Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II in Colombia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) is a widely used measure of experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility, two key constructs of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). The main aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties and factor structure of the Spanish version of the AAQ-II in Colombia. A secondary aim was to analyze measurement invariance of the AAQ-II across nonclinical and clinical samples considering that previous research has yielded mixed results. The AAQ-II was administered to a total of 1759 participants, including a sample of undergraduates, one of general population, and a clinical sample. Data were very similar to the ones obtained in the original AAQ-II version. The internal consistency across the different samples was good (Cronbach’s alpha between 0.88 and 0.91). The one-factor model found in the original scale showed a good fit to the data. Measurement invariance was also found across sample (clinical and nonclinical) and gender. The mean score of the clinical sample on the AAQ-II was significantly higher than the scores of the nonclinical samples. The AAQ-II was sensitive to the effects of a one-session ACT intervention, and AAQ-II scores were significantly related to emotional symptoms, mindfulness, satisfaction with life, and dysfunctional attitudes. The Spanish version of the AAQ-II shows good psychometric properties in Colombia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atienza, F. L., Pons, D., Balaguer, I., & García-Merita, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Satisfacción con la Vida en adolescentes [Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in adolescents]. Psicothema, 12, 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • A-Tjak, J. G. L., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A. J., & Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84, 30–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barraca, J. (2004). Spanish adaptation of the acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ). International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 505–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K., Waltz, T., & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42, 676–688. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, F. W., Lloyd, J., & Guenole, N. (2013). The work-related acceptance and action questionnaire (WAAQ): initial psychometric findings and their implications for measuring psychological flexibility in specific contexts. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 86, 331–347. doi:10.1111/joop.12001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14, 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, J., Marôco, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Galhardo, A. (2014). Validation of the psychometric properties of acceptance and action questionnaire-II in clinical and nonclinical groups of Portuguese population. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 14, 353–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daza, P., Novy, D. M., Stanley, M., & Averill, P. (2002). The depression anxiety stress scale-21: Spanish translation and validation with a Hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Graaf, L. E., Roelofs, J., & Huibers, M. J. H. (2009). Measuring dysfunctional attitudes in the general population: the dysfunctional attitude scale (form A) revised. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33, 345–355. doi:10.1007/s10608-009-9229-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elosua, P., Mujika, J., Almeida, L. S., & Hermosilla, D. (2014). Procedimientos analítico-racionales en la adaptación de tests. adaptación al español de la Batería de Pruebas de Razonamiento [Judgmental-analytical procedures for adapting tests: adaptation to Spanish of the Reasoning Tests Battery]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 46, 117–126. doi:10.1016/S0120-0534(14)70015-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fledderus, M., Oude Voshaar, M. A., ten Klooster, P. M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2012). Further evaluation of the psychometric properties of the acceptance and action questionnaire–II. Psychological Assessment, 24, 925–936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., Suzuki, N., & Watson, D. (2014). The brief experiential avoidance questionnaire: development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 26, 35–45. doi:10.1037/a0034473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gámez, W., Chmielewski, M., Kotov, R., Ruggero, C., & Watson, D. (2011). Development of a measure of experiential avoidance: the multidimensional experiential avoidance questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 23, 692–713. doi:10.1037/a0023242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gloster, A. T., Klotsche, J., Chaker, S., Hummel, K., & Hoyer, J. (2011). Assessing psychological flexibility: what does it add above and beyond existing constructs? Psychological Assessment, 23, 970–982.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1988). A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Luoma, J. B., Bond, F. W., Masuda, A., & Lillis, J. (2006). Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1–25. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.06.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Strosahl, K. D. (Eds.). (2004). A practical guide to acceptance and commitment therapy. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D., Polusny, M. A., Dykstra, T. A., Batten, S. V., Bergan, J., Stewart, S. H., Zvolensky, M. J., Eifert, G. H., Bond, F. W., Forsyth, J. P., Karekla, M., & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: a preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54, 553–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. D., & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy. An experiential approach to behavior change. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. D. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: a functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152–1168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality and Quantity, 44, 153–166. doi:10.1007/s11135-008-9190-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). PRELIS 2 user’s reference guide: A program for multivariate data screening and data summarization: A preprocessor for LISREL. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurascio, A., Forman, E., Timko, C. A., Butryn, M., & Goodwin, C. (2011). The development and validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ). Eating Behaviors, 12, 182–187. doi:10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: a researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López, J. C., Ruiz, F. J., Feder, J., Barbero, A., Suárez, J. J., Rodríguez, J. A., & Luciano, C. (2010). The role of experiential avoidance in the performance on a high cognitive demand task. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 475–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, M. C., & Hayes, S. C. (2001). Trastorno de evitación experiencial [Experiential avoidance disorder]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 1, 109–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monestès, J. L., Karekla, M., Jacobs, N., Michaelides, M., Hooper, N., Kleen, M., Ruiz, F. J., Miselli, G., Presti, G., Luciano, C., Villatte, M., Bond, F. W., Kishita, N., & Hayes, S. C. (in press). Toward a transdiagnostic approach to psychological disorders: measuring experiential avoidance across six cultures with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire – II. European Journal of Psychological Assessment.

  • Rocha, K., Pérez, K., Rodríguez-Sanz, M., Borrell, C., & Obiols, J. E. (2011). Propiedades psicométricas y valores normativos del General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) en población española [Psychometric properties and normative scores of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) in general Spanish population]. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 11, 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J. (2010). A review of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) empirical evidence: correlational, experimental psychopathology, component and outcome studies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 10, 125–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy versus traditional cognitive behavioral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current empirical evidence. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 12, 333–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., Langer, A. I., Luciano, C., Cangas, A. J., & Beltrán, I. (2013). Measuring experiential avoidance and psychological inflexibility: the Spanish translation of the acceptance and action questionnaire. Psicothema, 25, 123–129. doi:10.7334/psicothema2011.239.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., & Odriozola-González, P. (2014). The Spanish version of the work-related acceptance and action questionnaire (WAAQ). Psicothema, 26, 63–68. doi:10.7334/psicothema2013.110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., & Odriozola-González, P. (2015). Comparing cognitive, metacognitive, and acceptance and commitment therapy models of depression: A longitudinal study survey. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18(e39), 1–9. doi:10.1017/sjp.2015.31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Barón-Rincón, D., Barrera, A., Martínez, A., & Peña, A. (2016). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the dysfunctional attitude scale revised in Colombian undergraduates. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48, 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Odriozola-González, P., Barbero-Rubio, A., López-López, J. C., Eisenbeck, N., Budziszewska, L., & Gil, E. (2015). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the dysfunctional attitude scale revised. Behavioral Psychology, 23, 287–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., & Riaño-Hernández, D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in Colombian undergraduates. Suma Psicológica, 23, 18–24.

  • Soler, J., Tejedor, R., Feliu-Soler, A., Pascual, J. C., Cebolla, A., Soriano, J., Alvarez, E., & Pérez, V. (2012). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la escala mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS) [Psychometric propoerties of the Spanish versión of the mindful attention awareness scale (MAAS)]. Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría, 40, 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinhoven, P., Drost, J., de Rooij, M., van Hermert, A. M., & Pennix, B. W. (2014). A longitudinal study of experiential avoidance in emotional disorders. Behavior Therapy, 45, 840–850. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Törneke, N., Luciano, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Bond, F. W. (2016). Relational frame theory and three core strategies in understanding and treating human suffering. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 254–272). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Wolgast, M. (2014). What does the acceptance and action questionnaire (AAQ-II) really measure? Behavior Therapy, 45, 831–839. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2014.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotá, Colombia

    Francisco J. Ruiz & Diana Riaño-Hernández

  2. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain

    Juan C. Suárez-Falcón

  3. Universidad Santo Tomás, Bogotá, Colombia

    Sebastián Cárdenas-Sierra, Yesica Durán & Karen Guerrero

Authors
  1. Francisco J. Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan C. Suárez-Falcón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sebastián Cárdenas-Sierra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yesica Durán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen Guerrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Diana Riaño-Hernández
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco J. Ruiz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5

Table 5 Items of the acceptance and action questionnaire-II
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ruiz, F.J., Suárez-Falcón, J.C., Cárdenas-Sierra, S. et al. Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II in Colombia. Psychol Rec 66, 429–437 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation