Skip to main content
Log in

Physical frailty, sarcopenia, and the enablement of autonomy: philosophical issues in geriatric medicine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical frailty and loss of muscular mass (sarcopenia) are believed to be predictors of age-related conditions, such as disability and loss of autonomy. In this paper, I show that what in political and moral philosophy has come to be known as “the capability approach” may indeed provide much needed conceptual clarification in the area of frailty research. Other than being useful at the theoretical level, the capability approach can definitely help in the implementation of clinical guidelines and public health measures aimed at translating the results that are accumulating from frailty research. I will first briefly review the main philosophical tenets of the capability approach, and then analyze how they relate to current debates about frailty and sarcopenia by introducing the notion of “enablement”. Finally, I will show how my analysis bears on both clinical research in this domain and public policy aimed at tackling some of the age-related issues in an aging society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sen A (1999) Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sen A, Nussbaum MC (eds) (1993) The quality of life. Clarendon Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sen A (1981) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sen A (1992) Inequality reexamined. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nussbaum MC (1992) Human functioning and social justice in defense of Aristotelian essentialism. Political Theory 20:202–246. doi:10.1177/0090591792020002002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morley JE, Vellas B, Abellan van Kan G et al (2013) Frailty consensus: a call to action. J Am Med Dir Assoc 14:392–397. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.03.022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J et al. (2001) Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M146–M156. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C et al (2005) A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ 173:489–495. doi:10.1503/cmaj.050051

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg IH (1997) Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr 127:990S–991S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rolland YM, Czerwinski S, Abellan Van Kan G et al (2008) Sarcopenia: its assessment, etiology, pathogenesis, consequences and future perspectives. J Nutr Health Aging 12:433–450

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cesari M, Vellas B (2012) Sarcopenia: a novel clinical condition or still a matter for research? J Am Med Dir Assoc 13:766–767. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2012.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ et al (2011) Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 12:249–256. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.01.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merskey H (1986) Variable meanings for the definition of disease. J Med Philos 11:215–232. doi:10.1093/jmp/11.3.215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nordenfelt L (2007) The concepts of health and illness revisited. Med Health Care Philos 10:5–10. doi:10.1007/s11019-006-9017-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jacobsen DE, Samson MM, Kezic S, Verhaar HJ (2007) Postmenopausal HRT and tibolone in relation to muscle strength and body composition. Maturitas 58:7–18. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.04.012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Artaza JN, Bhasin S, Magee TR et al (2005) Myostatin inhibits myogenesis and promotes adipogenesis in C3H 10T(1/2) mesenchymal multipotent cells. Endocrinology 146:3547–3557. doi:10.1210/en.2005-0362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work was funded by a grant from the Innovative Medicines Initiative—Joint Undertaking (IMI-JU 115621). The author is grateful to Matteo Cesari, Marco Canevelli, Michele Loi, Régis Le Lain, and the journal’s reviewers for very helpful discussions and comments on the previous drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Blasimme.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blasimme, A. Physical frailty, sarcopenia, and the enablement of autonomy: philosophical issues in geriatric medicine. Aging Clin Exp Res 29, 59–63 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0714-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0714-3

Keywords

Navigation