Abstract
Few studies have assessed professional identity among medical learners and links between identity and unprofessional behaviors. This study applied identity fusion theory and professional identity formation to examine the relationship between medical students’ social media beliefs and behaviors and professional identity measured by a physician professional identity fusion pictorial item. The hypothesis was students who were more strongly fused with physicians as a group would report (a) stronger beliefs that students should be held accountable for their social media behavior and (b) more concerns about their own social networking behavior. Participants included 3473 first-, second-, third-, and fourth-year medical students at eight schools in Texas. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and regression analyses were conducted to explore if professional identity formation, measured by the physician professional identify (PPI) item, was related to social media beliefs about accountability and concerns about social media behavior. The degree of physician professional identity fusion was unrelated to concerns about social media behavior (p = 0.102). Analyses revealed students’ degree of physician professional identity fusion was positively associated with beliefs about accountability for social media behaviors (b = 0.085, p = 0.004). This suggests as students’ physician identity emerges, they are more likely to expect themselves and peers to represent the larger community of physicians professionally, at least in the realm of social media. While this study focused on beliefs and behaviors related to social media, the results are encouraging for professional identity formation in general.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40670-018-0562-1/MediaObjects/40670_2018_562_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs40670-018-0562-1/MediaObjects/40670_2018_562_Fig2_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chretien KC, Greysen SR, Chretien JP, Kind T. Online posting of unprofessional content by medical students. JAMA. 2009;302(12):1309–15.
Chretien KC, Goldman EF, Beckman L, Kind T. It’s your own risk: medical students’ perspectives on online professionalism. Acad Med. 2010;85(10):S68–71.
Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, et al. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954–7.
Kind T, Genrich G, Sodhi A, Chretien KC. Social media policies at US medical schools. Med Educ Online. 2010;15:1–8.
Finn G, Garner J, Sawdon M. ‘You’re judged all the time!’Students’ views on professionalism: a multicentre study. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):814–25.
Gray K, Annabell L, Kennedy G. Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: insights from four case studies. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):971–6.
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. Reframing medical education to support professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1446–51.
Hendelman W, Byszewski A. Formation of medical student professional identity: categorizing lapses of professionalism, and the learning environment. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:139.
Jensen DH, Jetten J. Bridging and bonding interactions in higher education: social capital and students’ academic and professional identity formation. Front Psychol. 2015;6:126.
Monrouxe LV. Identity identification and medical education: why should we care? Med Educ. 2010;44(1):40–9.
Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough: integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse. Acad Med. 2012;87(9):1185–90.
MacLeod A. Caring, competence and professional identities in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2011;16(3):375–94.
Holden MD, Buck E, Luk J, Ambriz F, Boisaubin EV, Clark MA, et al. Professional identity formation: creating a longitudinal framework through TIME (transformation in medical education). Acad Med. 2015;90(6):761–7.
Adams K, Hean S, Sturgis P, Clark JM. Investigating the factors influencing professional identity of first-year health and social care students. Learn Health Soc Care. 2006;5(2):55–68.
Rodríguez C, Pawlikowska T, Schweyer F-X, Lopez-Roig S, Belanger E, Burns J, et al. Family physicians’ professional identity formation: a study protocol to explore impression management processes in institutional academic contexts. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:184.
Goldie J. The formation of professional identity in medical students: considerations for educators. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):e641–8.
Trede F. Role of work-integrated learning in developing professionalism and professional identity. Asia Pac J Coop Educ. 2012;13(3):159–67.
Green MJ. Comics and medicine: peering into the process of professional identity formation. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):774–9.
Meyer EM, Zapatka S, Brienza RS. The development of professional identity and the formation of teams in the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System’s Center of Excellence in Primary Care Education Program (CoEPCE). Acad Med. 2015;90(6):802–9.
Crossley J, Vivekananda-Schmidt P. The development and evaluation of a Professional Self Identity Questionnaire to measure evolving professional self-identity in health and social care students. Med Teach. 2009;31(12):e603–7.
Phinney JS. Ethic identity and acculturation. In: Chun K, Ball P, Marin G, editors. Acculturation: advances in theory, measurement, and applied research. Washington, DC: Am Psych Assoc; 2003. p. 63–81.
Mael F, Ashforth BE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Org Behav. 1992;13(2):103–23.
Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. 1979; 33–47. Monterey: Brooks-Cole; 1979. p. 33–47.
Swann WB Jr, Jetten J, Gómez A, Whitehouse H, Bastian B. When group membership gets personal: a theory of identity fusion. Psych Rev. 2012;119(3):441.
Swann Jr WB, Gómez A, Seyle DC, Morales J, Huici C. Identity fusion: the interplay of personal and social identities in extreme group behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009;96(5):995–1011.
Swann Jr WB, Buhrmester MD. Identity fusion. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015;24(1):52–7.
Swann WB Jr, Gomez A, Huici C, Morales JF, Hixon JG. Identity fusion and self-sacrifice: Arousal as a catalyst of pro-group fighting, dying and helping behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(5):824–41.
Swann WB Jr, Gomez A, Dovidio JF, Hart S, Jetten J. Dying and killing for one’s group: identity fusion moderates responses to intergroup versions of the trolley problem. Psych Sci. 2010;21(8):1176–83.
Swann WB Jr, Buhrmester MD, Gomez A, Jetten J, Bastian B, Vazquez A, et al. What makes a group worth dying for? Identity fusion fosters perception of familial ties, promoting self-sacrifice. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;106(6):912–26.
Newson M, Buhrmester M, Whitehouse H. Explaining lifelong loyalty: the role of identity fusion and self-shaping group events. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e160427. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160427.
Ginsburg S, Regehr G, Stern D, Lingard L. The anatomy of the professional lapse: bridging the gap between traditional frameworks and students’ perceptions. Acad Med. 2002;77(6):516–22.
Monrouxe LV, Rees CE. “It’s just a clash of cultures”: emotional talk within medical students’ narratives of professionalism dilemmas. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;17(5):671–701.
Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS. Social medial use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):893–901.
Buck E, West C, Graham L, Frye A, Teal C. Challenges to assessing professional identity among medical students: a tale of two measures. J Educ Eval Health Prof.
Cain J, Scott DR, Akers P. Pharmacy students’ Facebook activity and opinions regarding accountability and e-professionalism. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(6):1–6.
Sandars J, Homer M, Pell G, Croker T. Web 2.0 and social software: the medical student way of e-learning. Med Teach. 2008;30(3):308–12.
Lagu T, Kaufman EJ, Asch DA, Armstrong K. Content of weblogs written by health professionals. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(10):1642–6.
MacDonald J, Sohn S, Ellis P. Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctors. Med Educ. 2010;44(8):805–13.
Peluchette J, Karl K. Examining students’ intended image on Facebook: “What were they thinking?!”. J Educ Bus. 2009;85(1):30–7.
Boelen C, Woollard B. Social accountability and accreditation: a new frontier for educational institutions. Med Educ. 2009;43(9):887–94.
Gomez A, Brooks ML, Buhrmester MD, Vazquez A, Jetten J, Swann Jr WB. On the nature of identity fusion: insights into the construct and a new measure. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100(5):918–33.
Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Boudreau JD, Snell L, Steinert Y. A schematic representation of the professional identity formation and socialization of medical students and residents: a guide for medical educators. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):718–25.
Stern DT, Papadakis M. The developing physician—becoming a professional. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1794–9.
Wald HS, Anthony D, Hutchinson TA, Liben S, Smilovitch M, Donato AA. Professional identity formation in medical education for humanistic, resilient physicians: pedagogic strategies for bridging theory to practice. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):753–60.
Whitehouse H, Lanman JA. The ties that bind us. Curr Anthropol. 2014;55(6):674–95.
Onyura B, Bohnen J, Wasylenki D, Jarvis A, Giblon B, Hyland R, et al. Reimagining the self at late-career transitions: how identity threat influences academic physicians’ retirement considerations. Acad Med. 2015;90(6):794–801.
Cain J. Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008;72(1):10.
Conaboy C. For doctors, social media a tricky case. In: The Boston globe 2011. http://archive.boston.com/lifestyle/health/articles/2011/04/20/for_doctors_social_media_a_tricky_case/. Accessed 7 May 2014.
Jaschik S. Banned from blogging. In: Inside Higher Education 2013.https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/06/06/appeals-court-upholds-blogging-related-expulsion-student-nursing-school. Accessed 22 June 2014.
Walsh C, Abelson HT. Medical professionalism: crossing a generational divide. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(4):554–64.
Acknowledgements
At the time of the study, the Texas Medical Association (TMA) Consortium of Medical Education Research in Texas (Co-MERiT) Project Team Members included the following: James M. Wagner, MD, CHAIR, and Angela Mihalic, MD, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas; Stephen B. Greenberg, MD, FORMER CHAIR, Cayla Teal, PhD, Mary L. Brandt, MD, Baylor College of Medicine; Ruth L. Bush, MD, MPH, Lori Graham, PhD, and Courtney West, PhD, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine; Simon C. Williams, PhD, Robert Casanova, MD, and Vaughan Lee, PhD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at Lubbock, School of Medicine; Kathryn Horn, MD, Tania Arana, PhD, David Osborne, PhD, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, Paul L. Foster School of Medicine; Frank Papa, DO, PhD, and Roy Martin, DMin, University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine; Gary Rosenfeld, PhD, Peggy Hsieh, PhD, Allison R. Ownby, PhD, and Jeffrey P. Spike, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School; Florence Eddins-Folensbee, MD, Dana M. McDowelle, PhD, and Debra Lee Stark, DrPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Era Buck, PhD, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. We also wish to thank William B. Swann, Jr. at The University of Texas at Austin for consultation on the project and Yuanyuan Zhou at Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine for her contributions to data analysis and interpretation. The authors and the Consortium of Medical Education Research in Texas (Co-MERiT) team members would like to thank the Texas Medical Association (TMA) for their support for the Co-MERiT meetings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval was granted by each institution’s Institutional Review Board. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
West, C.A., Wagner, J.M., Greenberg, S.B. et al. Examining Medical Students’ Social Media Beliefs and Behaviors and Their Relationship to Professional Identity. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 389–399 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0562-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0562-1