Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Self-Efficacy, Academic Motivation, and Self-Regulation: How Do They Predict Academic Achievement for Medical Students?

  • Original research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Self-efficacy, academic motivation, and self-regulation have been identified as important factors contributing to students’ learning success in general education. In the field of medical education, however, few studies have examined these variables or their interrelationships as predictors of undergraduate medical students’ learning outcomes, especially in the context of flipped learning.

Methods

Using structural equation modeling (SEM), this study explored the impact of self-efficacy on 146 first- and second-year medical students’ academic achievement in a flipped-learning environment, and whether such impact (if any) was mediated by academic motivation and self-regulated learning (SRL) strategies.

Results

On average, students scored highest on self-efficacy (mean = 5 out of a possible 7), followed by intrinsic motivation (mean = 4.59), resource-management strategies (mean = 4.48), metacognitive strategies (mean = 4.46), extrinsic motivation (mean = 4.24), and cognitive strategies (mean = 4.17). Our SEM results suggest that, while there was a direct effect of self-efficacy on learning outcomes, academic motivation and SRL strategies did not mediate it.

Conclusions

By unpacking the structural relationships among self-efficacy, academic motivation, SRL strategies, and learning outcomes, this study provides evidence-based support for the importance of promoting students’ self-efficacy in undergraduate medical flipped-learning environments. Strategies for increasing students’ self-efficacy are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Upon request

References

  1. Stegers-Jager KM, Cohen-Schotanus J, Themmen APN. Motivation, learning strategies, participation and medical school performance. Med Educ. 2012;46:678–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04284.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klassen RM, Klassen JRL. Self-efficacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0411-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burgoon JM, Meece JL, Granger NA. Self-efficacy’s influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:249–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brydges R, Butler D. A reflective analysis of medical education research on self-regulation in learning and practice. Med Educ. 2012;46:71–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04100.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel R, Green W, Shahzad MW, Church H, Sandars J. Using a self-regulated learning-enhanced video feedback educational intervention to improve junior doctor prescribing. Med Teach. 2020;42:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1748183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Demirören M, Turan S, Öztuna D. Medical students’ self-efficacy in problem-based learning and its relationship with self-regulated learning. Med Educ Online. 2016;21:30049. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.30049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y-H, Kao P-F, Liao H-C. The relationship of vocabulary learning strategies and self-efficacy with medical English and terminology. Percept Mot Skills. 2016;122:47–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516628377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1986;4:359–73. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson M, Abraham C, Bond R. Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2012;138:353–87. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tiyuri A, Saberi B, Miri M, Shahrestanaki E, Bayat BB, Salehiniya H. Research self-efficacy and its relationship with academic performance in postgraduate students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences in 2016. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:11. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_43_17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Motlagh SE, Amrai K, Yazdani MJ, Abderahim H a, Souri H. The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:765–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Multon KD, Brown SD, Lent RW. Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: a meta-analytic investigation. J Couns Psychol. 1991;38:30–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmerman BJ, Bandura A, Martinez-Pons M. Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Am Educ Res J. 1992;29:663–76. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312029003663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yusuf M. The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ academic achievement. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci. 2011;15:2623–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Moulaert V, Verwijnen MGM, Rikers R, Scherpbier AJJA. The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ. 2004;38:1044–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01954.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobral DT. What kind of motivation drives medical students’ learning quests? Med Educ. 2004;38:950–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01913.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Deci EL, Ryan RM. A motivational approach to self: integration in personality. Neb Symp Motiv Neb Symp Motiv. 1990;38:237–88.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000;25:54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kusurkar RA, Croiset G, Galindo-Garré F, Ten Cate O. Motivational profiles of medical students: association with study effort, academic performance and exhaustion. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-87.

  20. Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: which are the key subprocesses? Contemp Educ Psychol. 1986;11:307–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zimmerman BJ. Attaining self-regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handb. Self-Regul. San Diego: Academic Press; 2000. p. 13–39.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Hattie J. Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Abingdon: Routledge; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Durning SJ, Cleary TJ, Sandars J, Hemmer P, Kokotailo P, Artino AR. Perspective: viewing “strugglers” through a different lens: how a self-regulated learning perspective can help medical educators with assessment and remediation. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2011;86:488–95. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820dc384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. White CB, Gruppen LD, Fantone JC. Self-regulated learning in medical education. In: Tim S, editor. Understanding Medical Education, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2013, p. 201–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118472361.ch15.

  25. Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Am Educ Res J. 2008;45:166–83. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zumbrunn S, Tadlock J, Roberts ED. Encourage self regulated learning in the classroom: A review of the literature. Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium (MERC); 2011

  27. Pintrich PR, Smith DA, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning; 1991

  28. Vallerand RJ, Pelletier LG, Blais MR, Briere NM, Senecal C, Vallieres EF. The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educ Psychol Meas. 1992;52:1003–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed. Pearson: London; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bentler PM, Chou C-P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16:78–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods. 1996;1:130–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70399-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Doménech-Betoret F, Abellán-Roselló L, Gómez-Artiga A. Self-efficacy, satisfaction, and academic achievement: the mediator role of students’ expectancy-value beliefs. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schunk DH, Meece JL, Pintrich PR. Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. London, UK: Pearson; 2014

  35. Bierer SB, Dannefer EF. The learning environment counts: longitudinal qualitative analysis of study strategies adopted by first-year medical students in a competency-based educational program. Acad Med. 2016;91:S44–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. ten Cate O, Kusurkar RA, Williams GC. How self-determination theory can assist our understanding of the teaching and learning processes in medical education. AMEE guide no. 59. Med Teach. 2011;33:961–73. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ten cate O, Durning S. Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice. Med Teach. 2007;29:591–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701606799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van Eyk HJ, Hooiveld MHW, Van Leeuwen TN, Van der Wurff BLJ, De Craen AJM, Dekker FW, et al. Scientific output of Dutch medical students. Med Teach. 2010;32:231–5. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421591003596592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pintrich PR. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educ Psychol Rev. 2004;16:385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sandars J, Cleary TJ. Self-regulation theory: applications to medical education: AMEE guide no. 58. Med Teach. 2011;33:875–86. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.595434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wolters CA. Regulation of motivation: evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol. 2003;38:189–205. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. West C, Sadoski M. Do study strategies predict academic performance in medical school? Med Educ. 2011;45:696–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03929.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lapp H, Makowka P, Recker F. Peer-mentoring program during the preclinical years of medical School at Bonn University: a project description. GMS J Med Educ. 2018;35. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001154.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BZ has contributed to study design, data collection, data analysis, drafting, and finalization of the manuscript. CC contributed to data analysis, drafting, and finalization of the manuscript. CL contributed to data analysis, drafting, and finalization of the manuscript. YZ contributed to data collection, drafting, and finalization of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Binbin Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, B., Chang, C., Lin, CH. et al. Self-Efficacy, Academic Motivation, and Self-Regulation: How Do They Predict Academic Achievement for Medical Students?. Med.Sci.Educ. 31, 125–130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01143-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-01143-4

Keywords

Navigation