Skip to main content
Log in

An Exploration of the Authoritative School Climate Construct Using Multilevel Latent Class Analysis

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authoritative school climate construct, or the degree to which schools demonstrate student support and disciplinary structure, predicts several important student outcomes (e.g., racial suspension gap, student disengagement). To better understand this construct, we used multilevel latent class analysis to identify latent classes of student perceptions of school climate, model school-level variation in student experiences, and examine the relation between school climate and student and school demographics. Using a nationally representative sample of public high students in the USA, results show that student perceptions of school climate fall into four classes, Authoritative, Permissive, Authoritarian, and Uninvolved, which are consistent with authoritative school climate literature. Student gender, ethnicity/race, and SES all impact a student’s likelihood of membership in these classes. Schools tend to have a predominant school climate experience, although considerable variability in individual student experiences within a school exists. Findings address gaps in the authoritative school climate literature and have important implications for future research and policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allison, P. D. (2009). Missing data. In R. E. Millsap & A. Maydeu-Olivares (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology (pp. 72–89). Sage Retrieved from http://statisticalhorizons.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Milsap-Allison.pdf.

  • American Psychological Association Zero-Tolerance Task Force. (2008). Are zero-tolerance policies effective in the schools: an evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63, 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.9.852.

  • Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2008). Multilevel mixture models. In G. R. Hancock & K. M. Samuelsen (Eds.), Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models (pp. 27–51). Information Age.

  • Baumrind, D. (1968). Authoritarian v. authoritative parental control. Adolescence, 3, 255–272.

  • Baumrind, D. (1991a). Adolescent exploratory behavior: precursors and consequences. In L. P. Lipsitt & L. L. Mitnick (Eds.), Self-Regulation and Risk-Taking (pp. 109–142). Ablex.

  • Baumrind, D. (1991b). Effective parenting during the early adolescent transition. In P. E. Cowan & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Advances in Family Research (Vol. 2, pp. 111–163). Erlbaum.

  • Baumrind, D. (2013). Authoritative parenting revisited: history and current status. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative Parenting: Synthesizing Nurturance and Discipline for Optimal Child Development (pp. 11–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13948-002.

  • Bear, G. G. (2008). Best practices in classroom discipline. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology V (pp. 1403–1420). National Association of School Psychologists.

  • Blondal, K. S., & Adalbjarnardottir, S. (2012). Student disengagement in relation to expected and unexpected educational pathways. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56, 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.

  • DeBold, E., Brown, L. M., Wessen, S., & Brookins, G. K. (1999). Cultivating hardiness zones for adolescent girls: a reconceptualization of resilience in relationships with caring adults. In N. G. Johnson, M. C. Roberts, & J. Worell (Eds.), Beyond Appearances: A New Look at Adolescent Girls (pp. 18–204). American Psychological Association.

  • Dee, T. S. (2005). A teacher like me: does race, ethnicity, or gender matter? The American Economic Review, 95, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670446.

  • Dever, B. V., & Karabenick, S. A. (2011). Is authoritative teaching beneficial for all students? A multi-level model of the effects of teaching style on interest and achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022985.

  • Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 533–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001.

  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., Goldsmith, H. H., & Van Hulle, C. A. (2006). Gender differences in temperament: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 33–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33.

  • Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5.

  • Ferguson, A. A. (2000). Bad Boys: Public School and the Making of Black Masculinity. University of Michigan Press.

  • Gerlinger, J., & Wo, J. C. (2014). Preventing school bullying: should schools prioritize an authoritative school discipline approach over security measures? Journal of School Violence, 15, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.956321.

  • Gregory, A., & Cornell, D. (2009). “Tolerating” adolescent needs: moving beyond zero tolerance policies in high school. Theory Into Practice, 48, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840902776327.

  • Gregory, A., & Weinstein, R. S. (2004). Connection and regulation at home and in school: predicting growth in achievement for adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 405–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558403258859.

  • Gregory, A., Skiba, R. J., & Noguera, P. A. (2010). The achievement gap and the discipline gap: two sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 39, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621.

  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2011). The relationship of school structure and support to suspension rates for Black and White high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 48, 904–934. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211398531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., Cornell, D., & Fan, X. (2012). Teacher safety and authoritative school climate in high schools. American Journal of Education, 118, 401–425. 0195-6744/2012/11804-0005

  • Hadzi-Pavlovic, D. (2009). Finding patterns and groupings: I. introduction to latent class analysis. Acta Neuropsychiatrica, 21, 312–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5215.2009.00429.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, K., & Muthén, B. (2010). Multilevel latent class analysis: an application of adolescent smoking typologies with individual and contextual predictors. Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511003659342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028002026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. J. (2002). In Search of Wholeness: African American Teachers and Their Culturally Competent Classroom Practices. Palgrave.

  • Kaplan, D., & Keller, B. (2011). A note on cluster effects in latent class analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.607071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, T., Cornell, D., Huang, F., Meyer, P., Lacey, A., Nekvasil, E., & …Shukla, K. (2014). Multilevel multi-informant structure of the Authoritative School Climate Survey. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000062.

  • Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: the role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312036004907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N., & Rubin, D. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88, 767–778. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchant, G. J., Paulson, S. E., & Rothlisburg, B. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students’ perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, G., and Peel, D. (2000). Finite Mixture Models. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus Statistical Analysis With Latent Variables: User’s Guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

  • Mutz, R., & Daniel, H. (2011). University and student segmentation: multilevel latent-class analysis of students’ attitudes towards research methods and statistics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02062.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, A. B., & Martens, M. P. (2008). School violence: Associations with control, security/enforcement, educational/therapeutic approaches, and demographic factors. School Psychology Review, 37, 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund-Gibson, K., & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund-Gibson, K., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2010). An application of multilevel LCA to study peer victimization in middle school. Adv. Appl. Stat. Sci., 3, 343–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M., Katz, K., Renshaw, T. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2012). Gauging the system: trends in school climate measurement and intervention. In S. R. Jimerson, A. B. Nickerson, M. J. Mayer, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of School Violence and Safety: International Research and Practice (2nd ed., pp. 317–329). Routledge.

  • Pellerin, L. A. (2005). Applying Baumrind’s parenting typology to high schools: toward a middle-range theory of authoritative socialization. Social Science Research, 34, 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C. M. B., & Molloy, G. N. (1990). Psychological and biographical differences between secondary school teachers experiencing high and low levels of burnout. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1990.tb00920.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rindskopf, D. (2006). Heavy alcohol use in the “fighting back” survey sample: separating individual and community level influences using multilevel latent class analysis. Journal of Drug Issues, 6, 441–462. 0022-0426/06/0210.1027/1016--9040.11.1.1

  • Ripski, M. B., & Gregory, A. (2009). Unfair, unsafe, and unwelcome: do high school students’ perceptions of unfairness, hostility, and victimization in school predict engagement and achievement? Journal of School Violence, 8, 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220903132755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at Fairness: How America’s Schools Cheat Girls. Touchstone.

  • Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclove, L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shouse, R. C. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict and congruence in American high schools. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 11, 173–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. L. (2002). The color of discipline: sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021320817372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 357–385. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313483907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2004). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base Year Data File User’s Manual [NCES 2004-405]. Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004405.pdf

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007-2008). Schools and Staffing Survey (SASS) [Public school teacher, BIE school teacher, and private school teacher data files]. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009324/tables/sass0708_2009324_t12n_02.asp

  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2007-2008). U.S. Department of Education and Justice. (2011). Secretary Duncan, Attorney General Holder announce effort to respond to school-to-prison pipeline by supporting good discipline practices [Press release]. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/secretary-duncan-attorney-general-holder-announce-effort-respond-school-prison-p

  • U.S. Office of Education, Safe and Drug-Free Schools Office. (2010). Safe a supportive schools. Fiscal year 2010 information and application procedures (CFDA #84.184Y). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Multilevel latent class models. Sociological Methodology, 33, 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0081-1750.2003.t01-1-00131.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. (2008). Latent class and finite mixture models for multilevel data sets. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 17, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2004). Latent class analysis. In M. S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman, & T. Futing Liao (Eds.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Sciences Research Methods (pp. 549–553). SAGE.

  • Weinstein, R. S., Gregory, A., & Strambler, M. (2004). Intractable self-fulfilling prophecies: fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education. American Psychologist, 59, 511–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.6.511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, K., & Payne, A. (2010). Racial threat and punitive school discipline. Social Problems, 57, 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.1.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents? Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. A., & Rowley, S. J. (2001). The schooling of ethnic minority children: commentary. Educational Psychologist, 36, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3601_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashley M. Mayworm.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was granted an exemption from the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, Santa Barbara. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

The current study uses secondary data that was collected as part of the national ELS:2002 study by the Institute of Education Sciences. Informed consent was obtained in the original study, and a description of informed consent procedures is available in the ELS:2002 User Guide (U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics 2004).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mayworm, A.M., Sharkey, J.D. & Nylund-Gibson, K. An Exploration of the Authoritative School Climate Construct Using Multilevel Latent Class Analysis. Contemp School Psychol 27, 283–302 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00386-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-021-00386-1

Keywords

Navigation