Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching a Child with Autism to Mand for Answers to Questions Using a Speech-Generating Device

  • Special Section: The Intraverbal Relation
  • Published:
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study systematically replicates and extends the findings of Ingvarsson and Hollobaugh (2010) by teaching a boy with autism who used a speech-generating device to mand for answers to unknown questions. The effects of the intervention were evaluated via a multiple baseline across stimulus sets. The intervention resulted in acquisition of both the mand for information and intraverbal responses (i.e., correct answers to previously unknown questions). However, generalization of the mand for information was limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., et al. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an ipod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258–1264. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, A. S., & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: teaching children with autism to mand for answers to questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbal responding in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., & Le, D. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics to establish intraverbal behavior in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 411-429. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-411.

  • Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lechago, S. A., & Low, A. (2015). A review of the mand-for-information training research literature. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 35–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., & Jones, R. M. (2012). Annual research review: re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 490–509. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostryn, C., Wolfe, P. S., & Rusch, F. R. (2008). A review and analysis of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) for individuals with autism spectrum disorders using a paradigm of communication competence. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 13–24. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raulston, T., Carnett, A., Lang, R., Tostanoski, A., Lee, A., Machalciek, W., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., & Lancioni, G. (2013). Teaching individuals with autism spectrum disorders to ask questions: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 866–878. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.03.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., Devellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward an objective classification of childhood autism: childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 10, 91–103. doi:10.1007/BF02408436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. (2005). Vineland-II adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: VB-MAPP. AVB Press.

  • Sundberg, M., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. doi:10.1177/0145445501255003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tager-Flusberg, H., & Kasari, C. (2013). Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: the neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6, 468–478. doi:10.1002/aur.1329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. A., & Harris, S. L. (1995). Teaching children with autism to seek information: acquisition of novel information and generalization of responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 3–14. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer, L., & Rispoli, M. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: a review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306. doi:10.3109/17518421003671494.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vedora, J., Meunier, L., & Mackay, H. (2009). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism: a comparison of textual and echoic prompts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 79.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59-67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001.

  • Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131, 1128–1134. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2221d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amarie Carnett.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from the individual participant included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This article is part of a special section on the intraverbal relation in The Analysis of Verbal Behavior.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carnett, A., Ingvarsson, E.T. Teaching a Child with Autism to Mand for Answers to Questions Using a Speech-Generating Device. Analysis Verbal Behav 32, 233–241 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0070-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0070-6

Keywords

Navigation