Skip to main content
Log in

Responses of water productivity to irrigation and N supply for hybrid maize seed production in an arid region of Northwest China

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water and nitrogen (N) are generally two of the most important factors in determining the crop productivity. Proper water and N managements are prerequisites for agriculture sustainable development in arid areas. Field experiments were conducted to study the responses of water productivity for crop yield (WP Y-ET ) and final biomass (WP B-ET ) of film-mulched hybrid maize seed production to different irrigation and N treatments in the Hexi Corridor, Northwest China during April to September in 2013 and also during April to September in 2014. Three irrigation levels (70%–65%, 60%–55%, and 50%–45% of the field capacity) combined with three N rates (500, 400, and 300 kg N/hm2) were tested in 2013. The N treatments were adjusted to 500, 300, and 100 kg N/hm2 in 2014. Results showed that the responses of WP Y-ET and WP B-ET to different irrigation amounts were different. WP Y-ET was significantly reduced by lowering irrigation amounts while WP B-ET stayed relatively insensitive to irrigation amounts. However, WP Y-ET and WP B-ET behaved consistently when subjected to different N treatments. There was a slight effect of reducing N input from 500 to 300 kg/hm2 on the WP Y-ET and WP B-ET , however, when reducing N input to 100 kg/hm2, the values of WP Y-ET and WP B-ET were significantly reduced. Water is the primary factor and N is the secondary factor in determining both yield (Y) and final biomass (B). Partial factor productivity from applied N (PFPN) was the maximum under the higher irrigation level and in lower N rate (100–300 kg N/hm2) in both years (2013 and 2014). Lowering the irrigation amount significantly reduced evapotranspiration (ET), but ET did not vary with different N rates (100–500 kg N/hm2). Both Y and B had robust linear relationships with ET, but the correlation between B and ET (R 2=0.8588) was much better than that between Y and ET (R 2=0.6062). When ET increased, WP Y-ET linearly increased and WP B-ET decreased. Taking the indices of Y, B, WP Y-ET , WP B-ET and PFP N into account, a higher irrigation level (70%–65% of the field capacity) and a lower N rate (100–300 kg N/hm2) are recommended to be a proper irrigation and N application strategy for plastic film-mulched hybrid maize seed production in arid Northwest China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D, et al. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration–guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford K J, Hsiao T C. 1982. Physiological responses to moderate water stress. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, et al. Physiological Plant Ecology II: Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 263–324.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant K J, Benson V W, Kiniry J R, et al. 1992. Simulating corn yield response to irrigation timings: validation of the EPIC model. Journal of Production Agriculture, 5(2): 237–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çakir R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research, 89(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X P, Cui Z L, Vitousek P M, et al. 2011. Integrated soil-crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(16): 6399–6404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Z L, Zhang F S, Chen X P, et al. 2010. In-season nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat: Maximizing yields, minimizing environmental impact in an over-fertilization context. Field Crops Research, 116(1–2): 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Wit C T. 1958. Transpiration and Crop Yields. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University, 1–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo E, Rinaldi M. 2008. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research, 105(3): 202–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobermann A. 2005. Nitrogen use efficiency-state of the art. In: IFA International Workshop on Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers. Germany: Frankfurt, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du T S, Kang S Z, Sun J S, et al. 2010. An improved water use efficiency of cereals under temporal and spatial deficit irrigation in north China. Agricultural Water Management, 97(1): 66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du T S, Kang S Z, Zhang J H, et al. 2015. Deficit irrigation and sustainable water–resource strategies in agriculture for China’s food security. Journal of Experimental Botany, 66(8): 2253–2269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English M, Raja S N. 1996. Perspectives on deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management, 32(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farré I, Faci J M. 2006. Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment. Agricultural Water Management, 83(1–2): 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer R A, Turner N C. 1978. Plant productivity in the arid and semiarid zones. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 29(1): 277–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu Q P, Wang Q J, Shen X L, et al. 2014. Optimizing water and nitrogen inputs for winter wheat cropping system on the Loess Plateau, China. Journal of Arid Land, 6(2): 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia A L, Marcelis L, García-Sánchez F, et al. 2007. Moderate water stress affects tomato leaf water relations in dependence on the nitrogen supply. Biologia Plantarum, 51(4): 707–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts S, Raes D. 2009. Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agricultural Water Management, 96(9): 1275–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheysari M, Mirlatifi S M, Bannayan M, et al. 2009. Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage. Agricultural Water Management, 96(5): 809–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammad H M, Ahmad A, Abbas F, et al. 2012. Optimizing water and nitrogen use for maize production under semiarid conditions. Turkish Journal of Agriculture & Forestry, 36(5): 519–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks R J. 1983. Yield and water-use relationships: an overview. In: Taylor H M, Jordan W R, Sinclair T R. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam M R, Garcia S C, Horadagoda A. 2012. Effects of irrigation and rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter yield, proportions of plant fractions of maize and nutritive value and in vitro gas production characteristics of whole crop maize silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 172(3–4): 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin L B, Cui H Y, Li B, et al. 2012. Effects of integrated agronomic management practices on yield and nitrogen efficiency of summer maize in North China. Field Crops Research, 134: 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S Z, Shi W J, Zhang J H. 2000. An improved water-use efficiency for maize grown under regulated deficit irrigation. Field Crops Research, 67(3): 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S Z, Hao X M, Du T S, et al. 2017. Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice. Agricultural Water Management, 179: 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemaire G, Gastal F, Plénet D. 1997. Dynamics of N uptake and N distribution in plant canopies. Use of crop N status index in crop modelling. In: Lemaire G, Burns I G. Diagnostic Procedures for Crop N Management. Paris: INRA, 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Q F, Sun Q P, Chen X P, et al. 2012. Alternative cropping systems for sustainable water and nitrogen use in the North China Plain. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 146(1): 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary M J, Rehm G W. 1990. Nitrogen and sulfur effects on the yield and quality of corn grown for grain and silage. Journal of Production Agriculture, 3(1): 135–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogola J B O, Wheeler T R, Harris P M. 2002. Effects of nitrogen and irrigation on water use of maize crops. Field Crops Research, 78(2–3): 105–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey R K, Maranville J W, Admou A. 2000. Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: I. Grain yield and yield components. Agricultural Water Management, 46(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payero J O, Melvin S R, Irmak S, et al. 2006. Yield response of corn to deficit irrigation in a semiarid climate. Agricultural Water Management, 84(1–2): 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran H, Kang S Z, Li F S, et al. 2016. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen management on hybrid maize seed production in north-west China. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 3(1): 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras V O, Richards R A. 2014. Improvement of crop yield in dry environments: benchmarks, levels of organization and the role of nitrogen. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65(8): 1981–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampathkumar T, Pandian B J, Rangaswamy M V, et al. 2013. Influence of deficit irrigation on growth, yield and yield parameters of cotton–maize cropping sequence. Agricultural Water Management, 130: 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R, Bingham G E, Lemon E R, et al. 1975. Water use efficiency of field-grown maize during moisture stress. Plant Physiology, 56(2): 245–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R, Tanner C B, Bennett J M. 1984. Water-use efficiency in crop production. BioScience, 34(1): 36–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Albrizio R, Giorio P, et al. 2000. Gas-exchange response and stomatal and non-stomatal limitations to carbon assimilation of sunflower under salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 44(3): 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Albrizio R. 2005. Resource use efficiency of field-grown sunflower, sorghum, wheat and chickpea: II. Water use efficiency and comparison with radiation use efficiency. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 130(3–4): 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steduto P, Hsiao T C, Fereres E. 2007. On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity. Irrigation Science, 25(3): 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone P J, Wilson D R, Reid J B, et al. 2000. Water deficit effects on sweet corn. I. Water use, radiation use efficiency, growth, and yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 52(1): 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C B, Sinclair T R. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production: research or re-search? In: Taylor H M, Jordan W A, Sinclair T R. Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. Madison, WI: ASA, CSSA, SSSA, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhart S A, Andrade F H. 1995. Nitrogen defeciency in maize: I. Effects on crop growth, development, dry matter partitioning, and kernel set. Crop Science, 35(5): 1376–1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei C Z, Ma T F, Wang X J, et al. 2012. The fate of fertilizer N applied to cotton in relation to irrigation methods and N dosage in arid area. Journal of Arid Land, 4(3): 320–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart S J, Bastiaanssen W G M. 2004. Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agricultural Water Management, 69(2): 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51621061, 91425302, 51379208), the Research Projects of the Agricultural Public Welfare Industry in China (201503125), and the Discipline Innovative Engineering Plan (111 Program, B14002). We are very grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Tong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ran, H., Kang, S., Li, F. et al. Responses of water productivity to irrigation and N supply for hybrid maize seed production in an arid region of Northwest China. J. Arid Land 9, 504–514 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0017-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0017-3

Keywords

Navigation