Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Differential-algebraic equations of the multicriteria locally optimal trajectory of economic restructuring

  • Published:
International Journal of Dynamics and Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper introduces a system of differential-algebraic equations with non-negativity constraints that determines a locally optimal trajectory of economic restructuring. It aims to provide the maximum economic growth constrained by the steepest possible decrease in energy consumption and the greenhouse gas emissions. The input–output models (conventional, energy-related, and greenhouse gas emissions related) and factorial models of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are used as a basis. The goal is achieved by changing the structure of the gross output in the direction of the tangent line to the optimal trajectory. This trajectory may serve as a benchmark for the assessment of the actual structural change resulting from the interplay of market forces and government intervention or as a roadmap for economic development programs. The local optimization property makes the suggested trajectory attractive in situations when the best short-term performance prevails, while the long-term objectives should be taken into account as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ilchmann A, Reis T (eds) (2013) Surveys in differential-algebraic equations I. Series: differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Berlin

  2. Ilchmann A, Reis T (eds) (2015a) Surveys in differential-algebraic equations II. Series: differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Berlin

  3. Ilchmann A, Reis T (eds) (2015b) Surveys in differential-algebraic equations III. Series: differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Berlin

  4. Ilchmann A, Reis T (eds) (2017) Surveys in differential-algebraic equations IV. Series: differential-algebraic equations forum. Springer, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu W, Li B, Fu C, Chen B (2015) Dynamics of a predator-prey ecological system with nonlinear harvesting rate. Wuhan Univ J Nat Sci 20(1):25–33

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Santra P, Mahapatra G, Pal D (2016) Analysis of differential-algebraic prey-predator dynamical model with super predator harvesting on economic perspective. Int J Dyn Control 4(3):266–274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Y, Jiang W (2017) Bifurcations in a delayed differential-algebraic plankton economic system. J Appl Anal Comput 7(4):1431–1447

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cánovas JS, Muñoz-Guillermo M (2017) On the complexity of economic dynamics: an approach through topological entropy. Chaos Solitons Fractals 103:163–176

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Eriksson R, Hansen H, Winther L (2017) Employment growth and regional development: industrial change and contextual differences between Denmark and Sweden. Eur Plan Stud 25(10):1756–1778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gogoleva T, Golikova G, Kanapukhin P (2018) Economic analysis of investments as a source of economic changes. Stud Syst Decis Control 135:107–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sayapova AR (2017) Input–output coefficients in the evaluation of a scientific and technological component of the macrostructural forecasting. Stud Russ Econ Dev 28(6):585–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Annicchiarico B, Di Dio F (2015) Environmental policy and macroeconomic dynamics in a new Keynesian model. J Environ Econ Manag 69(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Q, Lei Q, Xu H, Yuan J (2018) China’s energy revolution strategy into 2030. Resour Conserv Recycl 128:78–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schnabl G (2017) Monetary policy and overinvestment in East Asia and Europe. Asia Eur J 15(4):445–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tu S, Long H (2017) Rural restructuring in China: theory, approaches and research prospect. J Geogr Sci 27(10):1169–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Shao T, Dong Q (2018) Reassessing the lewis turning point in China: evidence from 70,000 rural households. China World Econ 26(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaninsky A (2017) Optimal environment-friendly economic restructuring: the United States-China cooperation case study. Econ Change Restruct (in print)

  18. Leontief W (1986) Input–output economics, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leontief W (1941) The structure of the American economy, 1919–1939: an empirical application of equilibrium analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miller R, Blair P (2009) Input–output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Timmer M, Dietzenbacher E, Los B, de Stehrer R, Vries G (2015) An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: the case of global automotive production. Rev Int Econ 23:575–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maital S, Vaninsky A (1999) Data envelopment analysis with a single DMU: a graphic projected-gradient approach. Eur J Oper Res 115(3):518–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meerovich V (1974) Turnover of financial funds and efficiency of production (Oborot Sredstv i Effektivnost’ Proizvodstva). Financy, Moscow (in Russian)

  24. Vaninsky A (1983) An extension of the integral method of economic analysis to the analysis of interrelated and derivative factors. Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, 8:130–141. http://www.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=at&paperid=5200&option_lang=eng (in Russian). English translation is available in Automation and Remote Control 44, 8(2):1074–1083 (1984)

  25. Vaninsky A (1987) Factorial analysis of economic activity (Factornyi Analiz Khozyaistvennoi Deyatel’nosti), Moskva, Financy i Statistika (in Russian)

  26. Vaninsky A (2014) Optimal economic restructuring aimed at an increase in GDP constrained by a decrease in energy consumption and CO2 emissions. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. International Science Index 90. Int J Math Comput Phys Electr Comput Eng 8(6):882–888. https://waset.org/Publications?q=vaninsky&search=Search

  27. Vaninsky A, Meerovich V (1978) Problems of the methodology of analysis of the impact of structural change on the indicators of production efficiency, (Voprosy metodologii analiza vliyaniya strukturnykh sdvigov na pokazateli effectivnosti proizvodstva). In: Proceedings of the national scientific conference “economic leverages of the efficiency of using material, Labor, Finance, and natural resources”, vol 2, pp 105–107, Central Economic-Mathematical Institute, Moskva (in Russian)

  28. Ghosh A (1964) Experiments with input–output models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vaninsky A (2006) Computational method of finding optimal structural change in economic systems: an input-output projected-gradient approach. J Interdiscip Math 9(1):61–76

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Vaninsky A (2009) Structural change optimization in input–output models. J Interdiscip Math 12(6):839–861

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Maital S, Vaninsky A (2000) Productivity paradoxes and their resolution. J Prod Anal 14(3):191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaya Y (1990) Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paper presented to the IPCC energy and industry subgroup, response strategies working group, Paris (mimeo)

  33. Thompson B (2004) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Kaplan W (1993) Advanced calculus, 4th edn. Addison-Wesley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Grana Drummond L, Iusem A (2004) A projected gradient method for vector optimization problems. Comput Optim Appl 28:5–29

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Metivier L, Montarnal P (2012) Strategies for solving index one DAE with non-negative constraints: application to liquid–liquid extraction. J Comput Phys Elsevier 231(7):2945–2962. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00763691/document

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Vaninsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vaninsky, A. Differential-algebraic equations of the multicriteria locally optimal trajectory of economic restructuring. Int. J. Dynam. Control 6, 1767–1775 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-018-0419-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-018-0419-x

Keywords

Navigation