo A, Woodgate W, Cayuela L, Marshall AR, Ledo A, Courtney-Mustaphi C (2018) Tropical forest canopies and their relationships with climate and disturbance: results from a global dataset of consistent field-based measurements. For Ecosyst 5(1):7

    Google Scholar 

  • Polevshchikova I (2019) Disturbance analyses of forest cover dynamics using remote sensing and GIS. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 316(1):012053

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy CS, Sreelekshmi S, Jha CS, Dadhwal VK (2013) National assessment of forest fragmentation in India: landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation and forest cover change. Ecol Eng 60:453–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters K, Wickham J, O’Neill R, Jones B, Smith E (2000) Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conserv Ecol 4(2):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, Wickham JD, O’neill RV, Jones KB, Smith ER, Coulston JW, Smith JH (2002) Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 5(8):0815–0822

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikimaru A (1996) Landsat TM data processing guide for forest canopy density mapping and monitoring model. In: ITTO workshop on utilization of remote sensing in site assessment and planning for rehabilitation of logged-over forest, Bangkok, Thailand. 8:1–8

  • Rikimaru A, Roy PS, Miyatake S (2002) Tropical forest cover density mapping. Trop Ecol 43(1):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy PS, Sharma KP, Jain A (1996) Stratification of density in dry deciduous forest using satellite remote sensing digital data—an approach based on spectral indices. J Biosci 21(5):723–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy PS, Miyatake S, Rikimaru A (1997) Biophysical spectral response modeling approach for forest density stratification. In: Proceedings of the 18th Asian conference on remote sensing

  • Sahana M, Sajjad H, Ahmed R (2015) Assessing spatio-temporal health of forest cover using forest canopy density model and forest fragmentation approach in Sundarban Reserve forest, India. Modeling Earth Syst Environ 1(4):49

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahana M, Ahmed R, Jain P, Sajjad H (2016) Driving force for forest fragmentation explored by land use change in Song watershed, India. Spat Inf Res 24(6):659–669

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder TA, Healey SP, Moisen GG, Frescino TS, Cohen WB, Huang C, Yang Z (2014) Improving estimates of forest disturbance by combining observations from Landsat time series with US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis data. Remote Sens Environ 154:61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler A, Folkeson L (2003) COST 341—Habitat fragmentation due to transportation infrastructure: The Swedish National Review. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Senf C, Seidl R, Hostert P (2017) Remote sensing of forest insect disturbances: current state and future directions. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 60:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Srivastava PK, Szabó S, Petropoulos GP, Gupta M, Islam T (2017) Landscape transform and spatial metrics for mapping spatiotemporal land cover dynamics using Earth Observation data-sets. Geocarto Int 32(2):113–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth J, Nagendra H, Tucker C (2002) Fragmentation of a landscape: incorporating landscape metrics into satellite analyses of land-cover change. Landsc Res 27(3):253–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth J, Munroe D, Nagendra H (2004) Land cover change and landscape fragmentation—comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region. Agr Ecosyst Environ 101(2–3):185–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabó S, Túri Z, Márton S (2014) Factors biasing the correlation structure of patch level landscape metrics. Ecol Indic 36:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Bullock EL, Olofsson P, Estel S, Woodcock CE (2019) Near real-time monitoring of tropical forest disturbance: new algorithms and assessment framework. Remote Sens Environ 224:202–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Túri Z, Szabó S (2008) The role of resolution on landscape metrics based analysis. Acta Geographica Silesiana 4(1):47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Clark WC, Kates RW, Richards JF, Mathews JT, Meyer WB (1990) The earth as transformed by human action. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, p 713

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt P, Riitters KH, Estreguil C, Kozak J, Wade TG, Wickham JD (2007) Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecol 22(2):171–177

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the Reviewers and Editors for their constructive comments and valuable suggestions which helped us to improve the overall quality of the manuscript. We are also thankful to Forest Department officials for their help and cooperation during visit to the study area.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sehgal Foundation, Gurugram, Haryana, 122003, India

    Purva Jain

  2. Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, 110025, India

    Raihan Ahmed, Sufia Rehman & Haroon Sajjad

Authors
  1. Purva Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raihan Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sufia Rehman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haroon Sajjad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haroon Sajjad.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jain, P., Ahmed, R., Rehman, S. et al. Detecting disturbed forest tracts in the Sariska Tiger Reserve, India, using forest canopy density and fragmentation models. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 6, 1373–1385 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00755-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-00755-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation