Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling and mapping landslide susceptibility zones using GIS based multivariate binary logistic regression (LR) model in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya, India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multivariate binary logistic regression (LR) model was used for the assessment of landslide susceptibility in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya. For this purpose, a spatial database of 13 factors such as rainfall, slope, aspect, curvature, relief, drainage density, distance from drainage, distance from lineament, distance from road, geology, soil, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and land use/land cover was constructed under Geographical Information System (GIS) environment. A landslide inventory map was prepared and converted into binary raster coded by 0 for absence and 1 for the presence of landslide. Total 946 landslide pixels were found out of which 725 landslide pixels (76.63%) were used as training dataset for the model and the model was validated using all landslide pixels. The coefficient value of geology was maximum followed by NDVI, soil and land use/land. The calculated probability value was used as Landslide Susceptibility Index (LSI). On the basis of the LSI value, the landslide susceptibility map was divided into five distinct categories of very low, low, moderate, high and very high susceptibility. The susceptibility classes depict that, 9.18% of total area was under very high and high susceptibility contains 75.48% area of total landslide. Finally the accuracy of the model was assessed by area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and landslide density method. The AUC value of 0.947 indicates a very good quality of the model and landslide density shows that the density is increasing with LSI classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghdam IN, Varzandeh MHM, Pradhan B (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using an ensemble statistical index (Wi) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) model at Alborz mountains (Iran). Environ Earth Sci 75(7):553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed B (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using multi-criteria evaluation techniques in Chittagong Metropolitan area, Bangladesh. Landslides 12:1077–1095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgun A (2012) A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 9:93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbalagan R (1992) Landslide hazard evaluation and zonation mapping in mountainous terrain. Eng Geol 32:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anbarasu K, Sengupta A, Gupta S, Sharma SP (2010) Mechanism of activation of the Lanta Khola landslide in Sikkim Himalayas. Landslides 7:135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998) Generalized linear modeling of susceptibility to landsliding in central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci 24:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood WW, Mather KF (1932) Physiography and Quaternary geology of the San Juan mountains, Colorado. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 166:163–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai S, Wang J, Lü G, Zhou P, Hou S, Xu S (2010) GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping of the Zhongxian segment in the Three Gorges area, China. Geomorphology 115:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balteanu D, Chendes V, Sima M, Enciu P (2010) A country wide spatial assessment of landslide susceptibility in Romania. Geomorphology 124:102–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basharat M, Shah HR, Hameed N (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and weighted overlay method: a case study from NW Himalayas, Pakistan. Arab J Geosci 9:292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathrellos GD, Kalivas DP, Skilodimou HD (2009) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping models applied to natural and urban planning in Trikala, Central Greece. Estud Geol 65(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui DT, Lofman O, Revhaug I, Dick O (2011) Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Nat Hazards 59:1413–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinali M, Reichenbach P, Guzzetti F, Ardizzone F, Antonini G, Galli G, Cacciano M, Castellani M, Salvati P (2002) A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risks in Umbria, Central Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos A, Enrique A, Van Western CJ (2008) Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment by multicriteria analysis: a case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantanamo Cuba. Geomorphology 94:453–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chai H, Sun X, Wang Q, Ding X, Hong H (2016) A GIS-based comparative study of frequency ratio, statistical index and weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping. Arab J Geosci 9:204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WA, Hosking PL (1986) Statistical methods for geographers. Wiley, New York, p 518

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandell DR, Varnes DJ (1961) Movement of the Slumgullion earth flow near Lake city, Colorado. Short papers in the geologic and hydrologic sciences. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 424-B:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. Special Report, Transportation Research Board, vol 247. National Academy of Sciences, pp 36–75

  • Dagdelenler G, Nefeslioglu HA, Gokceoglu C (2015) Modification of seed cell sampling strategy for landslide susceptibility mapping: an application from the Eastern part of Gallipoli Peninsula (Canakkale, Turkey). Bull Eng Geol Environ 75:575–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF (2002) Landslide characteristics and slope instability modeling using GIS, Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 42(3–4):213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai FC, Lee CF, Ngai YY (2002) Landslide risk assessment and management: an overview. Eng Geol 64:65–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal AS, Amada T, Aniya M (2000) Landslide hazard mapping and its evaluation using GIS: an investigation of sampling schemes for a grid-cell based quantitative method. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 66(8):981–989

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey CS, Chaudhry M, Sharma BK, Pandey AC, Singh B (2005) Visualization of 3-D digital elevation model for landslide assessment and prediction in mountainous terrain: a case study of Chandmari landslide, Sikkim, eastern Himalayas. Geosci J 9(4):363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endlich FM (1876) Report of F.M. Endlich. In: US geological and geographical survey (Hayden) of the territories annual report 1874, 203

  • Garcia-Rodriguez MJ, Malpica JA, Benito B, Diaz M (2007) Susceptibility assessment of earthquake-triggered landslides in El Salvador using logistic regression. Geomorphology 95:172–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, central Italy. Geomorphology 31:181–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzzetti F, Mondini AC, Cardinali M, Fiorucci F, Santangelo M, Chang K (2012) Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth Sci Rev 112:42–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantitative geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jian W, Xiang-guo P (2009) GIS-based landslide hazard zonation model and its application. Proced Earth Planet Sci 1:1198–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanwal S, Atif S, Shafiq M (2016) GIS based landslide susceptibility mapping of northern areas of Pakistan, a case study of Shigar and Shyok Basins. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 8(2):348–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping and factor effect analysis using frequency ratio in a catchment scale: a case study from Garuwa sub-basin, East Nepal. Arab J Geosci 8(10):8601–8613 

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan YA, Lateh H, Baten MA, Kamil AA (2012) Critical antecedent rainfall conditions for shallow landslides in Chittagong city of Bangladesh. Environ Earth Sci 67(1):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ko Ko C, Flentje P, Chowdhury R (2004) Landslides qualitative hazard and risk assessment method and its reliability. Bull Eng Geol Env 63(2):149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Anbalagan R (2016) Landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) in Tehri reservoir rim region, Uttarakhand. J Geol Soc India 87(3):271–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Application of logistic regression model and its validation for landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS and remote sensing data. Int J Remote Sens 26(7):1477–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Choi U (2003) Development of GIS-based geological hazard information system and its application for landslide analysis in Korea. Geosci J 7:243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leoni G, Campolo D, Falconi L, Gioè C, Lumaca S, Puglisi C, Torre A (2015) Heuristic method for landslide susceptibility assessment in the Messina municipality. Eng Geol Soc Territ 2:501–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S (2015) Upslope contributing area, topographic wetness and landsliding: a case study of the Shivkhola watershed, Darjeeling Himalaya. Int Res J Earth Sci 3(7):23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Maiti R (2012) Application of 1-d slope stability model in landslide susceptibility mapping of Shivkhola watershed Darjiling Himalaya. Int J Geol Earth Environ Sci 2(2):34–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Maiti R (2015) Semi-quantitative approaches for landslide assessment and prediction. In: Springer natural hazards. Springer, Singapore (ISBN 978-981-287-145-9)

  • Mandal S, Mandal B (2015) Assessment and prediction of slope instability in the Lish river basin of Eastern Darjiling Himalaya using RS and GIS. Int Res J Earth Sci 3(12):9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandal S, Mandal K (2017a) Bivariate statistical index for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya, India. Spat Inf Res 26(1):59–75

  • Mandal B, Mandal S (2017b) Landslide susceptibility mapping using modified information value model in the Lish river basin of Darjeeling Himalaya. Spat Inf Res 25:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martha TR, Govindharaj KB, Kumar KV (2015) Damage and geological assessment of the 18 September 2011 Mw 6.9 earthquake in Sikkim, India using very high resolution satellite data. Geosci Front 30:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal S, Mandal S (2017) RS & GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping of the Balason River basin, Darjeeling Himalaya, using logistic regression (LR) model. Georisk 12(1):29–44

  • Nagarajan R, Mukherjee A, Roy A, Khire MV (1998) Temporal remote sensing data and GIS application in landslide hazard zonation of part of Western Ghat, India. Int J Remote Sens 19:573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parise M (2002) Landslide hazard zonation of slopes susceptible to rock falls and topples. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Singh RP, Buchroithner MF (2006) Estimation of stress and its use in evaluation of landslide prone regions using remote sensing data. Adv Space Res 37:698–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Mansor S, Pirasteh S, Buchroithner M (2011) Landslide hazard and risk analyses at a landslide prone catchment area using statistical based geospatial model. Int J Remote Sens 32(14):4075–4087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman SA, Aruchamy S (2017) Geoinformatics based landslide vulnerable zonation mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a study of Kallar river sub watershed, Kallar watershed, Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu. Model Earth Syst Environ 3:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawat MS, Joshi V, Rawat BS, Kumar K (2011) Landslide movement monitoring using GPS technology: a case study of Bakthang landslide, Gangtok, East Sikkim, India. J Dev Agric Econ 3(5):194–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawat MS, Sundriyal YP, Joshi V (2016) Slope stability analysis in a part of East Sikkim, using remote sensing & GIS. In: 2016 2nd international conference on next generation computing technologies (NGCT-2016), Dehradun, 14–16 Oct 2016

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi AD, Devkota KC, Yoshida K, Pradhan B, Pourghasemi HR, Kumamoto T, Akgun A (2014) Application of frequency ratio, statistical index, and weights-of-evidence models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping in Central Nepal Himalaya. Arab J Geosci 7(2):725–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rozos D, Bathrellos G, Skillodimou H (2011) Comparison of the implementation of rock engineering system and analytic hierarchy process methods, upon landside susceptibility mapping using GIS: a case study from the Eastern Achaia Country of Peloponnesus, Greece. Environ Earth Sci 63:49–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar S, Kanungo DP, Patra AK, Kumar P (2008) GIS based spatial data analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping. J Mt Sci 5:52–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahabi H, Hashim M (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based statistical models and remote sensing data in tropical environment. Sci Rep 5:9899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shit PK, Bhunia GS, Maiti R (2016) Potential landslide susceptibility mapping using weighted overlay model (WOM). Model Earth Syst Environ 2:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siyahghalati S, Saraf AK, Pradhan B, Jebur MN, Tehrany MS (2014) Rule-based semi-automated approach for the detection of landslides induced by 18 September 2011 Sikkim, Himalaya, earthquake using IRS LISS3 satellite images. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7(1):326–344  

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazik E, Jahantab Z, Bakhtiari M, Rezaei A, Alavipanah SK (2014) Landslide susceptibility mapping by combining the three methods fuzzy logic, frequency ratio and analytical hierarchy process in Dozain basin. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XL-2(W3):267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornyai R, Lúchava M (2015) Using statistical analyses to assess landslide hazard. Geol Geophys Environ 41(1):144–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunusluoglu MC, Gokceoglu C, Nefeslioglu HA, Sonmez H (2007) Extraction of potential debris source areas by logistic regression technique: a case study from Barla, Besparmak and Kapi mountains (NW Taurids, Turkey). Environ Geol 54:9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vakhshoori V, Zare M (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping by comparing weight of evidence, fuzzy logic and frequency ratio methods. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 7(5):1731–1752

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen CJ, Terlien MTJ (1996) An approach towards deterministic landslide hazard analysis in GIS. A case study from manizales (colombia). Earth Surf Process Landf 21:853–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (ed) Landslides, analysis and control. Transportation Research Board Sp. Rep. No. 176. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, pp 11–33

  • Varnes DJ, Savage WZ (1996) The Slumgullion earth flow: a large-scale natural laboratory. US Geol Surv Bull 2130:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Vishwakarma CA, Asthana H, Singh D, Pant M, Sen R, Mukherjee S (2017) GIS based bi-variate statistical approach for landslide susceptibility mapping of South District, Sikkim. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 6(7):13661–13674

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Sawada K, Moriguchi S (2013) Landslide susceptibility analysis with logistic regression model based on FCM sampling strategy. Comput Geosci 57:81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Wu Y, Yang Y, Chen F, Zhang N, Ke Y, Li W (2017) A comparative study on the landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression and statistical index models. Arab J Geosci 10:187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimatsu H, Abe S (2006) A review of landslide hazards in Japan and assessment of their susceptibility using an analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method. Landslides 3:149–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Gaber AFD, Buchroithner MF (2009) Geomorphological hazard analysis along the Egyptian Red Sea coast between Safaga and Quseir. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:751–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AM, Pradhan B, Sabtan AA, El-Harbi HM (2012) Coupling of remote sensing data aided with field investigations for geological hazards assessment in Jazan area, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Environ Earth Sci 65(1):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CH, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2002) On the spatial relationship between landslides and causative factors on Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 43:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanu Mandal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mandal, S., Mandal, K. Modeling and mapping landslide susceptibility zones using GIS based multivariate binary logistic regression (LR) model in the Rorachu river basin of eastern Sikkim Himalaya, India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 4, 69–88 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0426-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-018-0426-0

Keywords

Navigation