Skip to main content
Log in

Implementing Personal Mentoring in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program—3-Year Evaluation

  • Original research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To empower residents-in-training through personal mentorship from a senior physician who dedicates time and guidance to their personal development and provides professional and emotional support.

Methods

A structured model of personal mentoring for residents was designed and implemented in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology. The process was assessed by a special-purpose survey constructed and reviewed by established medical mentors. The survey examined residents’ attitudes towards personal aspects associated with their residency. The questionnaires were filled out anonymously before launching and 1 and 3 years after initiating the personal mentoring process.

Results

The residents’ reports showed a distinct trend of increased positive attitudes towards the personal mentoring throughout the process. The residents reported on an improvement in the mentors’ availability to address personal aspects within the mentoring relationship (empathy, emotional support in deliberations, career guidance, etc.). The general satisfaction with the residency program improved as well.

Conclusions

Mentoring is a significant element in a comprehensive, multi-dimensional process. Integrating personal mentoring into a residency program, with the focus on interpersonal relational characteristics as empathy, availability, open communication, and guidance, led to improvements in residents’ professional development and skills. They also received optimal support and guidance in their professional careers and personal deliberations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gunasingam N, Burns K, Edwards J, Dinh M, Walton M. Reducing stress and burnout in junior doctors: the impact of debriefing sessions. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91:182–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Prins JT, Gazendam-Donofrio SM, Tubben BJ, Van Der Heijden FMMA, Van De Wiel HBM, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM. Burnout in medical residents: a review. Med Educ. 2007;41:788–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dyrbye LN, West CP, Satele D, Boone S, Tan L, Sloan J, et al. Burnout among US medical students, residents, and early career physicians relative to the general US population. Acad Med. 2014;89:443–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen MM, Sandborg CI, Hudgins L, Sanford R, Bachrach LK. A multifaceted mentoring program for junior faculty in academic pediatrics. Teach Learn Med. 2016;28:320–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Taherian K, Shekarchian M. Mentoring for doctors. Do its benefits outweigh its disadvantages? Med Teach. 2008;30:e95–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogunyemi D, Solnik MJ, Alexander C, Fong A, Azziz R. Promoting residents’ professional development and academic productivity using a structured faculty mentoring program. Teach Learn Med. 2010;22:93–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassbach CE, Blankenburg R. A novel pediatric residency coaching program: outcomes after one year. Acad Med. 2018;93:430–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsu AK, Tabaee A, Persky MS. Mentorship in otolaryngology residency: the resident perspective. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1263–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Levy BD, Katz JT, Wolf MA, Sillman JS, Handin RI, Dzau VJ. An initiative in mentoring to promote residents’ and faculty members’ careers. Acad Med. 2004;79:845–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Straus SE, Chatur F, Taylor M. Issues in the mentor--mentee relationship in academic medicine: a qualitative study. Acad Med. 2009;84:135–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gazelle G, Liebschutz JM, Riess H. Physician burnout: coaching a way out. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:508–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davis OC, Nakamura J. A proposed model for an optimal mentoring environment for medical residents: a literature review. Acad Med. 2010;85:1060–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, Feldman MD. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll. 2013;88:82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sambunjak D, Straus SE, Marusic A. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ojeda M. Modern analysis of customer surveys: with applications using R. Investig Operacional. 2014;35:89–90.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abedin Z, Biskup E, Silet K, Garbutt JM, Kroenke K, Feldman MD, et al. Deriving competencies for mentors of clinical and translational scholars. Clin Transl Sci. 2012;5:273–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Esposito MJ, Roychoudhury S, Fornari A. A professionalism and mentoring curriculum for pathology residents in training. Acad Pathol. 2018;5:2374289518805062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ssemata AS, Gladding S, John CC, Kiguli S. Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:123.

  19. Jackson VA, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr PL, Inui T. “Having the right chemistry”: a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003;78:328–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Strowd RE, Reynolds P. Opinion & special articles: the lost resident why resident physicians still need mentoring. Neurology. 2013;80:e244–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Ms. Dalia Dawn Orkin for her important English language contributions and editing services.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RK, TBS, and AF contributed to conception and design, analysis, and interpretation of data; drafting the article and revising it critically for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ami Fishman.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The Institutional Ethics Committee approved the survey (MMC #014214).

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fishman, A., Kenett, R. & Biron-Shental, T. Implementing Personal Mentoring in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program—3-Year Evaluation. Med.Sci.Educ. 30, 293–297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00902-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00902-2

Keywords

Navigation