Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative assessment of soil erosion modelling approaches in a Himalayan watershed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The quantitative estimate of soil erosion, in space and time, is valuable information to initiate land degradation measures at a watershed level. In this study, two models, Morgan Morgan Finney (MMF) and universal soil loss equation (USLE), were used in GIS environment to assess the soil erosion, as a function of land use/land cover, soil and topography in a mountainous watershed in the Kashmir Himalayan region, India. The two modelled soil erosion estimates were validated using the available land degradation maps of the area in order to determine their efficacy for soil erosion modelling. The results from the two models showed some similarity between the two soil erosion estimates. However, keeping in view the soil deposition being taken into consideration by MMF (47.33% of watershed area), the disagreement with the USLE soil estimates is understandable. USLE estimated 72.52% of watershed area under 0–1 kg m−2 year−1 while as the MMF model estimated only 41.27% of the watershed area in this category. In both the model results, almost equal area of the watershed has been classified with erosion > 10 kg m−2 year−1 category. Based on the model validation with the available land degradation data, the USLE estimates of soil erosion were found more reliable because of the good correlation with the land degradation maps. The erosion estimates worked out in this study, particularly the categories under very high, high, severe and very severe eroded areas, shall go a long way in framing up the strategies for mitigation and control of soil erosion in the mountainous Himalayan watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adediji A, Tukur AM, Adepoju KA (2010) Assessment of revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) in Katsina area, Katsina state of Nigeria using remote sensing (RS) and geographic information system (GIS). Iran J Energy Environ 1(3):255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Aflizar RA, Masunaga T (2013) Assessment erosion 3D hazard with USLE and surfer tool: a case study of Sumani Watershed in West Sumatra Indonesia. J Trop Soils 18(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaf S, Meraj G, Romshoo SA (2014) Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the Western Himalayan watershed. Environ Monit Assess 186(12):8391–8412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baba SMJ, Yusuf KW (2001) Modeling soil erosion in tropical environments using remote sensing and geographical informations systems. Hydrol Sci J 46(1):191–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Badar B, Romshoo SA, Khan MA (2013) Modeling the catchment hydrological response in a Himalayan lake as a function of changing land system. Earth Syst Sci 112(2):434–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, Schaepman ME (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manag 24(3):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behera P, Rao KD, Das KK (2005) Soil erosion modeling using MMF model-a remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS at catchment scale. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1635–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuyan SJ, Kalita PK, Jannsen KA, Barnes PL (2002) Soil loss predictions with three erosion simulation models. Environ Model Softw 17:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carré F, McBratney AB, Mayr T, Montanarella L (2007) Digital soil assessments: beyond DSM. Geoderma 142:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassman KG (1999) Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96(11):5952–5959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabral PP, Baithuri N, Pandey A (2008) Soil erosion assessment in a hilly catchment of North Eastern India using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 22:1783–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar RA, Romshoo SA, Chandra R, Ahmad I (2014) Tectono-geomorphic study of the Karewa Basin of Kashmir Valley. J Asian Earth Sci 92:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vente J, Poesen J (2005) Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models. Earth Sci Rev 71(1–2):95–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ploey J (1990) Modelling the erosional susceptibility of catchments in terms of energy. Catena 17:175–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson A, Collins R (1998) Predicting erosion and sediment yield at the catchment scale. In: Vries PD, Agus F, Kerr J (eds) Soil erosion at multiple scales. principles and methods for assessing causes and impacts. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 317–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan EH, Erpul G, Bayramin İ (2007) Use of USLE/GIS methodology for predicting soil loss in a semiarid agricultural watershed. Environ Monit Assess 131(1–3):153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fayaz MA, Balyan R, Sharma P (2018) Laboratory investigation for stabilization of clayey soil in Kashmir Valley. Int J Eng Dev Res 6(3):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Fistikoglu O, Harmancioglu NB (2002) Integration of GIS with USLE in assessment of soil erosion. Water Resour Manag 16(6):447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu G, Chen S, McCool KD (2006) Modeling the impacts of no-till practice on soil erosion and sediment yield using RUSLE, SEDD and ArcView GIS. Soil Till Res 85:38–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin ML, Beasley DB, Fletcher JJ, Foster GR (1988) Estimating soil loss on topographically nonuniform field and farm units. J Soil Water Conserv 43:326–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyssels G, Poesen J, Bochet E, Li Y (2005) Impact of plant roots on the resistance of soils to erosion by water: a review. Progr Phys Geogr 29(2):189–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal MF, Khan IA (2014) Spatiotemporal land use land cover change analysis and erosion risk mapping of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 17(2):209–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Sajjad H (2014) Watershed prioritization using morphometric and land use/land cover parameters of Dudhganga Catchment Kashmir Valley India using spatial technology. J Geophys Remote Sens 3:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Sajjad H, Bhat FA (2013) Morphometric analysis of Shaliganga sub catchment, Kashmir Valley, India using geographical information system. Int J Eng Trends Technol 4(1):10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • ISRO (2018) Desertification and land degradation, Atlas of selected districts of india (based on IRS LISS III data of 2011-13 and 2003-05) volume 1. Indian space research organization, Space application Centre

  • Ives JD, Messerli B (1989) The Himalayan dilemma: reconciling development and conservation. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain MK, Kothyari UC (2000) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):771–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Kumar S, Varghese J (2001) Estimation of soil loss for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resour Manag 15:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Paudel RC (2010) Erosion predictions by empirical models in a mountainous watershed in Nepal. J Spat Hydrol 10(1)

  • Karsli F, Atasoy M, Yalcin A, Reis S, Demir O, Gokceoglu C (2009) Effects of land-use changes on landslides in a landslide-prone area (Ardesen, Rize, NE Turkey). Environ Monit Assess 156(1–4):241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan S, Romshoo SA (2008) Integrated analysis of geomorphic, pedologic and remote sensing data for digital soil mapping. J Himal Ecol Sustain Dev 3:84–93. https://doi.org/10.15373/22778160/June2014/31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirmani NA, Sofi JA, Bhat MA, Bangroo SA, Bhat SA (2011) Soil micronutrient status of district Budgam. Res J Agric Sci 2(1):30–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosmas C, Danalatos N, Cammeraat LH, Chabart M, Diamantopoulos J, Farand R, Mizara A (1997) The effect of land use on runoff and soil erosion rates under Mediterranean conditions. Catena 29(1):45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Kushwaha SPS (2013) Modelling soil erosion risk based on RUSLE-3D using GIS in a Shivalik sub-watershed. J Earth Syst Sci 122(2):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee GS, Lee KH (2006) Scaling effect for estimating soil loss in the RUSLE model using remotely sensed geospatial data in Korea. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Dis 3:135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mati BM, Morgan RPC, Quinto JN (2006) Soil erosion modelling with EUROSEM at Emboriand Mukogodo catchments, Kenya. Earth Surf Process Landf 31:579–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meraj G, Romshoo SA, Ayoub S, Altaf S (2017) Geoinformatics based approach for estimating the sediment yield of the mountainous watersheds in Kashmir Himalaya, India. Geocarto Int. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2017.1333536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova H, Hofierka J, Zlocha M, Iverson LR (1996) Modelling topographic potential for erosion and deposition using GIS. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10(5):629–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S, Meena PK, Mishra PK, Shukla R (2014) Impact of climate change on future soil erosion in different slope, land use, and soil-type conditions in a part of the Narmada River Basin, India. J Hydrol Eng 20(6):C5014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal A, Khare D, Kundu S (2016) Impact assessment of climate change on future soil erosion and SOC loss. Nat Hazards 82(3):1515–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Burch GJ (1986) Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation 1. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(5):1294–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Peterson GA (1993) Soil attribute prediction using terrain analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC (2009) Soil erosion and conservation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Duzant JH (2008) Modified MMF (Morgan–Morgan–Finney) model for evaluating effects of crops and vegetation cover on soil erosion. Earth Surf Process Landf 33(1):90–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RP, Quinton JN (2001) Erosion modeling. In: Landscape erosion and evolution modeling. Springer, Boston, pp 117–143

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RPC, Morgan DDV, Finney HJ (1984) A predictive model for the assessment of soil erosion risk. J Agric Eng Res 30:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabi S (2016) Plant diversity in prevalent agroforestry systems of district Budgam. Doctoral dissertation, SKUAST Kashmir

  • Oliveira TS, Rodrigues PB, Sobrinho DAB, Panachuki TE, Wendland E (2013) Use of SRTM data to calculate the (R)USLE topographic factor. Acta Sci Technol 35(3):507–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2007) Identification of critical erosion prone areas in the small agricultural watershed using USLE, GIS and remote sensing. Water Resour Manag 21:729–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Mathur A, Mishra SK, Mal BC (2009) Soil erosion modeling of a Himalayan watershed using RS and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 59(2):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey A, Himanshu SK, Mishra SK, Singh VP (2016) Physically based soil erosion and sediment yield models revisited. Catena 147:595–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parveen R, Kumar U (2012) Integrated approach of universal soil loss equation (USLE) and geographical information system (GIS) for soil loss risk assessment in upper south Koel Basin, Jharkhand. J Geogr Inf Syst 4(6):588–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham TG, Degener J, Kappas M (2018) Integrated universal soil loss equation (USLE) and geographical information system (GIS) for soil erosion estimation in A Sap basin: Central Vietnam. Int Soil Water Conserv Res 6(2):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (1990) Relative importance of factors influencing fluvial soil loss at theglobal scale. Am J Sci 290:547–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Abinod S, Geetha N (2012) Estimation of soil erosion risk within a small mountainous sub-watershed in Kerala, India, using revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and geo-information technology. Geosci Front 3(2):209–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao YP (1981) Evaluation of cropping management factor in universal soil loss equation under natural rainfall condition of Kharagpur, India. In: Proceedings of Southeast Asian regional symposium on problems of soil erosion and sedimentation. Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, pp 241–254

  • Rashid M, Lone MA, Romshoo SA (2011) Geospatial tools for assessing land degradation in Budgam district, Kashmir Himalaya, India. J Earth Syst Sci 120(3):423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza M, Ahmad A, Mohammad A (1978) The valley of Kashmir: a geographical interpretation, vol 1, The land. Vikas Publishing House Private, New Delhi, pp 115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Renschler C, Diekkruger B, Mannaerts C (1997) Regionalization in surface runoff and soil erosion risk evaluation. In: Regionalization of hydrology, vol 254. IAHS Publishers, Wallingford, pp 233–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Renschler CS, Mannaerts C, Diekkrüger B (1999) Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soil erosion risk—rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, Spain. Catena 34:209225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romshoo SA, Bhat SA, Rashid I (2012) Geoinformatics for assessing the geomorphological control on the hydrological response at watershed scale in Upper Indus basin. Earth Syst Sci 121(3):659–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romshoo SA, Amin M, Ahmad I, Sastry KLN (2016) Soil erosion estimation of Lidder watershed, Kashmir Himalaya using Morgan-Morgan-Finney model in GIS environment. J Himal Ecol Sustain Dev 11(2016):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Romshoo SA, Altaf S, Amin M, Ameen U (2017) Sediment yield estimation for developing soil conservation strategies in GIS environment for the mountainous Marusudar catchment, Chenab basin, J&K, India. J Himal Ecol Sustain Dev 12:16–32 (ISSN No. 0973–7502)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roose E (1975) Erosion et ruissellement en Afrique de l’ouest: vingt années de mesures en petites parcelles experimentales

  • Shabani F, Kumar L, Esmaeili A (2014) Improvement to the prediction of the USLE K factor. J Geomorphol 201(1):229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah AH, Ahmad HF, Nengroo ZA, Kuchay NA, Bhat MS (2013) Changing land use and cropping pattern in Budgam District of Jammu and Kashmir—a spatio-temporal analysis. Int J Sci Eng Res 4(2):120–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiono T, Kamimura K, Okushima S, Fukumoto M (2002) Soil loss estimation on a local scale for soil conservation planning. Jpn Agric Res Q 36(3):157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha DP, Jetten VG (2018) Modelling erosion on a daily basis, an adaptation of the MMF approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 64:117–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shruthi RBV, Kerle N, Jetten V, Abdellah L, Machmach I (2015) Quantifying temporal changes in gully erosion areas with object-oriented analysis. Catena 128:262–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh G, babu R, Narain P, Bhusan LS, Abrol IP (1992) Soil Erosion rates in India. J Soil Water Conserv 47(1):97–99

    Google Scholar 

  • USDA (1972) National engineering handbook, section 4, hydrology. USDA, Soil Conservation Service. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenbrenner JW, MacDonald LH, Rough D (2006) Effectiveness of three post-fire rehabilitation treatments in the Colorado front range. Hydrol Process 20(14):2989–3006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JR, Berndt HD (1972) Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydrol Div ASCE 98(12):2087–2098

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses. USDA agricultural research services handbook 537. USDA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolkerstorfer G, Strauss P (2004) Soil erosion at the mesoscale: comparison of two erosion models for a pre-alpine Austrian basin. IAHS Publ 288:339–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaz SN, Romshoo SA (2012) Assessing the geoindicators of land degradation in the Kashmir Himalayan region, India. Nat Hazards 64(2):1219–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work was conducted as part of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change and Space Application Centre (SAC), Indian Space Research organization (ISRO) Government of India sponsored national research project titled “Desertification and Land Degradation: Monitoring, Vulnerability Assessment and Combating Plans”. The financial assistance received from the sponsors under the project to accomplish this research is thankfully acknowledged. The authors express gratitude to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions on the earlier version of the manuscript that greatly improved its content and structure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shakil A. Romshoo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amin, M., Romshoo, S.A. Comparative assessment of soil erosion modelling approaches in a Himalayan watershed. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 5, 175–192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0526-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0526-x

Keywords

Navigation