Skip to main content
Log in

Robust Optimization of Both Dissolution Time and Heat Affected Zone Over the Friction Stir Welding Process Using SQP Technique

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This works deals with the determination of the optimized parameters in friction stir welding (FSW) process; this through the determination of the optimal operating conditions (the welding velocity and power) necessary for welding a typical Aluminum alloy material AA2195-T8. A physical model based on the Lagrangian formulation considering a surfacic heat source that moves during the welding process, was applied. The used model predicts the evolution of the thermal field and the maximum temperature over time. Sequential quadratic programming (SQP) was used to solve the constrained multi-objectives optimization problem, in which the objective functions consist to minimize the dissolution time into heat affected zone (HAZ) and the length heat affected zone. In which, the simulated temperature profiles and the natural aging kinetics have been correlated to predict the hardness profiles in the FSW workpiece. The good agreement between the results of the two approaches would it possible to use the proposed numerical model to predict the thermal field and the maximum value of the temperature. The optimization process has demonstrated its robustness and the main results obtained are: the optimal parameters show a reduction of 13.44% in the temperature value at HAZ compared to the initial case, while a reduction of 46.5% in the dissolution time was recorded. The lower hardness zone in the optimal case retracted to the weld midline, the minimum hardness value at the thermal affected zone increases compared to the initial case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thomas WM, Nicholas ED, Needham JC, Murch MG, Temple-Smith P, Dawes CJ (1995) Friction welding. Google Patents

  2. Mishra RS, Ma Z (2005) Friction stir welding and processing. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 50(1–2):1–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boukraa M, Lebaal N, Mataoui A, Settar A, Aissani M, Tala-Ighil N (2018) Friction stir welding process improvement through coupling an optimization procedure and three-dimensional transient heat transfer numerical analysis. J Manuf Process 34:566–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boukraa M et al (2021) Effects of boundary conditions and operating parameters on temperature distribution during the friction stir welding process. In: IOP conference series: materials science and engineering, vol 1140(1), p 012050

  5. P. Cavaliere, G. Campanile, F. Panella, A. Squillace (2006) Effect of welding parameters on mechanical and microstructural properties of AA6056 joints produced by friction stir welding. J Mater Process Technol 180(1–3):263–270

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fujii H, Cui L, Maeda M, Nogi K (2006) Effect of tool shape on mechanical properties and microstructure of friction stir welded aluminum alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 419(1–2):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sato YS, Urata M, Kokawa H (2002) Parameters controlling microstructure and hardness during friction-stir welding of precipitation-hardenable aluminum alloy 6063. Metall Mater Trans A 33(3):625–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Scialpi A, De Filippis L, Cavaliere P (2007) Influence of shoulder geometry on microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded 6082 aluminium alloy. Mater Des 28(4):1124–1129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang W, Guo X, McClure J, Murr L, Nunes A (1998) Heat input and temperature distribution in friction stir welding. J Mater Process Manuf Sci 7:163–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chao YJ, Qi X, Tang W (2003) Heat transfer in friction stir welding—experimental and numerical studies. J Manuf Sci Eng 125(1):138–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chekifi T (2018) Computational study of droplet breakup in a trapped channel configuration using volume of fluid method. Flow Meas Instrum 59:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chekifi T (2019) Droplet breakup regime in a cross-junction device with lateral obstacles. Fluid Dyn Mater Process 15(5):545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chekifi T, Boukraa M, Aissani M (2021) DNS using CLSVOF method of single micro-bubble breakup and dynamics in flow focusing. J Vis 24:519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang X, Xiao B, Ma Z (2011) A transient thermal model for friction stir weld. Part II: effects of weld conditions. Metall Mater Trans A 42(10):3229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahmadi H, Arab NM, Ghasemi FA (2014) Optimization of process parameters for friction stir lap welding of carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic composites by Taguchi method. J Mech Sci Technol 28(1):279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vidal C, Infante V (2013) Optimization of FS welding parameters for improving mechanical behavior of AA2024-T351 joints based on Taguchi method. J Mater Eng Perform 22(8):2261–2270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shanavas S, Dhas JER (2017) Parametric optimization of friction stir welding parameters of marine grade aluminium alloy using response surface methodology. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 27(11):2334–2344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pattanaik A, Pradhan S, Panda S, Bagal D, Pal K, Patnaik D (2018) Effect of process parameters on friction stir spot welding using grey based Taguchi methodology. Mater Today Proc 5(5):12098–12102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kesharwani R, Panda S, Pal S (2014) Multi objective optimization of friction stir welding parameters for joining of two dissimilar thin aluminum sheets. Procedia Mater Sci 6:178–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bilgin MB, Meran C, Canyurt OE (2015) Optimization of strength of friction stir welded joints for AISI 430 ferritic stainless steels by genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9–12):2221–2233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lebaal N, Chamoret D, Schlegel D, Folea M (2017) Thermal modelling of friction stir process (FSP) and identification parameters. Mater Phys Mech 32(1):14–20

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou X, Pan W, MacKenzie D (2013) Identifying friction stir welding process parameters through coupled numerical and experimental analysis. Int J Press Vessels Pip 108:2–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mahoney W, Rhodes CG, Flintoff JG, Spurling RA, Bingel WH (1998) Metall Mater Trans A 29:1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Chekifi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boukraa, M., Chekifi, T., Lebaal, N. et al. Robust Optimization of Both Dissolution Time and Heat Affected Zone Over the Friction Stir Welding Process Using SQP Technique. Exp Tech 46, 677–689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00515-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00515-8

Keywords

Navigation