Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A randomized controlled trial and pragmatic analysis of the effects of volunteering on the health and well-being of older people

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Volunteering among older people has the potential to deliver health benefits to the individual, along with economic and social benefits to society. However, it is not clear whether healthier people are more likely to engage in volunteering, whether volunteering improves health, or the extent to which the relationship may be reciprocal. There is an identified need for longitudinal work, especially in the form of randomized controlled trials, to establish causality.

Aims

To assess the effects of commencing volunteering among older non-volunteers utilizing a randomized controlled trial approach involving per-protocol and pragmatic analyses.

Methods

Of the 445 Australians aged 60 + years who participated in the study, 201 were assigned to an intervention arm that required them to participate in a minimum of 1 h/week of formal volunteering in a position of their choice. The remaining participants were assigned to a control condition and asked to continue their lives as usual, but were not discouraged from commencing volunteering.

Results

Across the assessed physical, psychological, and social variables, a significant difference in sit-to-stand scores was found in both the per-protocol and pragmatic analyses, and a further significant difference in the fast pace walk was identified in the pragmatic analyses.

Conclusion

The results provide some support for policies and programs designed to encourage older people to engage in volunteering to maintain or improve their health.

Trial registration

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000091505.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stephens C (2017) From success to capability for healthy ageing: shifting the lens to include all older people. Crit Public Health 27:490–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2016.1192583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2015) World Report on Ageing and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dubas-Jakóbczyk K, Kocot E, Kissimova-Skarbek K et al (2017) Economic evaluation of health promotion and primary prevention actions for older people—a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 27:670–679. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherry KE, Jackson Walker E, Silva Brown J et al (2013) Social engagement and health in younger, older, and oldest-old adults in the Louisiana healthy aging study. J Appl Gerontol 32:51–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464811409034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper R, Stafford M, Hardy R et al (2014) Physical capability and subsequent positive mental wellbeing in older people: findings from five HALCyon cohorts. Age 36:445–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-013-9553-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daskalopoulou C, Stubbs B, Kralj C et al (2017) Physical activity and healthy ageing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies. Ageing Res Rev 38:6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.06.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hamer M, Lavoie KL, Bacon SL (2014) Taking up physical activity in later life and healthy ageing: the English longitudinal study of ageing. Br J Sports Med 48:239–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Peel NM, McClure RJ, Bartlett HP (2005) Behavioral determinants of healthy aging. Am J Prev Med 28:298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider N, Yvon C (2013) A review of multidomain interventions to support healthy cognitive ageing. J Nutr Health Aging 17:252–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0402-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson ND, Damianakis T, Kröger E et al (2014) The benefits associated with volunteering among seniors: a critical review and recommendations for future research. Psychol Bull 140:1505–1533. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Connolly S, O’shea E (2015) The perceived benefits of participating in voluntary activities among older people: do they differ by volunteer characteristics? Act Adapt Aging 39:95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2015.1024075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkinson CE, Dickens AP, Jones K et al (2013) Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health 13:773. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-773

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kail BL, Carr DC (2017) Successful aging in the context of the disablement process: working and volunteering as moderators on the association between chronic conditions and subsequent functional limitations. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72:340–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim ES, Konrath SH (2016) Volunteering is prospectively associated with health care use among older adults. Soc Sci Med 149:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.11.043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carson ED (1999) Comment: on defining and measuring volunteering in the United States and abroad. Law Contemp Probl 62:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cnaan RA, Amrofell L (1994) Mapping volunteer activity. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 23:335–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee Y, Brudney JL (2012) Participation in formal and informal volunteering: implications for volunteer recruitment. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 23:159–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21060

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2018) Older Australia at a Glance. AIHW, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  19. Douglas H, Georgiou A, Westbrook J (2017) Social participation as an indicator of successful aging: an overview of concepts and their associations with health. Aust Health Rev 4:455–462. https://doi.org/10.1071/ah16038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fried LP, Carlson MC, Freedman M et al (2004) A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model. J Urban Health 81:64–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jth094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lum TY, Lightfoot E (2005) The effects of volunteering on the physical and mental health of older people. Res Aging 27:31–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027504271349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Burr JA, Han SH, Tavares JL (2015) Volunteering and cardiovascular disease risk: does helping others get “under the skin?”. Gerontologist 56:937–947. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta S (2018) Impact of volunteering on cognitive decline of the elderly. J Econ Ageing 12:46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2018.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Proulx CM, Curl AL, Ermer AE (2018) Longitudinal associations between formal volunteering and cognitive functioning. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 73:522–531. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Y-P, Chen Y-M, Chen C-H (2013) Volunteer transitions and physical and psychological health among older adults in Taiwan. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68:997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tomioka K, Kurumatani N, Hosoi H (2017) Association between the frequency and autonomy of social participation and self-rated health. Geriatr Gerontol Int 17:2537–2544. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13074

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li Y, Ferraro KF (2005) Volunteering and depression in later life: social benefit or selection processes? J Health Soc Behav 46:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650504600106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Binder M, Freytag A (2013) Volunteering, subjective well-being and public policy. J Econ Psychol 34:97–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kahana E, Bhatta T, Lovegreen LD et al (2013) Altruism, helping, and volunteering: pathways to well-being in late life. J Aging Health 25:159–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264312469665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown KM, Hoye R, Nicholson M (2012) Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and social connectedness as mediators of the relationship between volunteering and well-being. J Soc Serv Res 38:468–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2012.687706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Carr DC, Kail BL, Matz-Costa C et al (2018) Does becoming a volunteer attenuate loneliness among recently widowed older adults? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 73:501–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbx092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carlson MC, Saczynski JS, Rebok GW et al (2008) Exploring the effects of an “everyday” activity program on executive function and memory in older adults: experience Corps®. Gerontologist 48:793–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rook KS, Sorkin DH (2003) Fostering social ties through a volunteer role: implications for older-adults’ psychological health. Int J Aging Hum Dev 57:313–337. https://doi.org/10.2190/nbbn-eu3h-4q1n-uxhr

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang F (2006) What resources are needed for volunteerism? A life course perspective. J Appl Gerontol 25:375–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464806292858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kelemen M, Mangan A, Moffat S (2017) More than a ‘little act of kindness’? Towards a typology of volunteering as unpaid work. Sociology 51:1239–1256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517692512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patsopoulos NA (2011) A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 13:217–224

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Pettigrew S, Jongenelis M, Newton R et al (2015) Research protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the health effects of volunteering for seniors. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13:74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-015-0263-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2018) 2033.0.55.001—Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA), Australia, 2016. ABS, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rantanen KK, Strandberg TE, Stenholm SS et al (2015) Clinical and laboratory characteristics of active and healthy aging (AHA) in octogenarian men. Aging Clin Exp Res 27:581–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0329-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taaffe DR, Simonsick EM, Visser M et al (2003) Lower extremity physical performance and hip bone mineral density in elderly black and white men and women: cross-sectional associations in the Health ABC Study. J Gerontol A Bio Sci Med Sci 58:M934–M942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Choi L, Ward SC, Schnelle JF et al (2012) Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 44:2009. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e318258cb36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G et al (2013) Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med 34:975–982. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1337945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R et al (2007) The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes 5:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hyland ME, Sodergren SC (1996) Development of a new type of global quality of life scale, and comparison of performance and preference for 12 global scales. Qual Life Res 5:469–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenberg M (1965) Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M (1995) Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-NELSON, Windsor

  48. Ryff CD (1989) Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 57:1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cutrona CE, Russell DW (1987) The provisions of social relationships and adaptation to stress. In: Jones WH, Perlman D (eds) Advances in personal relationships, vol 1. JAI Press. Greenwich, CT, pp 37–67

    Google Scholar 

  50. Olanrewaju O, Kelly S, Cowan A et al (2016) Physical activity in community dwelling older people: a systematic review of reviews of interventions and context. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168614

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Bandinelli S, Milaneschi Y, Ferrucci L (2009) Chair stands test and survival in the older population. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:2172–2173. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02544.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Nicole Biagioni, Zenobia Talati, and the team of staff and students at Curtin University and the Vario Health Clinic at Edith Cowan University for their assistance with data collection.

Funding

This work was supported by an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP140100365).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SP conceptualized the study and took primary responsibility for preparing the manuscript. MJ conducted the analyses and assisted with study design and manuscript preparation. RN, BJ, and JW provided conceptual input for the study design and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. The funder played no role in the conducting of the research or the reporting of the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Pettigrew.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Statement on the welfare of animals

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pettigrew, S., Jongenelis, M.I., Jackson, B. et al. A randomized controlled trial and pragmatic analysis of the effects of volunteering on the health and well-being of older people. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 711–721 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01241-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01241-3

Keywords

Navigation