Abstract
Delivering educational content through lectures has been a mainstay for medical education; however, discussions about the use of lectures in medical education still remain. Through efforts at our institution, we sought to better understand student and faculty expectations for using lectures in the pre-clinical curriculum and use this information to help shape a renewed curriculum. We surveyed students and faculty members who participated in our pre-clinical curriculum regarding their expectations for live lectures. The questionnaire they completed addressed open- and closed-ended questions about the effectiveness of lectures and what, if any, benefits might be gained from attending live lectures. A total of 110 students and 78 faculty members completed the questionnaire. Compared to students, faculty members were significantly more likely to expect that live lectures provide students with critical thinking skills, motivation to learn, and opportunities for interaction with faculty members. Students were significantly more likely to expect that live lectures facilitate social support. Thematic analysis of open-ended responses provided additional considerations about the benefits of lectures. Our results suggest that examining the perspectives of students and faculty about the purpose of lectures may reveal differences in their expectations. Curricular models may benefit from creating an environment where faculty members, in collaboration with students, consider the appropriate uses and limitations of lectures. Our results have been used to inform curriculum development at our institution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bligh DA. What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000.
Gunderman R. Is the lecture dead? The Atlantic. January 29, 2013.
Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9.
Billings-Gagliardi S, Mazor KM. Student decisions about lecture attendance: do electronic course materials matter? Acad Med. 2007;82(10 Suppl):S73–6.
Cardall S, Krupat E, Ulrich M. Live lecture versus video-recorded lecture: are students voting with their feet? Acad Med. 2008;83(12):1174–8.
AAMC. Instructional formats used in the curriculum 2013–14. LCME Part II Annual Medical School Questionnaire. Association of American Medical Colleges. 2013. http://www.aamc.org/initiatives/cir/406454/05b.html. Accessed February 9 2015.
Cantillon P Teaching large groups. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):437.
Kulkarni R, AC A, Reddy B. Student perception on lectures in medical education. Anatomica Karnataka. 2011;5(2):1–9.
NBME. Embedding professionalism in medical education: assessment as a tool for implementation. Baltimore: Association of American Medical Colleges and National Board of Medical Examiners; 2002.
Zazulia AR, Goldhoff P. Faculty and medical student attitudes about preclinical classroom attendance. Teach Learn Med. 2014;26(4):327–34.
Karnieli-Miller O, Vu TR, Frankel RM, Holtman MC, Clyman SG, Hui SL, et al. Which experiences in the hidden curriculum teach students about professionalism? Acad Med. 2011;86(3):369–77.
Jones SE. Reflections on the lecture: outmoded medium or instrument of inspiration? JFHE. 2007;31(4):397–406.
Russell IJ, Hendricson WD, Herbert RJ. Effects of lecture information density on medical student achievement. J Med Educ. 1984;59(11):881–9.
Hagen SS, Shaikh MJ, Rosenbaum ME, Ephgrave K. Are students learning what faculty are intending to teach? J Surg Res. 2008;147(2):225–8.
Kessler CS, Dharmapuri S, Marcolini EG. Qualitative analysis of effective lecture strategies in emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(5):482–9 e7.
Richardson D. Don’t dump the didactic lecture; fix it. Adv Physiol Educ. 2008;32(1):23–4.
Ball S, Bax A. Self-care in medical education: effectiveness of health-habits interventions for first-year medical students. Acad Med. 2002;77(9):911–7.
Chou CL, Johnston CB, Singh B, Garber JD, Kaplan E, Lee K, et al. A “safe space” for learning and reflection: one school’s design for continuity with a peer group across clinical clerkships. Acad Med. 2011;86(12):1560–5.
Ferguson KJ, Wolter EM, Yarbrough DB, Carline JD, Krupat E. Defining and describing medical learning communities: results of a national survey. Acad Med. 2009;84(11):1549–56.
Kalmey JK. Stop wasting classroom time: embrace the podcast and use the “lecture” to enhance learning. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1054.
Harden RM, Crosby J. AMEE Guide No 20: The good teacher is more than a lecturer—the twelve roles of the teacher. Med Teach. 2000;22(4):334–47.
Karakitsiou DE, Markou A, Kyriakou P, Pieri M, Abuaita M, Bourousis E, et al. The good student is more than a listener—the 12 + 1 roles of the medical student. Med Teach. 2012;34(1):E1–8.
Stuart J, Rutherford RJ. Medical student concentration during lectures. Lancet. 1978;2(8088):514–6.
Mazur E. Farewell, lecture? Science. 2009;323(5910):50–1.
Exley K, Dennick R. Why lecture? Giving a lecture: from presenting to teaching. Second ed. Florence: Routledge; 2009.
Lowell, Miller, Ryder, Cannon. Students: comments on curriculum, 1909–1915. Transcript from the Dean’s Papers 1910.
Acknowledgments
This study was approved by the University of Iowa’s Institutional Review Board (IRB-01 #201104741). The authors are grateful to Dr. Rick Axelson for the assistance with data analyses and development of the questionnaire. They also wish to thank Mr. Jeff Emrich for overseeing the administration of the questionnaire, as well as Mr. Michael Haugsdal and Dr. Lauris Kaldjian, who inspired and encouraged this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rysavy, M., Christine, P., Lenoch, S. et al. Student and Faculty Perspectives on the Use of Lectures in the Medical School Curriculum. Med.Sci.Educ. 25, 431–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0171-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-015-0171-1