The Analysis of Verbal Behavior

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 233–241 | Cite as

Teaching a Child with Autism to Mand for Answers to Questions Using a Speech-Generating Device

Special Section: The Intraverbal Relation

Abstract

The current study systematically replicates and extends the findings of Ingvarsson and Hollobaugh (2010) by teaching a boy with autism who used a speech-generating device to mand for answers to unknown questions. The effects of the intervention were evaluated via a multiple baseline across stimulus sets. The intervention resulted in acquisition of both the mand for information and intraverbal responses (i.e., correct answers to previously unknown questions). However, generalization of the mand for information was limited.

Keywords

Autism Intraverbals Mands for information Question answering Speech-generating device Verbal behavior 

References

  1. Achmadi, D., Kagohara, D. M., van der Meer, L., O’Reilly, M. F., Lancioni, G. E., Sutherland, D., et al. (2012). Teaching advanced operation of an ipod-based speech-generating device to two students with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6, 1258–1264. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2012.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Finkel, A. S., & Williams, R. L. (2001). A comparison of textual and echoic prompts on the acquisition of intraverbal behavior in a six-year-old boy with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 61–70.Google Scholar
  3. Ganz, J. B. (2015). AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 31, 203–214. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1047532.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2010). Acquisition of intraverbal behavior: teaching children with autism to mand for answers to questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 1–17. doi:10.1901/jaba.2010.43-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Hollobaugh, T. (2011). A comparison of prompting tactics to establish intraverbal responding in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 659–664. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-659.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ingvarsson, E. T., & Le, D. D. (2011). Further evaluation of prompting tactics to establish intraverbal behavior in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 75–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ingvarsson, E. T., Tiger, J. H., Hanley, G. P., & Stephenson, K. M. (2007). An evaluation of intraverbal training to generate socially appropriate responses to novel questions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 411-429. doi:10.1901/jaba.2007.40-411.
  8. Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Michael, J., & Poling, A. (2003). Motivating operations and terms to describe them: some further refinements. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 407–414. doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lechago, S. A., & Low, A. (2015). A review of the mand-for-information training research literature. International Journal of Behavior Analysis & Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 35–54.Google Scholar
  10. Lord, C., & Jones, R. M. (2012). Annual research review: re-thinking the classification of autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 53, 490–509. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02547.x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. McNaughton, D., & Light, J. (2013). The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29, 107–116. doi:10.3109/07434618.2013.784930.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Mirenda, P. (2003). Toward functional augmentative and alternative communication for students with autism: manual signs, graphic symbols, and voice output communication aids. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 34, 203–216. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2003/017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ostryn, C., Wolfe, P. S., & Rusch, F. R. (2008). A review and analysis of the picture exchange communication system (PECS) for individuals with autism spectrum disorders using a paradigm of communication competence. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 33, 13–24. doi:10.2511/rpsd.33.1-2.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raulston, T., Carnett, A., Lang, R., Tostanoski, A., Lee, A., Machalciek, W., Sigafoos, J., O’Reilly, M., Didden, R., & Lancioni, G. (2013). Teaching individuals with autism spectrum disorders to ask questions: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 866–878. doi:10.1016/j.rasd.2013.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reichle, J., York, J., & Sigafoos, J. (1991). Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: strategies for learners with severe disabilities. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes.Google Scholar
  16. Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., Devellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward an objective classification of childhood autism: childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 10, 91–103. doi:10.1007/BF02408436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sennott, S., & Bowker, A. (2009). Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go. Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 137–145. doi:10.1044/aac18.4.137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sparrow, S., Cicchetti, D., & Balla, D. (2005). Vineland-II adaptive behavior scales (2nd ed.). Minneapolis: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal behavior milestones assessment and placement program: VB-MAPP. AVB Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sundberg, M., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. doi:10.1177/0145445501255003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tager-Flusberg, H., & Kasari, C. (2013). Minimally verbal school-aged children with autism spectrum disorder: the neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6, 468–478. doi:10.1002/aur.1329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, B. A., & Harris, S. L. (1995). Teaching children with autism to seek information: acquisition of novel information and generalization of responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 3–14. doi:10.1901/jaba.1995.28-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. van der Meer, L., & Rispoli, M. (2010). Communication interventions involving speech-generating devices for children with autism: a review of the literature. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13, 294–306. doi:10.3109/17518421003671494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Vedora, J., Meunier, L., & Mackay, H. (2009). Teaching intraverbal behavior to children with autism: a comparison of textual and echoic prompts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25, 79.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Carnett, A., & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59-67. doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001.
  27. Wodka, E. L., Mathy, P., & Kalb, L. (2013). Predictors of phrase and fluent speech in children with autism and severe language delay. Pediatrics, 131, 1128–1134. doi:10.1542/peds.2012-2221d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Victoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyThe University of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations