Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Driving force for forest fragmentation explored by land use change in Song watershed, India

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study attempts to assess forest fragmentation and degradation in response to land use/land cover changes in Song watershed, India during 1998–2014. Landsat TM and Landsat 8 OLI satellite data across two dates (1998 and 2014) were used to analyze land use/land cover change and its impact on forest cover. The extent of forest degradation was analyzed using fragmentation model. Four categories of disturbance viz. core, perforated, edge and patch were obtained using 200 meters edge width. The result shows overall decrease of 7% in area under forest over 16 years. Area under open forest, mixed land use/land cover I (agriculture, forest and built up) and mixed land use/land cover III (agriculture and built up) has significantly increased while area under dense forest has decreased during the study period. Fragmentation model revealed lots of disturbance in forest located in mixed land use/land cover areas. Perforated and patch classes of forest have experienced a significant increase in their respective areas while core area has decreased at the expense of other fragmentation classes. Degradation of forest occurred at large scale at Hrishikesh and Thano forest ranges of Dehradun district and Gadol range in Tehri Garhwal district lying in the watershed. Rishikesh city in Dehradun district located in southern part of watershed recorded increase in patches due to developmental activities. Remote sensing and fragmentation model showed their effectiveness in analyzing forest degradation and monitoring the health of the forest in the watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nagendra, H., Southworth, J., & Tucker, C. (2003). Accessibility as a determinant of landscape transformation in Western Honduras: Linking pattern and process. Landscape Ecology, 18, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Echeverría, C., Newton, A. C., & Lara, A. (2007). Impacts of forest fragmentation on species composition and forest structure in the temperate landscape of southern Chile. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16, 426–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zanella, L., Borem, R. A. T., Souza, C. G., Alves, H. M. R., & Borem, F. M. (2012). Atlantic forest fragmentation analysis and landscape restoration management scenarios. Natureza and Conservação, 10(1), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Simoniello, T., Coluzzi, R., Imbrenda, V., & Lanfredi, M. (2015). Land cover changes and forest landscape evolution (1985–2009) in a typical Mediterranean agroforestry system (high Agri Valley). Nat. Hazards. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15, 1201–1214. doi:10.5194/nhess-15-1201-2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McMorrow, J., & Talip, M. (2001). Decline of forest area in Sabah, Malaysia: Relationship to state policies, land code and land capability. Global Environmental Change, 11, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mundia, C. N., & Murayama, Y. (2009). Analysis of land use/cover changes and animal population dynamics in a wildlife sanctuary in East Africa. Remote Sensing, 1, 952–970. doi:10.3390/rs1040952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Iqbal, M., Rashid, S. M., Sajjad, H., Siddiqui, M. A., & Siddiqui, L. (2012). Anthropogenic impact on landuse/Landcover in Dudhganga Watershed of Kashmir Valley, India. International Journal of Geomatics and Geoscience, 2(3), 892–900.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Numata, I., & Cochrane, M. A. (2012). Forest Fragmentation and Its Potential Implications in the Brazilian Amazon between 2001 and 2010. Journal of Forestry, 2(4), 265–271.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daye, D. D., & Healey, J. R. (2015). Impacts of land-use change on sacred forests at the landscape scale. Global Ecology and Conservation, 3, 349–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. FAO (2010). Global forest resources assessment 2010—main report. FAO forestry paper no. 163. Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/013/i1757e/i1757e00.htm.

  11. Bennett, A. F., & Saunders, D. A. (2010). Habitat fragmentation and landscape change. Conservation biology for all (pp. 88–106). United Kingdom: Oxford University Press http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199554249.do.

  12. Chivian, E. (2013). Global environmental threats: Why they are hard to see and how a medical model may contribute to their understanding. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy, 3(2), 93–104. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2013.02.09.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haddad, N. M., Brudvig, L. A., Clobert, J., Davies, K. F., Gonzalez, A., Holt, R. D., et al. (2015). Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science Advances, 1(2), e1500052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Uddina, K., Chaudharya, S., Chettria, N., Kotrua, R., Murthya, M., Chaudhary, R. P., et al. (2015). The changing land cover and fragmenting forest on the roof of the world: A case study in Nepal’s Kailash sacred landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 141, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer, W. B., & Turner, B. L. (1992). Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Ecology and Systematics, 23, 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gascon, C., Malcolm, J. R., Patton, J. L. S., Da-Silva, M. N. F., Bogarti, J. P., Lougheed, S. C., Peres, C. A., Neckel, S., & Boag, P. T. (2000). Riverine barriers and the geographic distribution of Amazonian species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 97 (25), 6397. 13672–13677 .

  17. Rao, K. S., & Pant, R. (2001). Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a typical micro watershed in region of Colorado. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ochoa-Gaona, S. (2001). Traditional land-use systems and patterns of forest fragmentation in the Highlands of Chiapas. Mexico. Environmental Management, 27, 571–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Achard, F., Eva, H. D., Stibig, H. J., Mayaux, P., Gallego, J., Richards, J., et al. (2002). Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 297(5583), 999–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. FAO (2003). Forestry outlook study for Africa: Sub-regional report—Southern Africa. African Development Bank, European Commission and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

  21. Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Sanyilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., et al. (2006). Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology, 20(1), 65–73. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00351.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crooks, K. R., Burdett, C. L., Theobald, D. M., Rondinini, C., & Boitani, L. (2011). Global patterns of fragmentation and connectivity of mammalian carnivore habitat. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences., 366(1578), 2642–2651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riutta, T., Slade, E. M., Morecroft, M. D., Bebber, D. P., & Malhi, Y. (2014). Living on the edge: Quantifying the structure of a fragmented forest landscape in England. Landscape Ecology, 29(6), 949–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Richard, O., Bierregaard, J., Lovejoy, E. T., Kapos, V., Santos, A. D., & Hutchings, R. W. (1992). The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest. BioScience, 42(11), 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Parry, B. A., Vogt, K. A., & Beard, K. H. (2000). Landscape spatial patterns and edges in forest certification: Roots, issues, challenges and benefits (pp. 194–198). School of Forest and Environmental Studies: CRC Press Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown, N. R., Noss, R. F., Diamond, D. D., & Myers, M. N. (2001). Conservation biology and forest certification: Working together toward ecological sustainability. Journal of Forestry, 99, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Garcia-Gigorro, S., & Saura, S. (2014). Forest fragmentation estimated from remotely sensed data: Is comparison across scales possible? For. Sci., 51(1), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Klein, B. C. (1989). Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology, 70(6), 1715–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J., & Margules, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology, 5, 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Forman, R. T. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions (p. 652). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Haila, Y. (1999). Islands and fragments in maintaining biodiversity in forest ecosystems. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Santos, T., Tellería, J. L., & Virgós, E. (1999). Dispersal of Spanish juniper Juniperus thurifera by birds and mammals in a fragmented. Landscape Ecography, 22, 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, M., Zhu, Z., James, E., Xu, V. D., Wen, W., & Liu, A. (2011). Characterizing fragmentation of the collective forests in southern China from multi temporal Landsat imagery: A case study from Kecheng district of Zhejiang province. Applied Geography, 31, 1026–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harris, L. D. (1984). The fragmented forest: Island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity (p. 211). USA: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goparaju, L., Tripathi, A., & Jha, C. S. (2005). Forest fragmentation impacts on phytodiversity—An analysis using remote sensing and GIS. Current Science, 88(8), 1264–1275.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jha, C. S., Goparaju, L., Tripathi, A., Gharai, B., Raghubanshi, A. S., & Singh, J. S. (2005). Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: An analysis using remote sensing and GIS. Biodiversity and Conservation, 14, 1681–1698. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-0695-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Giriraj, A., Murthy, M. S. R., & Beierkuhnlein, C. (2009). Evaluating forest fragmentation and its tree community composition in the tropical rain forest of Southern Western Ghats (India) from 1973 to 2004. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 161(1), 29–44. doi:10.1007/s10661-008-0724-5.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nagendra, H., Paul, S., Pareeth, S., & Dutt, S. (2009). Landscapes of protection: Forest change and fragmentation in northern West Bengal. India. Environmental Management, 44, 853. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9374-9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Raman, R., & Punia, M. (2012). Land use dynamics and landscape fragmentation in higher Garhwal Himalaya, India. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 12(1), 53–65.

  40. Roy, P. S., Murthy, M. S. R., Roy, A., Kushwaha, S. P. S., Singh, S., Jha, C. S., et al. (2013). Forest fragmentation in India. Current Science, 105(6), 774–780.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Singh, J. S., Pandey, U., & Tiwari, A. K. (1984). Man and forests: A central Himalayan case study. Ambio, 13, 80–87.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ives, J. D., & Messerli, B. (1990). The Himalayan Dilemma. London and New York: United Nations University and Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lugo, A. E., Parrotta, J. A., & Brown, S. (1993). Loss of species causes by tropical deforestation and their recovery through management. Ambio, 22, 106–109.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sharma, S., Palni, L. M. S., & Roy, P. S. (2001). Vegetation fragmentation and anthropogenic disturbances in a Himalayan landscape. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 2(4), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Roy, P. S., & Tomar, S. (2000). Biodiversity characterization at landscape level using geospatial modeling technique. Biological Conservation, 95(1), 95–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sharma, S., & Roy, P. S. (2007). Forest fragmentation in the Himalaya: A Central Himalayan case study. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 14(2), 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Biradar, C. M., Saran, P. L., Raju, N., & Roy, P. S. (2005). Forest canopy density stratification: How relevant is biophysical spectral response modeling approach? Geocarto International, 20(1), 15–21. doi:10.1080/10106040508542332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Echeverría, C., Newton, A., Nahuelhual, L., Coomes, D., & Benayas, J. M. (2011). How landscapes change: Integration of spatial patterns and human processes in temperate landscapes of southern Chile. Applied Geography, 32, 822–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Panta, M., & Kim, K. (2006). Spatio-temporal dynamic alteration of forest canopy density based on site associated factors: View from tropical forest of Nepal. Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 22(5), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Mon, M. S., Kajisa, T., Mizoue, N., & Yoshida, S. (2010). Monitoring deforestation and forest degradation in the Bago Mountain Area, Myanmar using FCD Mapper. Journal of forest planning, 15(2), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Chapungu, L., Takuba, N., & Zinhiva, H. (2014). A multi-method analysis of forest fragmentation and loss: The case of ward 11, hiredzi district of Zimbabwe. CAcademic Journals, 8(2), 121–128.

    Google Scholar 

  52. CLEAR, (2002). Forest fragmentation in Connecticut: 1985–2006. Center for land use education and research. http://clear.uconn.edu/projects/landscape/forestfrag. Acessed 05 May 2015.

  53. Vogt, P., Riitters, K. H., Estreguil, C., Kozak, J., Wade, T. G., & Wickham, J. D. (2007). Mapping spatial patterns with morphological image processing. Landscape Ecology, 22, 171–177. doi:10.1007/s10980-006-9013-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wulder, M. A., White, J. C., Andrew, M. E., Seitz, N. E., & Coops, N. C. (2009). Forest fragmentation, structure, and age characteristics as a legacy of forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 258, 1938–1949. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Southworth, J., Munroe, D., & Nagendra, H. (2004). Land cover change and landscape fragmentation comparing the utility of continuous and discrete analyses for a western Honduras region Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment, 101, 185–205. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.09.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Abdullah, S. A., & Nakagoshi, N. (2007). Forest fragmentation and its correlation to human land use change in the state of Selangor, peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management, 241, 39–48. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nagendra, H., Pareeth, S., & Ghate, R. (2006). People within parks—forest villages, land-cover change and landscape fragmentation in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve, India. Applied Geography, 26, 96–112. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Li, M., Huang, C., Zhu, Z., Wen, W., Xu, D., & Liu, A. (2009). Use of remote sensing coupled with a vegetation change tracker model to assess rates of forest change and fragmentation in Mississippi. USA. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(24), 6559–6574. doi:10.1080/01431160903241999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Munroea, D. K., Nagendra, H., & Southworth, J. (2007). Monitoring landscape fragmentation in an inaccessible mountain area: Celaque National Park, Western Honduras. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, 154–167. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Alig, R. J., Lewis, D. J., & Swenson, J. J. (2005). Is forest fragmentation driven by the spatial configuration of land quality? The Case of Western Oregon Forest Ecology and Management, 217, 266–274. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Roy, D. P., Kovalskyy, V., Zhanga, H. K., Vermote, E. F., Yana, L., Kumar, S. S., et al. (2016). Characterization of Landsat-7 to Landsat-8 reflective wavelength and normalized difference vegetation index continuity. Remote Sensing of Environment, 185, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ke, Y., Im, J., Lee, J., Gong, H., & Ryu, Y. (2015). Characteristics of Landsat 8 OLI-derived NDVI by comparison with multiple satellite sensors and in situ observations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 164, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Parent, J., Civco, D., & Hurd, J. (2007). Simulating future forest fragmentation in a Connecticut region undergoing suburbanization. ASPRS 2001 annual conference. Tampa, Florida.

  64. MacLean, M. G., & Congalton, R. G. (2010). Mapping and analysis of fragmentation in South eastern New Hampshire. A special joint symposium of ISPRS technical commission iv & Auto Carto in conjunction with ASPRS/CaGIS 2010, Fall Specialty Conference, Orlando, Florida.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India

    Mehebub Sahana, Raihan Ahmed, Purva Jain & Haroon Sajjad

Authors
  1. Mehebub Sahana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Raihan Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Purva Jain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Haroon Sajjad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haroon Sajjad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahana, M., Ahmed, R., Jain, P. et al. Driving force for forest fragmentation explored by land use change in Song watershed, India. Spat. Inf. Res. 24, 659–669 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0062-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0062-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation