Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the multifrequency electronic apex locator Joypex 5 in primary teeth

  • Original Scientific Article
  • Published:
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate ex vivo the accuracy of the multifrequency electronic apex locator (EAL) Joypex 5 in primary molars.

Methods

Fourteen primary molars were selected for a total of 25 root canals. Working length measurements were performed by direct observation (DO), using a 15 K-file into the root canal until its tip was visible at the apical foramen and electronically using the EALs Joypex 5. Data were analysed statistically using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To assess whether a significant difference in accuracy of the electronic apex locator existed, the Student’s t test was performed at 5 % significance.

Results

No statistical difference was observed between the direct observation and the EAL measurement (p < 0.05). The ICC confirmed the agreement of different methods to measure canal length. The R 2 coefficient was close to 1, denoting a strong agreement between measures obtained with Joypex 5 and DO.

Conclusion

The multifrequency EALs Joypex 5 showed adequate accuracy in the root length determination of primary teeth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angwaravong O, Panitvisai P. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption. Int Endod J. 2009;42:115–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Azar MR, Mokhtare M. Rotary Mtwo system versus manual K-file instruments: efficacy in preparing primary and permanent molar root canals. Indian J Dent Res. 2011;22:363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrame AP, Triches TC, Sartori N, Bolan M. Electronic determination of root canal working length in primary molar teeth: na in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:402–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunton PA, Abdeen D, MacFarlane TV. The effect of an apex locator on exposure to radiation during endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2002;28:524–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vardasca Oliveira PT, Chita JJ, Silva PG, De Vicente FS, Pereira KF. Accuracy of two apex locators made in China compared to Root ZX II. Pesq Bras Odontoped Clin Integr. 2010;10:83–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElAyouti A, Weiger R, Lost C. Frequency of overinstrumentation with an acceptable radiographic working length. J Endod. 2001;27:49–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Pulp therapy in the primary dentition. Cur Opin Dent. 1991;1:556–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz A, Mass E, Kaufman AY. Electronic apex locator: a useful tool for root canal treatment in the primary dentition. J Dent Child. 1996;63:414–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kielbassa AM, Muller U, Munz I, Monting JS. Clinical evaluation of the measuring accuracy of Root ZX in primary teeth. O Surg O Med O Pathol O Radiol Endod. 2003;95:94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo MR, Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, Silva RA, Raffaini MS. Ex vivo evaluation of the accuracy of two electronic apex locators during root canal length determination in primary teeth. Int Endod J. 2008;41:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Nelson-Filho P, da Silva RA, Lucisano MP. Ex vivo accuracy of an apex locator using digital signal processing in primary teeth. Ped Dent. 2009;31:320–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majeed MA, Subhi AG. Assessment of the accuracy of a fifth generation apex locator (in vitro study). J Bagh Col Dent. 2011;23:12–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mello-Moura ACV, Moura-Netto C, Araki AT, Guedes-Pinto AC, Mendes FM. Ex vivo performance of five methods for root canal length determination in primary anterior teeth. Int Endod J. 2010;43:142–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nekoofar MH, Ghandi MM, Hayes SJ, Dummer PM. The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices. Int Endod J. 2006;39:595–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Filho P, Romualdo PC, Bonifácio KC, Leonardo MR, Silva RA, Silva LA. Accuracy of the iPex multi-frequency electronic apex locator in primary molars: an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2011;44:303–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ricucci D. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation. Part 1. Int Endod J. 1998;31:384–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruschel HC, Ligocki GD, Flaminghi DL, Fossati AC. Microstructure of mineralized tissues in human primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2011;35:295–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saritha S, Uloopi KS, Vinay C. Chandra Sekhar R, Rao VV. Clinical evaluation of Root ZX II electronic apex locator in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012;13:32–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer MA, White RR, Walton RE. Determining the optimal obturation length: a meta-analysis of literature. J Endod. 2005;31:271–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares RM, Silva EJ, Herrera DR, Krebs RL, Coutinho-Filho TS. Evaluation of Joypex 5 and Root ZX II: an in vivo and ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2013 [Epud ahead of print].

  • Tosun G, Erdemir A, Eldeniz AU, Sermet U, Sener Y. Accuracy of two electronic apex locators in primary teeth with and without apical resorption: a laboratory study. Int Endod J. 2008;41:436–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. J. N. L. Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silva, E.J.N.L., Herrera, D.R., Souza-Júnior, E.J. et al. Evaluation of the multifrequency electronic apex locator Joypex 5 in primary teeth. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 15, 51–54 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0065-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0065-0

Keywords

Navigation