Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability and validity of 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) is the abridged practical version of SF-36.

Aims

This cross-sectional study was aimed to assess the reliability and validity of SF-12 for the health status of Chinese community elderly population.

Methods

The Chinese community elderly people in Xujiahui district of Shanghai were investigated. The internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and split-half reliability coefficients. Construct validity was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Spearman’s correlation coefficient (ρ) was used for the evaluation of criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity with Spearman’s ρ ≥ 0.4 as satisfactory. Comparisons of the SF-12 summary scores among populations that differed in demographics were performed for discriminant validity.

Results

Total 1343 individuals aged ≥60 and <85 years old (response rate: 91.3 %) were analyzed. The Cronbach’s α value (0.910) and the split-half reliability coefficient (0.812) reflected satisfactory internal consistency reliability of SF-12. EFA extracted a two-factor model (physical and mental health). About 60.7 % of the total variance was explained by the two factors. CFA showed that the two-factor solution provided a good fit to the data. Good convergent validity and discriminant validity of SF-12 were proved by the correction analyses (Spearman’s ρ > 0.4) and the comparisons of the SF-12 summary scores among populations (P < 0.05). SF-12 summary scores were significantly correlated with the SF-36 summary scores (Spearman’s ρ > 0.4, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In conclusion, SF-12 had satisfactory reliability and validity in measuring health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lenz EK, Swartz AM, Strath SJ (2014) Do sedentary behaviors modify the health status of older adults? Int J Kinesiol Sport Sci 2(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kramarow E, Lubitz J, Lentzner H, Gorina Y (2007) Trends in the health of older Americans, 1970–2005. Health Aff 26(5):1417–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shoaee F, Azkhosh M, Alizad V (2013) Health status of Iranian older people: A demographical Analysis. Iran J Ageing 8(29):60–69

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE et al (2000) SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Quality Metric Inc., Lincoln

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1995) SF-12: how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H (2013) Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain. Health Qual Life Out 11(1):110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkinson C, Layte R, Jenkinson D et al (1997) A shorter form health survey: can the SF-12 replicate results from the SF-36 in longitudinal studies? J Public Health 19(2):179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakobsson U (2007) Using the 12-item Short Form health survey (SF-12) to measure quality of life among older people. Aging Clin Exp Res 19(6):457–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Iglesias C, Birks Y, Torgerson D (2001) Improving the measurement of quality of life in older people: the York SF-12. QJM 94(12):695–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE (2001) Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing 30(4):337–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peek MK, Ray L, Patel K et al (2004) Reliability and validity of the SF-36 among older Mexican Americans. Gerontologist 44(3):418–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Z, Li W, Tu X et al (2012) Validation and psychometric properties of Chinese version of SF-36 in patients with hypertension, coronary heart diseases, chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer. Int J Clin Pract 66(10):991–998

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu J, Qu B, Hu B et al (2013) The quality of life of men who have sex with men in China: reliability and validity testing of the SF-36 questionnaire. PLoS One 8(12):e83362

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan S, Lian Z, Sun G et al (2011) Assessment of the Chinese-Version SF-36 in the Chinese Opiate Addicts. Subst Use Misuse 46(13):1561–1568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34(3):220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Q, Zhou ZK, Shen B et al (2013) Validation of the SF-12 among adult Kashin–Beck disease patients in Aba Tibetan autonomous area in China. Rheumatol Int 33(3):719–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam CL, Eileen Y, Gandek B (2005) Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res 14(2):539–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu J, Li D, Li F et al (2011) Montreal cognitive assessment in detecting cognitive impairment in Chinese elderly individuals: a population-based study. J Geriatr Psychiatr Neurol 24(4):184–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu J, Zhou W, Hu S et al (2013) Cross-cultural difference and validation of the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in older adults residing in Eastern China: preliminary findings. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 56(1):38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahrens JH, Dieter U (1989) A convenient sampling method with bounded computation times for Poisson distributions. Am J Math Manag Sci 1:13

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tang S, Wang X, Zhang Y et al (2015) Analysis of high alert medication knowledge of medical staff in Tianjin: a convenient sampling survey in China. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci 35:176–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fang JQ, Lu Y (2003) Advanced medical statistics. World Scientific, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  23. Santos J, Reynaldo A (1999) Cronbach’s alpha: a tool for assessing the reliability of scales. J Ext 37(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Golombok S, Rust J (1989) Modern psychometrics: the science of psychological assessment. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cave J, Woolf K, Dacre J et al (2007) Medical student teaching in the UK: how well are newly qualified doctors prepared for their role caring for patients with cancer in hospital? Br J Cancer 97(4):472–478

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Harrington D (2008) Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ et al (2011) The 12-item medical outcomes study short form health survey version 2.0 (SF-12v2): a population-based validation study from Tehran, Iran. Health Qual Life Out 9(1):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Marinozzi A, Martinelli N, Panascì M et al (2009) Italian translation of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, with re-assessment of reliability and validity. Qual Life Res 18(7):923–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Mousavi SJ et al (2009) The Iranian version of 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): factor structure, internal consistency and construct validity. BMC Public Health 9(1):341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hu J, Gruber KJ, Hsueh K-H (2010) Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the SF-36 in older adults with diabetes in Beijing, China. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 88(3):273–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Heyerdahl S, Kvernmo S, Wichstrøm L (2004) Self-reported behavioural/emotional problems in Norwegian adolescents from multiethnic areas. Eur Child Adoles Psychiatry 13(2):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Finkenauer C, Engels RC, Baumeister RF (2005) Parenting behaviour and adolescent behavioural and emotional problems: the role of self-control. Int J Behav Develop 29(1):58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruffman T, Henry JD, Livingstone V et al (2008) A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: implications for neuropsychological models of aging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32(4):863–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sullivan S, Ruffman T, Hutton SB (2007) Age differences in emotion recognition skills and the visual scanning of emotion faces. J Gerontol B Psychol 62(1):P53–P60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Isaacowitz DM, Löckenhoff CE, Lane RD et al (2007) Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions. Psychol Aging 22(1):147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruffman T, Murray J, Halberstadt J et al (2010) Verbosity and emotion recognition in older adults. Psychol Aging 25(2):492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sullivan S, Ruffman T (2004) Emotion recognition deficits in the elderly. Int J Neurosci 114(3):403–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bloem I, La Heij W (2003) Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: implications for models of lexical access in language production. J Mem Lang 48(3):468–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi J, Liu M, Zhang Q et al (2008) Male and female adult population health status in China: a cross-sectional national survey. BMC Public Health 8(1):277

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liang Y, Cao R (2014) Is the health status of female victims poorer than males in the post-disaster reconstruction in China: a comparative study of data on male victims in the first survey and double tracking survey data. BMC Womens Health 14(1):18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wee CC, Davis RB, Hamel MB (2008) Comparing the SF-12 and SF-36 health status questionnaires in patients with and without obesity. Health Qual Life Out 6(1):11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Müller-Nordhorn J, Roll S, Willich S (2004) Comparison of the Short Form (SF)-12 health status instrument with the SF-36 in patients with coronary heart disease. Heart 90(5):523–527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank support provided through the funding by the Shanghai Ageing Development Foundation (13037). Thanks to Xujiahui community health service centers of medical personnel for their support and help.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by Zhongshan Hospital Research Ethics Committee.

Informed consent

Written consents were obtained from all the participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shanzhu Zhu or Yao Liu.

Additional information

Juan Shou and Limin Ren should be regarded as co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shou, J., Ren, L., Wang, H. et al. Reliability and validity of 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) for the health status of Chinese community elderly population in Xujiahui district of Shanghai. Aging Clin Exp Res 28, 339–346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0401-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-015-0401-9

Keywords

Navigation