Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Professor Goals and Student Experiences in Traditional IBL Real Analysis: a Case Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an in-depth account of traditional IBL instruction. Understanding the nature and effects of this form of instruction is of growing importance due to the strength and breadth of the IBL movement and its connections to other forms of inquiry in undergraduate mathematics. In this case study of one real analysis course taught by a very experienced instructor and leader in the IBL community, we identify the primary goals this professor set forth for his students and the instructional strategies he employed to help them attain these goals. We observe that many of these practices seek to manage the double bind of proving in the classroom (Herbst Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 176-203, 2002). Accordingly, we relate and categorize student storylines in the course according to their goal orientation and their level of buy-in to the IBL learning environment. We operationalize orientation and buy-in according to the double bind of the didactic contract by observing whether students focused more on the professor’s obligation to provide resources for students to successfully complete the work of the course (and earn good grades) or on his obligation to provide an authentic experience in mathematical proving. Students’ with different goal orientation and buy-in profiles took advantage of different aspects the professor’s instructional strategies to engage in the course in ways that were productive for them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The authors express our sincerest thanks to the American Institute of Mathematics for funding the workshop that initiated and informed this project. We would also like to thank all of the participants of that workshop for their input and stimulating dialogue.

  2. Theorems were intentionally not labeled so students would not avoid problems with famous names attached to them.

References

  • Aaron, W. R., & Herbst, P. G. (2012). Instructional identities of geometry students. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 382–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C., Browning, C., Daniel, D., So, S., & Mahavier, W. T. (2003). Calculus, a discovery based approach. New York: McGraw-Hill Primis Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppin, C. A., Mahavier, W. T., May, E. L., & Parker, E. (2009). The Moore Method: A pathway to learner-centered instruction (no. 75). Washington, D.C.: MAA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, P. C. (2014). How students interpret and enact inquiry-oriented defining practices in undergraduate real analysis. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 88–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(5), 451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Elliott, E. S. (1983). Achievement motivation. Handbook of Child Psychology, 4, 643–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. S., & Reppucci, N. D. (1973). Learned helplessness and reinforcement responsibility in children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(1), 109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. G. (1991). An overview of the calculus curriculum reform effort: issues for learning, teaching, and curriculum development. The American Mathematical Monthly, 98(7), 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullilove, R. E., & Treisman, P. U. (1990). Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: an evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3), 463–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassi, M. L., & Laursen, S. L. (2015). Transformative learning: personal empowerment in learning mathematics. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(4), 316–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, C. N., Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2016). Facilitating instructor adoption of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P. G. (2002). Engaging students in proving: a double bind on the teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(3), 176–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbst, P., & Brach, C. (2006). Proving and doing proofs in high school geometry classes: what is it that is going on for students? Cognition and Instruction, 24(1), 73–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C., Duncan, R., & Chinn, C. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., Keller, R., & Fukawa-Connelly, T. (2018). Results from a survey of abstract algebra instructors across the United States: understanding the choice to (Not) lecture. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(2), 254–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E., Andrews-Larson, C., Keene, K., Melhuish, K., Keller, R., & Fortune, N. (2019). Inquiry and gender inequity in the undergraduate mathematics classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. . In press.

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogan, M., & Laursen, S. L. (2014). Assessing long-term effects of inquiry-based learning: a case study from college mathematics. Innovative Higher Education, 39(3), 183–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuster, G., Johnson, E., Keene, K., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2018). Inquiry-oriented instruction: a conceptualization of the instructional principles. PRIMUS, 28(1), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O. N., Rasmussen, C., & Allen, K. (2005). Students' retention of mathematical knowledge and skills in differential equations. School Science and Mathematics, 105(5), 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S. L. (2013). From innovation to implementation: Multi-institution pedagogical reform in undergraduate mathematics. In D. King, B. Loch, & L. Rylands (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th DELTA conference on the teaching and learning of undergraduate mathematics and statistics (pp. 102–112). Melbourne: University of Western Sydney, School of Computing, Engineering, and Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S., & Rasmussen, C. (2019). I on the prize: Inquiry approaches to undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M.-L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for women and men of inquiry-based learning in college mathematics: a multi-institution study. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahavier, W. T., & Mahavier, W. S. (2009). Analysis. Journal of Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics, 12, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahavier, W. T., & Mahavier, W. S. (2013). Foundations of analysis. The Journal of Inquiry-Based Learning in Mathematics, 33, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics (Vol. 1). Reston: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. (2005). R. L. Moore: Mathematician and teacher. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., & Kwon, O. N. (2007). An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., King, K., & Teppo, A. (2005). Advancing mathematical activity: a practice-oriented view of advanced mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 7(1), 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 436–456). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (1988). Calculus for a New Century: A Pump, Not a Filter. Papers Presented at a Colloquium (Washington, DC, October 28–29, 1987). MAA Notes Number 8. Mathematical Association of America, 1529 18th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, U. (1992). Studying students studying calculus: a look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (2015). Effective proof reading strategies for comprehending mathematical proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(3), 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Texas State University, MCS 470, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA

    Paul Christian Dawkins

  2. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA

    Michael Oehrtman

  3. Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, 77705, USA

    W. Ted Mahavier

Authors
  1. Paul Christian Dawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Oehrtman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. Ted Mahavier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Christian Dawkins.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawkins, P.C., Oehrtman, M. & Mahavier, W.T. Professor Goals and Student Experiences in Traditional IBL Real Analysis: a Case Study. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. 5, 315–336 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00095-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-019-00095-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation