Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peer-Based Anatomy Tutoring for First-Year Medical Students: an Analysis of Peer-Tutoring from the Tutors’ Perspective

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In response to student demand for additional anatomy lab instructional time outside of typical teaching hours, a peer-based anatomy tutoring program was implemented at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. Peer tutoring is a well-studied form of supplemental instruction, and is known to benefit students and tutors alike. This study aims to address the effect of tutoring on the tutors themselves, specifically in the context of the gross anatomy laboratory.

Methods

A one-time 12-question survey was distributed to all students who acted as tutors over a three-year period (n = 57), asking them to reflect on their experiences as tutors. Specifically, we aimed to address their thoughts on their career plans and academic achievement as they relate to their experience as tutors, as well as their opinions on effective tutoring techniques.

Results

Based on a 100% response rate, 85.7% of tutors reported being “very interested” in incorporating a teaching component to their career, and 73.7% of respondents reported that their experience tutoring influenced this plan. In contrast to an expectation that tutors would skew their residency choices toward anatomy-focused specialties, the distribution of tutors’ anticipated specialty choices actually reflected the overall distribution of the class. The tutors believed their experience tutoring improved their academic and clinical performance. The overwhelming majority reported believing that their experience as a tutor improved their USMLE Step 1 score (90.2%, n = 46). Sixty-one percent (n = 31) reported feeling that the experience as a tutor helped with their clerkship evaluations. Finally, the most effective tutoring techniques were quizzing the students directly and using the tutors’ own notes and study materials from the prior year.

Discussion

This study supports the finding that tutoring provides a significant beneficial effect on the tutors based on their own perceptions, and further studies obtaining quantitative data on academic achievement and clinical performance of the tutors will be beneficial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dinsmore CE, Daugherty S, Zeitz HJ. Teaching and learning gross anatomy: dissection, prosection, “both of the above?”. Clin Anat. 1999;12:110–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McMenamin PG et al. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(6):479–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davis CR et al. Human anatomy: let the students tell us how to teach. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7(4):262–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: a review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ. 2014;7:321–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Krych AJ et al. Reciprocal peer teaching: students teaching students in the gross anatomy laboratory. Clin Anat. 2005;18(4):296–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore-West M, Hennessy SA, Meilman PW, O'Donnell JF. The presence of student-based peer advising, peer tutoring, and performance evaluation programs among U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1990;65(10):660–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Escovedo C et al. Utility and efficacy of a peer-based anatomy tutoring program for first-year medical students. Medical Science Educator. 2016;26(1):105–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Escovitz ES. Using senior students as clinical skills teaching assistants. Acad Med. 1990;65:733–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Field M, Burke JM, McAllister D, Lloyd DM. Peer-assisted learning: a novel approach to clinical skills learning for medical students. Med Educ. 2007;41:411–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobral DT. Cross-year peer tutoring experience in a medical school: conditions and outcomes for student tutors. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1064–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buckley S, Zamora J. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors’ skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    David Harrison

  2. David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA

    Jacob Lentz, Cameron Escovedo & Elena Stark

  3. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Naomi Schmalz

Authors
  1. David Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob Lentz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Naomi Schmalz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cameron Escovedo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elena Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Harrison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harrison, D., Lentz, J., Schmalz, N. et al. Peer-Based Anatomy Tutoring for First-Year Medical Students: an Analysis of Peer-Tutoring from the Tutors’ Perspective. Med.Sci.Educ. 27, 57–61 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0361-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0361-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation