Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Design optimization of spur gear using SA and RCGA

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gear size is one of the most important criteria in design optimization of gear set used in automotive, aeronautical and various other applications. Smaller gear size results in requirement of less material and hence reducing manufacturing cost. This paper aims at minimizing center distance of spur gear set to obtain its corresponding optimal design variables. Design variables included in this study are diametrical pitch and number of pinion teeth. Real Coded Genetic Algorithm and simulated annealing are employed for performing design optimization procedure. In this study, along with constraints on bending strength, contact strength, interference and contact ratio, scoring has been added as design constraint in design problem. All the design factors included in design procedure are considered as per AGMA standards. The recommended optimization techniques are implemented on a design example and optimum values of design variables are obtained. The obtained results are compared with those obtained by traditional design procedure to find the better solution as well as better optimization technique. Variations in input power and gear ratio have been done to verify their effect on the objective function and to further investigate a more useful optimization technique for gear design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

Addendum ratio

AGMA:

American Gear Manufacturing Association

b :

Face width (mm)

B :

Width of band of contact (mm)

C :

Centre distance (mm)

\(C_{\mathrm{p}}\) :

Elastic coefficient of material

\(c_{\mathrm{f}}\) :

Material constant for conductivity, density and specific heat

\(C_{\mathrm{f}}\) :

Surface condition factor

E :

Elastic modulus (GPa)

f :

Coefficient of friction

J :

Bending geometry factor

I :

Surface durability factor

\(K_{\mathrm{v}}\) :

Dynamic velocity factor

\(K_{\mathrm{o}}\) :

Overload factor

\(K_{\mathrm{m}}\) :

Load distribution factor

\(K_{\mathrm{s}}\) :

Size factor

\(m_{\mathrm{g}}\) :

Gear ratio

\(m_{\mathrm{c}}\) :

Contact ratio

N :

Number of teeth

\(P_{\mathrm{d}}\) :

Diametrical pitch

v :

Rolling velocity at point of contact(rpm)

V :

Pitch line velocity (rpm)

\(W_{\mathrm{t}}\) :

Transmitted load (N)

\(\phi\) :

Pressure angle (rad)

\(\phi _{\mathrm{t}}\) :

Transverse pressure angle (rad)

\(\mu\) :

Poisson ratio

1:

Pinion

2:

Gear

References

  1. Savage M, Coy JJ, Townsend DP (1982) Optimal tooth numbers for compact standard spur gear sets. J Mech Des 104:749–757. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3256424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll RK, Johnson GE (1984) Optimal design of compact spur gear sets. ASME J Mech Transm Autom Des 106:95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li X, Symmons GR, Cockerham G (1996) Optimal design of involute profile helical gears. Mech Mach Theory 31:717–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(95)00080-I

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zarefar H, Muthukrishnan SN (1993) Computer-aided optimal design via modified adaptive random-search algorithm. Comput Aided Des 25:240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(93)90055-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang H, Wang HP (1994) Optimal engineering design of spur gear sets. Mech Mach Theory 29:1071–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-114X(94)90074-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson DF, Gupta S, Shukla A (2000) Tradeoff analysis in minimum volume design of multi-stage spur gear reduction units. Mech Mach Theory 35:609–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-114X(99)00036-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang H, Tian Z, Zuo MJ (2005) Multiobjective optimization of three-stage spur gear reduction units using interactive physical programming. J Mech Sci Technol 19(5):1080–1086. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02984029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yokota T, Taguchi T, Gen M (1998) A solution method for optimal weight design problem of the gear using genetic algorithms. Comput Ind Eng 35:523–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00149-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mendi F, Baskal T, Boran K, Boran FE (2010) Optimization of module, shaft diameter and rolling bearing for spur gear through genetic algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 37:8058–8064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.05.082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Savsani V, Rao RV, Vakharia DP (2011) Optimal weight design of a gear train using particle swarm optimization and simulated annealing algorithms. Mech Mach Theory 45:531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2009.10.010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zolfaghari A, Goharimanesh M, Akbari AA (2017) Optimum design of straight bevel gears pair using evolutionary algorithms. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 39:2121–2129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-017-0733-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fonseca DJ, Shishoo S, Lim TC, Chen DS (2005) A genetic algorithm approach to minimize transmission error of automotive spur gear sets. Appl Artif Intell 19(2):153–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839510590901903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gologlu C, Zeyveli M (2009) A genetic approach to automate preliminary design of gear drives. Comput Ind Eng 57:1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tudose L, Buiga O (2014) Optimal mass minimization design of a two-stage coaxial helical speed reducer with Genetic Algorithms. Adv Eng Softw 68:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Padmanabhan S, Raman VS, Chandrasekaran M (2014) Optimisation of gear reducer using evolutionary algorithm. Mater Res Innov 18(6):378–382. https://doi.org/10.1179/1432891714Z.000000000983

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maitra GM (2014) Handbook of gear design. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dudley DW (2000) Hand book of practical gear design. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  18. Juvinall RC, Kurt MM (2006) Fundamentals of machine component design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deb K, Agrawal RB (1995) Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Syst 9:115–148

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Deb, K, Agarwal S (1999) A niched-penalty approach for constraint handling in genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the international conference on artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms, Springer, Vienna, pp 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6384-940

  21. Deb K (2001) Multiobjective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220(4598):671–680

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asim Gopal Barman.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Fernando Antonio Forcellini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rai, P., Barman, A.G. Design optimization of spur gear using SA and RCGA. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 257 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1180-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1180-y

Keywords

Navigation