Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of the location and size of soluble particles in the mechanical behavior of collapsible granular soil: a DEM simulation

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Collapsing soil structure caused by mineral dissolution is a challenge to geoenvironmental projects. Although the parameters affecting the macro-response of collapsible soil have been addressed experimentally, the micromechanical behavior of soluble soil is unclear. The aim of this study was to simulate the dissolution behavior of a granular assembly at the particle level. A DEM code was developed that considers both localized and random dissolution as well as the particle size distribution and stress level. The effect of particle dissolution was simulated by considering the role of particle size in the load-bearing skeleton. The results show that mechanical behavior of a granular assembly is strongly influenced by the location and percentage of dissolution of particles. The loss of the soluble particles decreases physical contact and transfers to neighboring particles due to the arching forces around the voids, as in a honeycomb structure. However, if the soluble areas cut across the load-bearing force chains, a honeycomb fabric cannot form because of the lack of an arching effect, leading to the collapse of the structure and large volume change. Particle loss of up to 3% will not have a serious impact on the mechanical behavior of the granular assembly. After fine particle dissolution of a binary mixture, the arching effect around them decreases the volumetric strain in comparison with the dissolution of coarse particles. Also, during dissolution, the high stress level will decrease the peak friction angle, but the opposite is true for the post-dissolution behavior above 12% strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das BM (2015) Principles of foundation engineering. Cengage learning, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gaaver KE (2012) Geotechnical properties of Egyptian collapsible soils. Alex Eng J 51:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell FG (2007) Engineering geology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gao X-J, Wang J-C, Zhu X-R (2007) Static load test and load transfer mechanism study of squeezed branch and plate pile in collapsible loess foundation. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 8:1110–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Reznik YM (2007) Influence of physical properties on deformation characteristics of collapsible soils. Eng Geol 92:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Truong QH, Eom YH, Lee JS (2010) Stiffness characteristics of soluble mixtures. Geotechnique 60(4):293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waltham T (2009) Foundations of engineering geology, 3rd edn. Spon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barden L, Mcgown A, Collins K (1973) The collapse mechanism in partly saturated soil. Eng Geol 7:49–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Veni G, Duchene H, Crawford NC, Groves CG, Huppert GN, Kastning EH, Olson R, Wheeler BJ (2001) Living with karst: a fragile foundation. American Geological Institute, Alexandria

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hunt RE (2007) Geologic hazards: a field guide for geotechnical engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Cha M, Santamarina JC (2016) Hydro-chemo-mechanical coupling in sediments: localized mineral dissolution. Geomech Energy Environ 7:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borja RI (2006) Conditions for instabilities in collapsible solids including volume implosion and compaction banding. Acta Geotech 1:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behavior. Willy, New York, p 592

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fattah MY, Al-Ani MM, Al-Lamy MT (2014) Studying collapse potential of gypseous soil treated by grouting. Soils Found 54:396–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fattah MY, Al-Ani MM, Al-Lamy MTA (2015) Wetting and drying collapse behaviour of collapsible gypseous soils treated by grouting. Arab J Geosci 8(4):2035–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fattah MY, Al-Ani MM, Al-Lamy MTA (2013) Treatment of collapse of gypseous soils by grouting. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers, ground improvement journal, UK, vol. 166, no GI1, pp 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.11.00020

  17. Al-Damluji S, Al-Farouk O, Al-Obaidi ALM, Al-Omari RR, Al-Ani MM, Fattah MY (2009) Experimental and numerical investigations of dissolution of gypsum in gypsiferrous iraqi soils. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Alexandria, Egypt, 5–9 Oct 2009, vol 1, pp 820–824

  18. Lee J-S, Tran MK, Lee C (2012) Evolution of layered physical properties in soluble mixture: experimental and numerical approaches. Eng Geol 143:37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin H, Santamarina JC (2009) Mineral dissolution and the evolution of k0. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135(8):1141–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shin H, Santamarina JC, Cartwright JA (2008) Contraction-driven shear failure in compacting uncemented sediments. Geology 36(12):931–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fam MA, Cascante G, Dusseault MB (2002) Large and small strain properties of sands subjected to local void increase. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 128(12):1018–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cha M, Santamarina JC (2013) Predissolution and post dissolution penetration resistance. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(12):2193–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mcdougall J, Kelly D, Barreto D (2013) Particle loss and volume change on dissolution: experimental results and analysis of particle size and amount effects. Acta Geotech 8(6):619–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson B, Tatsuoka F (2008) Geotechnics: the next 60 years. The essence of geotechnical engineering: 60 years of géotechnique. Thomas Telford Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cha M, Santamarina JC (2014) Dissolution of randomly distributed soluble grains: post-dissolution k0-loading and shear. Geotechnique 64(10):828–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cundall PA, Strack OD (1979) A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29:47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhu H, Zhou Z, Yang R, Yu A (2007) Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: theoretical developments. Chem Eng Sci 62:3378–3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coetzee CJ (2014) Discrete and continuum modelling of soil cutting. Comput Part Mech 1:409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zdravkovic L, Carter J (2008) Constitutive and numerical modelling. Geotechnique 58:405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu H, Zhou Z, Yang R, Yu A (2008) Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: a review of major applications and findings. Chem Eng Sci 63:5728–5770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bayesteh H, Mirghasemi A (2015) Numerical simulation of porosity and tortuosity effect on the permeability in clay: microstructural approach. Soils Found 55:1158–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zárate F, Cornejo A, Oñate E (2018) A three-dimensional FEM–DEM technique for predicting the evolution of fracture in geomaterials and concrete. Comput Part Mech 5:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Esposito RG, Velloso RQ Jr, Danziger EAV (2018) Multi-scale sensitivity analysis of pile installation using DEM. Comput Part Mech 5:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Huang X, O’Sullivan C, Hanley KJ, Kwok CY (2017) Partition of the contact force network obtained in discrete element simulations of element tests. Comput Part Mech 4:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bandeira AA, Zohdi TI (2018) 3D numerical simulations of granular materials using DEM models considering rolling phenomena. Comput Part Mech. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-018-0200-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu S, Sun D, Wang Y (2003) Numerical study of soil collapse behavior by discrete element modelling. Comput Geotech 30:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tran M, Shin H, Byun YH, Lee S (2012) Mineral dissolution effects on mechanical strength. Eng Geol 125:26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mirghasemi A, Rothenburg L, Matyas E (1997) Numerical simulations of assemblies of two-dimensional polygon-shaped particles and effects of confining pressure on shear strength. Soils Found 37:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bayesteh H, Mirghasemi A (2013) Procedure to detect the contact of platy cohesive particles in discrete element analysis. Powder Technol 244:75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Seyedi Hosseininia E (2012) Discrete element modeling of inherently anisotropic granular assemblies with polygonal particles. Particuology 10(2012):542–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Seyedi Hosseininia E (2012) Investigating the micromechanical evolutions within inherently anisotropic granular materials using discrete element method. Granul Matter 2012(14):483–503

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Abedi S, Mirghasemi AA (2011) Particle shape consideration in numerical simulation of assemblies of irregularly shaped particles. Particuology 9(2011):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rothenburg L, Bathurst RJ (1989) Analytical study of induced anisotropy in idealized granular materials. Géotechnique 39(4):601–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Seyedi Hosseininia E, Mirghasemi AA (2006) Numerical simulation of breakage of two-dimensional polygon-shaped particles using discrete element method. Powder Technol 166:100–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shire T, O’sullivan C, Hanley K (2016) The influence of fines content and size-ratio on the micro-scale properties of dense bimodal materials. Granul Matter 18:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huang X, O’Sullivan C, Hanley KJ, Kwok CY (2014) Discrete-element method analysis of the state parameter. Geotechnique 64(12):954–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shire T, O’sullivan C (2016) Constriction size distributions of granular filters: a numerical study. Geotechnique 64(10):826–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang J, Luo XD (2017) The critical state friction angle of granular materials: Does it depend on grading? Acta Geotech 13(3):535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vahidi-Nia F, Lashkari A, Binesh SM (2015) An insight into the mechanical behavior of binary granular soils. Particuology 21:82–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Dorostkar O, Mirghasemi AA (2016) Micro-mechanical study of stress path and initial conditions in granular materials using DEM. Comput Part Mech 3:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) under Grant No. 96008954. This support is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

    H. Bayesteh & T. Ghasempour

Authors
  1. H. Bayesteh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Ghasempour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Bayesteh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayesteh, H., Ghasempour, T. Role of the location and size of soluble particles in the mechanical behavior of collapsible granular soil: a DEM simulation. Comp. Part. Mech. 6, 327–341 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-018-00216-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-018-00216-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation